{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f37\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f38\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f40\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f41\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f42\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f43\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f44\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f45\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tblind0\tblindtype3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Style 1;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid271992\rsid666288\rsid1186453\rsid1509719\rsid1781294\rsid1794629\rsid2062077\rsid2124983\rsid2301766\rsid2630383\rsid2637572\rsid2913519\rsid3161454 \rsid3611311\rsid3695302\rsid4158747\rsid4265538\rsid4326497\rsid4662453\rsid5454972\rsid6185443\rsid6191731\rsid6453719\rsid7342623\rsid7371746\rsid8605816\rsid8806146\rsid9046753\rsid9315948\rsid9439709\rsid9515751\rsid9519249\rsid9572082\rsid9652127 \rsid9781847\rsid10498022\rsid10646009\rsid10835255\rsid10972685\rsid11489955\rsid12587901\rsid12652435\rsid12862596\rsid13454858\rsid13524861\rsid13830978\rsid13845448\rsid14288698\rsid14383958\rsid14828362\rsid14877830\rsid15155731\rsid15221336 \rsid15617536\rsid15801932\rsid16404350\rsid16740248}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6846;}{\info{\author Teniau_d}{\operator maltungtung_l}{\creatim\yr2008\mo12\dy2\hr15\min29}{\revtim\yr2009\mo1\dy30\hr16\min29}{\version41}{\edmins345}{\nofpages3} {\nofwords1588}{\nofchars9054}{\*\company USP, Emalus Campus}{\nofcharsws10621}{\vern16393}{\*\password 00000000}}{\*\xmlnstbl }\paperw11678\paperh16598\margl173\margr173\margt288\margb43\gutter0 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\grfdocevents0\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\subfontbysize\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3 \jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot13454858 \fet0{\*\wgrffmtfilter 013f}\sectd \linex0\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid14288698\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2 \pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FIJI}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9519249 \par }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 (WESTERN DIVISION) \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid14288698 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid9315948 AT LAUTOKA \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698\charrsid9315948 CIVIL JURISDICTION}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid9315948 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid14288698 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 Action No. 94 of 1978 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 BETWEEN}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 NADI TOWN COUNCIL \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 Plaintiff}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 AND}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 NADI BAY BEACH CORPORATION LTD. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 Defendant}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1186453 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932 Mr. V. Chand, Counsel for the Plaintiff \par M. D. Benefield, Counsel for the Defendant \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15801932 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid15801932 JUDGMENT \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1186453 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932 \par This is a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9519249 summons under o}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1186453\charrsid1186453 .13 r.9 to set aside a judgment in action 94/78, Lautoka, which was entered by the Nadi Town Council in default of a defence to their Claim for rates.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1186453 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932\charrsid1186453 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932 The statement of claim alleges that in 1974, }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932 75, }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932 76 &}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1186453\charrsid1186453 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1186453\charrsid1186453 77 t}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15801932 he Council issued notices of as}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1186453\charrsid1186453 sessment on the defendant company for rates owing unde}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7371746 r assess}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1186453\charrsid1186453 ment No. 514. They have}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7371746 not been paid and it is alleged}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1186453\charrsid1186453 the total amount said to }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2301766 be due inclusive of interest is $}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1186453\charrsid1186453 4,368.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1186453 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2301766 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6185443 In another action 95/78 there is a similar judgment entered by the Council against the same judgment debtor for arrears of rates in respect of another property }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2630383 amounting to $44,309.66 and a similar application}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11489955 to set aside. The result of this application}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2630383 will determine the result of action 95/78 also.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6185443 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2630383 \par On 11/4/78 the statement of claim was issued and an appearance was entered on 24/4/78. Judgment in default was entered on 10/5/78 and seven weeks later the judgm ent debtors, on 28/6/78, applied to set aside the judgment. No officer of the defendant company subscribed to any affidavit in support of that application. The applica}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14383958 tion purports to be made under o} {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2630383 .13 r.9. \par \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 O}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12587901 .13 r.9 relates to a judgment entered in default of appearance. Therefore on that basis the judgment debtor}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12587901 s application is misc}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 onceived or somewhat haphazard.}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2630383 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12587901 \par Judgement in default of defence is }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid666288 e}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5454972 ntered under the provisions of o}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid666288 .19 rules 2 to 7 and an application }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5454972 to set it aside is governed by o}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid666288 .19 r.9. However, the judgment creditor in his submission}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 s}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid666288 has made no reference to the error of the judgment debtor and there can be no harm in my proceedings as if the judgment debtor had made his application under the correct Order and rule. The actual requirements under either order cannot differ.}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12587901 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid666288 \par The supporting affidavit is sworn by the judgment debtor}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid666288 s solicitor who says that owing to pressure of work and because the judgment debtor}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid666288 s principal place of business is in Sydney he had difficulty in obtaining }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12652435 instructions and he overlooked that they }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662453 were out of time for filing a defence. This is an understandable situation; it happens fairly frequently and one is loathe to condemn a litigant in such circumstances. Nevertheless, once judgment in defaul t has been entered the judgment debtor has to satisfy the court that he has a reasonable defence to the claim. One should examine the merits of the proposed defence before depriving the plaintiff of the judgment which has, after all, been recorded in his favour.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid666288 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662453 \par The proposed defence admits the Council}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662453 s assessment No. 514}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9046753 and admits receiv}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5454972 ing demands for rates in 1975, }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5454972 76 & }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '} {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9046753 77 for the years 1974 to 1977.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662453 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9046753 \par The rateable value of property is, by the terms of s.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1781294 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9046753 61(2) of the Local Government Act based upon i ts unimproved value which is estimated by a surveyor. The owner is informed of the valuation and if he is dissatisfied with a valuation he may appeal in accordance with the provisions of s.70 to a first class magistrate and an appeal lies therefrom to the Supreme Court and thereafter to the Court of Appeal in the ordinary way of civil suits. However, the court of first instance is that of a first class magistrate and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction in the first instance to decide whether any valuatio n was properly and lawfully arrived at. \par \par Nowhere in the proposed statement of defence is }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1509719 there any reference to the question of valuation. This is not really surprising because had there been any serious complaint concerning the amount fixed as the unimproved }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4265538 value it would no doubt have been raised several years ago in the magistrate}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4265538 s}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3161454 court by way of appeal. }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4265538 The correctness of the valuation cannot be raised in the Supreme Court in a claim of this nature because that would require my deciding whether or not the valuation had been carried out lawfully and calculated fairly. If I decided that it had not been properly valued any magistrate hearing an appeal against the valuation would }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10498022 be }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4265538 embarrassed especially if he had views to the contrary. Moreover, such a d ecision on my part would in this case virtually oblige a magistrate to grant leave to appeal against the valuation several years out of time.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9046753 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4265538 \par Although the proposed defence and supporting affidavit made no }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15155731 reference to }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7342623 a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15155731 n}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7342623 y valuation Mr. Benefield appeared to touch on this aspect during the hearing of the application. He made a brief remark that the land in question was agricultural land but there is no reference }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14877830 in the affidavit or the proposed statement of defence to any issue based on the use of the land for agriculture. He also }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14828362 referred}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14877830 to s.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10646009 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14877830 65 which provides that regard shall be had to such building as are on the land when determining its unimproved value. These are the kind of matters to be raised by way of an appeal a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13830978 gainst the Council }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14877830 s valuation to a magistrate}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14877830 s court in the first instance and if there has been no appeal how can the Supreme Court usurp the function of the magistrate}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14877830 s court? In any event the proposed statement of defence does not, as I have said, refer to valuation. Mr. Benefield also }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9652127 complained that L.N 4/73, which presumably brought the land within t}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15155731 he municipality was ultra vires. Why endeavour to create such an issue after 5 years? In any event there is no reference to this in the affidavit or the proposed defence. Mr. Benefield argued that there were not estopped from pleading it was ultra vires. }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9652127 However, it is not pleaded in the proposed defence and in fact para 2 thereof admits that the land comes within the municipality.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4265538 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9652127 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9652127\charrsid16404350 The statement of defence confirms itself entirely to complaints about the assessment for rates which is quite different from the question of valuation. The statement of defence is very uninformative and lacking in detail. It merely makes assortions without setting out any facts in support.}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9652127 \par \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9652127\charrsid16740248 Para 4 denies that the rates were properly assessed, published and issued. No facts are pleaded to demonstrate that the rates were }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3611311\charrsid16740248 improperly assessed, such as complaining that they were never published or were wrongly published etc. The rates are assessed on the valuation at the rate approved and published by the Council. Nowhere does the defence complain of the valuation, and if it had complained, this Court has no power to consider it in the first instance. Section 72 & 73(1) set out the manner in which the rates are to be levied or imposed. The Council having decided what the rate shall be must under s.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10646009 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3611311\charrsid16740248 72 publish in a Fiji newspaper the amount of the rate. If the judgment }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519\charrsid16740248 debtor alleges this was not done then it should have been pleaded. Under }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16740248\charrsid16740248 s.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 73}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16740248\charrsid16740248 (}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519\charrsid16740248 1) the Council must issue a demand note to the owner stating:-}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9652127 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid2913519 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 (a) the property on which the rate is assessed; \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid271992 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid9439709 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 (b) the unimproved value thereon; \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid271992 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid2913519 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 (c) the period in respect of which the rate is made; \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid271992 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid2913519 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 (d) The amount payable}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 ;}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid271992 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid2913519 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 (e) the time or times of payment being not less than 30 days after the date of service upon him of the demand note.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2913519 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 \par If any of these requirements are not complied with the demand, although accurate, will not be valid. \par \par The statement of defence admits that the demands for rates have been served. It does not complain that the demands relates to a property which he }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 does not use so presumably s. 73}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 (1}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 )}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8806146 (}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 a) is complied with. It does not complain that the Council}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 s valuation has been misquoted and the Council}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 s valuation }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6453719 is the legal and proper valuation until a first class magistrate has, following the judgment debtor}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6453719 s appeal, declared otherwise. This would seem to dispose of }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8806146 s.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 73}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8806146 (}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6453719 1}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 )}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8806146 (}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6453719 b). Nowhere does the statement of defence allege that the year relating to each assessment is one in respect of which he owes no rates e.g. on the ground that they were paid or some exemption granted. Thus }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 s. 73}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8806146 (}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6453719 1}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 )}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8806146 (}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6453719 c) appears to be not in issue. The amount payable is disputed, but the statement of defence does not indicate the extent of any over assessment. If the Council has erroneously based its calculations on a higher valuation than that which was notified to the judgment debtor several years ago then the statement of defence should set out }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9515751 what }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 that valuation was. It}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8806146 is due to quoting an incorrect rate is should set out what }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9515751 the rate is which the Council published or other facts }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6191731 which show it is incorrect. No mathematical error is alleged. In my view }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4326497 s.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 73}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4326497 (}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6191731 1}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 )}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4326497 (}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6191731 d) is }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3695302\charrsid271992 disposed}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid271992 of.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6191731 S.73(1)(e) does not provide a basis for complaining about the assessment but simply as to when payment can lawfully be demanded and the proposed statement of defence makes no allegations in that respect.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2913519 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6191731 \par I do not know what para}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8605816 4}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6191731 of the }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9781847 statement of defence means i n its reference to the rates set being properly issued. The Act makes no reference to rates being issued but it speaks of serving }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2637572 a de}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12862596 mand rate on the owner; however;}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2637572 the judgment debtor admits that he received the demand.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6191731 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2637572 \par Para 5 of the statement of defence complains that the assessment were not proper and valid and did not comply with the provisions of the Act and even if they were validly made they were wrongly assessed and are excessive. \par \par Excessive rates may be due an over-valuation but as I have said it is not competent for this court to purport to determine whether there has been an excessive }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15617536 valuation in the first instance.}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2637572 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15617536 It}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2637572 may }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10972685 be due to misquoting the valuation or the rate or to mathematical error. But these are matters provided for in sections 72 & 73 and can be grounds for resisting a demand for rates as I have already explained but no facts have been pleaded to reveal any such grounds.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2637572 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10972685 \par In my opinion there is nothing in the affidavit or the proposed statement of defence which leads me to conclude that there is a }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15617536 triable}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10972685 issue in the Supreme Court in relation to the Council}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10972685 s demand for rates. \par \par It is not }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2062077 sufficient when applying to set aside a judgment in order to }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 defend to make general assertions denying liability. It }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15617536 should be apparent f}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 r}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15617536 o}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 m}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15617536 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 the defence that specific facts are alleged which if proved would result in a determination in the judgment debtor}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 s favour on an issue which would affect the matter of their liability in their favour. Not a single fact has been alleged in the proposed stateme nt of defence.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10972685 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 \par The application is dismissed and the judgment debtor will pay the Council}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14288698 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 s costs which I fix at $100.00. \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13524861 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3695302 (Sgd.) J.T. Williams}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861\charrsid13524861 \par JUDGE \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2913519 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 \par LAUTOKA, \par 4th August, 1978}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10835255 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 \par \par Messrs. Vijay Chand & Co., Counsel for the Plaintiff \par Messrs. Munro, Leys & Co.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3695302 ,}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 Counsel for the Defendant \par \par Date of Hearing}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3695302 :}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13524861 7th day of July, 1978. \par }}