{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f1\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial;} {\f2\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070309020205020404}Courier New;}{\f38\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f39\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f41\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;} {\f42\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f43\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f44\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f45\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;} {\f46\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\f48\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CE;}{\f49\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Cyr;}{\f51\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Greek;}{\f52\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Tur;} {\f53\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial (Hebrew);}{\f54\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial (Arabic);}{\f55\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Baltic;}{\f56\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial (Vietnamese);}{\f58\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CE;} {\f59\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Cyr;}{\f61\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Greek;}{\f62\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Tur;}{\f63\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New (Hebrew);} {\f64\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New (Arabic);}{\f65\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Baltic;}{\f66\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;\red255\green255\blue255;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\qj \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext15 Level 1;}{\s16\qj \li-1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin-1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext16 Level 2;}{ \s17\qj \li-1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin-1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext17 Level 3;}{\s18\qj \li-1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin-1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext18 Level 4;}{\s19\qj \li-1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin-1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext19 Level 5;}{\s20\qj \li-1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin-1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext20 Level 6;}{\s21\qj \li-1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin-1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext21 Level 7;}{ \s22\qj \li-1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin-1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext22 Level 8;}{\s23\qj \li-1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin-1440\itap0 \b\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext23 Level 9;}{\*\cs24 \additive \sbasedon10 Hyperlink;}{\s25\qj \fi-720\li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext25 _level1;}{\s26\qj \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext26 _level2;}{\s27\qj \fi-720\li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext27 _level3;}{\s28\qj \fi-720\li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext28 _level4;}{\s29\qj \fi-720\li3600\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin3600\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext29 _level5;}{\s30\qj \fi-720\li4320\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin4320\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext30 _level6;}{\s31\qj \fi-720\li5040\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin5040\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext31 _level7;}{\s32\qj \fi-720\li5760\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin5760\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext32 _level8;}{\s33\qj \fi-720\li6480\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin6480\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext33 _level9;}{ \s34\qj \fi-720\li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext34 _levsl1;}{ \s35\qj \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext35 _levsl2;}{\s36\qj \fi-720\li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext36 _levsl3;}{\s37\qj \fi-720\li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext37 _levsl4;}{\s38\qj \fi-720\li3600\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin3600\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext38 _levsl5;}{\s39\qj \fi-720\li4320\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin4320\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext39 _levsl6;}{\s40\qj \fi-720\li5040\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin5040\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext40 _levsl7;}{\s41\qj \fi-720\li5760\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin5760\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext41 _levsl8;}{\s42\qj \fi-720\li6480\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin6480\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext42 _levsl9;}{ \s43\qj \fi-720\li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext43 _levnl1;}{ \s44\qj \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext44 _levnl2;}{\s45\qj \fi-720\li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext45 _levnl3;}{\s46\qj \fi-720\li2880\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext46 _levnl4;}{\s47\qj \fi-720\li3600\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin3600\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext47 _levnl5;}{\s48\qj \fi-720\li4320\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin4320\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext48 _levnl6;}{\s49\qj \fi-720\li5040\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin5040\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext49 _levnl7;}{\s50\qj \fi-720\li5760\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin5760\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext50 _levnl8;}{\s51\qj \fi-720\li6480\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin6480\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext51 _levnl9;}{ \s52\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext52 Definition T;}{\s53\qj \li360\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx360\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin360\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext53 Definition L;}{\*\cs54 \additive \i Definition;}{ \s55\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs48\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext55 H1;}{\s56\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs36\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext56 H2;}{ \s57\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext57 H3;}{\s58\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext58 H4;}{ \s59\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext59 H5;}{\s60\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext60 H6;}{ \s61\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \i\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext61 Address;}{\s62\qj \li360\ri360\nowidctlpar \tx360\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\faauto\rin360\lin360\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext62 Blockquote;}{\*\cs63 \additive \i CITE;}{\*\cs64 \additive \f2\fs20 CODE;}{\*\cs65 \additive \i \sbasedon10 Emphasis;}{\*\cs66 \additive \ul\cf12 FollowedHype;}{\*\cs67 \additive \b\f2\fs20 Keyboard;}{\s68\qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar \tx0\tx958\tx1917\tx2876\tx3835\tx4794\tx5754\tx6712\tx7671\tx8630\tx9356\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f2\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext68 Preformatted;}{\s69\qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\brdrt\brdrdb\brdrw5\brdrcf1 \faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext69 zBottom of;}{\s70\qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\brdrb\brdrdb\brdrw5\brdrcf1 \faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext70 zTop of For;}{\*\cs71 \additive \f2 Sample;}{\*\cs72 \additive \b \sbasedon10 Strong;}{\*\cs73 \additive \f2\fs20 Typewriter;}{\*\cs74 \additive \i Variable;}{\*\cs75 \additive \v\cf6 HTML Markup;}{\*\cs76 \additive Comment;}{\s77\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext77 \styrsid13910095 header;}{\s78\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext78 \styrsid13910095 footer;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid94300\rsid602593\rsid1650130\rsid2769139\rsid6911754\rsid8275794\rsid9193889\rsid9859677\rsid13910095} {\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6764;}{\info{\title IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM}{\author Supreme Court of Guam}{\operator blake_r}{\creatim\yr2006\mo3\dy31\hr9\min19}{\revtim\yr2006\mo3\dy31\hr9\min19}{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages13}{\nofwords4696} {\nofchars26773}{\*\company }{\nofcharsws31407}{\vern16391}}\margl1440\margr1440\margt2037\margb1080 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\hyphhotz936\notabind\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\subfontbysize\lytprtmet\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3 \jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot13910095 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid6911754 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid6911754 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid6911754 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid6911754 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \sbknone\linex0\headery1440\footery1440\titlepg\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\header \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqr\tx9360\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\i\fs20\insrsid6911754 Arashi & Co. v. Nakashima Enter.}{\fs20\insrsid6911754 , Opinion\tab Page \chpgn of }{\field{\*\fldinst {\fs20\insrsid6911754 NUMPAGES \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid2769139 18}}}{\fs20\insrsid6911754 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 \par }{\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid8275794 {\shp{\*\shpinst\shpleft0\shptop0\shpright0\shpbottom0\shpfhdr0\shpbxmargin\shpbxignore\shpbypara\shpbyignore\shpwr3\shpwrk0\shpfblwtxt0\shpz0\shplid2049 {\sp{\sn shapeType}{\sv 20}}{\sp{\sn fFlipH}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fFlipV}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn lineColor}{\sv 2}}{\sp{\sn lineWidth}{\sv 6096}}{\sp{\sn fLine}{\sv 1}} {\sp{\sn posrelh}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fLayoutInCell}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fLayoutInCell}{\sv 0}}}{\shprslt{\*\do\dobxmargin\dobypara\dodhgt8192\dpline\dpptx0\dppty0\dpptx0\dppty0\dpx0\dpy0\dpxsize0\dpysize0\dplinew9\dplinecor2\dplinecog0\dplinecob0}}} {\shp{\*\shpinst\shpleft0\shptop7\shpright9360\shpbottom7\shpfhdr0\shpbxmargin\shpbxignore\shpbypara\shpbyignore\shpwr3\shpwrk0\shpfblwtxt0\shpz1\shplid2050{\sp{\sn shapeType}{\sv 20}}{\sp{\sn fFlipH}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fFlipV}{\sv 0}} {\sp{\sn lineColor}{\sv 2}}{\sp{\sn lineWidth}{\sv 6096}}{\sp{\sn fLine}{\sv 1}}{\sp{\sn posrelh}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fLayoutInCell}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fLayoutInCell}{\sv 0}}}{\shprslt{\*\do\dobxmargin\dobypara\dodhgt8193\dpline\dpptx0\dppty0\dpptx9360\dppty0 \dpx0\dpy7\dpxsize9360\dpysize0\dplinew9\dplinecor2\dplinecog0\dplinecob0}}}}{\insrsid6911754 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pndec\pnstart1 {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnlcltr\pnstart1 {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pnlcrm\pnstart1 {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pndec\pnstart1 {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pnlcltr\pnstart1 {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6 \pnlcrm\pnstart1 {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pndec\pnstart1 {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1 {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1 }\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 ARASHI & CO., INC. and HIROYUKI IGARASHI}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , \par Plaintiffs-Appellees, \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 vs.}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 NAKASHIMA ENTERPRISES, INC.,}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par Defendant-Appellant.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Supreme Court Case No.:}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 CVA04-004 \par Superior Court Case No.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 CV0334-02}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 OPINION}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Filed:}{\b\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 November 16, 2005}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Cite as:}{\b\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 2005 Guam 21}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appeal from the Superior Court of Guam \par Argued and submitted on March 1, 2005 \par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par }\trowd \irow0\irowband0\lastrow \ts11\trgaph120\trleft0\trkeep\trftsWidth1\trpaddl120\trpaddr120\trpaddfl3\trpaddfr3 \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrnone \clbrdrl\brdrnone \clbrdrb\brdrnone \clbrdrr\brdrnone \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil \cellx4680\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrnone \clbrdrl\brdrnone \clbrdrb\brdrnone \clbrdrr\brdrnone \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil \cellx9360\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\intbl\faauto\rin0\lin0\pararsid9859677 {\ul\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appearing for the Defendant-Appellant}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 : \par A. Alexander Gorman, }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Esq}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 . \par Timothy M.B. Farrell, }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Esq}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 . \par Law Offices of Gorman & Gavras, P.C. \par 2nd Floor, J & R Bldg. \par 208 Rte. 4 \par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam 96910\cell }{\ul\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appearing for the Plaintiffs-Appellees \par }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Thomas C. Moody, }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Esq}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 . \par Klemm, Blair, Sterling & Johnson, P.C. \par 1008 Pacific News Bldg. \par 238 Archbishop Flores St. \par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam 96910 \par \cell }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \trowd \irow0\irowband0\lastrow \ts11\trgaph120\trleft0\trkeep\trftsWidth1\trpaddl120\trpaddr120\trpaddfl3\trpaddfr3 \clvertalt\clbrdrt \brdrnone \clbrdrl\brdrnone \clbrdrb\brdrnone \clbrdrr\brdrnone \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil \cellx4680\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrnone \clbrdrl\brdrnone \clbrdrb\brdrnone \clbrdrr\brdrnone \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil \cellx9360\row }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \par BEFORE:}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 FRANCES M. TYDINGCO-GATEWOOD, Presiding Justice;}{\super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 1{\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 1}{\insrsid6911754 }{\fs20\insrsid6911754 Associate Justice Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood, as the senior member of the panel at the time of the Status and Disqualification Conference, was designated Presiding Justice. John A. Manglona, Associate Justice of the CNMI, sits as Justice }{ \i\fs20\insrsid6911754 Pro Tempore.}}}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Chief Justice; ROBERT J. TORRES, JR., Associate Justice; JOHN A. MANGLONA, Justice }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Pro Tempore}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 .}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 TORRES, J}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 .:}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [1]\tab }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Defendant-Appellant Nakashima Enterprises, Inc. appeals from the trial court\rquote s decision and order, as amended,}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 granting a motion to dismiss Nakashima\rquote s counterclaim and granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Arashi & Co., Inc. and its president, Hiroyuki Igarashi, on a Verified Complaint for Rescission.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The trial court held that because Nakashima did not have a business license at t he time of the execution of the lease or during the period in which it sought recovery of rent, that Nakashima had no right to maintain the counterclaim or defend against Arashi\rquote s and Igarashi\rquote s complaint for rescission.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 We affirm in part and reverse in part.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 I}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 .}{\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [2]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Arashi entered into a Commercial Lease Agreement (the \'93Lease\'94) with Nakashima for stall \'93No. 4\'94 in the food court of a beachside commercial building in Tumon, Guam which was being constructed by Nakashima.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The Lease was for a period of three years and was to commence on August 1, 2001; however, if the construction of the building was not completed by then,}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 the commencement date was to be \'93 one (1) month following the date of the completion of the Commercial Building.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s Excerpts of Record (\'93ER\'94 ), tab 6, Ex. A (Aff. of Peter J. Sablan in Supp. of Mot. for Summ J., Ex. A, Art. 3 \'a7 3.01).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Arashi deposited $10,000.00 to secure the space pursuant to \'a7 5.06 of the Lease}{ \super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 2{\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 2}{\insrsid6911754 }{ \fs20\insrsid6911754 Although the Lease contains two sections, both entitled \'a7 5.06, o ne requiring a security deposit in the amount of $10,000.00 and the other requiring a security deposit in the amount of $3,400.00, it is uncontradicted that Arashi deposited $10,000.00 with Nakashima, rather than $3,400.00. Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 6, Ex. A. (Lease \'b6 5.06).}}}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 and paid the first month\rquote s rent of $1,700.00 plus $150.00 in monthly common area fees.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 A \'93 Guarantee of Lease\'94 made by Arashi in favor of Nakashima was also executed by Igarashi (\'93Igarashi\'94) as President of Arashi, unconditionally guaranteeing the payment of rent and performance of all the obligations under the Lease. }{ \insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [3]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab The building was not ready for occupancy on August 1 because of construction delays, and by December 2001, the building was still not completed.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima claims that he i nformed Arashi in December that Nakashima would deliver possession of the premises in January 2002; nonetheless, in a letter dated December 27, 2001, Arashi made a written demand for rescission of the Lease.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima did not recognize Arashi\rquote s attempted rescission and the certificate of occupancy for the building was finally issued on January 11, 2002.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [4]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab In March 2002, Arashi and Igarashi filed suit against Nakashima for rescission of the Lease, cancellation of the guarantee, and return of the monies paid.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 In response, Nakashima counterclaimed for breach of the Lease alleging Igarashi was personally obligated under the guarantee, and demanding lease payments for the three years that the lease was to have been in effect.}{ \super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 3{\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 3}{\insrsid6911754 }{ \fs20\insrsid6911754 While Nakashima asserted Igarashi personally guaranteed the performance and rental payments, the prayer of relief contained in Nakashima\rquote s counterclaim did not specifically seek judgment against Igarashi pursuant to the guarantee.}}}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Arashi\rquote s}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 reply to the counterclaim raised numerous affirmative}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 defenses}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 but did not include the affirmative defense that Nakashima lacked a business license.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [5]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab On October 7, 2002, Arashi filed a Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment on the grounds \'93that there exist[s] no genuine issue of mat erial fact and [that] Arashi [and Igarashi were] entitled to judgment as a matter of law.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s ER tab 4, p. 2 (Notice of Mot. and Mot. for Summ. J.).}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 While the summary judgment motion referenced a contemporaneously filed affidavit and memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion, these additional documents}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 were not filed until August 2003, and the motion as filed offered no explanation as to why summary judgment was appropriate.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The later filed memorandum made clear, however, that Arashi was moving for summary judgment on the rescission of the Lease and cancellation of the guarantee and dismissal of all of the counterclaims on the grounds that}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 (1) summary dismissal of Nakashima\rquote s counterclaim was required because Nakashima did n ot have a business license at the time it executed the Lease or when it sought remedies in the Superior Court; (2) rescission was appropriate given the five-month delay in delivering}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 possession of the leased premises; and}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 (3) Igarashi did not become personally liable as a result of signing the guarantee on behalf of Arashi.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima opposed the summary judgment motion, asserting that Arashi had waived the business license issue when it failed to plead it as an affirmative defense in its reply and that N akashima had substantially complied with the business license law.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima further argued summary judgment on the rescission claim was not appropriate because the parties contemplated the commencement date could be delayed, the Lease specifically contai ned language to that effect, and whether the delay in the commencement date was unreasonable is a question of fact precluding summary judgment. }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [6]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab After oral argument the trial court, in a}{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 dated December 29, 2003, granted Arashi \rquote s motion to dismiss Nakashima\rquote s counterclaim on the basis that Nakashima only obtained its rental license in September 2003 and did not have the appropriate business license at the time it leased the property or when it filed its counterclaim.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The court\rquote s decision was, however, contradictory on whether it meant to also grant summary judgment on Arashi\rquote s rescission claim, and Igarashi\rquote s}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 liability under the guarantee.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 In its introduction, the court stated it would \'93grant in part Plaintiff\rquote s motion for summary j udgment (dismissing defendant\rquote s counterclaim) and deny the remaining request,\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 11, p. 3 (}{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 ).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Later in the }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , the Court found \'93that Plaintiff\rquote s second and third grounds for summary judgment may also be appropriately granted based upon a lack of a business license for rent\'94 and the Court granted \'93summary judgment on the Plaintiff\rquote s rescission complaint.\'94 Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 11, pp. 10-11 (}{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 ).}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [7]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Arashi then presented a proposed judgment on all three claims to the trial judge to sign, but Nakashima lodged an objection.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 He claimed that the trial court had entered judgment only on the counterclaim, but had not ruled on the rescission or personal guarantee claims.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima sought clarification of the court\rquote s decision by objecting to Plaintiff Arashi\rquote s proposed judgment, noting the inconsistency on page 3 of the }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 of December 29, 2003 (granting judgment on one claim) and pages 10-11 (granting judgment on all three claims).}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [8]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab In response, the trial court entered a second }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 conceding that its first order was contradictory.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The court resolved the inconsistency by saying:}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 When initially writing this decision, the Court, while it had decided to dismiss Defendant\rquote s counterclaim, was inclined to limit its summary judgment application solely to the counterclaim issue.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 However, after it reviewed the matter further, it came to a subsequent conclusion, that summary judgment was proper in all respects.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 When it arriv ed at this subsequent conclusion, the Court failed to correct its prior writing.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 In its final analysis, however, the Court concluded and decided that summary judgment was proper in total and that judgment should be entered in Plaintiff\rquote s favor pursuant thereto.}{\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s ER tab 12, p. 2 (}{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 ).}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The court then amended its order accordingly and granted Plaintiff\rquote s Motion for summary judgment in its entirety.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 A final judgment was entered on the docket and this appeal followed.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 II.}{\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [9]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab We have jurisdiction over this appeal from a final judgment pursuant to 48 U.S.C. \'a7 1424-1(a)(2) (Westlaw through P.L. 109-76 (2005)), and Title 7 GCA \'a7 3107(b) and \'a7 3108(b) (Westlaw through Guam P.L. 28-037(2005)).}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 III.}{\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [10]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab \'93A trial court\rquote s decision granting a motion for summary judgment is reviewed }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 de novo}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 .\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Bank of Guam v. Flores}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , 2004 Guam 25 \'b6 7.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'93The court may grant summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Guam Rules of Civil Procedure when \lquote the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 matter of law.\rquote \'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id. \'b6 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 8 (citing}{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Manvil Corp. v. E.C. Gozum & Co.}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , 1998 Guam 20 \'b6 6).}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [11]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab A trial court\rquote s decision to allow a party leave to amend to raise defenses is reviewed for abuse of discretion.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Executive View Estate, Inc. v. Look}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , No. CV-93-00062A, 1994 WL 129748 (D. Guam App. Div. March 15, 1994).}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 IV.}{\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [12]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Nakashima contends on appeal that the trial court erred when it dismissed the counterclaim and granted}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 summary judgment in Arashi\rquote s favor for rescission of the Lease and cancellation of the guarantee on the basis that Nakashima did not have a business license.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima maintains that it should not be barred from seeking enforcement of the Lease because Nakashima substantially complied with the business license law.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Furthermore, Nakashima asserts that Arashi neglected to plead Nakashima\rquote s failure t o have a business license as an affirmative defense and the trial court should not have permitted Arashi to amend its answer or to raise the defense in a motion for summary judgment.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The failure to have a business license, Nakashima contends, does not prevent the corporation from defending itself against the original complaint or asserting a cause of action by counterclaim.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Finally, Nakashima submits that summary judgment was not an appropriate way to decide whether there was an unreasonable delay in the commencement of the Lease entitling Arashi to rescission. }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [13]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Arashi insists that the trial court was correct in dismissing Nakashima\rquote s counterclaim and rescinding the Lease because of Nakashima\rquote s failure to comply with the business license law and in any event, rescission was reasonable as a matter of law.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Moreover, Arashi argues that the trial court\rquote s decision to allow}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Arashi to amend the pleadings and assert the business license law was not an abuse of its discretion.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 We now address these arguments in turn.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 A.}{\b\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima\rquote s Failure to Have a Business License}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 1.}{\b\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Arashi Could Raise the Failure to have a Business License as Affirmative Defense.}{\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [14]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Nakashima submits}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 that the trial court granted Arashi an unfair procedural advantage and erred when it permitted Arashi to raise Nakashima\rquote s failure to have a business license.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The failure to have a business license is an affirmative defense under Title 11 GCA \'a7 70130 (Westlaw through Guam Pub. L. 28-037 (2005)), but Arashi did not plead it as an affirmative defense in the reply to the counterclaim or in a motion to amend the pleadings, raising it only upon filing of the memorandum in support of the motio n for summary judgment.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 3 (Mem. of Points and Authorities in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J.).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [15]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Nakashima argues that Rule 12(b) of the Guam Rules of Civil Procedure requires that affirmative defenses must be raised in a \'93responsive pleading\'94 and such defenses are waived if not timely raised.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Guam R. Civ. P. 12(b).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 In opposition, Arashi points out that affirmative defenses may be raised for the first time in a summary judgment motion since there was no prejudice to Nakashima, and pursuant}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 to }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Foman v. Davis }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 371 U.S. 178 (1962), the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Arashi to include the affirmative defense.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima states that the }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Foman}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 case does not support this result.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [16]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Foman v. Davis}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , 371 U.S. 178, is an often-cited case holding that in matters of pleading, leave to amend should always be liberally granted.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Rule 15(a) of the Guam Rules of Civil Procedure, which is identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), provides that leave to amend \'93shall be freely given when justice so required.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Guam R. Civ. P. 15(a).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Foman}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 reminds that \'93 outright refusal to grant the leave without any justifying reason appearing for the denial is not an exercise of discretion; it is merely abuse of that discretion and inconsistent with the spirit of the Federal Rules.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Foman}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , 371 U.S. at 182.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 While leave to amend pleadings should be liberally granted, }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Foman}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 directs courts to review whether certain factors are present which may mitigate against leave to amend.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The factors }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Foman}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 instructs are to be considered are:}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'93 undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [or] futility of amendment.\'94}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [17]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab As part of this court\rquote s }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 de novo}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 review, it is permissible to examine the record to see if any of these factors are present.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima believes}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 that Arashi is guilty of two of the above-listed mitigating factors:}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 undue delay and prejudice to opponent.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [18]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Nakashima complains that he was prejudiced by the long delay between Arashi\rquote s filing of the reply to the counterclaim and raising the business license-defense.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima claims prejudice because if it}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 had known earlier of the oversight in obtaining the business license, the lower court may \'93not have interpreted the delay in the way it did.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s Opening Brief, p. 10 (July 10, 2004).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 However, no one debates that it is Nakashima\rquote s responsibility to know of its licensing requirements, not Arashi\rquote s.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima did not have a business license during part of the three-year lease period and the affirmative defense would still have been available to Arashi up to the point that a license was secured.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Therefore, an examination of the record reveals no bad faith, no dilatory motive, no repeated failure to cure deficiencies, and no futility of amendment on Arashi\rquote s part.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 It was never Arashi\rquote s responsibility to remind Nakashima of the licensing requirement and we cannot agree Nakashima was unduly prejudiced by virtue of the allowance of the amendment.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [19]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab None of the mitigating factors from the }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Foman}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 case have therefore been established by Nakashima.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Moreover, it is permissible to raise an affirmative defense in a motion for summary judgment as long as there is no prejudice.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Camarillo v. McCarthy}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , 998 F.2d 638, 639 (9th Cir. 1993); }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 but see}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Harris v. Secretary,}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 126 F.3d 339, 344-45 (D.C. Cir. 1997).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 There is no reason that the trial judge should not have granted Arashi\rquote s motion for leave to amend to raise this affirmative defense and the trial court\rquote s decision does not constitute an abuse of discretion.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [20]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Nakashima then argues that case law prohibits Arashi from moving to amend his complaint in a brief rather than in a formal motion to amend.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 However, the authority that Nakashima relies on does not support this argument. Instead, the cases cited involve the situation where a trial court is asked to rule on the pleadings as they currently exist.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 For instance, in }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Samson Committee v. Lynn}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , 366 F. Supp. 1271 (E.D. Pa. 1973), there was a Rule 12(b)(6) motion which required that the trial court, in deciding whether the plaintiffs had stated a valid claim, to take the allegations in the complaint as true.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Samson }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 court determined that a party should not be}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 permitted to merely amend his complaint in an opposition to defeat the Rule 12(b)(6) motion and the proper means of raising claims that have inadvertently not been raised in the complaint is an amended complaint.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id. }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 at 1278.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Likewise, in }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , 745 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir. 1984), the issue was that the complaint itself had to stand or fall on its allegations, not its proposed amendments.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 This is not the situation here.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 In this case, the issue before the court is a motion to dismiss, not based on whether the allegations stand or fall as alleged, but whether an affirmative defense can be raised after an opposition is filed.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Therefore, Nakashima\rquote s cases are distinguishable and the trial court did not err in allowing Arashi to raise without a formal motion the affirmative defense that Nakashima did not have a business license.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [21]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab We must now decide how Nakashima\rquote s claims and rights are affected by this affirmative defense.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 2.}{\b\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Dismissal of Nakashima\rquote s Counterclaim was Proper}{ \insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [22]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab In the first argument in support of the motion for summary judgment (Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 5 p. 1), Arashi argued that Nakashima\rquote s lack of a business license prevents him from pursuing this counterclaim against Arashi.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Arashi relied upon Title 11 GCA \'a7 70130, which provided, in}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 pertinent part, (at the time that the cause of action was filed and when the motion was argued)}{\super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 4{\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 4}{\insrsid6911754 }{\fs20\insrsid6911754 Title 11 GCA \'a7 70130 was amended on December 18, 2003 by Guam Public Law 27-57:7, and now reads as follows: \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 It is the policy of the government of Guam that all persons engaging in, transacting, conducting, continuing, doing, or carrying on a business have business licenses. Unless otherwise specifically exempted by law, no perso n shall engage in, transact, conduct, continue, do, or carry on a business in Guam until it obtains a business license. The requirement to obtain a business license shall be independent of and in addition to a requirement for a certificate of authority fr om the Director of Revenue and Taxation or other applicable regulating agency or board, pursuant to applicable Guam laws, including, but not limited to, Title 22 GCA \'a7 15307, 22 GCA \'a7 15102, 18 GCA \'a7 7102 and 11 GCA \'a7 106213. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 Title 11 GCA \'a7 70130 (Westlaw through Guam Pub. L. 28-037 (2005)).}}}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 that:}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab It shall be contrary to public policy for the courts to enforce leases for Guam land for which there is no business license held by the lessor . . . [and] rental payments . . . during periods for which the pers on seeking to collect said rents had no business license . . . may not be collected through the courts . . . [and] no commercial activity (including operating or leasing of real property) ...without a business license may file suit in Guam courts until su ch time that a business license is obtained.}{\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 . . . .}{\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The courts shall liberally construe [the law] in favor of the landlord . . . and shall ignore technical deficiencies if the courts fin d there has been substantial compliance with the business license laws . . . and if the courts find that the landlord . . . has filed}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 . . . gross receipts tax returns . . . .}{ \insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 11 GCA \'a7 70130 (2003).}{\super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 5{\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 5}{\insrsid6911754 }{\fs20\insrsid6911754 The entire text of Title 11GCA \'a7 70130 before amendmen t by Public Law 27-57 provided: \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 \par }\pard \qj \fi-1440\li1440\ri1440\sa120\nowidctlpar\tx720\tx1440\faauto\rin1440\lin1440\itap0\pararsid13910095 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 \tab }{\b\fs20\insrsid6911754 \'a770130. Restriction of Activities on Persons Without Licenses.}{\fs20\insrsid6911754 \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid13910095 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 It is the policy of the government of Guam that all businesses have business licenses. Therefore: \par }\pard \qj \li1440\ri1440\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin1440\lin1440\itap0\pararsid13910095 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 (a) any person engaged in any commercial activity or money- making activity which does not require a business license (such as professionals, religious organizations, political candidates, etc.) shall obtain a statement from the Department of Revenue and Taxation indicating the name of the applicant, that no busin ess license is required, and the nature of the activity involved, which may be used in lieu of a business license for the nature of their business for purposes of this Section. The term \'93business license\'94 as used in this Section shall include such statements from the Department of Revenue and Taxation that the activity is exempt from the requirement for a business license; \par (b) no lease of real property may be recorded without a copy of the current business license of the Landlord (Lessor) attached; \par (c) It s hall be contrary to public policy for the courts to enforce leases for Guam land for which there is no business license held by the lessor of a lease or his or her successor in interest. Therefore, rental payments for Guam land accrued after the effectiv e date of this Section during periods for which the person seeking to collect said rents had no business license for such lease or rental activity may not be collected through the courts, and no person may be evicted from any leased real property for which rent is to be paid for any breach occurring or for any non-payment of rent during any period after the effective date of this Section when the person seeking to enforce the terms of the lease did not have a valid business license to rent said premises; \par }\pard \qj \li1440\ri1440\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin1440\lin1440\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 (d) no commercial activity (including operating or leasing of real property) doing business on Guam without a business license may file suit in Guam courts until such time that a business license is obtained. No person engaged in commercial activity without a business license may use the courts to enforce, directly or indirectly, any obligation, lien, or contract incurred during the period of such commercial activity without a business license; \par . . . . \par (f) The courts shall liberally construe subsections (b) t hrough (e) of this Section in favor of the landlord or business person and shall ignore technical deficiencies if the courts find there has been substantial compliance with the business license laws, rules, and regulations and if the courts find that the landlord or business person has filed on a timely basis (within 30 days of the due date) gross receipts tax returns fully reporting all accountable revenues from the activity concerned for the periods in question. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 11 GCA \'a770130 (1994).}}}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [23]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Nakashima argu es the lower court should have found that Nakashima substantially complied with the business license law because the company had other business licenses and paid gross receipts taxes on all revenues collected from the leased property.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The trial judge relied primarily on }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Taijeron v. Kim,}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 1999 Guam 16, in dismissing Nakashima\rquote s counterclaim.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 In that case, a landlord sought to enforce rental obligations during a period of time within which that landlord did not have a business license.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id. \'b6 4.}{\i\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The trial judge in }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Taijeron}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 granted summary judgment for the tenant because the landlord did not have a business license.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id. \'b6 5.}{\i\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 It was undisputed that the landlord did not have a business license, but the landlord argued that she had \'93substantially complied\'94 with Title 11 GCA \'a7 70130(f), as she had paid gross receipts taxes (as had Nakashima), and otherwise complied with Guam law in doing business.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id. }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'b6 14.}{ \insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [24]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab In reviewing the record }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 de novo}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , this court found \'93the record is devoid of any facts that show [land lord] making any effort to timely secure a business license to lease the property.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id.}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'b6 21.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Relying on the Appellate Division case of}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Archbishop of Guam v. G.F.G. Corp.}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , No.CV-95-00007A, 1995 WL 604383 (D. Guam App. Div. October 2, 1995),}{\super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 6{\footnote \pard\plain \ql \fi720\li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 6}{\insrsid6911754 }{\fs20\insrsid6911754 Westlaw notes the District Court of Guam case number as \'93CR-95-00007A.\'94 However, District Court records reveal that the proper case number is \'93CV-95-00007A.\'94}}}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 the court held, \'93[w]here, as it is here, [landlord] made no immediate attempt to remedy the statutory vio lation, it cannot be said that [landlord] substantially complied with the licensing requirement by acquiring it several months after her duty to do so arose.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Taijeron}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , 1996 Guam 16 \'b6 21.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [25]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab The holding of this court in }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Taijeron}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 compels the same result in this case:}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'93[W]e hold that [landlord]\rquote s procurement of a business license well after the lease obligations have incurred cannot be said to be a mere technical deficiency that should be ignored by the court below.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id.}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'b6 22.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The trial judge in this case relied on this statement from }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Taijeron}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , and held that Nakashima\rquote s undisputed actions did not constitute substantial compliance.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Accordingly, it was not possible for Nakashima to maintain his counterclaim for rent during the period of time within which he did not have a business license.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The trial judge\rquote s ruling was based on sound precedent and was not in error.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima has presented no ground to disturb this ruling, based on }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Taijeron}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 .}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [26]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Although Nakashima\rquote s counterclaim is dismissed as a res ult of its failure to have a business license at the time it filed its counterclaim, Nakashima may pursue any remaining remedies during the period it was in possession of a business license.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Taijeron}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 does not compel the conclusion that Nakashima cannot maintain a counterclaim for rents due under the contract for the time after he received the business licenses.}{ \super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 7{\footnote \pard\plain \ql \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 7}{\insrsid6911754 }{ \fs20\insrsid6911754 Nakashima would still need to seek leave to file an amended counterclaim and Arashi would be able to assert any defenses available against this counterclaim.}}}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Borrowing language from }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Taijeron}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , we conclude that \'93 although [Nakashima] can certainly maintain an action for a breach of the lease that occurred during the time [it] was in possession of a business license, [it] cannot sue for those breaches that occurred prior.\'94}{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Taijeron}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 , 1999 Guam 16 \'b6 26.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Whether Nakashima is successful on any counterclaim for rents during the period it had a business license, is, of course, dependent on whether}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 rescission of the lease was legally permissible.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 If the lease has been lawfully rescinded, then there is a discharge of the contractual duties and no breach of contract action remaining. This is the next issue we must examine.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 B.}{\b\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Rescission of the Lease}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 1.}{\b\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima Could Defend Against Rescission Even Witho ut a Business License.}{\b\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [27]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab In the second argument in support of Arashi\rquote s motion for summary judgment, Arashi argued that it was entitled to rescind under Guam law because there was a failure of consideration and that the delay was unreasonable as a matter of law.}{\super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 8{\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 8}{\insrsid6911754 }{\fs20\insrsid6911754 Title 18 GCA \'a7 89202 (Westlaw through Guam Pub. L. 28-037 (2005)) states: \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid602593 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 A party to a contract may rescind: \par . . . \par (2) If, through the fault of the party as to whom he rescinds, the consideration of his obligation fails, in whole or in part; \par . . . \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid602593 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 (4) If such consideration, before it is rendered to him, fails in a material respect, from any cause; . . . . }}}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 } {\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 This is not, however, the basis on which the trial judge granted summary judgment.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 In ruling on whether rescission was legally permissi ble, the trial court noted simply that the same statute which prevented Nakashima from bringing its counterclaim also prevented it from defending its lease in court.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The court found that the second (rescission) and third (cancellation of guarantee) grounds for summary judgment may also be appropriately granted based upon a lack of a business license for rent and concluded that it was \'93 compelled to grant summary judgment on Plaintiffs\rquote rescission complaint.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 11, p. 11 (}{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 ).}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [28]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Nakashima urges reversal of this ruling on the basis that the business license law does not compel this result.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 We review }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 de novo}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 whether it was the proper application of the business license law to deny Nakashima access to the Courts to defend i ts rights under the Lease.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [29]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab The trial court reasoned that Nakashima had no defense to rescission:}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'93 It is clear that the courts of Guam may not be used to enforce a lease held by a lessor for which there is no business license to rent.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 11, p. 10 (}{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 ).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The trial court concluded that summary judgment would be appropriate to prevent \'93 [d]efendant from retaining the said rentals it received from Plaintiffs when it was unlicensed to enter into a lease agreement and in allowing Plaintiffs the return of the monies they paid for in rent as part of their prayed for rescission.\'94}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 11, p. 10-11 (}{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Disision yan Otden}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 ).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The trial judge\rquote s conclusion that Nakashima was prevented from }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 defending}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 a lease due to a lac k of a business license is, however, not supported by law.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [30]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab In }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Guam Tai-Pan Dev. & Constr., Inc. v. Yigo Alta Estates, Inc.}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 . 2002 Guam 20, this court}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 addressed the issue whether failure to have a business license makes the contract void }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 ab initio}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 and whether an unlicensed party could defend against a suit.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The defendant in }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Tai-Pan }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 had filed a motion seeking summary adjudication that failure to secure a business license would not void the underlying obligation.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id. }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'b6 5.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 This court agreed, holding that though an unlicenced business is prevented from using the courts to enforce an obligation, the same law does not void the underlying contract altogether.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Finding the substantial compliance language in the statute to be indicative of the legislature\rquote s intent, (\'93we find that the legislature\rquote s inclusion of a substantial compliance clause in the License Law further evidences the legislative intent not to make such contracts automatically void due to non-compliance\'94), this court held, \'93a contract exe cuted by a non-licensed party under the License Law is not void per se.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id. }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'b6\'b6 13, 15.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Further, \'93the License Law while precluding the }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 enforcement}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 of a contract in court, does not expressly deny the party from }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 defending }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 their claims.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id.}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'b6 17.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The license law \'93removes an unlicensed [party\rquote s] power to }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 sue }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 not the power to }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 defend}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 .}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Id.}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [31]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab On the basis of the Guam }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Tai-Pan}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 case, we find that the underlying Lease retains its validity despite the fact that Nakashima did not have a business license.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 In th is case, Nakashima cannot sue to enforce the lease during the time he was not in possession of a business license but the Lease remains valid.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 It is not automatically void, nor is it automatically rescinded, and Nakashima is entitled to defend against the claims for rescission and cancellation of the guarantee.}{\super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 9{\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 9}{\insrsid6911754 }{\fs20\insrsid6911754 The amendment of the business license law on December 18, 2003, though not applicable to the case }{\i\fs20\insrsid6911754 sub judice}{\fs20\insrsid6911754 , now expressly provides \'93the failure of a person to obtain a business license . . . does not impair the validity of its corporate acts or prevent it from defending any proceeding in Guam.\'94 Title 11 GCA \'a7 70131(e) (as amended by Guam Sess. Law 27-57 (2003)). }}}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [32]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab The trial court\rquote s finding that Nakashima\rquote s lack of a business license pr evented it from defending against the rescission claim is not supported by law and was therefore in error. Notwithstanding this result, we may, on a }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 de novo}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 review, determine if there is another ground on which the trial court could have granted summary judgment on the rescission count.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 2.}{\b\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The Reasonableness of the Delay in the Lease Commencement Date is a Material Fact In Dispute}{\b\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [33]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Arashi believes that the delay in the Lease commencement date was unreasonable, entitling it to rescind the contract becau se, even though the Lease contemplated a commencement date of August 1, 2001 or one month after the completion of the building, the law implies a reasonable time for performance.}{\super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 10{\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 10}{\insrsid6911754 }{\fs20\insrsid6911754 Title 18 GCA \'a7 87123 (Westlaw through Guam Pub. L. 28-037 (2005)) provides, in relevant part: \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0 {\b\fs20\insrsid6911754 Time of performance, contract.}{\fs20\insrsid6911754 \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid6911754 If no time is specified for the performance of an act required to be performed, a reasonable time is allowed.}}}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Arashi acknowledges that what constitutes a reasonable time for performance is normally a question of fact.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima was, however, unable to deliver the premises until more than five months after August 1, 2001, and it did not earlier provide adequate assurances concerning the completion of the construction to support a finding of performance within a reasonable period of time, therefore rescission of the Lease, Arashi submits, is required as a matter of law.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [34]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab Nakashima argues, on the other hand, that because he was on the verge of turning over possession of the premises to Arashi, Arashi had no automatic right to rescission.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Moreover, the trial court never addressed the reasonableness of the delay in delivering possession.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The court simply decided the rescission issue based on the lack of a business license.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Therefore, summary judgment was inappropriate without resolution of the factual issues in dispute.}{ \insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [35]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab This court agrees that there is no clear demarcation of \'93reasonableness\'94 in this case.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The lease specifically contemplated that the occupancy would begin on August 1 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 or later}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \'93[I ]n the event the construction of the Commercial Building is not completed on the said commencement date, as stated above, the term of this Lease shall commence on the date one (1) month following the date of the completion of the Commercial Building.\'94 Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 6, p. 4 (Aff. of Peter J. Sablan in Supp. of Mot. for Summ J., Ex. A (Art. 3 \'a7 3.1)).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The court finds that this provision in the lease was clearly meant to cover the possibility that the occupancy would not begin on August 1, but sometime later.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Given this provision in the lease, it cannot be said that Arashi had an automatic legal right to rescind if there was a}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 delay.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 To so hold would ignore this conspicuous provision addressing a later-beginning occupancy.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [36]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab The law generally doe s not permit one party to rescind before another party has performed unless time is of the essence, or there is material and substantial frustration of purpose, not a \'93slight, casual or technical breach.\'94}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 O\rquote Herron v. S. Tier Stores, Inc}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 ., 189 N.Y.S.2d 323, 325 (Ct. App. 1959).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 If the date of performance is fixed, time is essential, and failure to perform on the day indicated is ground for rescission.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 John F. Trainor Co. v. G. Amsinck & Co.}{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 140 N.E. 931, 931 (Ct. App. N.Y. 1923); }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 see also}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Rein v. Robert Metrik Co.}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 105 N.Y.S.2d 160, 162 (Ct. App. 1951) (whether the delay was reasonable analyzed according to the facts).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 This case fits none of these situations.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 There was no clear frustration of purpose in this case.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The time for commencement of the lease was not of the essence.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Thus, whether the delay was reasonable needed to have been addressed by the trial judge. }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [37]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab There is no legal theory applicable in this case under which Arashi could have rescinded the contract without going into a fact analysis of reasonableness.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Since the law does not provide a clear legal remedy of rescission, the trial judge could not have granted summary judgment except on a finding that there was no material fact in dispute surrounding the reasonableness of the delay.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Whether more than five}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 months was an unreasonable period of delay is a material}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 factual issue in dispute, so summary judgment was not appropriate.}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 C.}{\b\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Cancellation of the Guarantee}{\b\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [38]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab The final issue is whether there exists an independent basis to grant summary judgment on the validity of the Guarantee. }{\i\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 See }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Appellant\rquote s ER, tab 6, Exhibit B, (Aff. of Peter J. Sablan in Supp. of Mot. for Summ J., Ex. B).}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 The Guarantee clearly states that it is made by Arashi in favor of Nakashima and signed by Igarashi, as President of Arashi.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Igarashi asserts that he did not intend to be personally bound by the guarantee and the identification of Arashi as the party to the contract and Igarashi\rquote s signature on the guarantee is an objective manifestation of that intent.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 By adding the title \'93President\'94 to his signature when he signed the Guarantee, Igarashi contends he was signing in a representative capacity only, on behalf of Arashi, making the Guarantee unenforceable against him personally.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Nakashima on the other hand, did not address the Guarantee in the opposition to the summary judgment but alleges in its counterclaim that the Guarantee was to be enforced against Igarashi personally.}{ \insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Neither of the parties addressed the Guarantee in their briefs on appeal.}{\super\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 11{\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2769139 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\super\insrsid6911754 11}{\insrsid6911754 }{\fs20\insrsid6911754 The fail ure of the parties to address the proper construction of the guarantee in their briefs on appeal further supports our decision }{\i\fs20\insrsid6911754 infra}{\fs20\insrsid6911754 , to not resolve the guarantee at this time.}}}{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [39]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab If the trial court on remand determines that Arashi may rescind the Lease and the parties are restored to their precontractual positions, then it will not be necessary to decide the proper construction of the Guarantee.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 We therefore decline to decide the issue at this time. }{\insrsid9859677 \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 V}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 .}{\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\insrsid9859677 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9859677 {\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 [40]}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 \tab We }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 AFFIRM}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 the finding that Nakashima was not permitted to pursue his counterclaim during the period of time during which he had no business license, but Nakashima may be able to amend his counterclaim to include a claim for rents due during the period of time duri ng which it held a business license.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 We }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 REVERSE}{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 the finding that Arashi had a legal right as a matter of law to rescind the Lease.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 Neither the business license law, nor the undisputed facts, support a right on Arashi\rquote s part to rescind without a factual review of whether the delay in completing the construction of the building was reasonable.}{\insrsid9859677\charrsid9859677 }{\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 We therefore }{\b\insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 REMAND }{ \insrsid6911754\charrsid9859677 the complaint and the counterclaim to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.}{\insrsid9859677 \par }}