{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f41\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Verdana;}{\f80\fnil\fcharset128\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BaskOldFace{\*\falt Arial Unicode MS};}{\f81\fnil\fcharset128\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@BaskOldFace;} {\f82\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f83\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f85\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f86\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f87\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f88\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f89\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f90\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f492\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Verdana CE;}{\f493\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Verdana Cyr;} {\f495\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Verdana Greek;}{\f496\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Verdana Tur;}{\f499\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Verdana Baltic;}{\f500\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Verdana (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255; \red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0; \red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 \styrsid10438796 Normal;}{\* \cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid10438796 header;}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 \styrsid10438796 footer;}{\*\cs17 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid10438796 page number;}{\*\cs18 \additive \ul\cf2 \styrsid10438796 SYS_HYPERTEXT;}{\s19\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext19 \ssemihidden \styrsid10438796 footnote text;}{\*\cs20 \additive \super \sbasedon10 \ssemihidden \styrsid10438796 footnote reference;}{\*\cs21 \additive \f41\fs19 \sbasedon10 \styrsid10438796 documentbody5;}{\*\cs22 \additive \ul\cf2 \sbasedon10 \styrsid10438796 Hyperlink;}}{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0} {\*\rsidtbl \rsid1124203\rsid2124457\rsid3015949\rsid6642364\rsid8925646\rsid9460098\rsid10290258\rsid10438796\rsid11625722\rsid12536845\rsid13195870}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM}{\author Ruddley_E} {\operator freriks_k}{\creatim\yr2010\mo1\dy11\hr8\min58}{\revtim\yr2010\mo1\dy14\hr16\min57}{\version8}{\edmins27}{\nofpages12}{\nofwords6040}{\nofchars34434}{\*\company USP}{\nofcharsws40394}{\vern24689}}\margl1440\margr1440\margb1008 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1440\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct\asianbrkrule\rsidroot6642364 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12536845 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12536845 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12536845 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12536845 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \psz1\linex0\headery1440\endnhere\titlepg\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid10438796\sftnbj {\headerf \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto \pnrdate652288747\pnrnot1\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2124457 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid2124457 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 DARLEEN S. CAMACHO, JENNIFER P. SGAMBELLURI, \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 and PAMELA S. QUINATA (aka PAMELA S. SGAMBELLURI), \par Plaintiffs-Appellants, \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 V \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 THE ESTATE OF PACIANO G. GUMATAOTAO}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 , \par Defendant-Appellee. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Supreme Court Case No.: CVA09-015 \par Superior Court Case No.: CV0957-07 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 OPINION \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12536845 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid12536845 Filed: January 7, 2010 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid12536845 Cite as: 2010 Guam 1 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Appeal from the Superior Court of Guam \par Argued and submitted on October 20, 2009 \par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\trowd \irow0\irowband0\lastrow \ts11\trqc\trleft0\trftsWidth1\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trautofit1\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tbllkhdrrows\tbllklastrow\tbllkhdrcols\tbllklastcol \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4673\clshdrawnil \cellx4673\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4672\clshdrawnil \cellx9345\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid8925646 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Appearing for Plaintiffs-Appellants:}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par Leilani V. Lujan, Esq.}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par Lujan Aguigui & Perez LLP \par 238 Archbishop Flores St. \par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, GU 96910 \par \cell Appearing for Defendant-Appellee: \par Louie J. Yanza, Esq. \par Maher, Yanza, Flynn, Timblin, LLP \par 115 Hesler Pl., Ground Flr. \par Gov. Joseph Flores Bldg. \par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, GU 96910\cell }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \trowd \irow0\irowband0\lastrow \ts11\trqc\trleft0\trftsWidth1\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trautofit1\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tbllkhdrrows\tbllklastrow\tbllkhdrcols\tbllklastcol \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4673\clshdrawnil \cellx4673\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4672\clshdrawnil \cellx9345\row }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par BEFORE: F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Presiding Justice}{\super\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 1}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 ; KATHERINE A. MARAMAN, Associate Justice; RICHARD H. BENSON, Justice Pro Tempore}{\super\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 2}{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par \par }{\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 CARBULLIDO, J.: \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [1]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Plaintiffs-Appellants Darleen S. Camacho, Jennifer P. Sgambelluri, and Pamela S. Quinata (aka Pamela S. Sgambelluri) (collectively the \'93Sgambelluris\'94 ) appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee The Estate of Paciano G. Gumataotao (\'93Gumataotao\'94) in relation to a dispute as to who owns seven parcels of real property in Piti.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Sgambelluris argue that the Superior Court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Gumataotao because a genuine issue of material fact exists as to:}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 (1) the validity and enforceability of a deed of conveyance dated September 17, 1980, in which the Sgambelluris conveyed the disputed parcels to Gumataotao after defaulting on a promissory note and mortgage in favor of the latter; and (2) the validity of certificates of title issued by the Depar tment of Land Management on July 18, 2008, which identify Gumataotao as the fee simple owner of said parcels.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [2]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We find that the recording of a deed is not essential to an effective conveyance of title as between a grantor and a grantee.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We also find tha t certificates of title are evidence of ownership, but are not determinative of ownership to real property.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 A grantor cannot employ, as against a grantee, various provisions of Guam\rquote s Land Title Registration Law, 21 GCA \'a7 29101 et seq., to invalidate an otherwise properly-executed deed of conveyance solely because said grantee did not record the instrument.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Accordingly, we affirm the Superior Court\rquote s grant of summary judgment in favor of Gumataotao.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [3]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This is a real property dispute involving statutory interpretation of Guam\rquote s Land Title Registration Law, 21 GCA \'a7 29101 et seq.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On April 22, 1971, Paciano G. Gumataotao and his wife entered into an option agreement with Joseph T. Gumataotao, giving the latter, in exchan ge for $25,000.00, an option to purchase for $800,000.00 a single parcel of property in Piti, Guam, containing an area of 400,000 square meters.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The option\rquote s purchase terms required a down payment of $100,000.00 (less the $25,000.00 paid for the option) together with a promissory note for the remaining balance.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The balance was to be payable in ten annual installments of $70,000.00 each, beginning one year after closing, with 6% interest p}{\insrsid10438796 er year on the unpaid balance. \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [4]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On December 28, 1973, Joseph T. Gumataotao notified Paciano Gumataotao and his wife that he had, on that same day, assigned the option agreement to the Sgambelluris.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 That same day, the Sgambelluris executed a promissory note in favor of Paciano Gumataotao with a payment schedule reflecting the terms set forth in the option agreement.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 As security for the note, the Sgambelluris gave Paciano Gumataotao a mortgage on the land set forth in the option.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In exchange, that same day, Paciano Gumataotao and his wife executed a warranty deed for the same, in favor of the Sgambelluris.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The notice of assignment, the mortgage, and the warranty deed were recorded with the Department of Land Management (\'93DLM\'94) on January 9, 1974.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The record reflects that on March 15, 1974, a check in the amount of $299,345.14 was made out to Joseph T. Gumataotao, for his sale of the option to the Sgambelluris.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [5]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 At some point, the parcel was subdivided into sixteen separate lots, including the seven at issue in this case.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On February 6, 1975, certificates of title for Lots 1-7 (\'931975 certificates of title\'94) were issued by the DLM, naming the Sgambelluris as the fee simple owners thereof.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On February 18, 1976, the Sgambelluris executed a second, junior mortgage on the land in favor of Citibank, N.A. (\'93Citibank\'94).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This second mortga}{\insrsid10438796 ge was recorded that same day. \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [6]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Because the Sgambelluris failed to make any payments on the 1973 promissory note and first mortgage in favor of Paciano Gumataotao, the Sgambelluris, in a settlement agreement, agreed to convey Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (\'93Lots 1-7\'94 ) back to Paciano Gumataotao in exchange for a credit of $142,460.00 against the amount still owed to the latter under the fore-mentioned instruments (i.e., $700,000.00 plus an interest of 6% per annum on the unpaid balance).}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 As part of this settlement agreement, Citibank agreed to release, as to Paciano Gumataotao, its mortgage on Lots 1-7 in exchange for the latter\rquote s agreeing to release, as to Citibank, its mortgage on Lots 8-16.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This settlement agreement was memorialized in a writing dated September 19, 1980.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On September 23, 1980, Citibank executed a Partial Release of Mortgages and Judgment, formally relinquishing its claims to Lots 1-7 to Paciano Gumataotao.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This release was recorded on December 13, 2000.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On September 17, 1980, the Sgambelluris executed a deed of conveyance (\'931980 deed\'94), conveying Lots 1-7 to Paciano Gumataotao in fee simple.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This 1980 deed }{\insrsid10438796 was never recorded. \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [7]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Paciano Gumataotao died intestate on July 12, 1981.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Petitions for letters of administration were filed in the probate case, Superior Court of Guam Probate Case No. PR0156-82, on December 14, 1982, March 18, 1985, and August 27, 1997.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Each succeeding petition pre-dating the Sgambelluris\rquote complaint in the instant case included an ever-increasing listing of decedent\rquote s real property assets, but did not include a description of the lots at issue here.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On November 14, 2005, the estate of Paciano G. Gumataotao filed with the DLM a Notice of Unfiled Deed Conveying P roperty, indicating that, by way of the unrecorded 1980 deed, the Sgambelluris had conveyed to Paciano G. Gumataotao all of their right and interest to the seven lots at issue}{\insrsid10438796 in this case. \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [8]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On August 20, 2007, the Sgambelluris filed a complaint to quiet title to the seven lots, alleging that Gumataotao\rquote s 2005 filing of the Notice of Unfiled Deed Conveying Property operated as a lien against Lots 1-7, which in turn constituted a \'93cloud against Plaintiffs\rquote title to said lots.\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Appellants \rquote Excerpts of Record (\'93ER\'94), tab 1 at 3 (Compl., Aug. 20, 2007).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Gumataotao then filed an unverified answer on September 14, 2007.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Sgambelluris moved for summary judgment on October 2, 2007.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On October 10, 2007, Gumataotao filed an Updated Preliminary Inventory, Estima te and Cost of Claim/Debts in the above-mentioned probate case (Case No. PR0156-82), listing the seven lots.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Gumataotao filed an opposition to the Sgambelluris\rquote summary judgment motion, and a cross-motion for summary judgment.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In support of its opposition and cross-motion, Gumataotao filed Declarations of Alvin C. Gumataotao, Helena G. Kubo (aka Helena Gumataotao), and defense counsel Louie J. Yanza.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Sgambelluris did not file a written response.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On July 28, 2008, the DLM issued new certificates of title for Lots 1-7 (\'932008 certificates of title\'94) identifying Paciano G. Gumataotao as}{\insrsid10438796 the fee simple owner thereof. \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [9]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On April 1, 2009, the Superior Court issued its Decision and Order granting summary judgment in favor of Gumataotao.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The judgment was enter ed on the docket on June 18, 2009.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The}{\insrsid10438796 Sgambelluris timely appealed. \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [10]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 While the instant appeal was pending, the Sgambelluris filed with this court an \'93Objection to the Appointment of the Honorable Richard H. Benson as Justice pro tempore\'94 (\'93Motion\'94).}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Because the Motion failed to comply with Guam\rquote s disqualification statute, we issued an order on September 17, 2009, treating it instead as a motion challenging the authority of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Guam to appoint pro tempore Justices.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Pursuant to Guam Rules of Appellate Procedure (\'93GRAP\'94) Rule 6, Gumataotao filed a response to the Sgambelluris\rquote Motion, to which the Sgambelluris then replied.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On October 16, 2009, we issued an order addressing the merits of the Motion, denying it.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 II. JURISDICTION \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [11]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This court has jurisdiction over an appeal from a final judgment pursuant to 48 USC \'a7 1424-1(a)(2) (Westlaw through Pub.L. 111-1 (2009)); 7 GCA \'a7\'a7 3107(b), 3108(a)}{\insrsid10438796 (2005). \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par {\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK3}{\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK4}[12]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We review the grant of a motion for summary judgment de novo.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Iizuka Corp. v. Kawasho Int \rquote l (Guam), Inc., 1997 Guam 10 \'b6 7 (citing Bagdadi v. Nazar, 84 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir. 1996)); Wasson v. Berg, 2007 Guam 16 \'b6 9{\*\bkmkstart wlCitedDoc} (citing Nat\rquote l Union Fire In s. Co. v. Guam Hous. & Urban Renewal Auth., 2003 Guam 19 \'b6 12).}{\insrsid10438796 {\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK3}{\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK4}{\*\bkmkend wlCitedDoc} \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 IV. DISCUSSION \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3015949 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Part I \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [13]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Before reaching the merits of the instant case, we first consider the issue implicated by the Sgambelluris\rquote \'93Objection to the Appointm ent of the Honorable Richard H. Benson as Justice pro tempore\'94; that is, whether the Guam statute granting the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Guam the authority to appoint pro tempore Justices is either inorganic or unconstitutional, or both.}{ \insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }{\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 A. The authority of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Guam to appoint }{\b\i\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 pro tempore}{\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Justices \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [14]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Sgambelluris essentially argue that 7 GCA \'a7 6108 inorganically and unconstitutionally authorizes the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Guam to appoint pro tempore justices.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Specifically, they argue that pro tempore justices must be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Legislature.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [15]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The plain language of the Organic Act of Guam undermines the Sgambelluris\rquote contention that 7 GCA \'a7 6108 is inorganic.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In their Objection, the Sgambelluris argue that nothing in the Organic Act, specifically 48 U.S.C.A. \'a7 1424-1, gives the Guam Supreme Court or the sitting Chief Justice the power to appoint pro tempore justices.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Organic Act states in pertinent part:}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \'93}{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 The qualifications and duties of the justices and}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 judges of the Supreme Court of Guam, the Superior Court}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 }{ \dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 of Guam, and all other local courts established by the laws of}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 Guam shall be governed by the laws of Guam and the rules}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 of such co\hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 urts}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 .\'94}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 48 U.S.C.A. \'a7 1424-1(e) (Westlaw current through Pub.L. 111-62 (2009)) (emphasis added).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This language unambiguously indicates that Congress delegated authority to Guam to determine the qualifications and }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 duties of the justices and}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 }{ \dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 judges of }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 Guam co\hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 urts. \par }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 [16]}{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 In the absence of any clear congressional directive to the contrary, it cannot be maintained that pro tempore justices must be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Legislature.}{\dbch\af80\insrsid2124457 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{ \dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 See Binns v. United States, 194 U.S. 486, 490-94 (1904) (\hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 articulating that Congress has plenary power to fashion the governments of its territories however it chooses, and in doing so is not limited to the quasi state form with three respective coordinate branches); accord People v. Okada, 694 F.2d 565, 568 (9t \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 h\hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 \hich\f0 Cir. 1982) (\'93\loch\f0 \hich\f0 Congress has the power to legislate directly for Guam, or to establish a government for Guam subject to congressional control\'94\loch\f0 ).}{ \dbch\af80\insrsid2124457 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 In Binns, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a congressionally-enacted license tax for th \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 e territory of Alaska.}{\dbch\af80\insrsid2124457 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 The statute, which required certain types of businesses to obtain licenses in order to operate within the territory, provided that the money generated from the fees was to be paid into the U.S. Treasury.}{\dbch\af80\insrsid2124457 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 Binns, 194 U.S. 486, 487.}{\dbch\af80\insrsid2124457 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 The\hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 U.S. Supreme Court upheld the statute, deeming the license fees as local taxes imposed under the plenary power of Congress over the territories for the purpose of defraying the expense of territorial government.}{\dbch\af80\insrsid2124457 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 Id. at 491.}{\dbch\af80\insrsid2124457 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 The Court unequivocally declare\hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 d:}{\dbch\af80\insrsid2124457 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \loch\af0\dbch\af80\hich\f0 \'93\loch\f0 It must be remembered that Congress, in the government of the territories . . . has plenary power, save as controlled by the provisions of the Constitution; that the form of government it shall establish is not prescribed, and may not necessarily be th \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 \hich\f0 e same in all the territories.\'94}{\dbch\af80\insrsid2124457 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 Id}{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 . \par }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 [17]}{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 Exercising}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 congressionally-conferred authority under 48 U.S.C. 1424-1(e) to set out t}{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 he qualifications and duties of the justices and}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 }{ \dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \hich\af0\dbch\af80\loch\f0 judges of the courts of Guam, the Guam Legislature enacted }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 7 GCA \'a7 6108.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\dbch\af80\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [18]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The plain language of 7 GCA \'a7 6108 likewise belies the Sgambelluris\rquote assertion that pro tempore justices must be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Legislature.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The statute explicitly states that \'93Judges or Justices pro tempore shall not be conf irmed by the Legislature.\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 7 GCA \'a7 6108(b) (2005).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Also, the statute indicates that a pro tempore justice \'93 shall meet the same qualifications as a regularly appointed Justice of the Supreme Court or be appointed in accordance with Guam law.\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 7 GCA \'a7 6108(a) (2005).}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This disjunctive \'93or\'94 indicates that meeting the qualifications of a regularly appointed Supreme Court Justice, and being appointed in accordance with Guam law, are two different things.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Moreover, the statute clearly confers the power of appointment to the Chief Justice:}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \'93 the Chief Justice shall appoint a Justice pro tempore to participate in the matter.\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The statute goes on to say:}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \'93[i]n order to provide for the orderly use of Judges or Justices pro tempore such Judge or Justice shall be appointed from among a list maintained by the Chief Justice of qualified and available persons.\'94}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 7 GCA \'a7 6108(b).}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [19]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The well-settled principle of statutory construction that a narrower, more specific provision of a statute takes precedence over a more gene ral provision of the same statute with respect to the same subject matter informs this court\rquote s finding that pro tempore justices need not be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Legislature.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 See, e.g., Rose v. State, 123 P.2d 505, 512 (Cal. 1942) (\'93 A specific provision relating to a particular subject will govern in respect to that subject, as against a general provision, although the latter, standing alone, would be broad enough to include the subject to which the more particular provision relates. \'94); People v. Moroney, 150 P.2d 888, 891 (Cal. 1944) (\'93[S]pecific provisions of a statute control over general provisions where there is a conflict.\'94).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 As the Sgambelluris po}{ \insrsid10438796 int out, 7 GCA \'a7 3109 provides: \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 I Maga\rquote lahen Gu\'e5han [The Governor of Guam], with the advice and consent of I Liheslaturan {\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK5}Gu\'e5han{\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK5} [the Legislature], shall appoint a qualified person to each of the positions of Justice created by this Title; and subject to the advice and consent of I Liheslaturan Gu\'e5 han, appoint a qualified person to any vacancy occurring in either the Supreme Court or the Superior Court of Guam, and to any newly created position of Justice or Judge authorized by statute. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par 7 GCA \'a7 3109(a) (2005).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Sgambelluris contend that this section of the statute irreconcilably conflicts with 7 GCA \'a7 6108, which, as explained above, confers upon the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Guam the power to appoint pro tempore justices.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Unlike section 3109, whi ch deals with the appointment of justices and judges in general, section 6108 addresses the appointment of pro tempore justices in particular.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The latter disposes of the narrower, more specific matter of when, how, and by whom pro tempore justices are to be appointed.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Accordingly, section 6108 governs, and the authority to appoint pro tempore justices resides in the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Guam.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 See, e.g., State ex rel. Robb v. Caperton, 446 S.E.2d 714, 717 (W. Va. 1994) (finding that the spec ific constitutional provision governing filling of vacancies in the office of the justice of the Supreme Court or a judge of the circuit court governed more general provisions in other sections of the Constitution relating to the filling of vacancies for state and county officers).}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [20]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Moreover, even a plain language reading of 7 GCA \'a7 3109 would not upset this court\rquote s conclusion that pro tempore justices need not be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Legislature.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 To be sure, the section provides:}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \'93I Maga\rquote lahen Gu\'e5han [The Governor of Guam] . . . shall . . . subject to the advice and consent of I Liheslaturan Gu\'e5han, appoint a qualified person to any vacancy occurring in either the Supreme Court or the Superior Court of Guam.\'94}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 7 GCA \'a7 3109(a) (emphasis added).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 It seems so plain that it is unnecessary to dwell on the matter that the appointment of pro tempore justices \'93[w]hen there is no Justice qualified or available to hear a cause, action, or hearing in the Supreme Court,\'94 7 GCA \'a7 6108(a), is not the filling of a \'93vacancy\'94 in the court.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In short, 7 GCA \'a7 3109(a) does not apply because the appointment of pro tempore justices, who by their very nature sit only temporarily, is not the same as the filling of a vacancy in the court.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [21]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Sgambelluris also tacitly assert in their Motion that the power to appoint pro tempore justices resides in the coordinate branches of government as a more or less inherent power.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We note that there are numerous ways of selecting state justices and judges, which can be categorized, among others, as election, and restricted and unrestricted gubernatorial appointment.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Regarding the appointment of pro tempore justices, the U.S. system does not show inherent power in the executive branch, with advice and consent by the legislative branch, as the Sgambelluris suggest.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Moreover, the Sgambelluris\rquote assertion is untenable in light of state practice allowing the Chief Justice particularly, or the Supreme Court generally, to appoint pro tempore justices.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 See, e.g., Mosk v. Su per. Ct. of L.A. County, 601 P.2d 1030, 1034-39 (Cal. 1979) (finding that the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court has the constitutional authority to assign judges from lower courts to the Supreme Court to replace disqualified justices {\*\bkmkstart SR_5048}{\*\bkmkend SR_5048}, and that even a panel composed entirely of pro tempore judges has authority to decide the merits of proceedings before it), superseded on other grounds as stated in Adams v. Comm\rquote n on Judicial Performance, 882 P.2d 358, 370-73 (Cal. 1994); City of Bes semer v. McClain, 957 So. 2d 1061, 1091-95 (Ala. 2006) (finding state statute that provided that the governor was to appoint a member of the bar of the Supreme Court to sit as a judge for a designated case, was unconstitutional to the extent that it restr icted the Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice\rquote s power under the Alabama Constitution to assign special justices to serve temporarily on the Supreme Court); State Bd. of Law Exam\rquote rs v. Spriggs, 155 P.2d 285, 287 (Wyo. 1945) (ruling that the constitutionally- conferred authority of the Chief Justice of the Wyoming Supreme Court to assign temporary judges allowed, in substance, the Chief Justice to assign as many district court judges to the Supreme Court as necessary to replace justices who were disqualified o r unable to act); Yelle v. Kramer, 520 P.2d 927, 928 (Wash. 1974) (recognizing the constitutionally-conferred authority of a majority of the justices of the Washington Supreme Court to assign judges or retired judges of courts of record of that state to te m porarily perform judicial duties in the Supreme Court); Crumlish v. Davis, 449 A.2d 1379, 1380-81 (Pa. 1982) (denying mandamus directing the Secretary of Pennsylvania to fill vacancies on the court in the upcoming election because the constitution already provided the Pennsylvania Supreme Court the authority to order the te}{\insrsid10438796 mporary assignment of judges). \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [22]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Although these cases proffer no perfect parallel to the challenged appointment power in the instant case}{\super\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 3}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 , they nevertheless stand to defeat the proposition advanced by the Sgambelluris in their Motion that the power to appoint pro tempore justices is a more or less inherent power of the coordinate branches of government.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In fact, the California Supreme Court in Mosk characterized the Chief Justice\rquote s appointment of temporary justices as \'93inherent\'94 , Mosk, 601 P.2d 1030, 1036, reasoning that implicit in the authority of the Chief Justice to expedite the work of the courts is the correlative power to assign judges to assist the Supreme Court when its justices have been disqualified.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. at 1034-36; see also Anton v. S.C. Coastal Council, 469 S.E.2d 604, 605 (S.C. 1996) (\'93The Chief Justice has inherent power to assign judges within the unified judicial system\'94) (emphasis added).}{ \insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [23]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Finally, this court deems it unnecessary to implicate the constitutionality of 7 GCA \'a7 6108 in light of the cardinal principle of statutory interpretation that statutes, where fairly possible, ought to be construed so as to avoid constitutional questions.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 See, e.g., Office of Sen ator Mark Dayton v. Hanson, 550 U.S. 511, 514 (2007) (discussing \'93established practice\'94 of interpreting statutes to avoid constitutional difficulties); United States v. Clark, 445 U.S. 23, 27 (1980) (finding it \'93well settled\'94 that the United States Supreme Court will not pass on the constitutionality of an act of Congress if a construction of the statute is fairly possible by which the question may be avoided); United States v. Congress of Indus. Orgs., 335 U.S. 106, 120-21 (1948) (finding that the United S tates Supreme Court has a duty, in construing congressional enactments, to take care to interpret them so as to avoid a danger of unconstitutionality); United States v. Standard Brewery, 251 U.S. 210, 220 (1920) (stating that when considering an act of Co ngress, a construction which might render it unconstitutional is to be avoided).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Here, because another reasonable construction of the pertinent provisions of the Guam Code and the Organic Act is readily discernable (i.e., that the U.S. Congress left it up t o Guam to set out the qualifications and duties of the Justices and Judges of Guam courts), this court construes the relevant statutes so as to avoid unnecessary constitutional difficulties.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [24]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 For the foregoing reasons, we hold that 7 GCA \'a7 6108, which authorizes the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Guam to appoint pro tempore justices without gubernatorial appointment or legislative confirmation, is neither inorganic nor unconstitutional.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid3015949 Part II \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [25]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We now turn to the merits of the case.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [26]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In their appeal, the Sgambelluris advance two interrelated arguments in support of their contention that the Superior Court erred in granting Gumataotao\rquote s motion for summary judgment:}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 1) that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to the validity and enforceability of a deed of conveyance dated September 17, 1980 (\'931980 deed\'94 ), in which the Sgambelluris conveyed Lots 1-7 to Gumataotao after defaulting on a promissory note and mortgage in favor of the latter; and 2) that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to the validity of certificates of title issued by the Department of Land Management on July 18, 2008 (\'932008 certificates of title\'94), which identify Gumataotao as the fee simple owner of Lots 1-7.}{\super\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 4} {\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Specifically, the Sgambelluris argue that both the 1980 deed and the 2008 certificates of title are invalid inasmuch as each fails to comply with at least one provision of Guam\rquote s Land Title Registration Law, 21 GCA \'a7 29101 et seq.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [27]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We address each of these arguments in turn.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }{\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 A. The 1980 Deed \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [28]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 To support their contention that the 1980 deed is invalid, the Sgambelluris rely solely on 21 GCA \'a7 29154, which provides:}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \'a7 29154. Name, Residence, and Address of Grantee on Instrument Presented for Registration: Service of Notices and Process on Person Interested. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Every deed or other voluntary instrument which is presented for registration including the endorsement of a cert ificate of title, shall contain or have endorsed upon it, the full name, residence and post office address of the grantee or other person who acquires or claims an interest under such instrument.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Any change in the residence or post office address of such person shall be endorsed by the registrar upon the original instrument, upon receiving a written statement of such change, duly acknowledged. }{\insrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par Appellants\rquote Br. at 16-17 (Aug. 18, 2009) (citing 21 GCA \'a7 29154 (2005)).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Sgambelluris argue that because the 1980 deed did not contain Paciano Gumataotao\rquote s residence and mailing address, the deed is \'93legally invalid and should not have been accepted for recording by the Guam Department of Land Management.\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Appellants\rquote Br. at 17.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Sgambelluris correctly assert that the lack of Paciano Gumataotao\rquote s residence and mailing address on the 1980 deed renders that deed technically defective under 21 GCA \'a7 29154.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 However, the Sgambelluris incorrectly assert that a technical deficiency in a deed necessarily defeats the transfer of title under it; i.e., that a defective deed cannot be cured.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Indeed, the appropriate mechanism for curing such minor technical deficiencies in a deed would be an action to quiet title.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 See 21 GCA \'a7 25101 (2005) (\'93 An action may be brought by any person against another who claims an estate or interest in real or personal property, adverse to him, for the purpose of determining such adverse claim . . . .\'94).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This is the case now before us, and, for the reasons set out below, we agree with the Superior Court\rquote s quieting title to the disputed property in Gumataotao.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \par [29]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 As to the relevance of recordation between a grantor and a grantee, the Superior Court was correct to look to our decision in{\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK22}{\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK23} Zahnen {\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK22}{\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK23}v. Limtiaco, 2008 Guam 5.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Zahnen case, like this case, involved a dispute over title to a parcel of real property.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 There, Mr. and Mrs. Zahnen (\'93the Zahnens\'94) purchased a registered parcel of land in 1966, and recorded the deed three years later.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Zahnen, 2008 Guam 5 \'b6 2.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In 1974, in exchange for consideration, the Zahnens granted a small portion of this property, via a warranty deed (\'931974 deed\'94), to Mr. and Mrs. Limtiaco (\'93the Limtiacos\'94).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. \'b6 3.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Subsequently, in 1982, the Zahnens signed a deed of conveyance (\'931982 deed\'94) transferring the same to the Limtiacos.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This deed was not recorded.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 At some point, the Limtiacos built an extension on their portion of the lot.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 After the Zahnens died, one in 1996 and the other in 1997, the entire lot was included in the inventory assets in both estates.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. \'b6 4.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Limtiacos submitted opposition throughout the probate proceedings, but the probate court distributed the entire lot in 2002 to the Zahnen\rquote s son and daughter.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The son then filed an action to quiet title to the lot in the Superior Court.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The case proceeded to a bench trial on the issues of the authenticity of the deeds as well as the application of the doctrine of laches.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. \'b6 5.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 As to the relevant issue, the trial court ruled that title to the disputed property had been properly conveyed to the Limtiacos by the 1974 and 1982 deeds.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{ \insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [30]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On appeal, the appellant son argued that the doctrine of laches precluded the Limtiacos from asserting a claim because of their failure to record the deed after conveyance.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We roundly rejected that argument:}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Although an unregistered deed is not afforded the same protections as a registered one, for example, protection from adverse possession . . . it does not follow that an unregistered deed is somehow an imperfect vestment of title.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Rather, as the law clearly states, \'93[a]n unrecorded instrument is valid as between the parties thereto and those who have notice thereof.\'94}{\insrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. \'b6 25 (quoting 21 GCA \'a7 37105 (2005)) (internal citation omitted).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 \'93Once title was conveye d through the deeds, nothing more was required to vest title in Limtiaco under the laws of Guam.\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. \'b6 26.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Here, like in Zahnen, the 1980 deed of conveyance from the Sgambelluris to Gumataotao was not recorded.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Like the Zahnens in the Zahnen case, the Sgambelluris here, as grantors, conveyed to Gumataotao the seven lots at issue in this case, and as such they had notice, which places them outside the class of persons intended to be protected by Guam\rquote s recording statute.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 See Pelowski v. Taitano, 2000 Guam 34 \'b6 34 (stating that in order to avail oneself of the protections of Guam\rquote s recording statute, one must either be an initial registrant or a bona fide purchaser).}{\super\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 5}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [31]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Finally, 21 GCA \'a7 37105 straightforwardly provides that, \'93 [a]n unrecorded instrument is valid as between the parties thereto and those who have notice thereof.\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 21 GCA \'a7 37105 (2005).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Section 37105, taken near verbatim from section 1217 of California\rquote s Civil Code, wholly accords with our considered position that, as between grantor and grantee, the recording of a deed is not essential to an effective conveyance of title.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In Merrit v. Rey, it was argued that the grantee was estopped from asserting title to the disputed property because she had faile d to record her deed and she had permitted the grantor to continue to enjoy the use and benefits derived from the property and the mortgaging thereof.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 286 P. 510, 512 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930).}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The California district court of appeal rejected this argument, fin ding that the facts did not conclusively establish either a failure to transfer title on the part of the grantor, or estoppel on the part of the grantee.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. at 513.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Citing section 1217 of California\rquote s Civil Code, the court held that the grantee\rquote s failure to record the deed \'93had no particular significance\'94 because \'93 [a]n unrecorded deed is valid as between the parties and with all those who have notice thereof.\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Because 21 GCA \'a7 37105 was taken near verbatim from section 1217 of California\rquote s Civil Code, Merritt is particularly instructive in the instant case, and therefore, we find it of no particular significance that the 1980 deed is unrecorded.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\b\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 B.}{\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid2124457 The 2008 Certificates of Title \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [32]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Superior Court rightly rejected as irrelevant the Sgambelluris\rquote contention that the DLM lacked authority to issue the 2008 certificates of title identifying Paciano G. Gumataotao as the fee simple owner of the disputed lots.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 To support their contention that the 2008 certificates of title are invalid, the Sgambelluris cite the following provision of our recording statute:}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 A registered owner of land desiring to transfer his whole estate or interest therein . . . may execute an instrument of conveyance in any form authorized by law for that purpose. }{\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid2124457 Upon filing such instr ument of the registrar\rquote s office, and surrendering to the registrar the duplicate certificate of title, the transfer shall be complete and the title so transferred shall vest in the transferee}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 ; thereupon, the registrar . . . shall stamp across the original and duplicate the word cancelled, in whole or in part, as the case may be. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid2124457 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Appellants\rquote Br. at 11 (citing 21 GCA \'a7 29149 (2005)) (emphasis added in brief).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 The Sgambelluris further rely on the following provision:}{ \insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 On the filing in the registrar\rquote s office o f an instrument intended to create a charge on registered land and upon the production of the duplicate certificate of title, whenever it appears from the original certificate of title that the person intending to create the charge has the title and right to create such charge and the person in whose favor the same is sought to be created is entitled by the terms of this law to have the same registered . . . }{\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid2124457 No new certificate of title shall be entered and no memorandum shall be made upon any certificate of title by the registrar in pursuance of any deed or other voluntary instrument, unless the owner\rquote s duplicate certificate of title is presented with such instrument . . . The production of the owner\rquote s duplicate certificate, whenever a voluntary instrument i s presented for registration, shall constitute authority from the registered owner to the registrar to issue a new certificate or to make a memorial in accordance with such instrument and the new certificate or the memorial shall be binding upon the regis tered owner}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 and upon all persons claiming under him in favor of every purchaser for value in good faith.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Appellants\rquote Br. at 12 (quoting 21 GCA \'a7 29160 (2005)) (emphasis added in brief).}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [33]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Certificates of title are only evidence that a titleholder\rquote s interest has been recorded under Guam\rquote s Land Title Registration Law; they are not required to effectuate a legal transfer of title to real property in Guam.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 See {\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK20}{\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK21}Sananap {\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK20}{\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK21}v. Cyfred, Ltd., 2009 Guam 13 \'b6 60.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In Sananap, we addressed as a sub-issue the argument that one\rquote s title might be defective for want of certificates of title.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 There, we simply assumed that certain parties were never issued certificates of title.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. \'b6 59.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In Sananap, we analyzed 21 GCA \'a7 29149, the same statutory provision cited in the instant case by the Sgambelluris in their attempt to invalidate the 2008 certificates of title.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We found that the \'93title so transferred\'94 referenced in 21 GCA \'a7 29149 \'93should be read to mean \lquote registered title\rquote and does not imply that only registered deeds are capable of legally }{\insrsid2124457 transferring title.\'94 Id. \'b6 60.}{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Instead, we stated that in Guam, ownership of real property does not require a certificate of title:}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [a]n estate in real property . . . can be transferred only by o peration of law, or by an instrument in writing, subscribed by the party disposing of the same, or by his agent thereunto authorized in writing.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. (quoting 21 GCA \'a7 4101 (2005)) (internal quot}{\insrsid2124457 ation marks omitted). }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We then stated that examples of title-transferring instruments include a simple wa}{ \insrsid2124457 rranty deed or quitclaim deed. }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [34]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In Sananap, we found that the homeowners \'93would not have defective title even if it were alleged that they are unable to obtain a cer tificate of title from the Department of Land Management.\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id. \'b6 60.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 This is so because \'93 a certificate of title is acquired later, after title has already been conveyed by another instrument . . . .\'94}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Id.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Hence, because the Sgambelluris conveyed their right and interest in the disputed lots to Gumataotao via the 1980 deed\emdash and because the deed itself is the title-transferring instrument\emdash we find the Sgambelluris\rquote assertion that the 2008 certificates of title are invalid ultimately irrelevant as to the issue of ownership of said lots.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [35]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Finally, the Sgambelluris argue that the 2008 certificates of title should never have been issued by the DLM to Gumataotao without the former\rquote s 1975 duplicate certificates of title, and that, consequently, the 2008 certificates were \'93issued without authority and are not binding\'94 on the Sgambelluris.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Appellants\rquote Br. at 13.}{ \insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We find this argument unpersuasive in light of our construction of Guam\rquote s Land Title Registration Law.}{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [36]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We have stated that in order to avail oneself of the protections of Guam\rquote s Land Title Registration Law, 21 GCA \'a7 29101 et seq., one must be either an initial registrant or a bona fide purchaser.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 See Pelowski v. Taitano, 2000 Guam 34 {\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK18}{\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK19}\'b6{\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK18} {\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK19} 34.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Although in Pelowski we expressly left it open as to whether there are other classes protected by the recording statute, see {\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK16} {\*\bkmkstart OLE_LINK17}Pelowski{\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK16}{\*\bkmkend OLE_LINK17}, 2000 Guam 34 \'b6 34 n.4, we did not leave it so widely open so as to afford protection under the recording s tatute to a grantor who first conveys her right and interest in real property to a grantee via a deed of conveyance and then later asserts that, for want of recording the deed, title never passed to the latter under it.}{\insrsid2124457 }{ \insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 We are confident that our finding today does not upset our reasoning in Pelowski. Id. \'b6 34 (finding that the Taitanos were not bona fide purchasers because they were put on constructive notice of others\rquote right and interest in the disputed property); accord Morioka v. I & F Corp. Guam, Civ. No. 91-00027A, 1991 WL 255842, at *3 (D. Guam App. Div. Nov. 18, 1991) (\'93 To become a bona fide purchaser of property one must acquire title through payment of value, in good faith, and without actual or constructive notice of another\rquote s rights.\'94).}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 In this ca se, it is beyond doubt that the Sgambelluris had notice of Gumataotao\rquote s interest in the seven lots at issue; it was they who deeded the lots to Gumataotao in 1980.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Accordingly, our conclusion that the Sgambelluris are not within the class of persons protected under Guam\rquote s recording statute is not disharmonious with our reasoning in Pelowski. }{\insrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\b\insrsid10438796\charrsid2124457 V. CONCLUSION \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10438796 {\insrsid2124457\charrsid10438796 \par }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 [37]}{\insrsid10438796 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Based on the foregoing, we find that the recording of a deed is not essential to an effective conveyance of title as between a grantor and a grant ee, and that certificates of title are evidence of ownership, but are not determinative of ownership to real property.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 A grantor cannot employ, as against a grantee, various provisions of Guam\rquote s Land Title Registration Law, 21 GCA \'a7 29101 et seq., to invalidate an otherwise properly-executed deed of conveyance solely because said grantee did not record the instrument.}{\insrsid2124457 }{\insrsid10438796\charrsid10438796 Accordingly, the Superior Court\rquote s grant of summary judgment in favor of Gumataotao is AFFIRMED. \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\insrsid2124457 _______________________ \par \par }{\b\insrsid2124457\charrsid9460098 Endnote \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 \par }\pard\plain \s19\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2124457 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 1. Associa te Justice F. Philip Carbullido, as the senior member of the panel, was designated Presiding Justice. \par }\pard \s19\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 2. The Honorable Richard H. Benson did not participate in the consideration or preparation of Part I of this opinion. \par }\pard \s19\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 3. These cases all involve the assignment of }{\i\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 judges}{\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 to temporarily perform judicial duties in the Supreme Court as temporary justices. In contrast, the Guam statute empowers the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Guam to appoint }{\i\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 pro tempore}{ \insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 justices from among a list of \'93qualified and available persons.\'94 7 GCA \'a7 6108(b). Taken together, the two pertinent subsections of 7 GCA \'a7 6108 only provide that such persons shall meet the same qualifications as a regularly appointed Justice of the Supreme Court, or be appointed in accordance with Guam law. }{\i\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 See }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 7 GCA \'a7 6108(a), (b) (2005). For purposes here, however, it suffices that the above-cited cases undermine the Sgambelluris\rquote assertion that the power to appoint }{\i\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 pro tempore}{\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 justices is a more or less inherent power of the coordinate branches of government. \par }\pard \s19\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 4. Although not enumerated as an issue on appeal, the Sgambelluris revive as a sub-issue their argument that pursuant to 7 GCA \'a7 15601, the Superior Court should have deemed admitted the genuineness and due execution of the 1975 certificates of title, which they attached to their original Complaint to Quiet Title. Appellants\rquote Br. at 9 (Aug. 18, 2009). The statute provides:} {\insrsid2124457 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 \par }\pard\plain \qj \li720\ri720\sa120\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid2124457 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 \'a7 15601 . Written Instrument: When Copy of Complaint Deemed Genuine. \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 When an action is brought upon a written instrument, and the complaint contains a copy of such instrument, or a copy is annexed thereto, the genuineness and due execution of such instrument are d eemed admitted, unless the answer denying the same be verified. (If the plaintiff relies upon a written instrument, in whole or in part, that fact shall be pleaded.) \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2124457 {\insrsid2124457 \par }{\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 7 GCA \'a7 15601 (2005). The Sgambelluris construe this provision to mean that because Defen dant-Appellee the Estate of Paciano G. Gumataotao filed an unverified answer, the latter is deemed to have admitted the genuineness and due execution of the 1975 certificates of title. Appellants\rquote Br. at 10. Even assuming this construction is correct, it d oes not follow that the Sgambelluris own the seven lots at issue in this case. As explained further in this opinion, certificates of title are not themselves title-transferring instruments, but rather, are acquired after title to real property has already been conveyed by another instrument. }{\i\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 See Sananap v. Cyfred, Ltd.}{\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 , 2009 Guam 13 \'b6 60. Here, the operative instrument is the 1980 deed of conveyance wherein the Sgambelluris conveyed the disputed seven lots back to Gumataotao after defaulting on a promissory note and mortgage in favor of the latter. Therefore, the Sgambelluris\rquote 1975 certificates of title, which are no doubt genuine, are immaterial. \par }\pard\plain \s19\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1124203 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 5. }{\insrsid13195870\charrsid13195870 In a relevant footnote, we stated}{ \insrsid1124203 : }{\insrsid13195870\charrsid13195870 \'93We reserve whether there are other classes prot}{\insrsid1124203 ected by the Registration Law. }{\insrsid13195870\charrsid13195870 We only conclude today that the Taitanos are not within the recognized classes protected by the Registration Law.\'94 Pelowski v. Taitano, 2000 Guam 34 \'b6 34 n.4. The opinion as a whole, however, reveals this court\rquote s aversion to any attempt by persons with notice of adverse claims to disputed property to claim bona fide purchaser status. In the instant case it is beyond doubt that the Sgambelluris, as grantor, had notice of Gumataotao\rquote s interest in}{\insrsid1124203 the seven lots here at issue. }{\insrsid13195870\charrsid13195870 Accordingly, the Sgambelluris cannot avail themselves of the protection of Guam\rquote s recording statute.}{\insrsid2124457\charrsid2124457 \par }}