{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f1\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial;} {\f2\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070309020205020404}Courier New;}{\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;}{\f37\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f38\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;} {\f40\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f41\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f42\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f43\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);} {\f44\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f45\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\f47\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CE;}{\f48\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Cyr;}{\f50\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Greek;} {\f51\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Tur;}{\f52\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial (Hebrew);}{\f53\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial (Arabic);}{\f54\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Baltic;}{\f55\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial (Vietnamese);} {\f57\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CE;}{\f58\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Cyr;}{\f60\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Greek;}{\f61\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Tur;}{\f62\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New (Hebrew);} {\f63\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New (Arabic);}{\f64\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Baltic;}{\f65\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New (Vietnamese);}{\f387\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f388\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Tahoma Cyr;} {\f390\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f391\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma Tur;}{\f392\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);}{\f393\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f394\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;} {\f395\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f396\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma (Thai);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0; \red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{ \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\* \ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tblind0\tblindtype3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{ \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \ssemihidden Balloon Text;}{\s16\ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx360\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 _level1;}{ \s17\ql \fi-360\li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext17 _level2;}{\s18\ql \fi-360\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1080\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext18 _level3;}{\s19\ql \fi-360\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext19 _level4;}{ \s20\ql \fi-360\li1800\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1800\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1800\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext20 _level5;}{\s21\ql \fi-360\li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext21 _level6;}{\s22\ql \fi-360\li2520\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx2520\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2520\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext22 _level7;}{ \s23\ql \fi-360\li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext23 _level8;}{\s24\ql \fi-360\li3240\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx3240\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin3240\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext24 _level9;}{\s25\ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx360\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext25 _levsl1;}{\s26\ql \fi-360\li720\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext26 _levsl2;}{ \s27\ql \fi-360\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1080\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext27 _levsl3;}{\s28\ql \fi-360\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext28 _levsl4;}{ \s29\ql \fi-360\li1800\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1800\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1800\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext29 _levsl5;}{\s30\ql \fi-360\li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext30 _levsl6;}{\s31\ql \fi-360\li2520\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx2520\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2520\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext31 _levsl7;}{ \s32\ql \fi-360\li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext32 _levsl8;}{\s33\ql \fi-360\li3240\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx3240\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin3240\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext33 _levsl9;}{\s34\ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx360\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext34 _levnl1;}{\s35\ql \fi-360\li720\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext35 _levnl2;}{ \s36\ql \fi-360\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1080\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext36 _levnl3;}{\s37\ql \fi-360\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext37 _levnl4;}{ \s38\ql \fi-360\li1800\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1800\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1800\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext38 _levnl5;}{\s39\ql \fi-360\li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext39 _levnl6;}{\s40\ql \fi-360\li2520\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx2520\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2520\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext40 _levnl7;}{ \s41\ql \fi-360\li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext41 _levnl8;}{\s42\ql \fi-360\li3240\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx3240\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin3240\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext42 _levnl9;}{\*\cs43 \additive \sbasedon10 Default Para;}{\s44\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx0\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext44 WP_Header;}{\s45\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext45 Footnote Tex;}{\*\cs46 \additive \super \sbasedon10 Footnote Ref;}{\s47\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx0\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext47 WP_Footer;}{\*\cs48 \additive \ul\cf2 \sbasedon10 WP_Hyperlink;}{\*\cs49 \additive \sbasedon10 documentbody;}{\*\cs50 \additive \super \sbasedon10 \ssemihidden footnote reference;}{\s51\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext51 Definition T;}{ \s52\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext52 WP_Normal;}{\s53\ql \li360\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx360\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext53 Definition L;}{ \s54\qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext54 \ssemihidden footnote text;}{\*\cs55 \additive \i \sbasedon10 Definition;}{ \s56\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs48\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext56 H1;}{ \s57\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs36\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext57 H2;}{ \s58\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext58 H3;}{ \s59\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext59 H4;}{ \s60\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext60 H5;}{ \s61\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext61 H6;}{ \s62\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \i\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext62 Address;}{\s63\ql \li360\ri360\nowidctlpar \tx360\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin360\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext63 Blockquote;}{\*\cs64 \additive \i \sbasedon10 CITE;}{\*\cs65 \additive \f2\fs20 \sbasedon10 CODE;}{\*\cs66 \additive \i \sbasedon10 WP_Emphasis;}{\*\cs67 \additive \ul\cf12 \sbasedon10 FollowedHype;}{\*\cs68 \additive \b\f2\fs20 \sbasedon10 Keyboard;}{ \s69\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx0\tx959\tx1918\tx2876\tx3835\tx4794\tx5754\tx6713\tx7672\tx8630\tx9356\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f2\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext69 Preformatted;}{\s70\qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\brdrb\brdrs\brdrw30\brdrcf1 \wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext70 zBottom of;}{ \s71\qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\brdrb\brdrdb\brdrw5\brdrcf1 \wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext71 zTop of For;}{\*\cs72 \additive \f2 \sbasedon10 Sample;}{\*\cs73 \additive \b \sbasedon10 WP_Strong;}{\*\cs74 \additive \f2\fs20 \sbasedon10 Typewriter;}{\*\cs75 \additive \i \sbasedon10 Variable;}{\*\cs76 \additive \v\cf6 \sbasedon10 HTML Markup;}{\*\cs77 \additive \v \sbasedon10 Comment;}{ \s78\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext78 _26;}{\s79\ql \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext79 _25;}{ \s80\ql \li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext80 _24;}{ \s81\ql \li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext81 _23;}{ \s82\ql \li3600\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin3600\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext82 _22;}{ \s83\ql \li4320\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin4320\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext83 _21;}{ \s84\ql \li5040\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin5040\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext84 _20;}{\s85\ql \li5760\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin5760\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext85 _19;}{\s86\ql \li6480\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin6480\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext86 _18;}{\s87\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx0\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext87 _17;}{ \s88\ql \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext88 _16;}{\s89\ql \li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext89 _15;}{\s90\ql \li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext90 _14;}{\s91\ql \li3600\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin3600\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext91 _13;}{\s92\ql \li4320\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin4320\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext92 _12;}{ \s93\ql \li5040\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin5040\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext93 _11;}{\s94\ql \li5760\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin5760\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext94 _10;}{\s95\ql \li6480\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin6480\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext95 _9;}{\s96\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx0\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext96 _8;}{ \s97\ql \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext97 _7;}{\s98\ql \li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext98 _6;}{\s99\ql \li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext99 _5;}{\s100\ql \li3600\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin3600\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext100 _4;}{\s101\ql \li4320\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin4320\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext101 _3;} {\s102\ql \li5040\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin5040\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext102 _2;}{ \s103\ql \li5760\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin5760\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext103 _1;}{\s104\ql \li6480\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin6480\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext104 _;}{\s105\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext105 header;}{\s106\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext106 footer;}{\*\cs107 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}{\*\cs108 \additive \fs16 \sbasedon10 \ssemihidden annotation reference;}{\s109\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext109 \ssemihidden annotation text;}{ \s110\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon109 \snext109 \ssemihidden annotation subject;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid351187\rsid790882\rsid1204939 \rsid2768777\rsid3151074\rsid3154913\rsid4873133\rsid5774112\rsid6948675\rsid7631719\rsid9993035\rsid10635923\rsid10887076\rsid11485483\rsid11599967\rsid11622050\rsid12129119\rsid12455770\rsid12583782\rsid13178917\rsid15350299\rsid15495737\rsid15932760} {\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6818;}{\info{\title Peole v. Diaz, CRA05-003}{\subject criminal}{\author Supreme Court of Guam}{\operator Kym Freriks}{\creatim\yr2007\mo7\dy2\hr14\min33}{\revtim\yr2007\mo7\dy2\hr14\min43} {\printim\yr2007\mo6\dy29\hr13\min56}{\version4}{\edmins12}{\nofpages22}{\nofwords9187}{\nofchars52367}{\*\company Judiciary of Guam}{\nofcharsws61432}{\vern16393}{\*\password 00000000}}{\*\xmlnstbl } \paperw12240\paperh15840\margl1440\margr1440\margt1440\margb1008\gutter0 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\hyphhotz0\notabind\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace0\dgvspace0\dghorigin0\dgvorigin0\dghshow0\dgvshow0 \jexpand\viewkind4\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot6948675 \fet0{\*\wgrffmtfilter 013f}{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 { \insrsid11622050 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11622050 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11622050 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11622050 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \psz1\sbknone\linex0\headery1440\endnhere\titlepg\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\headerl \pard\plain \ql \fi-2880\li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\i\fs20\insrsid13178917 People v. Diaz}{\fs20\insrsid13178917 , Opinion\tab \tab \tab Page \chpgn of }{\field{\*\fldinst {\fs20\insrsid13178917 NUMPAGES \\* arabic \\* MERGEFORMAT }}{\fldrslt { \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid13178917 34}}}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\fs20\insrsid13178917 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1200\tx-720\tx0\tx720\tx1440\tx1800\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tx9360\tx10080\tx10800\tx11520\tx12240\tx12960\tx13680\tx14400\tx15120\tx15840\tx16560\tx17280\tx18000\tx18720 \wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid13178917 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl240\slmult0\nowidctlpar \tx-1200\tx-720\tx0\tx720\tx1440\tx1800\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tx9360\tx10080\tx10800\tx11520\tx12240\tx12960\tx13680\tx14400\tx15120\tx15840\tx16560\tx17280\tx18000\tx18720 \wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid13178917 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1200\tx-720\tx0\tx720\tx1440\tx1800\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tx9360\tx10080\tx10800\tx11520\tx12240\tx12960\tx13680\tx14400\tx15120\tx15840\tx16560\tx17280\tx18000\tx18720 \wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid13178917 \par }}{\headerr \pard\plain \s105\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\i\fs20\insrsid13178917 People v. Diaz}{ \fs20\insrsid13178917 , Opinion \tab \tab Page }{\field{\*\fldinst {\cs107\fs20\insrsid13178917 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs107\fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid3154913 20}}}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj { \cs107\fs20\insrsid13178917 of }{\field{\*\fldinst {\cs107\fs20\insrsid13178917 NUMPAGES }}{\fldrslt {\cs107\fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid3151074 34}}}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\cs107\insrsid13178917 \par }\pard \s105\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tx638\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs107\insrsid13178917 \tab \par }\pard \s105\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\brdrt\brdrs\brdrw10\brsp20 \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx9360\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\rtlgutter\itap0 {\insrsid13178917 \par }}{\footerl \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx-1200\tx-720\tx0\tx720\tx1440\tx1800\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tx9360\tx10080\tx10800\tx11520\tx12240\tx12960\tx13680\tx14400\tx15120\tx15840\tx16560\tx17280\tx18000\tx18720 \wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid13178917 \par }}{\footerr \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\sl240\slmult0\nowidctlpar \tx-1200\tx-720\tx0\tx720\tx1440\tx1800\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\tx9360\tx10080\tx10800\tx11520\tx12240\tx12960\tx13680\tx14400\tx15120\tx15840\tx16560\tx17280\tx18000\tx18720 \wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid13178917 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 PEOPLE OF GUAM, \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Plaintiff-Appellee, \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 vs. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ANTONIO }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 TONY}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 M. DIAZ, \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Defendant-Appellant. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 OPINION \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid790882\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid790882\charrsid12455770 Filed:}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid790882\charrsid12455770 June 29, 2007 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cite as: 200}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10887076\charrsid12455770 7}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Guam }{ \b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1204939\charrsid12455770 3}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Supreme Court Case No.:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 CRA05-003 \par Superior Court Case No.:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 CF0050-03 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appeal from the Superior Court of Guam \par Argued and submitted on May 15, 2006 \par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\trowd \irow0\irowband0\lastrow \ts11\trgaph120\trrh2033\trleft630\trkeep\trftsWidth1\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trpaddl120\trpaddr120\trpaddfl3\trpaddfr3\tblind750\tblindtype3 \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4611\clpadl120\clpadt120\clpadb58\clpadr120\clpadfl3\clpadft3\clpadfb3\clpadfr3\clshdrawnil \cellx5241\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4159\clpadl120\clpadt120\clpadb58\clpadr120\clpadfl3\clpadft3\clpadfb3\clpadfr3\clshdrawnil \cellx9400\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\intbl\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid12455770 { \ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appearing for Defendant-Appellant:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par F. Randall Cunliffe, }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Esq.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par Cunliffe & Cook, P.C. \par 210 Archbishop Flores St. \par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam 96910 \par \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid790882\charrsid12455770 \cell }{\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appearing for Plaintiff-Appellee:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1204939\charrsid12455770 William C. Bischoff \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Marianne Woloschuck \par Assistant Attorney}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1204939\charrsid12455770 s}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 General \par Office of the Attorney General \par 287 West O\rquote Brien Dr. \par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam 96910\cell }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \trowd \irow0\irowband0\lastrow \ts11\trgaph120\trrh2033\trleft630\trkeep\trftsWidth1\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trpaddl120\trpaddr120\trpaddfl3\trpaddfr3\tblind750\tblindtype3 \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4611\clpadl120\clpadt120\clpadb58\clpadr120\clpadfl3\clpadft3\clpadfb3\clpadfr3\clshdrawnil \cellx5241\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4159\clpadl120\clpadt120\clpadb58\clpadr120\clpadfl3\clpadft3\clpadfb3\clpadfr3\clshdrawnil \cellx9400\row }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 { \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 BEFORE: F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Chief Justice; FRANCES M. TYDINGCO-GATEWOOD, Associate Justice}{\cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid351187 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{ \fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Associate Justice Frances Tydingco-Gatewood heard oral argument in this case. Prior to issuance of this Opinion, she was sworn in as Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court of Guam.}}}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ; ROBERT J. TORRES, JR., Associate Justice. \par \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 TORRES, J.:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [1]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Defendant-Appellant, Antonio M. }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Tony}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz was convicted on felony and misdemeanor charges of Theft of P roperty and misdemeanor charges of Official Misconduct and received a sentence which included five years of incarceration, three years of parole and 1,000 hours of community service.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 On appeal, Diaz alleges numerous errors arising from the charges of Official Misconduct; specifically, he challenges:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 (1) the amendment to the indictment which charged the Official Misconduct counts in the disjunctive rather than the conjunctive as in the original indictment; and (2) the sufficiency of the amended indictment with respect to the Official Misconduct charge.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In addition, Diaz challenges the sufficiency of the evidence related to both the Official Misconduct charges and the Theft of Property charges.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 He contends that the crime of Official Misconduct is one continuing course of uninterrupted conduct rather than twenty-three (23) separate counts.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz argues that the trial court committed error when it punished him separately for official misconduct and theft instead of merging the two crimes and punishing him concurrently.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Finally, he asserts that the Superior Court imposed a harsher sentence in order to punish him for exercising his right to a trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We reject each of the arguments advanced by Diaz and affirm. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 I. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [2]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab This case arises from Diaz\rquote s use, for personal purchases, of a Guam Mass Transit Authority (}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 GMTA}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ) Bank of Guam MasterCard issued in his name.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz obtained the GMTA credit card while employed as the agency\rquote s Assistant General Manager.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In July 2000, Diaz purchased three plane tickets using the GM TA credit card; two round-trip tickets for him and his wife and a one-way ticket for his daughter.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The trip served two purposes:}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 first, to accompany Diaz\rquote s daughter to college in California and second, to allow Diaz to attend training in Portland, Oregon for which he had received prior approval.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 While Diaz was on the mainland, he made numerous personal charges on the GMTA credit card at various restaurants, hotels, and stores.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Shortly after his return to Guam, Diaz purchased a computer for his daughter using the credit card.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [3]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab After the initial personal charges were made, he was questioned about the charges.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 He acknowledged that the charges were personal in nature, but made no payments to GMTA to cover the personal charges.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In January 2001, GMTA closed its account with the Bank of Guam, the issuer of the GMTA credit cards, including the one issued in Diaz \rquote s name.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 At the time that the account was closed, Diaz had not reimbursed GMTA for the personal charges made on the card.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [4]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab In May 2001, the Public Auditor\rquote s Office began an investigatory audit into the use of credit cards at GMTA.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Shortly after the Public Auditor Doris Flores Brooks began examining the matter, then-Senator Felix P. Camacho\rquote s office began its own investigation after receiving an anonymous tip regarding potential abuse and called for a legislative}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 oversight hearing regarding the use of credit cards at GMTA. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [5]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab On July 17, 2001, Diaz wrote two checks to GMTA for an amount covering all the personal charges he made on the GMTA card.}{\cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid351187 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{ \fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 The two checks, in fact, amounted to more than the total personal charges that Diaz made on the credit card. However, GMTA issued Diaz a check for the amount that he overpaid, $1,317.66, on August 7, 2001. }{ \v\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chatn }{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Transcript (\'93Tr.\'94), pp. 20-21 (Jury Trial, Feb. 2, 2005).}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [6]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab On February 5, 2003, Diaz was indicted by a Superior Court grand jury.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The original indictment included the following: First Charge, three counts of Theft of Property (As a 2nd Degree Felony); Second Charge, three counts of Unautho rized Use of a Credit Card (As a 3rd Degree Felony); Third Charge, seventeen Counts of Theft of Property (As a Misdemeanor); Fourth Charge, four counts of Theft of Property (As a Petty Misdemeanor); Fifth Charge, twenty-one counts of Unauthorized Use of a Credit Card (As a Misdemeanor); and Sixth Charge, twenty-four counts of Official Misconduct (As a Misdemeanor).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s Excerpts of Record (}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ER}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ), p. 1 (Indictment, Feb. 5, 2003).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The People later filed a motion requesting the dismissal of Count 17 of the Third Charge of Theft of Property (As a Misdemeanor), and Count 23 of the Sixth Charge of Official Misconduct (As a Misdemeanor), as well dismissal of both charges of the Unauthorized Use of a Credit Card.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The trial court granted this motion. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [7]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Su bsequently, the People filed an application to amend the original indictment to expand the jurisdictional allegation in each charge.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 For the Theft of Property charges, the People moved to remove the phrase }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 to personally benefit himself and others}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 and to clarify that Diaz was accused of depriving the Government of Guam of the money, and not of the item purchased.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 For the Official Misconduct charges, the People moved to change the phrase to }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 with the intent to benefit himself and another person}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 in order to more closely track the language of the statute.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz objected to each of these changes, but failed to object to anything else contained in the original indictment.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Over Diaz\rquote s objection, the Application to Amend was granted and an amended indictment was issued on January 25, 2005.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Amended Indictment included the following charges:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 First Charge, three counts of Theft of Property (As a 2nd Degree Felony); Second Charge, sixteen counts of Theft of Property (As a Misdemeanor); Third Charge, four coun ts of Theft of Property (As a Petty Misdemeanor); Fourth Charge, twenty-three counts of Official Misconduct (As a Misdemeanor).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant \rquote s ER, pp. 37-52 (Amended Indictment). \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [8]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab A jury found Diaz guilty of one count of Theft of Property (As a 2nd Degree Felony); one count of Theft of Property (As a Misdemeanor); and twenty-three counts of Official Misconduct (As a Misdemeanor).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant \rquote s ER, pp. 53-55 (Judgment).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz was sentenced to a total of five years of incarceration, a special parole for a ter m of three years, and 1,000 hours of community service. Diaz timely filed this appeal. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 II. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [9]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab This court has jurisdiction over a final judgment of conviction.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 48 U.S.C. \'a7 1424-1(a)}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 (West, Westlaw through Pub. L. 109-482 approved Jan. 15, 2007); 7 GCA \'a7 3107(b) (2005) and 8 GCA \'a7 130.15(a) (2005).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 III. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [10]\tab }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We review the amendment of an indictment }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 de novo}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Salas}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2000 Guam 2 \'b6 10.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 When there has been no objecti on below, we review the sufficiency of an indictment for plain error.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Chung}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2004 Guam 2, \'b6\'b6 8-9; }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Jones}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2006 Guam 13 \'b6 8.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 A claim of fatal variance will be treated as an attack on the sufficiency of the evidence.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Campbell}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2006 Guam 14; }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Antonakeas}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 255 F.3d 714, 721 (9th Cir. 2001).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this court must decide whether, from the evidence presented at trial, }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 of each charge of conviction proven }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 beyond a reasonable doubt.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Guerrero}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2003 Guam 18 \'b6 13; }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 see also}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Maysho}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 4 \'b6 14.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Whether or not an offense is defined as a continuing course of conduct involves issues of statutory interpretation.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. San Nicolas}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2001 Guam 4 \'b6\'b6 23-26.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Whether one offense }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 merges with another for purposes of punishment is a question of statutory interpretation.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Cedar}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 437 F.2d 1033, 1036 (9th Cir. 1971).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Issues of s tatutory interpretation, such as defining a continuing course of conduct and merger of offenses, are reviewed }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 de novo}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 . }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Flores}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2004 Guam 18 \'b6 8 (quoting }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Ada v. Guam Tel. Auth.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 1999 Guam 10 \'b6 10).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Finally, the trial court \rquote s imposition of a sentence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Super. Ct. (Chiguina)}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2003 Guam 11 \'b6 12.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 IV. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [11]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab In the instant appeal, Diaz challenges various aspects of the Amended Indictment, the evidence and the sentence. }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We examine each of the issues in turn.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \fi-720\li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 A.\tab The Indictment}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [12]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz challenges numerous aspects of the Official Misconduct charges.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 He argues first, that the Official Misconduct charge should have been pled in the conjunctive rather than the disjunctive; and second, that the Amended Indictment failed to allege an essential element of the Official Misconduct charge. \par }\pard \ql \fi-1440\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 1.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Conjunctive or Disjunctive}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [13]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz asserts that the Amended Indictment, which used the disjunctive, charged a new and different offense, permitted a non-unanimous determination by the jurors, and failed to protect him from being placed in double jeopardy.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [14]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab The People filed an application to amend the Indictment, which requested, among other changes, that the court amend all of the Official Misconduct charges to read }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 with intent to benefit himself }{\b\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 or}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 another person}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 in place of }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 with intent to benefit himself and another person.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellee\rquote s ER, tab 1, p. 2 (Application to Amend Indictment).}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The People moved to amend the Indictment in order to track the language of 9 GCA \'a7 49.90, the Official Misconduct statute.}{ \cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\keepn\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 In the instant case, the indictment as originally drafted was sufficient and more artfully drawn than the amended one. However, although the amendment to this particular charge was unnecessary, it does not follow that it was not permissible. }{ \i\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 See United States v. Blanchard}{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 , 495 F.2d 1329, 1332-33 (1st Cir. 1974). Therefore, we address herein whether the amendment was permissible.}}}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Over Diaz\rquote s objection, the trial court granted the motion to amend the indictment pursuant to 8 GCA \'a7 55.20.}{ \cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid351187 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Title 8 GCA \'a7 55.20 is substantially similar to and is derived from Rule 7(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. }{\v\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chatn }{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 8 GCA \'a7 55.20 cmt.; Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(e). Accordingly, federal cases interpreting Rule 7(e) are persuasive authority in the interpretation of section 55.20. }{\i\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 See Amerault v. Intelcom Support Serv., Inc.}{ \fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 , 2004 Guam 23 \'b6 16.}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [15]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab We review the amendment of the indictment }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 de novo}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Salas}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2000 Guam 2 \'b6 10. Amendments to indictments are governed by 8 GCA \'a7 55.20, which provides: }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [t]he court may permit an indictment or information to be amended upon the application of the prosecuting attorney at any time before verdict or finding }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 if no additional [or] different offense is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 .}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 8 GCA \'a7 55.20 (2005) (emphasis added).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Salas}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2000 Guam 2, in examining an amendment to an indictment, we noted that this statute: \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [P]rovides the court with a flexible tool to allow parties to change easily small errors in their pleadings.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Guam courts have followed this law verbatim. Unless a judge has been able to point to an added charge of which the defendant and his or her counsel had no knowledge or a substan tial way in which a defendant has been prejudiced, judges have consistently allowed the prosecution to make this amendment.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11485483\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'b6 13.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Accordingly, we examine the amendment to ascertain whether the Amended Indictment charged a new or different offense and whether the amendment prejudiced the defendant.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Section 55.20 limits the trial court\rquote s ability to allow amendments to those situations in which:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 1) }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 no additional [or] different offense is charged}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ; and 2) the }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 8 GCA \'a7 55.20 (2005).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We examine each of these requirements in turn. \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4873133\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 a.\tab No additional or different offense}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [16]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab The People\rquote s application to amend the indictment did not, on its face, attempt to charge Diaz either with a new or additional offense.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Both the original and the Amended Indictment refer to the offense of Official Misconduct pursuant to 9 GCA \'a7 49.90(a) (2005), which provides:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'a7 49.90. Official Misconduct; Defined and Punished.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 A public servant commits a misdemeanor if, with intent to benefit himself or another person or to harm another person or to deprive another person of a benefit: \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 (a) he commits an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that such act is unauthorized, or \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 (b)}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 he knowingly refrains from performing a duty which is imposed upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Amended Indictment contains no factual allegations that are new or different from the original indictment.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 An amendment to an indictment which alleges no new facts and cites no new statutory citation has been held not to charge an additional or different offense.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Stone}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 954 F.2d 1187, 1191 (6th Cir. 1992).}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Here, the same statute is referenced and the same facts are alleged in both indictments.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 } {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We find that the change of }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 and}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 to }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 or}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 was of one word to track the language of the statute and does not rise to the level of charging an additional or different offense.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Therefore, under the first prong of the two-part analysis of 8 GCA \'a7 55.20, Diaz has not shown the trial court erred in allowing the amendment. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 b.\tab Absence of prejudice to the defendant}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [17]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Having determined that no additional or different offense was charged, we must next examine whether th e amendment prejudiced Diaz.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 This analysis is necessary even where an amendment does not charge an additional or new offense, as this type of amendment to an indictment may prejudice a defendant in }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 a substantial way.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Salas}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2000 Guam 2 \'b6 13.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Third Circuit articulated the standard for concluding if a defendant is prejudiced as follows: \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The test as to whether the defendant is prejudiced by an amendment to an indictment has been said to be whether a defense under an indictment as it originally stood w ould be equally available after the amendment is made, and whether any evidence the defendant might have would be equally applicable to the indictment in the one form as in the other. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Fawcett}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 115 F.2d 764, 767 (3rd Cir. 1940).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz fails to allege prejudice which would satisfy the test as expressed in }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Fawcett}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , nor do we find any.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The amendment did not eliminate any defense available to Diaz or make any evidence inapplicable.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In the instant case we find, as the Supreme Court of South Dakota has held, that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [u]se of \lquote or\rquote rather than \lquote and \rquote left appellant neither less nor more certain of the charge against him; and use of \lquote and\rquote would have given him no additional practical benefit in the preparation of his defense.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 State v. Strauser}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 63 N.W.2d 345, 348 (S.D. 1954).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Finding no prejudice under the standard set forth by the Third Circuit, we turn to the other arguments advanced by Diaz. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [18]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Instead of asserting prejudice concerning the preparation of his defense, Diaz alleges the amendment al lowed the jury to reach a non-unanimous decision and insufficiently protected him from double jeopardy in the future.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz relies on the general rule that pleading in the conjunctive is preferred where a statute specifies several means by which a crime can be committed.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Heflin v. United States}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 223 F.2d 371, 373 (5th Cir. 1955).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [19]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Title 9 GCA \'a7 49.90 does, in fact, specify alternative means by which a person may commit the offense of Official Misconduct, stating that a person may either }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 commit[] an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that such act is unauthorized}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 as set forth in subsection (a), or may }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 knowingly refrain[] from performing a duty which is imposed upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 as set forth in subsection (b).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 There are multiple uses of the disjunctives in the statute:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 (1) those contained in the introductory paragraph dealing with intent, }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 to benefit himself or another person or to harm another person or to deprive another person of a benefit}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ; and (2) another which separates the means by which the crime of official misconduct may be committed, }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 committing an act}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 or }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 refraining from performing a duty.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Section 49.90 contains multiple intents:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 to benefit himself or another person,}{\cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4873133 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Diaz argues that the elements requiring that he acted to benefit himself and to benefit another person are two separate and distinct intents outlined in the statute. It is not obvious to this court tha t the statute created two separate intents. However, we need not address this issue because even if they were separate intents, the conjunctive is not required. }}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 to harm another person, and to deprive another person of a benefit.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 It also contains alter native methods of committing the crime of Official Misconduct by either committing an act, or knowingly refraining from performing a duty.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Amended Indictment pleads neither multiple intents nor multiple means of committing the act in the disjunctive. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [20]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab However, Diaz\rquote s reliance on the general rule against disjunctive pleading is misplaced.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States ex rel. Bradley v. Hartigan}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 612 F. Supp. 795 (C.D. Ill. 1985), addressed the sufficiency of an information which alleged various mental states using the disjunctive }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 or.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The court found the information to be sufficient stating: \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Bradley additionally argues that the information was void because it uses the disjunctive conjunction }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 or,}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 thereby making it uncertain whether he was charged with comm itting the act with the intent to satisfy the desires of the victim or the desires of himself.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Bradley, however, was charged at trial with but one act of lewd fondling.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The use of the disjunctive conjunction }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 or}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 in setting apart the differing mental states did not render the charge uncertain in the indictment. \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 As the information charged only one physical act, the petitioner's conviction serves as a double jeopardy bar despite the disjunctive pleading of the mental state element. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id. }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 at 805; }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 see also United States v. Scott}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 884 F.2d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 1989) (finding an indictment to be sufficient which, like the statute, disjunctively charged a defendant with intending to extort money or some other thing of value because the indictment specified the act that constituted the violation and a single method of committing the offense).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Nearly all of the Official Misconduct counts contained in the Amended Indictment allege one discrete act by Diaz, namely, the single use of the GMTA credit card issued in his name.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Counts 1 and 2 allege specific charges made to the GMTA credit card, namely, the purchase of airline tickets in Count 1 and hotel accommodations in Count 2. Appellant\rquote s ER, pp. 45-46 (Amended Indictment).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The use of the disjunctive }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 or}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 in Count s 1 and 2 did not render the counts uncertain as both allege the purchase of specific items on the GMTA credit card.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Just as in }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Bradley}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 612 F. Supp. 795, the use of the disjunctive conjunction }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 or}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 in setting apart the differing mental states did not ren der the charge uncertain in the indictment.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Because the counts charge only one physical act, Diaz\rquote s conviction serves as a double jeopardy bar despite the disjunctive pleading of the mental state.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Accordingly, Diaz suffered no prejudice by the amendment.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [21]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Finding that Diaz was not prejudiced is consistent with the purpose behind the general rule against disjunctive pleading.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The most substantial reason against disjunctive pleading relates to statutes where the use of either or any of two or more a ccusatory words creates uncertainty as to which of two or more offenses created by the one statute, is charged, and conviction had in event of conviction.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Strauser}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 63 N.W.2d at 347.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Accordingly, we hold that the amendment allowed by the trial court did not prejudice Diaz.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 2.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Essential Element \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [22]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz argues the Amended Indictment omits an essential element of the crime of Official Misconduct, specifically, knowledge that the act committed was unauthorized, which therefore renders the charging document constitutionally defective.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Although he asserts that the Amended Indictment should be reviewed }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 de novo}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , Diaz failed to object to the Amended Indictment for failure to charge an offense during the trial court proceedings.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Although the Application to Amend the Indictment did not include a request to rephrase, the amendment nonetheless occurred before trial, and Diaz had an opportunity to object to the Amended Indictment prior to trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 See Gov\rquote t of Canal Zone v. Burjan}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 596 F.2d 690, 693 (5th Cir. 197 9) (finding the defendant had waived his objections to the amendment of the indictment by his failure to object prior to trial).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [23]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Generally, failure to object to an indictment prior to trial results in waiver.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Title 8 GCA \'a7 65.15 (2005) states: \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'a7 65.15. Motions Which Must be Made Prior to Trial. \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Any defense, objection or request which is capable of determination without the trial of the general issue may be raised before trial by motion.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Motions may be written or oral at the discretion of the judge. The following shall be raised prior to trial: \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 (a) Defenses and objections based on defects in the institution of the prosecution; \par (b) Defenses and objections based on defects in the indictment, information or complaint (other than that it fails to show jurisdiction in the court or to charge an offense which objections shall be noticed by the court at any time during the pendency of the proceedings); \par (c) Motions to suppress evidence; \par (d) Requests for discovery pursuant to Chapter 70 (commencing with \'a7 70.10); or \par (e) Requests for a severance of charges or defendants pursuant to \'a7 65.35. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 As set forth above, there are two exceptions to the general rule:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 lack of jurisdiction and failure to plead essential elements are objections which may be raised at any time. 8 GCA \'a7 65.15(b).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz asserts that the amendment to the indictment removed an essential element of the crime; he does not allege that the court lacked jurisdiction. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [24]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab We review objections raised for the first time on appeal for plain error.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Chung}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2004 Guam 2 \'b6 9.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In order to reverse for plain error, the defendan t must demonstrate (1) there was error; (2) the error was clear or obvious under current law; (3) the error affected the defendant\rquote s substantial rights.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Furthermore, our discretion will be employed only }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 when necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Demapan}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2004 Guam 24 \'b6 5.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [25]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab The charge of Official Misconduct in the original indictment asserted that }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz did . . . commit an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official function}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 by charging an item on his GMTA credit card }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 with knowledge that such use of the credit card was unauthorized, in violation of 9 GCA \'a7 49.90(a).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s ER, pp. 24-34 (Indictment).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Amended Indictment, however, phrased the Official Misconduct charges differently, and alleged that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz did . . . }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 knowingly }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 commit an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official function}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 by charging an item on his GMTA credit card }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 in violation of 9 GCA \'a7 49.90(a).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s ER, pp. 45-52 (Amended Indictment) (emphasis added). \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [26]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz asserts that when the indictment was amended, the People remove d an essential element from the Official Misconduct charges, by not including the phrase }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 with knowledge that such use of the credit card was unauthorized.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s ER, pp. 45-52 (Amended Indictment).}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Amended Indictment did not include this phrase, but instead charged that Diaz did }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 knowingly commit an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his function.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s ER, pp. 45-52 (Amended Indictment). \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 a.\tab Error}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [27]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab The indictment, as originally drafted, clearly charged Diaz with knowing that the use of his GMTA card was unauthorized.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Amended Indictment did not.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We find that there was error in failing to track the language of the statute, which sets forth the el ement of knowledge. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [28]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab However, we do not find the error was plain.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Indictments will be broadly construed in favor of the government following a verdict.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Laverick}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 348 F.2d 708, 714 (3d Cir. 1965).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Furthermore, }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [t]the indictment shou ld be read in its entirety, construed according to common sense.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Givens}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 767 F.2d 574, 584 (9th Cir. 1985).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 When sufficiency of an indictment is challenged after trial, it is only required that \lquote the necessary facts appear in }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 any form }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 or }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 by fair construction }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 can be found within the terms of the indictment.\rquote }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. James}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 980 F.2d 1314, 1317 (9th Cir. 1992) (quoting }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Kaneshiro v. United States}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 445 F.2d 1266, 1269 (9th Cir. 1971)). \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [29]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab The Amended Indictment charged that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz did . . . }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 knowingly }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 commit an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his function}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 by purchasing various items, including airline tickets, hotel accommodations, and items from retail clothing stores, }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 by charging . . . to [the GMTA] credit card . . . issued in his name as Assistant General Manager of the [GMTA], in violation of 9 GCA \'a7 49.90(a).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s ER, pp. 45-52 (Amended Indictment).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 All of the counts contained in the Official Misconduct alleged violations of 9 GCA \'a7 49.90 (a).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Examining the statute, there is only one knowledge requirement:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 knowing that such act is unauthorized.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 9 GCA \'a7 49.90(a).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Amended Indictment includes the element of knowledge, but alleges that Diaz }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 did . . . knowingly commit . . . an unauthorized exercise of his official function.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s ER, pp. 45-52 (Amended Indictment).}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The original indictment, in contrast, alleged that Diaz had used the credit card }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 with knowledge that such use . . . was to personally benefit himself and others.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s ER at 1-34 (Indictment).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The amendment moved the element of knowledge to the beginning of the allegation; it did not eliminate the element completely.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The element of knowledge has been defined as follows:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 A person acts knowingly, or with knowledge, with respect to his conduct or to }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 attendant circumstances}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 when he is aware of the nature of his conduct or that those circumstances exist.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 9 GCA \'a7 4.30(b) (2005) (emphasis added).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has held an indictment that charged a defendant with }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 knowingly selling stolen bonds}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 sufficiently informed him that he was charged with knowledge that the bonds were stolen.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Clemmons}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 892 F.2d 1153, 1158-59 (3rd Cir. 1989).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Therefore, construing the Am ended Indictment broadly, we find that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 knowingly}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 refers to the act and its attendant circumstances, which in the instant case includes knowing that the act was unauthorized.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 A common sense reading of the Amended Indictment would necessarily include the element that Diaz knew that such acts were unauthorized.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Accordingly, we find that this error was not clear or obvious under current law. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 b.\tab Affecting substantial rights or avoiding miscarriage of justice \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [30]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Because we find that the error was not cl ear or obvious, we need not address whether the error affected Diaz's substantial rights, or whether correction is necessary to avoid a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial system. Furthermore, Diaz does not allege that he w as prejudiced in any way. The reference to the statute also adequately informed Diaz of the necessary information to prepare his defense. }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 See James}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 980 F.2d at 1317-18. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [31]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab This court addressed the same issue in }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Jones}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2006 Guam 13, where the ap pellant challenged the indictment against him, arguing that it failed to charge, as an essential element of Money Laundering, that he knew the proceeds were derived from a violation of the Guam Uniform Controlled Substances Act. }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'b6 13.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We rejected Jones\rquote argument, and held that an objective reader could understand that the Money Laundering charge included the allegation that Jones knew the proceeds were from a violation of the Act.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'b6 18.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We further held that, reading the indictment in its entirety with all other charges, the indictment implied that Jones knew the proceeds were derived from a violation of the controlled substances act. }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'b6 19. We acknowledged that despite poor draftsmanship of the indictment, there was no plain error because Jones had been adequately informed of the nature of the offense charged and he did not claim that he had been prejudiced. }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'b6\'b6 20-21. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [32]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Similarly here, a common sense reading of the entire Amended Indictment reveals that the language contained in the Amended Indictment does not rise to the level of plain error.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz did not allege that he had been prejudiced, and the Official Misconduct charges contained a specific reference to this statutory provision, giving fair notice to Diaz of the nature of the crime charged.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'b6 20.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \fi-720\li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 B.\tab Sufficiency of the Evidence}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [33]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz argues that there was insufficient evidence to support either of his convictions.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we must decide whether, from the evidence presented at trial, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of each charge of conviction proven beyond a reasonable doubt.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Maysho}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 4 \'b6 14. \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 1.\tab \tab Theft Charges \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [34]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz advances that there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions on the charges of Theft.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The jury found him guilty of Count 2 of Theft of Property (As a 2nd Degree Felony) and Count 16 of Theft of Property (As a Misdemeanor).}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s ER, p. 54 (Judgment).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz argues that the People failed to provide evidence that he obtained U.S. currency belonging to GMTA with the intent to deprive GMTA on the date alleged in the Amended Indictment.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 He focuses on the evidence which demonstrates when GMTA made payments on the account, asserting that there was no deprivation until GMTA paid for the personal charges he had made.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We review the evidence to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Maysho}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 4 \'b6 14. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [35]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab The jury convicted Diaz on two charges of Theft of Property, alleging that he }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 did unlawfully take, obtain, and exercise unlawful control}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 over a particular amount of U.S. currency belonging to GMTA with the intent of depriving GMTA.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s ER, pp. 2, 7 (Indictment).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions because GMTA failed to provide evidence that they paid for these particular charges on or around the date on which he used the credit card.}{ \cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 { \fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 In his opening brief, Diaz states that the payments made towards the balance on the credit card account were made for some of the charges on the statement but not all. He points to certain payments being counted towards certain charges. It is unclear from the record provided how he arrives at this calculation. It is entirely possible that GMTA only made payments in the amo unt of charges that had already been approved by GMTA. However, neither that process nor any evidence indicating credit towards only certain charges was presented or included in the appeal.}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Although Diaz frames his argument as a sufficiency issue, the argument is more correctly analyzed as a variance problem.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [36]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Assuming Diaz is correct that the theft occurred at the time GMTA paid for the personal charges he made on the GMTA credit card, we address whether the evidence presented at trial resulted in an impermissible variance.}{ \cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid351187 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 If the time of the theft actually occurred when Diaz used the card in an unauthorized manner, then the indictment was completely sufficient and there was absolutely no variance involved. For purposes of this opinion, we assum e, without deciding, the theft occurred at the time GMTA paid the bill. }}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 A variance has been defined }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 in criminal procedure, [as] a difference between the allegations in a charging instrument and the proof actually introduced at trial.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Black\rquote s Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004). \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [37]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 A claim of fatal variance is treated as an attack on the sufficiency of the evidence.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Hewlett}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 453 F.3d 876, 879 (7th Cir. 2006); }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 see also United States v. Jenkins, }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 779 F.2d 606, 616 (11th Cir. 1986); }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Antonakeas}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 255 F.3d 714, 721 (9th Cir. 2001).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The inquiry when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence is }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 whether the evidence in the record could reasonably support a finding of guilt[] beyond a reasonable doubt.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Maysho}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 4 \'b6 8 (quoting }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Guerrero}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2003 Guam 18 \'b6 13). \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [38]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz raises the variance argument for the first time on appeal; at no time during the duration of the trial did Diaz object to a variance in the evidence presented by the People.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Usually }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [t]he object ion of variance not taken at the trial cannot avail the defendant as an error in the higher court, if it could have been obviated in the court below.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Phoenix Sec. Co. v. Dittmar}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 224 F. 892, 896 (9th Cir. 1915) (quoting }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Roberts v. Graham}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 6 Wall. 578).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Nevertheless, 8 GCA \'a7 130.50 (2005) provides: \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'a7 130.50. }{\b\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 De Minimis}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Rule: }{ \b\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Plain Error}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Rule. \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 (a) Any error, defect, irregularity or }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 variance}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded. \par (b) Plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the court. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 (Emphasis added.)}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [W]hile generally this court will not address issues raised for the first time on appeal, it may exerc ise its discretion to do so . . . when review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. . . .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Sinlao v. Sinlao}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 24 \'b6 30 (quotation marks omitted).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Therefore, because Diaz failed to object at trial, we review for plain error.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Barragan}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 263 F.3d 919, 925 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b) which is substantially similar to 8 GCA \'a7 130.50(b));}{\cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\keep\keepn\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4873133 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{ \fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that \'93[a] plain error that affects substantial rights may be considered even though it was not brought to the court\rquote s attention.\'94 As this rule is similar to 8 GCA \'a7 130.50(b), cases interpreting Rule 52(b) are persuasive authority in the interpretation of section 55.20. }{\i\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 See Amerault}{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 , 2004 Guam 23 \'b6 16.}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Dennis}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 237 F.3d 1295, 1300 (11th Cir. 2001).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Under the plain error standard, one must prove that there was error, that the error was clear or obvious under current law, and that the error affected the substantial rights of the defendant.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Chung}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2004 Guam 2 \'b6 9.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Furthermore, plain error }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 will be found only where necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Perez}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 1999 Guam 2 \'b6 21.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [39]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Where the variance is not \lquote material\rquote and does not affect the substantial rights\rquote of the accused, the Court held there is no violation of the Fifth Amendment.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Cina}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 699 F.2d 853, 857 (7th Cir. 1983) (quoting }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Berger v. United States}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 295 U.S. 78, 82 (1935).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Supreme Court has articulated the standard: \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The true inquiry, therefore, is not whether there has been a variance in proof, but whether there has been such a variance as to \lquote affect the substantial rights\rquote of the accused. The general rule that allegations and proof must correspond is based upon the obvious requirements (1) that the accused shall be definitely informed as to the charges against him, so that he may be enabled to present his defense and not b e taken by surprise by the evidence offered at the trial; and (2) that he may be protected against another prosecution for the same offense. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Berger v. United States}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 295 U.S. 78, 82 (1935) (quoting 28 U.S.C. \'a7 391). \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [40]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab We have held that where time is not an element of a crime, }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [p]roof of any date before the return of the indictment and within the statute of limitations is sufficient.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Atoigue}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , DCA No. CR91-95A, 1992 WL 245628, at *7 (D. Guam App. Div., Sept. 11, 1992) (quoting }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Bowman}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 783 F.2d 1192, 1197 (5th Cir. 1986)); }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Campbell}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2006 Guam 14 \'b6 17.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The date of a theft has been held not to be an essential element of the crime.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Stewart v. United States}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 395 F.2d 484, 488 (8th Cir. 1968); }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 State v. Hersch}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 445 N.W.2d 626, 634 (N.D. 1989); }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 see also People v. Sanchez}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 95 P.2d 169, 173 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1939).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Amended Indictment clearly outlines the dates on which Diaz used the GMTA credit card for personal purchases, during a period of time from July 24, 2000 to October 4, 2000.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 GMTA paid the remaining balance on the credit card at issue by early February 2001.}{\cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid351187 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{ \fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 It appears that GMTA attempted to pay off the re mainder of the balance of the GMTA cards issued by Bank of Guam on January 25, 2001. However, the accounts were not completely paid off until February 7, 2001, when GMTA made a payment of $5.00 to the bank for the remaining charges on the account. Tr. pp . 141-46 (Jury Trial, Feb. 2, 2005). }}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Therefore, even assuming that the theft did not occur until GMTA paid off the card, the theft occurred no later than February 2001.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz was originally indicted on February 5, 2003.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Clearly, even using the date of the offense proffered by Diaz, the crime occurred before the date of the indictment.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Furthermore, the proof provided at trial also fell within the period of the statute of limitations.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Title 8 GCA \'a7 10.20 provides that prosecutions for theft as a felony must be commenced within three years following the commission of a crime.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Section 10.30 gives the prosecution one year to institute proceedings for a non-felony.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 However, section 10.40 outlines an exception for public officers, which allows the prosecutors to begin criminal proceedings against a public officer }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 at any time while such public officer or employee continues in public office or employment or within three (3) years thereafter.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 8 GCA \'a7 10.40 (2005).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz\rquote s use of the credit card for personal charges began in July of 2000, with payments were made over time and the final payment made on February 7, 2001; thus, all events occurred before the grand jury indicted Diaz and within the three-year statute of limitations.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 This entire period falls within the acceptable range as outlined in }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Atoigue}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , which found variances acceptable where the proof produced at trial occurred both before the issuance of the indictment and within the period of statute of limitations. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [41]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Furthermore, Diaz does not assert he was prejudiced in any way by the variance between the indictment and the proof presented at trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We also fail to see how the variance affected his substantial rights.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 When time is not an essential element, }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 the variance between proof is irrelevant so long as the defendants were afforded adequate notice of the charges against them.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Laykin}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 886 F.2d 1534, 1543 (9th Cir. 1989).}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Amended Indictment in the instant case clearly provided Diaz with adequate notice.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Each charge contained the date, the amount of the personal charge, and the location at which the GMTA card was used.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In fact, the allegations contained in the Amended Indictment provided Diaz more notice, as compared to the notice provided through the indictment which alleged the date of the theft as the day on which GMTA paid the charges.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 There is no evidence that Diaz was surprised by the evidence at trial or inadequately protected against being placed in jeopardy again for the same offense.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [42]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Accordingly, Diaz\rquote s argument with regard to the sufficiency of the evidence on the theft charges is without merit.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Assumi ng that no theft occurred until the credit card was paid by GMTA, the result is a permissible variance.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 There was no error.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 For the foregoing reasons, we affirm convictions on the Theft of Property charges. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 2.\tab \tab Official Misconduct Charges}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [43]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz asserts that, as a matter of law, he is not guilty of Official Misconduct due to the Government\rquote s alleged failure to prove that he knew that the use of the credit card was unauthorized.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 This argument is actually two-fold.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [44]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab First, Diaz argues that the te stimony of Rodney Priest, a former member of the board of GMTA, consisted of inadmissible hearsay.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s Brief, p. 12 (Oct. 26, 2005).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz objected at the time that Priest\rquote s testimony was offered during the trial.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 After considering the objection, the court allowed Priest to testify regarding the content of the board meetings.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The admission of Priest\rquote s testimony, as it was an evidentiary ruling, will be reviewed for an abuse of discretion.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Hall}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2004 Guam 12 \'b6 34. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [45]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz next raises a sufficiency of the evidence issue.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Without the alleged inadmissible testimony, he argues that the People did not provide any evidence to establish that his use of the credit card was unauthorized.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 As discussed above, }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [t]here is sufficient evidence to support a conviction if viewing the evidence \lquote in the light most favorable to the prosecution . . . any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.\rquote } {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Maysho}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 4 \'b6 8 (quoting }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Guerrero}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2003 Guam 18 \'b6 13).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We address the sufficiency argument first.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 a.\tab Sufficiency of the evidence \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [46]\tab }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz argues that testimony of Priest was inadmissible, and that without his testimony, there was insufficient evidence that the use of the credit card was unauthorized and that Diaz knew that the use was unauthorized.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz, however, overlooks evidence which could tend to prove both of these elements. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [47]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab At trial, testimony was presented regarding both the fact that the personal charges were not a uthorized and the fact that Diaz knew that personal charges were unauthorized.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 First, there is the testimony of Myra Abaya, former personnel officer at GMTA.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 She testified about the procedure one would go through in order to have a trip authorized and paid for by GMTA.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In addition, Abaya provided testimony with regard to the procedure for acquiring both a travel authorization and a per diem allowance while on an authorized trip.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The People also presented the testimony of Emiline Pereira, former GMTA Boa rd secretary, who testified that the scope of the authorization for use of the credit card was limited to charges made }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 on behalf of the authority.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Transcript (}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Tr.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ), pp. 67-68 (Jury Trial, Feb.2, 2005).}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Jane Flores, former GMTA Accountant, also testifi ed that there was a procedure for justifying additional charges made, those which exceeded the per diem allowance; one may be reimbursed by the Government of Guam should the additional charges be justified.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Furthermore, the People presented evidence that Diaz signed a paper certifying these personal charges made on the GMTA credit card.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Flores testified that although her normal duties included writing che cks to make payments on the Bank of Guam credit accounts, the checks which were issued by the agency to the bank to pay for the personal charges made on the card were not signed by her and were instead signed by someone else. She testified that she stoppe d issuing checks for payment of the credit card to the Bank of Guam in November of 2000 because she }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 was very uncomfortable . . . to cut a check for charges that [she] knew were not relevant to government activity.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Tr., pp. 136-38 (Jury Trial, Feb.2, 2005).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The People presented evidence which showed that Diaz and GMTA Director Martinez signed the final three checks written to the Bank of Guam for the remaining balance on the credit card.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In addition, there is evidence that Diaz never made a single payment on any of the personal charges for about a year.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Finally, there is ample evidence in the record that Diaz may have been motivated to make payments on the personal charges by an impending public scandal. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [48]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab When viewed in a light most favorable to the government, the evidence is more than sufficient.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 It is clear that a rational trier of fact could find beyond a reasonable doubt that the charges were unauthorized and that Diaz knew so at the time he made them.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4873133\charrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 b. \tab Admissibility of testimony \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [49]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz argues that the testimony offered by Priest was inadmissible hearsay.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 However, as we find that there was sufficient evidence that Diaz knew the charges were unauthorized, even in the absence of Priest\rquote s testimony, we need not address the hearsay issue. \par }\pard \ql \fi-720\li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 C.\tab Punishment \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [50]\tab }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz raises a number of issues with regard to the punishment he received.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz asserts that the Official Misconduct charges were more accurately a continuing course of conduct rather than twenty-three separate violations.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 He also contends that the Theft of Property charges merge into the Official Misconduct.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Finally, he argues that the sentence imposed on him by the trial judge punished him for exercising his right to proceed to trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We address each issue separately. \par }\pard \ql \fi-1440\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 1.\tab \tab Single count or continuing course of conduct \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [51]\tab }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Whether or not the twenty-three counts of Official Misconduct should have been charged as a single count, rather than separately is raised for the first time on appeal.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 As stated above, only certain objections to an indictment may be made for the first time on appeal.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Those are the limited exceptions, such as when there is an objection to jurisdiction or an assertion that the indictment failed to allege a crime.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 8 GCA \'a7 65.15(b).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Failure to comply with the timeliness requirements set forth in section 65.15 generally results in a waiver of those objections, unless the defendant can show good cause.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 8 GCA \'a7 65.45 (2005); }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. White}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 20 \'b6 14.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz has not made a showing of good cause in the instant case.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 This court has held }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 that failure to raise objections to defects in the indictment or institution of the prosecution in a timely fashion, without good cause, precludes appellate review.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 White}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 20 \'b6 16. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [52]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab There is a separate statutory provision which allows this court to review a conviction on multiple counts.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Title 9 GCA \'a7 1.22 (e) (2005) states: \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'a7 1.22.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Prosecution for Conduct Which Constitutes More Than One Offense.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 When the same conduct of a defendant may establish the commission of more than one offense, the defendant may be prosecuted for each such offense.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 He may not, however, be convicted of more than one offense if: \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 . . . \par (e) the offense is defined as a continuing course of conduct and the defendant\rquote s course of conduct was uninterrupted, unless the law provides that specific periods of such conduct constitute separate offenses. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Section 1.22 is modeled and based upon the Model Penal Code \'a7 1.07 (1).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 9 GCA \'a7 1.22 cmt.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Compiler\rquote s Comment to this section goes o n to state that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 this [s]ection cannot be used as a basis to strike counts of indictments or information before trial and conviction.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 When analyzing whether 9 GCA \'a7 1.22(e) applies, this court must look to the statute.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 San Nicolas}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2001 Guam 4 \'b6 24.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Issues of statutory interpretation are reviewed }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 de novo}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Gutierrez}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 19 \'b6 13.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [53]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab All of the counts contained in the charge of Official Misconduct are alleged violations of 9 GCA \'a7 49.90 (a). }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The test is whether the statute prohibits individual acts, or instead, prohibits the course of action which they constitute.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 San Nicolas}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2001 Guam 4 \'b6 24.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 If the statute prohibits continuous conduct, only one offense is committed even though the course of conduct persists over a long peri od of time.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Johnson}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 612 F.2d 843, 845 (4th Cir. 1979).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Johnson}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , court also cited several examples of both continuous conduct crimes, such as violations of Fair Labor Standards Act and illegal cohabitation, and single act crimes, such as drug sales and multiple mailings in violation of the Mail Fraud Act.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 When examining the statute, the legislative intent appears to attempt to punish a public servant whenever he or she commits }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 an act}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 which is unauthorized and which he or she knows is unauthorized.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz argues that the real issue at hand is the use of the credit card, and not each individual act.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We disagree.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 As the People point out, the unauthorized acts occurred over a period of months and the acts were committed before, during, and after Diaz\rquote s trip to California.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [54]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab After analyzing the language of the statute, the clear intent of the statute is to punish a public servant for each individual act of Official Misconduct. \par }\pard \ql \fi-1440\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 2.\tab Merger \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [55]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Whether one offense merges with another is a question of statutory interpretation.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cedar}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 437 F.2d at 1036.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Issues of statutory interpretation are reviewed }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 de novo}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Gutierrez}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2005 Guam 19 \'b6 13.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz argues that the offense of Theft of Property should merge into the offense of Official Misconduct.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In support of his argument, he cites to 9 GCA \'a7 1.22 (d) (2005), which states: \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \'a7 1.22.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Prosecution for Conduct Which Constitutes More Than One Offense.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 When the same conduct of a defendant may establish the commission of more than one offense, the defendant may be prosecuted for each such offense.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 He may not, however, be convicted of more than one offense if: \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 . . . \par (d) the offenses differ only in that one is defined to prohibit a designated kind of conduct generally and the other to prohibit a specific instance of such conduct. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Section 1.22(d) seems completely inapplicable here, despite Diaz\rquote s assertion.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Theft of Property statute undisputably }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 prohibit[s] a specific instance }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 of conduct.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz argues that merger is proper because section 1.22(d) may be interpreted to mean that the Official Misconduct statute is }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 defined to prohibit}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Theft of Property offenses in general.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Official Misconduct statute and the Theft of Property statute, however, do not have any relationship that appears obvious on their face.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Either offense may be committed independently of the other.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Moreover, these statutes do not fit into the general/specific category which Diaz suggests. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [56]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Diaz cites one case in support of his position that the Theft of Property charges should merge into the Official Misconduct charges, relying on }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 State v. Malone}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 635 A.2d 596 (N.J. Super. A.D. 1993).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Malone}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 deals mainly with a well-recognized example of when merger of offenses is proper, and that an inchoate crime should merge with the substantive crime if one is convicted of both.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz cites no other authority for his argument that the two offenses should merge. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [57]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab On the other hand, the Ninth Circuit has held that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 offenses merge only when proof of the elements of one necessarily establishes all of the elements}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 of the other offense.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cedar}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 437 F.2d at 1036; }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 see also State v. Freeman}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 774 P.2d 888 (Haw. 1989) (holding that charges of theft did not merge with charges of fraudulent use of a credit card).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cedar}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , the defendant was convicted of }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 steal[ing], purloin[ing] and knowingly convert[ing] to his own use}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 government property, as well as the separate crime of cutting and destroying trees on government property.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cedar}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 437 F.2d at 134.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 T he Ninth Circuit found that there was no merger because }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 the elements of the two offenses differ markedly, each requiring proof that the other does not.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cedar}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 437 F.2d at 1036.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Merger does not result simply because the same evidence is offered to prove both offenses.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Id.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 at 1036 n.3 (citing }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Harris v. United States}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 359 U.S. 19, 23 (1959). \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [58]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab The elements of the Theft of Property charge are completely different from the elements of the Official Misconduct charge.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Under 9 GCA \'a7 43.30(a) (2005), }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [a] person is guilty of }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 theft}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 if he unlawfully takes or obtains or exercises unlawful control over, movable property of another with intent to deprive him thereof.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 (Emphasis added.)}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Title 9 GCA \'a7 49.90(a) provides in relevant part that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [a] public servant commits a misdemeanor if, with intent to benefit himself or another person . . . he commits an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that such act is unauthorized.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 As the Ninth Circuit recognized in }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cedar}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ,}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 certain factors that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "} {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 point to a construction of the two statutes as creating separately punishable offenses,}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 such as the lack of }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 language, history, or purpose to suggest that they were merely variant formulations of the same wrong designed to afford prosecutors alternative approaches or to reach different classes of offenders.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cedar}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 437 F.2d at 1036.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Official Misconduct and Theft of Property offenses do not even contain a single common element.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz has not shown that these crimes are different formulations to reach similar conduct.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We hold, therefore, that the charge of Theft of Property does not merge into the charge of Official Misconduct. \par }\pard \ql \fi-1440\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 3.\tab Sentence \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [59]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab We review the trial court\rquote s imposition of a sentence for abuse of discretion.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Chiguina}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2003 Guam 11 \'b6 12.}{ \cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 { \fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Diaz failed to object to his sentence during the sentencing hearing. This court has not yet addressed whether or not a failure to object to a sentence changes the standard of review on appeal. We find it unnec essary to decide this issue because the judge\rquote s imposition of the instant sentence does not even amount to an abuse of discretion, the most deferential standard of review. \par }}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz contends that the trial court punished him for exercising his constitutional right to a trial.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In support of his claim, Diaz directs this court\rquote s attention to three Superior Court cases in which the defendants received significantly shorter sentences:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Martinez}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , Criminal Case No. CF0107-03, }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Robles}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , Criminal Case No. CF0355-03, and }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 People v. Millard}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , Criminal Case No. CF431-03.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The three defendants in the aforementioned cases were sentenced by the same Superior Court judge who sentenced Diaz, and Diaz argues that he and the defendants were similarly situated, with the fundamental difference being that while three defendants pleaded guilty, Diaz exercised his right to trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz requests this court take judicial notice of the three pertinent cases.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Appellant\rquote s Brief, p. 22 n.7.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Although he requests taking jud icial notice of the cases in general, we recognize that Diaz focuses upon the sentences imposed on each of the defendants in these other cases.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [60]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Rule 201 of the Guam Rules of Evidence}{\cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid351187 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{ \fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Rule 201, based on Federal Rules of Evidence 201, reads in relevant part: \par }\pard\plain \qj \li720\ri720\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid3154913 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 RULE 201.\tab }{ \ul\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS.}{\b\ul\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid351187 {\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 (a)\tab }{\b\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Scope of Rule. }{\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 This Rule governs only judicial notice of adjudicative facts. \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid3154913 {\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 (b)\tab }{\b\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Kinds of Facts. }{ \insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid351187 {\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 (c)\tab }{\b\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 When Discretionary. }{ \insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 A court may take judicial notice, whether requested or not. \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid3154913 {\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 (d)\tab }{\b\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 When Mandatory}{\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 . A court shall take judicial notice if requested by a party and supplied with the necessary information. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid351187 {\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Guam R. Evid. 201.}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 governs the admission of evidence through judicial notice of adjudicative facts.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Rule 201 delineates two categories of facts which may be properly admitted through judicial notice and outlines when judicial notice is discretionary and when it is mandatory. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [61]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab We must first determine whether or not the kinds of facts Diaz would like this court to take judicial notice of are appropriate under Rule 201.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The length of the sentences imposed and the circumstances surrounding each of the crimes involved are not facts which could be considered }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 generally known within the territorial jurisdiction.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Guam R. of Evid. 201(b)(1).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The sentences imposed in those cases, however, may be found by looking at the court records and thus, are facts that are }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Rule 201(b)(2).}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 This court has held that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [i]t is proper to take judicial notice of court files but that a court may only take judicial }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 notice of }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 the truth of facts}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 in certain documents, including past court orders, findings of fact and conclusions of law, and judgments.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In re N.A.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2001 Guam 7 \'b6 58.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Accordingly, the sentences imposed upon each of the defendants, which are contained within the Superior Court case files referred to by Diaz, are facts which this court may notice as to their truth and existence.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [62]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab We now must decide whether it is mandatory or discretionary to take judicial notice of the sentences imposed in the other cases.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Subsect ions (c) and (d) of Rule 201 of the Guam Rules of Evidence outline the circumstances where judicial notice is mandatory or within the discretion of the court.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Subsection (d) mandates that a court }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 shall}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 take judicial notice if requested by a party and supplied with the necessary information.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Guam R. of Evid. 201(d) (emphasis added).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Rule 201 does not define }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 necessary information.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The vast majority of courts have held that the necessary information provision in Rule 201(d) commands that the court be provided with copies of the source of the facts in order for the court to be required to take judicial notice.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Bhalli v. Methodist Hosp.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 896 S.W.2d 207, 210 (Tex. App. 1995); }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Salinero v. Pon}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 177 Cal. Rptr. 204, 210-11 (App. 1981); }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Surgitek, Inc. v. Adams}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 955 S.W.2d 884, 889 n.4 (Tex. App. 1997).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In interpreting its equivalent to Rule 201 (which is identical to Guam\rquote s rule), the Wyoming Supreme Court set forth the following test for an appellate court: \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [W]e now establish two requirements for judicial not ice of prior court proceedings in order to insure a proper record for appellate review. First, written notice must be given to the trial court so that it is clear what matters the trial court had the opportunity to consider; and second, judicially noticed documents must be physically included as part of the record filed on appeal, or must be on file at the Supreme Court as the result of a different proceeding. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cockreham v. Wyo. Prod. Credit Ass\rquote n}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 743 P.2d 869, 872-73 (Wyo. 1987).}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [63]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Although Diaz provi ded this court with the names of the defendants and the Superior Court case numbers for the relevant cases, he failed to supply any court documents.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 He did not attach copies, certified or otherwise, of the judgments in those cases.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Furthermore, Diaz neglected to direct this court\rquote s attention to any particular facts within the file.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz failed to provide this court with the necessary information required by Rule 201(d); therefore, taking judicial notice of the sentences imposed in the other cases is not mandatory.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [64]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Pursuant to Rule 201(c), however, this court may still exercise its discretion to take judicial notice of the lengths of the sentence imposed.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz argues that he received a longer sentence because he exercised his right to trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The Supreme Court of Connecticut has held that inquiries such as these should be based on the totality of the circumstances and that the burden of proof lies with the defendant.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 State v. Kelly}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 770 A.2d 908, 947 (Conn. 2001); }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 see also State v. Candito}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 493 A.2d 250 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Although the rule articulated above concerns the proof of claim rather than the court\rquote s discretion to take judicial notice, it informs our decision nonetheless.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz failed to provide this court with information which would d emonstrate that the individual defendants in the relevant Superior Court cases are indeed similarly situated; Diaz did not indicate the statutory provisions to which the defendants pled guilty or under which the defendants were convicted.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Furthermore, as previously noted, Diaz\rquote s request that this court take judicial notice of the files fails to direct this court\rquote s attention to the particular documents contained in the Superior Court case files. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [65]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Rule 201 does not expressly prohibit taking judicial notice of another court\rquote s records, yet neither does the rule expressly allow it.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cf.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cal. Evid. Code \'a7 452(d) (West, Westlaw through chap. 1 of 2007 Reg. Sess. urgency legislation) (}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Judicial notice may be taken of . . . [r]ecords of (1) any court of this state or (2) any court of record of the United States or of any state of the United States.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [66]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab We have never articulated the standard for determining when we may take judicial notice of matters that were not presented to the trial court.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Courts generally have been reluctant to take judicial notice of proceedings in other cases and in other courts.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 An appellate court cannot take judicial notice of records in other courts.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Manley v. Brown}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 989 P.2d 448, 458 n.45 (Okla. 1999); }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 see also}{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 M/V Am. Queen v. San Diego Marine Constr. Corp.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 708 F.2d 1483, 1491 (9th Cir. 1983) (}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 As a general rule, a court may not take judicial notice of proceedings or records in another cause so as to supply, without formal introduction of evidence, facts essential to support a contention in a cause then before it.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In fact, }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In re N.A.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 2001 Guam 7 \'b6 58-59, we stated that it may be inappropriate to take judicial notice of entire case files, proposing instead that a court may only take judicial notice of the truth of facts contained in certain documents.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Our holding in }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In re N.A.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , however, does not appear to warrant such a narrow interpretation that limits judicial notice to only the trial court record of the proceeding before the court.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Cf.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Occidental Permian Ltd. v. Railroad Comm\rquote n of Texas}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 47 S.W.3d 801, 811 (Tex. Ct. App. 2001) (stating that a prior case interpreting Rule 201 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 does not compel a court to take judicial notice of an agency order in a case other than the one then on appeal before the court.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 There is no clear consensus on this issue, and other courts have declined to apply such a narrow interpretation.}{\cs50\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \s54\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\super\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 \chftn }{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 These courts choose to examine the circumstances of the case to determine whether to exercise its discretion to take judicial notice. \'93 Although courts do not ordinarily notice judicially the record and facts in one action in deciding another and different one, they can and should do so when justice requires. And there may be cases so closely interwoven, or so clearly interde pendent as to invoke a rule of judicial notice in one suit of the proceedings in another suit.\'94 }{\i\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 C.A.W. v. Weston}{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 , 58 S.W.3d 909, 914 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001) (citations and quotation marks omitted); }{\i\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Sapp v. Wong}{\fs24\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 , 654 P.2d 883, 886 n.3 (Haw. App. 1982) (\'93Court s have generally recognized that they may, in appropriate circumstances, take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without their judicial system if those proceedings have a direct relation to the matter at issue.\'94). \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Other courts have broadly interpreted taking judicial notice of other proceedings. The Connecticut Supreme Court has liberally interpreted its rule, stating: \'93 There is no question concerning the trial court's power to take judicial notice of a file in a p roper case in the same court, whether or not between the same parties. We also may take judicial notice of files of the Superior Court in the same or other cases.\'94 }{\i\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 State v. Lenihan}{ \insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 , 200 A.2d 476, 478 (Conn. 1964) (citations omitted). Other courts have allowed taking judicial notice. }{\i\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 Kirshner v. Shinaberry}{\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 , 582 N.E.2d 22, 24 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989) (stating that \'93a court may take judicial notice of a court's finding in another case\'94); }{\i\insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 May Dep\rquote t Stores Co. v. Teamsters Union Local No. 743}{ \insrsid13178917\charrsid3154913 , 355 N.E.2d 7, 9 (Ill. 1976) (stating that where the party had appended letters of determination from the National Labor Relations Board to its appellate brief, then \'93 the contents of these letters [are] matters which may be judicially noticed. In an instance such as this no sound reason exists to deny judicial notice of public documents which are included in the records of other courts and administrative tribunals.\'94 ). }}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Based on the record before this court, we decline to exercise our discretion to review the case files in their entirety.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [67]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Moreover, even if this court chose to exercise its discretion to take judicial notice of the sentences in the other cases or of the disparity in the sentences based on particular documents contained in the Superior Court case files, t he outcome in the instant case would not be affected.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 There is no constitutional requirement that identical punishment be meted out for like crimes.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Jackson v. United States}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 338 F. Supp. 7, 15-16 (D.C.N.J. 1971) (citing }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Williams v. Okla., }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 358 U.S. 576 (1959)).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Mere disparity in sentences is insufficient to show that the sentencing court penalized [defendants] for going to trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Frost}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 914 F.2d 756, 774 (6th Cir. 1990).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Assuming that the case files cited by Diaz would demonstrate disparity, that alone is not enough.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Disparate sentences between those of equal culpability, for instance when one defendant plea bargains for a lesser punishment while the other goes to trial, are not per se indicative that the harsher sentence is an i mpermissible punishment for exercising the right to trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{\i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 City of Daytona Beach v. Del Percio}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 476 So.2d 197, 205-06 (Fla. 1985).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 It is axiomatic that the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits lies almost entirely within the discretion of the trial judge.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 " }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 United States v. Stull}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 743 F.2d 439, 448 (6th Cir. 1984); }{ \i\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 see also United States v. Endicott}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 , 803 F.2d 506, 510 (9th Cir. 1986) (}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "} {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 It is within the discretion of the trial court to impose disparate sentences upon codefendants.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 "}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 ). \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [68]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab The court was not required to take the other defendants\rquote sentences into consideration when sentencing Diaz.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In addition, the trial court articulated numerous reasons for imposing the sentence against Diaz.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 The transcript of the sentencing hearing is rep lete with information regarding the factors the trial judge considered in sentencing Diaz. The court laid out numerous aggravating factors during the hearing, which included the seriousness of the offenses, the abuse of a position of trust, the vulnerabil ity of the victim, the harm caused, and the court\rquote s perception that Diaz failed to accept responsibility for his actions.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Here, Diaz points to nothing more than the disparity to support his argument that he was punished for asserting his right to go to trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Diaz fails to point to any evidence, nor do we find any, that the trial court was motivated by any other factor than the crimes for which Diaz had been found guilty. \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [69]}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \tab Therefore, we affirm the imposition of the sentence as determined by the trial court.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 V. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12455770 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 [70]\tab }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We hold that the trial court did not err in requiring the prosecution to use or elect the conjunctive in the Official Misconduct charge.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Furthermore, we find that the Official Misconduct charges, as contained in the Amended Indictment, are sufficient.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We hold that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions of Theft of Property.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Even if the trial court committed error by admitting the testimony of witness Rodney Priest, we find that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions for Official Misconduct.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 We find that the crime of Official Misconduct is not a crime of a continuing course of conduct, and hold that Diaz was properly convicted of twenty-three (23) counts.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 In addition, we hold that the charge of Theft of Property does not merge into the charge of Official Misconduct.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Finally, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Diaz.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12455770 }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 Accordingly, we }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 AFFIRM}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7631719\charrsid12455770 . \par }}