{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f37\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f38\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f40\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f41\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f42\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f43\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f44\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f45\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;
\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;
\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden 
Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tblind0\tblindtype3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Style 1;}{\s16\ql \li864\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin864\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Style 2;}}
{\*\rsidtbl \rsid353070\rsid486960\rsid600790\rsid735622\rsid983479\rsid1066844\rsid1080484\rsid1119192\rsid1130901\rsid1576756\rsid1585039\rsid1658928\rsid1913640\rsid2453034\rsid3162802\rsid3238942\rsid3428240\rsid3692683\rsid3696319\rsid3939292
\rsid4134693\rsid4669706\rsid4726517\rsid5061288\rsid5130522\rsid5190859\rsid5440812\rsid5589643\rsid5646286\rsid5718875\rsid5779702\rsid5907440\rsid6317167\rsid6510393\rsid6755112\rsid6848337\rsid6956569\rsid7150994\rsid7163437\rsid7227415\rsid7352226
\rsid7867209\rsid7894286\rsid8019266\rsid8066263\rsid8135441\rsid8210372\rsid8213855\rsid8939945\rsid8979858\rsid9513159\rsid9571202\rsid9590986\rsid9655196\rsid9706307\rsid9784669\rsid9908622\rsid10109185\rsid10251002\rsid10429587\rsid10826488
\rsid10844000\rsid10962375\rsid11088913\rsid11164728\rsid11419795\rsid11566767\rsid11808141\rsid12275294\rsid12336012\rsid12541293\rsid12613943\rsid12660295\rsid13700975\rsid13778978\rsid13837548\rsid13858968\rsid14093579\rsid14568917\rsid14688058
\rsid14878090\rsid15211926\rsid15228730\rsid15673632\rsid15695298\rsid15735265\rsid15742999\rsid16009301\rsid16197281\rsid16201041\rsid16270250\rsid16283238\rsid16649805}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6846;}{\info
{\title IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FIJI (WESTERN DIVISION)}{\author Teniau_d}{\operator maltungtung_l}{\creatim\yr2008\mo12\dy5\hr16\min38}{\revtim\yr2009\mo1\dy26\hr11\min3}{\version36}{\edmins520}{\nofpages8}{\nofwords3892}{\nofchars22191}
{\*\company USP, Emalus Campus}{\nofcharsws26031}{\vern16393}{\*\password 00000000}}{\*\xmlnstbl }\paperw11678\paperh16598\margl2520\margr765\margt585\margb1212\gutter0 
\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\grfdocevents0\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\subfontbysize\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3
\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot3939292 \fet0{\*\wgrffmtfilter 013f}\sectd \linex0\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid6848337\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2
\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang 
{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FIJI}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12613943 
\par }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 (WESTERN DIVISION)}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid486960\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16201041 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid3692683 AT LAUTOKA
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16201041\charrsid3692683 PROBATE JURISDICTION}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid3692683 

\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16201041 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16201041\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid486960\charrsid8210372 Action No. 2 of 1974
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 IN THE ESTATE OF SHIU PRASAD JOHN LOCHAN
\par ALIAS SHIU PRASAD JOHN LOCHAN }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11419795 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid11419795 s/o Lochan}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3692683  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid11419795 late of Lautoka, Fiji, Theatre Proprietor
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16201041 BETWEEN}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 HARRY RAM LOCHAN
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 s/o Ranjit
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16201041 Plaintiff}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16201041 AND}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 RAJENDRA DUTT MAHARAJ}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16201041 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 s/o Ram Lal}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3692683 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3692683\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16201041 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 A}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16201041 ND}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3692683 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3692683\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 OLIN MAYA MAHARAJ
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 d/o Shiu Prasad John Lochan}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8213855 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16201041 Defendants}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid6956569 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 Mr. S.M. Koya, Counsel for the Plaintiff
\par Mr. K.C. Ramrakha,}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15695298  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 Counsel for the Defendants.
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8210372 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid8210372 JUDGMENT
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4134693 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372\charrsid6956569 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10251002 This}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5646286  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10251002 
action follows the death of S.P.J. Lochan, hereinafter called the testator, who made several wills between the beginning of 1965 and his death in October}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6956569  1973.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10251002 
\par He had two daughters, OLIN & JUNE, a son-in-law Rajendra Maharaj who is married to the daughter OLIN, a common law wife hereinafter called the wife and a nephew Harry Lochan, the plaintiff.
\par 
\par His will of 17.2.65 provided for his wife for }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6956569 her }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10251002 life, 
for the maintenance of his daughter OLIN and for his estate to be divided between the two daughters and his nephew Harry Lochan. He appointed his nephew (the plaintiff) and his son-in-law Rajendra Maharaj (hereina}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6956569 fter called Rajendra }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3692683 as }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6956569 executors).}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10251002 

\par 
\par In 1971 h
e had a stroke and was in hospital for several weeks; in 1972 and 1973 he had further strokes. During 1973 he made three further wills which are disputed by the nephew Harry Lochan (hereinafter called the nephew). The wills, put in by consent as Exhibits 
D2, D3 & D4}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6755112  are dated 21.6.73, 22.9.73 and 25.9.73 respectively and they all omit any reference to the nephew. The testator died on 24.10.73.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10251002 

\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6755112 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8019266 The statement of claim alleges that the wills Exs. D2, D3, & D4 are forgeries or were prepared when the deceased w
as not of sound mind and memory or are the products of undue influence exerted upon an enfeebled testator by OLIN and her husband Rajendra. Allegations of forgery were abandoned during the trial and the issues are whether there was a lack of testamentary 
capac}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 ity and/}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8019266 or undue influence.
\par 
\par The testator was about 69 years when he died and the nephew had been brought up as his son from an early age. There is no evidence that in 1973 the testator was on anything but reasonable relations with his nephew who continued to live with him after his 
marriage in 1967. }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8213855 The}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8019266  testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8019266 
s wife did not get on well with her }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8019266 daughter}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 -in-}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8019266 law}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8019266  and after one year the nephew moved to a house of his own. However, there }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 is no evidence that the father-}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8019266 son relationship ceased or was strained. In fact the evidence which
 I accept points to its continuance. Why therefore should the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8019266 
s last 3 wills disinherit the nephew when in 1965 he was beneficiary as to one third and a }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 co-e}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid983479 xecutor?}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6755112 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid983479 
\par The earliest of the 1973 wills Ex. D2 dated 21.6.73. was drafted by a solicitor, Mr. D.S. Sharma, she received hi}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8213855 s instructions Ex. D1 from Rajen}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid983479 
dra, (deft.), on 21.6.73. Mr. Sharm}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid983479 s (D.W.1) office was near to the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid983479 s flat in the Glo}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 pe cinema building which belonged }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid983479 
to the testator. The will Ex. D.2 appoints Rajendra, who instructed the solicitor, as sole executor and equal beneficiary with the wife and two daughters. Thus half the deceased}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid983479 s estate went to the daughter Olin and her husband Rajendra (deft.).
\par 
\par Such a share out may not have appealed to the wife and daughter June. Anyway a handwritten will Ex. D3 appeared on 22.9.73 excluding Rajendra (deft.) and sharing the property equally among the wife and 2 daughters. On 25.9.73}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14878090  a typewritten will Ex.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14878090 D4}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid983479 
 was made repeating the terms of Ex. D3.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid983479\charrsid5646286 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid486960 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16009301 What was the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16009301 s mental an
d physical state when he made his 1973 wills? Mr. Sharma, D.W.1, said that on 21.6.73 the deceased was in bed; he read the instructions Ex.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15673632  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16009301 
D.1. and the will to him. He said the testator spoke rationally and over a cup of tea said he had had a stroke. In cross-examination, D.W.1, (solicitor), stated that the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16009301 s family did not inform him that he was receiving medical treatment; he did not inquire about relatives who might hope to benefit under the will but learned that he had made a will several year
s earlier. No effort was made to obtain the existing will of 1965 which was being revoked. In }{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16009301\charrsid15673632 Rattan Sing v Amirchand}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16009301 
 1948, 1 A.E.R. 152, at 156 E, the Privy Council observed that one would expect a testator of sound mind who intended to disinherited a near relation to send for any previous wills.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15673632  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16197281 D.W.5, A.S. Ali, the senior clerk of D.W.1, witnessed the signing of the will Ex.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15673632  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16197281 
D2; he was not aware that the testator had had a stroke but said he was in bed. D.W.5, said that the testator spoke normally but I find that evidence to be far from reliable.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12541293 
\par Rajendra (deft.) gave Mr. Sharma, D.W.1, the instructions for the will Ex. D.2 o
f June 1973. He denied knowing of the subsequent will Ex. D.3 until after it had been made but for reasons hereinafter appearing, I do not believe him. Ex. D3 was prepared by a Mr. Mishra, solicitor, who is now in Canada. His clerk SHABAZ KHAN, D.W.2, was
 present when the typed will, Ex. D4 was signed by the testator at the latter}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12541293 
s flat on 25.9.73 in the presence of the solicitor, Mr. Mishra. Ex. D.3, dated 23.9.73 is the handwritten will of which Ex. D.4 is a typed repe}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319 ti}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12541293 
tion.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319  D.W.6, Janti, a domestic, wh
o worked for the deceased for many years witnessed Ex. D.3. She says that the testator spoke reasonably at that time and that he told her it was his will. I have not the slightest doubt that at this time the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319 s speech was considerably affected by a paralysis of the left side of his face and I am not at all sure what D.W.6 meant by the expression }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319 spoke reasonably}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319 . Did she mean }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319 less slurred}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319  than usual?
\par 
\par D.W.8, Olin, one of the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319 s two daughters, says that she was not aware of the wills Ex. 
D.3 and Ex. D.4 until after they were executed. For reasons which appear later I find that she was aware that they were being prepared and executed even if she did not know the contents before hand. She remembered the solicitor, Mr. Mishra coming to the t
estator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319 s flat and writing the will Ex. D3 and later returning }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10429587 with}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3696319  the typed }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8979858 replica Ex. D4. She indicates that in regard to each will the testator asked }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8979858 them}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8979858 
 if they were satisfied. Her evidence indicates that the persons thus addressed were the witness D.W.8, her sister and her mother.
\par 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15211926 D.W.9, Natwarlal Vagh, says that he saw the testator every Sunday. He is in the film distribution business and the testator was a cinema proprietor. He state}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10429587 d}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15211926  that the testator was bedfast for about a month prior to his death and that until 10 days before his death he was }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15211926 all right}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15211926 
 and that up to a month before his death he was in }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10429587 control of his mental faculties}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15211926 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12541293 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15211926 
\par The medical evidence tendered by the defendant came}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15695298  from two doctors. D.W.2, Dr. Ye}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15211926 
nkat Raju, was called to attend the testator on 11/8/72 and says that there was a paralysis of the left side of the body due to a stroke. He sa}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12275294 w him again on 14/8/72 when there}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15211926  had been a slight improvement. Dr. Raju did not appear to have been informed that this was a second stroke and that the first one }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11164728 
had occurred in 1971. He observed no positive signs of mental impairment. But this was about }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12275294 a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11164728  year before the disputed wills
 were executed and his evidence, does not greatly assist as to the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11164728 s mental capacity in 1973.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15211926 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11164728 
\par D.W.4, Dr. Young, attended the testator at a time which he thinks was about 4 to 6}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12275294  months before his death. He had}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11164728 
 suggested that the testator be sent to hospital but his family did not respond. He said that had the testator suffered an impairment of the mind he would have noticed this.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1585039 
 The doctor stated that the testator was in pain and said very little. Dr. Young had no notes made at the time. He did no
t purport to have an accurate recollection and I think it may have been much more than 6 months before the death that he saw the testator.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11164728 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1585039 The daughters Olin and June both state that the deceased was in possession of his mental faculties until after the will of September 1973 was made. Like the plaintiff (}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4726517 nephew}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1585039 ) they are beneficiaries}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7352226  and could be tempted to colour the evidence in their own favour.
}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7352226 
\par Evidence as the deceased}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7352226 s mental state given by the plaintiff}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7352226 s witnesses reveals a somewhat different picture from that presented by the other side.
\par 
\par Mrs.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4726517  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7352226 Marriott, P.W.1, worked at the Globe Cinema, for the testator, from 1957 to 1972. She mentioned the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7352226 s second stroke in August 1972 and said Dr. Raju had visited him on that occasion. After the third stroke in June 1973 she visited him often.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8939945  In August 1973 she wanted him to sign some papers connected with hurricane damage to her home but he could not understand and she approached Rajendra to sign them. She said the deceased appear}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4726517 ed}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8939945  not to }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15695298 recognise}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8939945 
 her in September 1973.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7352226 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8939945 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8939945\charrsid13700975 P.W.2, Ramat Ali, a hairdresser renting accommodation on the ground floor of the Globe Cinema dressed the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8939945\charrsid13700975 s hair. He gave evidence of the stroke and the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8939945\charrsid13700975 
s deteriorating condition saying that after the third stroke in 1973 the testator was bedfast, his mind wandered and he spoke of his childhood. Two months prior to the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8939945\charrsid13700975 s death }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1130901\charrsid13700975 when he dressed his hair hi}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7867209 
s speech was slurred and laborio}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1130901\charrsid13700975 us.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8939945 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13700975 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13700975\charrsid13700975 P.W.3, A.C. Chand, worked at the Globe Cinema. He witnessed the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13700975\charrsid13700975 s first stroke in 1971 and said Dr. }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6317167 Y}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13700975\charrsid13700975 
oung attended him. If that is so Dr.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9908622  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1080484 Young}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1080484 s recollection of the occasion is two years out in point of time. }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6317167 He P.W.3, recollected the second stro
ke in 1972 when Dr. Raju attended the testator. P.W.3 visi}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid353070 
ted the test testator each day for instructions and received them up to the occasion of the third stroke in June 1973. He says that from August 1973 onwards the deceased did not appear to recognised
 him. Prior to this deceased used to lie on his bed with closed eyes and open mouth and it took time to get instructions from him because his mind wandered. From August 1973 onwards P.W.3 received instructions from Rajendra. On 3.9.73 was resigning but co
uld get no response }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9908622 from}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid353070 
 the testator and so he handed his resignation to Rajendra. In cross-examination he said the testator was very sick after July 1973. A.C. C}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 hand}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 s recollection of the chronological order of events appeared to be reliable.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13700975 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 
\par P.W.4, V.N.Singh, Clerk to the Agricultural Tribunal, visited the testator every week in 1973. He says that in July 1973 the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 
s face was twisted, he was on his back and his tongue hang out. On those occasions when the deceased could talk he stayed with him fo
r 10 minutes or so but there were occasions when he could not speak. A visit of 10 minutes duration is rather short and suggests that the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 s more lucid periods did not call for anything but short visits.
\par 
\par The evidence of P.W.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4669706 s 1.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 2,}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4669706  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 3}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4669706  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 &}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4669706  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 4 fits in w
ith that of P.W.5 Dr. Gounder. The latter first visited the testator on 13/5/73 and noted the partial paralysis of the left side. He said the testator could not sit up by himself and when assisted to a sitting position complained of pain. }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11566767 He visited him on the 15th and 16th May and gave pain killing injections advising }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11566767 
the family}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11566767  to get him out of bed three times a day to exercise a painful left knee. During visits h}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4669706 e saw the wife and he saw D.W.9, June }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11566767 (the daughter) whom he identified in Court. At that stage Dr. Gounder stated that the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11566767 s mind was not clear although he was apparently capable and had some capacity and understanding. Dr. Gounder nevertheless made sure that the rela}
{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4669706 tives knew what was to be done.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1066844 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11566767 
\par At the instance of the nephew }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10962375 (plaintiff) Dr. Gounder states that he asked Mr. Ramesh Patel, consulting physician, to examine the testator on 30/6/73.
\par 
\par I ignore certain questions which were erroneously}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4669706  put to the doctor in evidence-in-}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10962375 chief as to the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10962375 s testamentary capacity. H
is replies if I acted on them would save me from making a decision because they would answer the very decision which I have to make. Therefore I exclude the doctor}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10962375 s opinions as to the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10962375 s testamentary capacity.
\par 
\par On 11/8/73 Dr. Gounder again saw the testator who was still in bed; he was very weak and suffering from }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548 diarrhoea. The testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548 s words were slurred; they did not make sense and the doctor had to ask the wife what it was that the testator was trying to say. On 14/8/73 the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548 s conditio
n was much the same. He saw him again on the 13/9/73 and gave him a multi-vitamin injection which was what he had done on other occasions. The }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid600790\charrsid600790 t}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548\charrsid600790 estator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548  showed no emotional change when the doctor appeared at his bedside and did not seem to appreciate that a
 doctor was in attendance or what the doctor was telling him to do. This was before the }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8066263 last of the wills was executed.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548 
\par 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548\charrsid5130522 On 19/10/73 when called again the doctor found the testator crying and trying to speak but unable to make himself understood. At this s
tage, the last of the said wills had been executed. Dr. Gounder said that during this vi}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8066263 sit Rajendra appeared and said,}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548\charrsid5130522 
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid13837548 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548\charrsid5130522 
Oh there is nothing wrong with him. He has just had too much to }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8066263 drink}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548\charrsid8066263 .}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805\charrsid8066263 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13837548 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8066263 In cross-exam}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548 ination the doctor said that prior to 19/10/73 the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13837548 s replies had been unintelligible. One therefore wonders what, if anything, lay behind the comment that the testator had had too much to drink}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3238942 
. It was only a few days before his death and any drink he may have consumed would have had to be carried to him. The nephew who allegedly encouraged the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3238942 s acknowledged drinking habits was no longer and accepted visitor. He, the doctor agreed he did not ask any questions designed to check the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 
'}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3238942 s mental capacity to conduct his business, to deal with property and to formulate a will.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11566767 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3238942 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5589643 In re-examination he doubted whether one could have got cogent replies from the testator to questions about }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8066263 his }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5589643 personal and business affairs. Prior to 19/10/73 he would answer, shake his head or remain silent. From that evidence I conclude that the testator was, prior to 19/10/73 in an exception}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571202 ally weak, exhausted and depende}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5589643 
nt state in the physical sense; that even if he understood he could only shake his head, and at times he was silent. One could not tell from silence whether or not he had understood.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3238942 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5589643 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9590986 The nephew, P.W.6, says that he saw the testator regularly until August 1973 but then his aunt (the wife) }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5190859 
prevented his visits. From May to August he noticed the testator deteriorating, he was forgetful and could not remember whether he had had his medicine. In July he had to tell the testator who he was.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5589643 

\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5190859 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5190859\charrsid5061288 Out of the evidence on both sides the picture emerges of a man who had a stroke in 1971 which made it difficult for him to get around}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571202  but he}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5190859\charrsid5061288  did so with a stick}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571202 . His condition did not improve}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5190859\charrsid5061288  and he had a further stroke
 in August 1972 which made him worse. It appears that about May 1973 he had a third stroke when trying to use the bathroom and from onwards was virtually bedfast. P.W.6 Janki says he was }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7227415\charrsid5061288 bedfast for about 6 months prior to his death and that appears to fit in with the evidence of Dr. Gounder, P.W.5.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5190859 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 
\par In determining the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 
s mental condition during that period I have to pay regard to the credibility of all the witnesses and I have no hesitation whatever in using P.W.5, Dr. Gounder as the yardstick. The doctor was undoubt}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571202 
ed}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 ly a witness of the highest }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571202 integrity}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 
 and I accept his evidence with the exception of those inadmissible portions which give a direct opinion as to the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 
s testamentary capacity. In cross-examination the doctor said he had formed an opinion of the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 
s mental capacity from his onsers answers to general questions concerning his health, habits and well being.
\par 
\par I find on the evidence of Dr. Gounder and P.W.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 s 1,}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571202  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 2,}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571202  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 3 & }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5130522 4 that fol}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 lowing his third stroke in May 1973, the already seriously weakened and partially paralysed testator bec}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9571202 a}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 me bedfast and was absolutely dependent upon those around him. Indeed for the whole of 1973 he was dependent }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9784669 
upon his wife and daughters to help him to
 move and even to eat. His memory was not good and from May onwards grew worse as did his understanding. No doubt there would be periods of greater lucidity and ability to comprehend but I consider that there was no depth to his understanding. In other wo
rds he would probably remember people when his recollections were prompted. That conclusion is supported by his behaviour when }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5779702 
he made out his will. Thus he did not call for his former will or wills. In revoking his earlier testamentary disposition in favou
r of his adopted son he gave no reasons and if he recollected him and remembered he had been a beneficiary in an earlier will I think he would have mentioned this. Such behaviour was commented on by the Privy Council in }{
\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5779702\charrsid12660295 Ratt}{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12660295 an}{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5779702\charrsid12660295  Singh v. Amirchand}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5779702  1948, 1 A.E.R. 152 at 156 F who said,}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5061288 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid8135441 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 
It is relevant to note that he failed to employ the solicitor who had acted for him previously or even to ask him to send the previous wills or copies of them, for these are precautions which a testator of sound}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12660295  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 mind who deliberately intended to alter his will and disinherit his near relations would naturally take.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8135441 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 
\par The will Ex. D. 3/D.4 of September 1973 is very short. It makes no reference to the kind of property disposed of and contains the statement,
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid8135441 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 I Declare that no pe
rson other than my above-named wife and two daughters are entitled to any share or benefit of }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12660295 an}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 y kind under this my will.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8135441 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 
\par Was the testator there saying these are the only persons who have }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 a claim upon me}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441  by way of close kinship? If so, it was not accurate because he had an adopted son who was also his nephew.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13778978 
 Surely the latter, having been brought up as a son from childhood would have a moral claim on the estate. By statute an adopted child has the same rights as a natural child. On signing that will had the }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10844000 testator failed to recollect the adopted nephew? Did he intend to disinherit him? The above phraseology does nothing to help determine that very important question.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8135441 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10844000 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10826488 There is no evidence that the solicitor who drafted the will questioned the testato
r about the size of his family, or his close relatives, or any previous testamentary dispositions or the extent of his disposable possessions. According to the Privy Council supra th}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16283238 o}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10826488 se are considerations which help to determine whether a testator intended to disinherit a near relative.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10844000 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10826488 
\par I am satisfied that the will Ex. D3/D4 was the product of a man so enfeebled by a succession of strokes, pain and resultant partial paralysis that his
 mind and memory were not sufficiently sound as to appreciate and understand the nature of the dispositions therein.
\par 
\par I arrive at a similar conclusion for similar reasons in regard to the will of June 1973.
\par 
\par Should I be wrong }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12336012 
in these conclusions there is the issue of undue influence. The evidence shows that from the time of the first stroke in 1971 the testator began to be increasingly dependent upon others. In August }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7163437 
1972 he clearly could not survive and move around even in h
is own abode and could not sit outside it without assistance. He was dependant upon his wife, friends and relatives and the defendant Rajendra began to take an increasing part in the management of the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7163437 s business affairs and it is not unreasonable to deduce that he would gain more of the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7163437 s confidence. After the 3rd stroke in May 1973 he became an enfeebled and partially paralysed old man who could onl}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9655196 y sit up in bed with assistance. His wife and two daughters were in constant attendance }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7163437 on 
him and were in a position greatly to influence him having regard to his dependence upon them.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10826488 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7163437 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1913640 The law appertaining to undue influence was considered by Ungoed-Thomas J. }{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1913640\charrsid6510393 In Re Graig deceased}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1913640 , 1970, 2 W.L.R. 1219. He referred to instances where undue influ
ence may be presumed as arising where the donee has been in a position to exert undue influence over the donor although there has been no actual proof of its exercise. In such cases the courts require proof of its non-exercise. In }{
\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15695298 Blomb}{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1913640\charrsid6510393 y v. Ryan}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1913640  (1956) 99 
C.L.R. 362 at 405 Fullager J. observed in relation to the probable existence of undue influence that the circumstances which may induce a court of equity to set a transaction aside are of great variety and they include a need of any kind on the part of th
e donor such as sickness, age, infirmity. The common characteristic being that they set one party at a serious disadvantage }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13858968 vis a vis the other.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7163437 

\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14688058 
\par In the instant case at the times of the 1973 wills the testator wa}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6510393 s in my view, absolutely depende}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14688058 nt on those a
round him. It would be a simple matter for his wife and two daughters to remind him of their existence and to omit any reference to his adopted son. In my view it is significant that this bedridden, partly paralysed elderly man made three wills in 3 month
s and that the second of those was handwritten by a solicitor and later typed as a third will and that the testator signed them all. His hand was very shaky indeed. Such behaviour implies a considerable degree of urgency on the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14688058 s part to put }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14568917 his af
fairs in order at a stage when his mental capacity was such that he would scarcely be fully alive to such an emergency. I think that the motivation probably came from some other source such as those in regular contact with him, namely his wife, daughters 
and Rajendra. I am }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1576756 satisfied that the nephew had at this stage been prevented from seeing the testator.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14688058 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1576756 
\par P.W.2, the hairdresser, says that in September 1973, between 1 & 2 p.m., one day, both the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1576756 
s daughters appeared in his shop. They were agitated and were permitted to use his telephone to con}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16270250 tact Rajendra in Nadi. He says (Olin (Rajendra}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 
'}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14093579 s wife)) }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16270250 said,}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1576756 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16270250 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16270250 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16270250 
Father is very ill. Get a lawyer as quickly as possible}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 "}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16270250 .
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16270250 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16270250 
\par Both }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3162802 daughters deny that such an incident took place I believe P.W.4. He }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3162802\charrsid14093579 appred}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3162802 
 to be reliable and his account has the ring of truth about it. It will be noted that Dr. Gounder P.W. 5 was attending the testator in September and his evidence is that his patient was in a very poor mental con
dition. A solicitor did come to see the testator in September; in fact}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5718875  he came twice, once when the handwritten will was made and once when the typed draft of it was prepared for the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5718875 s signature.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16270250 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5718875 
\par P.W.4 not unnaturally asked if he could see the testator when he heard that disturbing }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1658928 telephone message but he says the sisters stated that the doctor had forbade any visitors.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5718875 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1658928 
\par The sisters did not simply say that they could not recollect that incident; they denied its occurrence. Their evidence suggests that they were }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15695298 unaware}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9513159  of the hairdresser}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9513159 
s shop. I find it hard to accept their denials. Why are they untruthful about the incident? It is probable that they wanted a solicitor to change the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9513159 s will but they wish to conceal that anxiety. They had every opportunity of priming the testator in what to say and their sending for a solicitor in those circumstances is,}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14093579  to my mind, rather suspicious.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1658928 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9513159 
\par With regard to the will of June 1973 in which the deceased disinherited his adopted son the wife and daughters were, as I have said, in a position to exert undue influence upon the testator. His }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11808141 
condition then was very poor physically and weakened mentally. On this occasion the Solicitor Mr. Sharma received his instructions by the hand of Rajendr}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15695298 a and it is significant that tho}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11808141 se instructions not only omitted any reference to the adopted son but completely disinherited him and gave \'bc
 of the estate to Rajendra. Those instructions formed the basis of the will Ex. D2. When Ex. D2 was to be revoked 3 months later it is significant that Mr. Sharma (solicitor) whose office was only yards away from the testator}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11808141 s home was not again called }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15695298 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11808141  see }{
\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11808141\charrsid15695298 Rattan Singh v. Amirchand}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11808141\charrsid15695298  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11808141 
(supra). Why did the testator not call upon }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5440812 Mr. Sharma? Was it because Mr. Sharma might query the executing of another will so soon after that of June 1973?}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9513159 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid486960 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8210372 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5440812 In my view the circumstances attending the wills of June and September 1973 are such as to raise a presumption of undue influence exercised by the beneficiaries upon the }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9706307 
testator. It is significant that the person who was omitted from those wills, the nephew and adopted son, had been deterred from visiting the man who had been his father from childhood. Those who benefited were actually present 
i.e. within the flat when they were made and at least one of them, namely the de facto wife, had deterred the nephew from visiting the testator on what proved to be his deathbed.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13700975 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9706307 
\par There is nothing in the evidence given by the defendants to rebut the presumption of undue influence which a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7894286 rises in the circumstances. It could be}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9706307 
 rebutted by showing that the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9706307 
s former will had been carefully explained to him and that he realised that he was disinheriting the nephew and showing that the solicitor had carefully questioned the testator about his survi}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11088913 
ving relatives, children and family generally, about his property and in the circumstances, he being in bed at the time, about his health, kind of illness, how long he had been bedfast and so forth. In fact I w
ould go so far as to say that this is what the solicitor in regard to each of the 1973 wills should have done to ensure that the particular will which he was then executing represented the testator}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11088913 s definite and lucid wishes unhampered by any outside influence or bad memory.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9706307 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11088913 
\par The presence and assistance of a doctor at the material time would have been of help. No one knows better than a solicitor that wills are frequently challenged and that they are sometimes set on grounds of lack of testamentary }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15228730 capacit
y and of undue influence. The solicitors connected with the 1973 wills appear to have been slow to appreciate the obligations placed upon them by what they actually saw. This in large measure was probably due to the omission of the wife and daughters to d
raw the solicitors}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16649805 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15228730 
 attentions to the fact that the testator had had a series of strokes, had been in hospital and had during the preceding 2 years been attended by doctors.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11088913 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15228730 
\par Judgment is entered against the wills of June and September 1973 and probate of the will of 17/2/65 should be decreed in solemn form.
\par 
\par Costs to be paid by the defendant to the Plaintiff.
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15228730 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15695298 (Sgd.) J.T. WILLIAMS}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15228730\charrsid15228730 
\par JUDGE
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid486960 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15228730 
\par LAUTOKA,
\par 26th October, 1978.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13700975 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15735265 Messrs Koya & Co., Counsel for the Plaintiff}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13700975 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15695298 Messrs Ramrakha}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15735265 s, Counsel for the Defendant}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5907440 s}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15735265 
\par 
\par Date of Hearing: 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th October, 1978.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13700975 
\par }}