{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}
{\f36\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}WP TypographicSymbols{\*\falt Courier New};}{\f172\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f173\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}
{\f175\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f176\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f177\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f178\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}
{\f179\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f180\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;
\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}
{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*
\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\*\cs15 \additive \sbasedon10 \ssemihidden footnote reference;}{
\s16\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 \styrsid11150860 header;}{\s17\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext17 \styrsid11150860 footer;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid2820335\rsid3763703\rsid5594447\rsid9508377\rsid11150860}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6764;}{\info{\author lroberto}
{\operator blake_r}{\creatim\yr2005\mo8\dy12\hr9\min4}{\revtim\yr2006\mo3\dy10\hr15\min10}{\version4}{\edmins3}{\nofpages6}{\nofwords1948}{\nofchars11110}{\*\company Superior Court of Guam}{\nofcharsws13032}{\vern16391}}\margl1440\margr1440 
\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\notabind\wraptrsp\transmf\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\truncatefontheight\subfontbysize\sprsbsp\wpjst\lytprtmet\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3
\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot5594447 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5594447 \chftnsep 
\par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5594447 \chftnsepc 
\par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5594447 \chftnsep 
\par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5594447 \chftnsepc 
\par }}\sectd \sbknone\linex0\headery1440\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid5594447\sftnbj {\header \pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqr\tx9360\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\i\fs20\insrsid5594447 
Aguon v. Gutierrez}{\fs20\insrsid5594447 , Opinion\tab Page }{\field{\*\fldinst {\fs20\insrsid5594447 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid2820335 6}}}{\fs20\insrsid5594447  of 9
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl-19\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid2820335 
{\shp{\*\shpinst\shpleft1440\shptop0\shpright10800\shpbottom19\shpfhdr1\shpbxpage\shpbxignore\shpbypara\shpbyignore\shpwr3\shpwrk0\shpfblwtxt1\shpz0\shplockanchor\shplid2049{\sp{\sn shapeType}{\sv 1}}{\sp{\sn fFlipH}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fFlipV}{\sv 0}}
{\sp{\sn fillColor}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fillBackColor}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fFilled}{\sv 1}}{\sp{\sn lineWidth}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fLine}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fShadow}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn posrelh}{\sv 1}}{\sp{\sn fLayoutInCell}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn fBehindDocument}{\sv 1}}
{\sp{\sn fLayoutInCell}{\sv 0}}}{\shprslt{\*\do\dobxpage\dobypara\dodhgt0\dprect\dpx1440\dpy0\dpxsize9360\dpysize19\dpfillfgcr0\dpfillfgcg0\dpfillfgcb0\dpfillbgcr0\dpfillbgcg0\dpfillbgcb0\dpfillpat1\dplinehollow}}}}{\fs20\insrsid5594447 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 
\par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}
{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM}{\insrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 PACITA AGUON,
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 individually, and on behalf of all those similarly situated}{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ,}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Petitioner-Appellant,
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 v.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 CARL T.C. GUTIERREZ, }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Governor of Guam}{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ,}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 MICHAEL J. REIDY}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , Acting Director of Administration,}{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par Y'ASELA A. PEREIRA}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , Treasurer of Guam; }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 JOHN H. RIOS}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , Director of
\par the Government of Guam Retirement Fund; }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 GERALD S.A. PEREZ}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ,}{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par ODILIA M. BAUTISTA}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 JENNIFER MUNA\_AGUON}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ,
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 MARK J. HEATH}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  and }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 PAUL D. UNTALAN}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ,
\par in their capacities as members of the Board of Trustees
\par of the Government of Guam Retirement Fund,
\par and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Respondents-Appellees.}{\insrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Supreme Court Case No. CVA01-010
\par Superior Court Case No. SP0207-97}{\insrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 OPINION}{\insrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Filed:}{\b\insrsid2820335  }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 September 4, 2002}{\insrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Cite as:}{\b\insrsid2820335  }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 2002 Guam 14}{\insrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Appeal from the Superior Court of Guam
\par Argued and submitted on June 18, 2002
\par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\trowd \irow0\irowband0\ts11\trqc\trgaph120\trleft-120\trftsWidth1\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trpaddl120\trpaddr120\trpaddfl3\trpaddfr3\tblrsid2820335 \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl 
\cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil \cellx4560\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil \cellx9240\pard 
\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\intbl\faauto\rin0\lin0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\ul\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Appearing for the Petitioner-Appellant}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 :
\par Michael F. Phillips, Esq.
\par Phillips & Bordallo, P.C.
\par 410 West O}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Brien Dr., Suite 102
\par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam 96910\cell 
\par \cell }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \trowd \irow0\irowband0
\ts11\trqc\trgaph120\trleft-120\trftsWidth1\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trpaddl120\trpaddr120\trpaddfl3\trpaddfr3\tblrsid2820335 \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil 
\cellx4560\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil \cellx9240\row }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\intbl\faauto\rin0\lin0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 

\par }{\ul\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Appearing for Respondents-Appellees 
\par }{\insrsid2820335  }{\ul\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Gutierrez, Reidy, and Pereira}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 :
\par }\pard \ql \fi-1440\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\intbl\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin1440\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Eric A. Heisel\tab 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\intbl\faauto\rin0\lin0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Assistant Attorney General
\par Office of the Attorney General
\par Suite 2-200E, Judicial Center Building
\par 120 West O}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Brien Drive
\par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam 96910\cell 
\par }{\ul\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Appearing for Respondents-Appellees 
\par }{\insrsid2820335  }{\ul\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Board of Trustees of the Retirement Fund}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 : 
\par Joanne L. Grimes, Esq.
\par Elyze J. McDonald, Esq.
\par Carlsmith Ball LLP
\par 134 West Soledad Ave
\par Suite 2-200E, Judicial Center Building
\par Bank of Hawaii Building, Suite 401
\par Hag\'e5t\'f1a, Guam 96910\cell }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \trowd \irow1\irowband1\lastrow 
\ts11\trqc\trgaph120\trleft-120\trftsWidth1\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trpaddl120\trpaddr120\trpaddfl3\trpaddfr3\tblrsid2820335 \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil 
\cellx4560\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth4680\clshdrawnil \cellx9240\row }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid2820335 
\par }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 BEFORE:}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Chief Justice,}{\cs15\super\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain 
\qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs15\fs20\super\insrsid5594447 \chftn }{\fs20\insrsid5594447 
  The Chief Justice recused himself from this matter.  Justice Carbullido, as the senior member of the panel, was designated as the Acting Chief Justice.}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
FRANCES M. TYDINGCO-GATEWOOD, Associate Justice, and JOHN A. MANGLONA, Designated Justice.}{\insrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 CARBULLIDO, J.:}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [1]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab Petitioner-Appellant Pacita Aguon (hereinafter }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Aguon}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
) sought a mandate from the Superior Court directing Respondents-Appellants Carl T.C. Gutierrez, Governor of Guam, et al.}{\cs15\super\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain 
\qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs15\fs20\super\insrsid5594447 \chftn }{\fs20\insrsid5594447   Michael J. Reidy, Acting Director of Administration; Y}{
\fs20\insrsid5594447 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 10}{\fldrslt\f36\fs20}}}{\fs20\insrsid5594447 
asela A. Periera, Treasurer of Guam; John H. Rios, Director of the Retirement Fund; Gerald S.A. Perez, Odilia M. Bautista, Jennifer Muna-Aguon, Mark J. Heath, and Paul D. Untalan, as the Board of Trustees of the Government of Guam Retirement Fund}}}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  (hereinafter collectively referred to as }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Respondents}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ) to implement a cumulative increase in her annual annuity pursuant to Title 4 GCA }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 39 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  8122.1.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
Respondents filed a motion for summary judgment, which the lower court granted after finding that section 8122.1 conferred a supplemental and not cumulative benefit.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
Aguon appeals this grant of summary judgment and the underlying interpretation of section 8122.1.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 We agree with the lower court}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 s reading of section 8122.1 and affirm the grant of summary judgment.
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 I.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [2]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab Aguon filed a petition for a writ of a mandate in the Superior Court to compel Respondents to implement the annual increase in her annuity as set forth in Title 4 GCA }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 39 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  8122.1 for the years}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 1990 to 1999.}{
\cs15\super\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs15\fs20\super\insrsid5594447 \chftn }{\fs20\insrsid5594447 
  Section 8122.1 was enacted in 1990 by Public Law 20-150:4 and repealed in 1999 by Public Law 25-72:IV:5.}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
It is undisputed that Aguon received a $1,500 supplement from the Retirement Fund for each year she was qualified to receive an annual annuity.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
However, Aguon believes that section 8122.1 does not simply supplement her annual annuity, but rather provides for a cumulative increase.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Under this theory, if Aguon}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
s annual annuity in 1990 was $10,000, then she would be entitled to $11,500 in 1990 ($10,000 annuity + $1,500 increase), $13,000 in 1991 ($11,500 payment 
from the previous year + $1,500 increase), $14,500 in 1992 ($13,000 payment from the previous year + $1,500 increase), and so on for each subsequent year.}{\insrsid5594447 
\par }{\insrsid2820335\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [3]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab Respondents filed several motions, including a motion for summary judgment, which is the subject of the instant appeal.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
The trial court agreed with Respondents and found section 8122.1 conferred a supplemental rather than cumulative increase.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
Because Aguon received her supplemental increases during the years in question, the trial court concluded that section 8122.1 had been complied with and granted summary judgment for Respondents.}{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 II.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [4]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab This court has jurisdiction over all final judgments of the Superior Court pursuant to Title 7 GCA }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 39 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  3107 (1994).
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 III.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [5]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab A grant of summary judgment is reviewed }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 de novo, Iizuka Corp. v. Kawasho Int`l (Guam), Inc.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 1997 Guam 10, 
}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 38 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  7, and is only proper in instances where there are no genuine issues of material fact, Guam R
. Civ. P. 56(c).}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 The parties here concede that there are no facts in dispute and that the issue presented on appeal is strictly one of statutory interpretation.}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Issues of statutory construction are questions of law reviewed }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 de novo}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 .}{\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Ada v. Guam Tel. Auth.}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 1999 Guam 10, }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 38 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  10.}{\insrsid5594447 
\par }{\insrsid2820335\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [6]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
In cases involving statutory construction, the plain language of a statute must be the starting point.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Pangelinan v. Gutierrez}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 2000 Guam 11, }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 38 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  23; }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Am. Tobacco Co. v. Patterson}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 456 U.S. 63, 68, 102 S. Ct. 1534, 1537 (1982).}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
In looking at the statute}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 s language, the court}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst 
SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 s task is to determine whether or not the statutory language is }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols"
 \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 plain and unambiguous.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 519 U.S. 337, 340, 117 S. Ct. 843, 846 (1997).}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols"
 \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 The plainness or ambiguity of statutory language is determined by reference to the language itself, the specific context in which that languag
e is used, and the broader context of the statute as a whole.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Id.}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  at 341, 117 S. Ct. at 846.
\par }{\b\insrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [7]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab We start our analysis of section 8122.1 with a literal reading of the statute}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols"
 \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 s language.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 The language o}{\insrsid2820335 f section 8122.1 is as follows:}{\insrsid5594447 
\par }{\insrsid2820335\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 The }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 annual annuity}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
 of every retired employee, including retired employees receiving a disability retirement annuity, survivors, or dependent receiving or who subsequently receive a retirement annuity from the Retirement Fund,}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 shall be }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 increased}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
 by One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500) per year effective as of May 1, 1990, such increases to be funded from the General Fund and not from the Retirement Fund.
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par 4 GCA }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 39 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  8122.1 (emphasis added).
\par }{\b\insrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [8]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab The trial court found that the plain language of section 8122.1 entitled Aguon to a $1,500 increase of her }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 annual annuity,}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
 and that the term }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 annual annuity}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  did not include amounts issued as increases in prior years.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Appellant}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 s Excerpts of Record, tab 2, p. 8 (Decision and Order, Nov. 12, 1997).}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
Aguon believes that the trial court improperly read into the plain language of the statute the term }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
supplement}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  in place of the term }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 increase.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 She argues that a plain reading of the statute mandates that annuities be increased by $1,500 each
 year; in other words, every year the retiree is entitled to receive $1,500 more than the total amount paid the previous year.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
Respondents counter by arguing that the plain language of section 8122.1 only allows for a $1,500 increase to the retiree}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 s }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 annual annuity,}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst 
SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  the amount of which is set by Title 4 GCA }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 39 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt
\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  8122, and that the amounts paid as an increase do not become part of the }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 annual annuity.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
Respondents also note that the language of the statute clearly identifies a separate funding source for the increases, and argued that}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols"
 \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [b]ecause the $1,500 comes from the General Fund, it }{\ul\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 cannot}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
 be an increase in amount of the basic annuity, which can come only from the Retirement Fund.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Brief of Appellees Gutierrez, et al., p. 5.}{\insrsid5594447 
\par }{\insrsid2820335\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [9]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab We find that the wording of the statute, specifically the terms }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt
\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 increase}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  and }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 annual annuity,}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  can be subject to both parties}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
 interpretations, and is therefore ambiguous.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Wis. Bankers Ass}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 n (Inc.) v. Mut. Sav. & Loan Ass}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 n of Wis.}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 291 N.W.2d 869, 875 (Wis. 1980) (}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
A statute, phrase, or word is ambiguous when capable of being interpreted by reasonably well-informed persons in either of two or more senses.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt
\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ).}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 However, the language of the statute cannot be}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
read in isolation, and must be examined within its context.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 United States v. Am. Trucking Ass}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols"
 \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ns}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 310 U.S. 534, 542, 60 S. Ct. 1059, 1063 (1940) ( }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols"
 \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 To take a few words from their context and with them thus isolated to attempt to determine t
heir meaning, certainly would not contribute greatly to the discovery of the purpose of the draftsmen of a statute . . . .}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ); }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Gutierrez v. Ada}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 528 U.S. 250, 255, 120 S. Ct. 740, 744 (2000) (}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 words and people are known by their companions.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ).}{\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Sumitomo Constr. Co. v. Gov}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 t of Guam}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 2001 Guam 23, }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 38 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  17.}{
\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 A statute}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
s context includes looking at other provisions of the same statute and other related statutes.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Portland Gen. Elec. Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Indus.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
, 859 P.2d 1143, 1146 (Or. 1993).}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 With respect to the statute at hand, there are two separate points to which this court directs its attention.}{\insrsid5594447 
\par }{\insrsid2820335\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [10]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab First, section 8122.1, which provides for the disputed increases, is separate and distinct from the statutes that determine various annuity amounts.}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Sections 8122 (basic annuity), 8125 (disability annuity), and 8135 (survivor annuity) each deal with measuring the amount of an annuity payment.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
The $1,500 increase is not found within any of the subsections of these statutes, but is instead separately set forth in another section.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
If the $1500 increase were intended to be an increase to the annuity amount itself, as asserted by Aguon, then it should be located within those sections that deal with calculating annuity payments.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
For example, sections 8122(b) and 8135(b) provide retirees within an }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
automatic increase in his annual annuity.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
Although there is nothing in the record before us showing how these provisions have been implemented, we find the language of these subsections are more susceptible to the interpretation Aguon is now trying to impose on section 8122.1.}{\insrsid2820335  }
{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 If the section 8122.1 increases were similarly intended to become part of the annuity amount, then it should share the language and}{\insrsid2820335  location of these subsections.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [11]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab Second, section 8122.1 is identical in language and subject matter to three other}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
annuity increases given over the course of twenty-four years:}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 (1) $1,200, implemented in 1978}{\cs15\super\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \chftn {\footnote \pard\plain 
\qj \fi720\li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs15\fs20\super\insrsid5594447 \chftn }{\fs20\insrsid5594447   This increase was enacted by Public Law 14-87:11 and reads:
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 
\par }\pard \qj \fi-720\li1440\ri1440\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin1440\lin1440\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 Notwithstanding other provisions of law to the contrary, the amount of each service retirement annuity, disability annuity and survivor}{
\fs20\insrsid5594447 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 10}{\fldrslt\f36\fs20}}}{\fs20\insrsid5594447 
s annuity paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter III, Title V of the Government Code shall be increased One Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($1,200) per year . . . .\tab 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 Guam Pub. L. 14-87:11 (Dec. 23, 1977).}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ; (2) $700, implemented in 1980}{\cs15\super\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \chftn {\footnote 
\pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs15\fs20\super\insrsid5594447 \chftn }{\fs20\insrsid5594447   This increase was enacted by Public Law 15-135:4 and reads:
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 
\par }\pard \qj \li720\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin720\lin720\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 Notwithstanding other provisions of law to the contrary, the amount of each service retirement annuity, disability annuity and survivor}{\fs20\insrsid5594447 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 10}{\fldrslt\f36\fs20}}}{\fs20\insrsid5594447 s annuity pai
d pursuant to the provisions of Chapter III, Title V of the Government Code shall be increased Seven Hundred Dollars ($700) per year . . . .
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5594447 Guam Pub. L. 15-135:4 (Aug. 22, 1980).}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 ; and (3) $838, implemented in 1985}{\cs15\super\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \chftn {\footnote 
\pard\plain \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\sa240\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs15\fs20\super\insrsid5594447 \chftn }{\fs20\insrsid5594447   Respondents note that the origin of 
the $838 annuity supplement is somewhat unclear.  They speculate that it may have originated from the $419 COLA established in Public Law 18-26:18.}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 .}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [Q]uestions of statutory interpretation may be aided by refe
rence to the prevailing interpretation of other statutes that share the same language and either have the same general purpose or deal with the same general subject as the statute under consideration.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst 
SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Santos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 525 F.}{\insrsid2820335 
Supp. 655, 666 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).}{\insrsid5594447 
\par }{\insrsid2820335\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [12]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab Each of the previous three annuity increases were implemented as supplemental rather than cumulative increases.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 In attempting t
o harmonize them, we presume that, when the Legislature enacted the later of the two statutes, it was aware of the one earlier enacted.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Gov}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 t Employees Ins. Co. v. Ins. Comm}{
\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 r of Md.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 630 A.2d 713, 717 (Md. Ct. App. 1993).}{\insrsid2820335  
}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Thus, in enacting the latest of these increases, the section 8122.1 increase, we can assume that the legislature was aware of the previous legislation and the manner in which it was being employed.}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 By carrying over the same language, we find that the legislature intended to confer the same b}{\insrsid2820335 enefit, a supplemental benefit.}{\insrsid5594447 
\par }{\insrsid2820335\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [13]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab Moreover, the four increases appear to be enacted as part of the same statutory scheme.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Acts }{
\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 in pari materia}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , or which deal with the same subject matter, are to be construed together.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 United States v. Stewart}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 311 U.S. 60, 64, 61 S. Ct. 102, 105 (1940).}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 The legislature provided monies to fund all four annuity increases in a single
 appropriation, and then delineated each of the increases as areas to which the money was to be directed.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
The bulk amount was sufficient to pay each retiree $4,238, the total sum of the four increases, but was vastly insufficient to cover a cumulative increase.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
Thus, interpreting section 8122.1 to provide for a cumulative increase would be inconsistent with similar legislation that provides for other annuity increases and the legislation that funds all of the annuity increases.}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 In order to harmonize section 8122.1 with legislation }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 in pari materia}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , it must be r}{\insrsid2820335 ead as a supplemental increase.}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [14]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab Respondents}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
 Rios, et al., presented this court with an alternative ground upon which to affirm the trial court}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
s judgment.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 They argued that had the trial court not disposed of the matter by summary judgment, it would have been proper for the trial court to grant its motion to dismiss.}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 An alternative ground for affirming the trial court}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
s judgment can be presented by an appellee absent the filing of a cross-appeal.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 See}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Leon Guerrero v. Look}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 2001 Guam 22, }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 38 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  37.}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 However, because the holding of the trial court has been affirmed on the same ground upon which it was decided, it is unnecessary for us to consider the Respondents}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL
 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  alternative argument.
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 IV.}{\b\insrsid5594447 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tqc\tx4680\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid2820335\charrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [15]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab The language of the statute, when read in context, loses its ambiguity.}{\insrsid2820335  }{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Section 8122.1 confers a $1,500 supplement to each retiree}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
s annual annuity, and not a cumulative increase as asserted by Aguon.}{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Because this interpretation of the statute}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols"
 \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 s language is }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 coherent and consistent}{
\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335  with the statutory scheme, it is conclusive and any further statutory analysis is inappropriate.}{
\insrsid2820335  }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Robinson}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 519 U.S. at 340, 117 S. Ct. at 846; }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Am. Tobacco Co.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
, 456 U.S. at 68, 102 S. Ct. at 1537 (quoting }{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Consumer Prod. Safety Comm}{\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{
\i\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 n v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 , 447 U.S. 102, 108, 100 S. Ct. 2051, 2055 (1980)) (}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt
\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [A]bsent a clearly expressed legislative intention to the contrary, that language must ordinarily be regarded as conclusive.}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f36\fs24}}}{\insrsid2820335 ).}{\insrsid5594447 
\par }{\insrsid2820335\charrsid2820335 
\par }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 [16]}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 \tab We find that the lower court correctly interpreted section 8122.1 and therefore }{\b\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 AFFIRM}{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 
 the grant of summary judgment.}{\insrsid2820335 
\par 
\par }\pard \qj \fi720\li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 JOHN A. MANGLONA\tab \tab  \tab  FRANCES M. TYDINGCO-GATEWOOD
\par Designated Justice\tab \tab \tab \tab }{\insrsid2820335  }{\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 Associate Justice}{\insrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid2820335 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2820335 {\insrsid5594447\charrsid2820335 F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO
\par Acting Chief Justice
\par }}