{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f37\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}
{\f38\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f40\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f41\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f42\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}
{\f43\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f44\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f45\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;
\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;
\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden 
Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tblind0\tblindtype3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Style 1;}{\*\cs16 \additive \ul\cf2 \sbasedon10 \styrsid4285883 Hyperlink;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid1049593\rsid2378502\rsid3025238\rsid4265551\rsid4285883\rsid4413534\rsid4747486
\rsid5460833\rsid5923130\rsid6036154\rsid6558189\rsid6689263\rsid6829726\rsid6979514\rsid7090046\rsid7147639\rsid7826503\rsid9517182\rsid9571944\rsid9991150\rsid10367886\rsid10486986\rsid10900037\rsid11556975\rsid11944196\rsid12986956\rsid12993375
\rsid13065333\rsid13576026\rsid13706125\rsid15289885\rsid15804110}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6850;}{\info{\title IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FIJI}{\author Sam_I}{\operator maltungtung_l}{\creatim\yr2009\mo1\dy29\hr10\min16}
{\revtim\yr2009\mo3\dy18\hr16}{\version6}{\edmins489}{\nofpages2}{\nofwords934}{\nofchars5324}{\*\company USP, Emalus Campus}{\nofcharsws6246}{\vern16393}{\*\password 00000000}}{\*\xmlnstbl }\paperw11678\paperh16598\margl0\margr0\margt0\margb0\gutter0 
\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\grfdocevents0\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\subfontbysize\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3
\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot3025238 \fet0{\*\wgrffmtfilter 013f}\sectd \linex0\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid1049593\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2
\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang 
{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11944196 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FIJI
\par (WESTERN DIVISION)
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1049593 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986 AT LAUTOKA}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11944196 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 CIVIL JURISDICTION}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid1049593 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1049593 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11944196 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid1049593 Action No. 299 of 1978
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9571944 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11944196 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 BETWEEN}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9571944 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11944196 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986 AKKAMMA}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13065333  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 d/o}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986  Ram Sami
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 Plaintiff}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9571944 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4747486\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11944196 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 SUBRAIYA}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13065333  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 f/n Appaiya Naidu
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 Defendant}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9571944 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4285883 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 Mr. N. Tappoo, Counsel for the Plaintiff
\par Mr. H.C. Sharma, Counsel for the Defendant.
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11944196 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571944 JUDG}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 MENT
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9571944 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11944196 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 This is a claim for possession of a piece of land occupied by the defendant.
\par 
\par It is common ground that the defendant}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 s brother, Venkat Naidu, sold to the plaintiff a }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 lease}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 "}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986  of Crown land for $10,000 under an agr}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6558189 eement dated 30/10/73, Ex. P. 2. T}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 he Director of Lands endorsed his consent to the agreement on 14/12/73.
\par 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid15289885 Prior to the Director giving his consent some correspo}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid15289885 
ndence passed between the Director and Messrs B.K. Pillay & Co., Solicitors of Nadi, which is marked EX.5 and was put in by consent. EX. P 5(3) is a letter dated 2/11/73 and indicates that consent to a transfer of all the land would be given, but not to a
n agreement which proposed to sub-divide the land.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11944196\charrsid10486986 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986 
\par The land in question is known as Farm 709; C.T. 10661 and while Venkat Naidu occupied it the defendant apparently lived on a portion of it large enough to accommodate a house. On 8/8/73 Venkat }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15289885 Naidu}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986  by a written agreement EX. P.3 dated 8/8/73 purported to transfer t}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571944 o the defendant an area 9 yds. x}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986  77 yds. The Director of Lands would not agree to that sub-division.
\par 
\par When Venkat Naidu and the plaintiff were arranging the sale it was agreed that the defendant should be gran}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571944 ted the said portion of 9 yds. x}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15289885 
 77 yeds. a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986 nd clause 9 of the Sale and Purchase agreement EX.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15289885  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986 P.2 excepted that portion from the assignment explaining that it was granted to the defendant. On receiving the }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986\charrsid10486986 
Sale}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986  and Purchase agreement Ex.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15289885  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986 P.2 the }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15289885 Director wrote the letter EX. P.5(3)}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986  supra and returned the agreement EX.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15289885 
 P.2. T}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986 hereupon Messrs Pillay replied to the Director by a letter of 28/11/73, EX.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15289885  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986 P. 5(4) saying that the plaintiff and Venkat Naidu had cancelled the assignment to the defendant and enclosed the sale and purchase agreement EX.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15289885  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986 P.2. with the offending para 9 deleted. Thereupon the Director of Lands gave his consent to the transfer, which as}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571944  I have said is endorsed there}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986 on as from 14/12/73.
\par 
\par The defendant is still }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7826503\charrsid10486986 on the land and o
n 20/12/77 the plaintiff served him with notice to quit. In his written statement of defence the defendant alleges that when the Director of Lands refused his consent to the partitioning of the 9}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5923130  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12986956 yds. x}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7826503\charrsid10486986  77 yds. Venkat Naidu and the plaintiff amended clause
 9 but agreed among themselves that the defendant would still be allowed to remain on that portion.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15804110\charrsid10486986 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7826503\charrsid10486986 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11556975\charrsid10486986 P.W.1, a registered surveyor, employed by the Department of Lands and Mines}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13706125 
, gave evidence by reference to the plan EX. P.6 to show that the defendant's house was in fact upon the plaintiff's land.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13706125 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986 The defendant and his brother Venkat Naidu both stated in evidence that the defendant had paid Venkat}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5923130  Naidu}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986  $400}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5923130 .00}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986 
 for the piece of land in question. That evidence is somewhat suspect because the document EX.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13706125  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986 
P.3 says it was to be granted to the defendant in consideration}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13706125  of natural love and affection.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986 
\par 
\par P}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13706125 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986 W.2 Madhwan Pillai was the solicitor}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986 s clerk (Pillay & Co.) who dealt with this arrangement, says that he informed Venkat Naidu and the defendant that the Dir
ector of Lands would not permit the sub-division favouring the defendant. He says that they both agreed to the deletion of the offending clause 9.
\par 
\par The }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154 plaintiff, P.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13706125 W.3, gave evidence in that}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154  belated order by consent and for convenie}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13706125 nce of witness. She says that}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154  following the Director}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154 s refusal to sub-divide the Crown lease Venkat}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13706125  Naidu told the defendant in her}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154 
 presence that he would have to vacate the land. She says she gave him 3 months in which to find another place.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10486986 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154 
\par I have no hesitation in stating that I believe the plaintiff and I accept her evidence that once the Director of Lands made it clear that there could be no sub}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13706125 -}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154 division the defendant agreed to vacate.
\par 
\par On 17/4/71 the plaintiff received from the Director an Approval Notice of Lease, EX}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10367886 . P.1. I}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154 
t contains an addition to clause 2 to the effect that it is a protected lease under the provisions of the Crown Lands Ordinance. P.W.1 says that a lease is ready for issue to the plaintiff from the Director of Lands.
\par 
\par Mr. Sharma for the defendant submitted that an Approval Notice does not give any right}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10367886 s}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154  to the holder. I have already ruled in }{
\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154\charrsid6036154 Pachamma v. Logessa}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154 
, Civ A.88/78 (judgement dated 14.9.79) that such an Approval Notice gives the holder the equitable rights of a lessee under a properly executed lease. Following my own ruling in that case I find that the plaintiff can maintain this action.
\par 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6979514 I accordingly find that the defendant is a trespasser and must give up possession.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6036154 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6979514 
\par In addition to her claim for possession the plaintiff claims damages for loss of use of the land. She says it would produce about 8 tons of sugar cane }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12993375 per year and that her nett }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9991150 profit}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12993375  is about $15.00 per ton.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6979514 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12993375 
\par P.W. 1 says that the area held by the plaintiff is not 8 acres as had been thought by the parties but in fact it measures
 12 acres and 32 perches. The plaintiff says she produced 253 tons last year and that works out at roughly 21 tons an acre based on the assumption that all her land is under cultivated. There is no evidence as to how much land is under cultivation and no 
way of checking the plaintiff}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12993375 
s statement that the land occupied by the defendant would produce 8 tons of cane. She states that the nett profit on a ton of cane comes to $15.00 but I am not informed as to the price of cane or given }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10367886 any }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12993375 details to support th
at statement. There is no evidence from any other source as to the net profit per ton. I do not think I would be justified in accepting her evidence that she has lost 8 x $15.00 = $120 per year by reason of the defendant}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12993375 s trespass.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12993375\charrsid10486986 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11556975\charrsid10486986 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4285883 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10900037 
Had the particulars of the damages been set out in the Statement of Claim they could have been pleaded to in the Statement of Defence and the defence pleading may have assisted me in arriving at }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10367886 
some conclusion.
\par 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10900037 There will be judgment for the plaintiff for possession. The defendant will pay the costs hereof.
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1049593 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1049593 (Sgd.) J.T. WILLIAMS}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10900037\charrsid1049593 
\par }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10367886 JUDGE}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10900037\charrsid1049593 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4285883 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10900037 
\par LAUTOKA,
\par 25th October, 1979}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2378502 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10900037 
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1049593 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10900037 Messrs Anand, Ta}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4413534 ppoo, Krishna & Co., for the P}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10900037 laintiff
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4413534 Messrs Patel & Sharma, for the Defendant.
\par 
\par Date of Hearing: 3rd day of October, 1979}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2378502 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4413534\charrsid10486986 
\par }}