{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;}{\f65\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f66\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f68\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f69\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f70\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f71\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f72\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f73\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f415\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f416\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Tahoma Cyr;}{\f418\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f419\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma Tur;}{\f420\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);} {\f421\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f422\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;}{\f423\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f424\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma (Thai);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255; \red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0; \red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \ssemihidden Balloon Text;}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Style 1;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid349095\rsid461496\rsid1464665\rsid2837309\rsid2845812\rsid2970054\rsid3080296\rsid3425530\rsid3619093\rsid4211201\rsid4921699\rsid4997572\rsid5851429\rsid5977938\rsid6422600\rsid6764791 \rsid6846396\rsid7028445\rsid7109898\rsid7233966\rsid7802388\rsid8812767\rsid11037346\rsid11223635\rsid11690400\rsid11826758\rsid11883827\rsid12209539\rsid12285433\rsid13188293\rsid13437989\rsid13516553\rsid14290962\rsid14970666\rsid15681550\rsid16084721 \rsid16149705\rsid16403587}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI}{\author maltungtung_l}{\operator blake_r}{\creatim\yr2009\mo10\dy14\hr14\min48}{\revtim\yr2010\mo4\dy6\hr16\min3}{\version22}{\edmins181} {\nofpages3}{\nofwords1610}{\nofchars9183}{\*\company scims}{\nofcharsws10772}{\vern24689}}\paperw11907\paperh16840\margl0\margr0\margt0\margb0 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\subfontbysize\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3 \jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot6846396 \fet0\sectd \psz9\linex0\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid7109898\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2 \pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qr \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4211201 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4211201 [2000] 1 FLR 46 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3080296 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3080296\charrsid4211201 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6422600 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600\charrsid6422600 IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4211201\charrsid6422600 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4211201 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600\charrsid4211201 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13188293 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16403587\charrsid16403587 ABDUL KADEER KUDDUS HUSSEIN \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16403587 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16403587 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16403587 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 v}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16403587 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16403587 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16403587\charrsid1464665 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16403587 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid16403587 PACIFIC FORUM LINE LIMITED}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13188293 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13188293\charrsid16403587 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6846396 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13188293 High Court Civil Jurisdiction}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16403587 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13188293 Scott, J \par 6 March, 200}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11223635 0}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13188293 \par HBC 404/90S \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13188293\charrsid6846396 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4211201 {\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid16403587 Striking out for want of}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16403587\charrsid16403587 } {\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid16403587 prosecution - inordinate and inexcusable 4 year delay causing serious prejudice to defendant -}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4211201 }{ \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid16403587 principles on which court will allow a plaintiff to continue prosecution of case \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6846396 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16403587\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 The appellant commenced proceedings against the consignee as first defendant, the respondent as the shipper as second defendant and the insurers as third defendant for damage s claimed for negligence and consequential loss on a damaged shipment of furniture. He is no longer proceeding against the first and third defendants. The respondent applied twice to have the action struck out for want of prosecution. An order striking ou t the action was granted in 1993. The appellant applied to have the matter reinstated but the application was adjourned }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid5977938 sine die}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 due to non appearance of the appellant. He filed a Notice of Intention to Proceed. He applied again, unsuccessfully, to have the matter reinstated in 1998. The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal, which allowed an appeal against the High Court}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s refusal to restore }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16403587 and referred the matter back to}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 the High Court for determination of the application to have the matter restored. \par \par }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid16403587 Held}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 - (1) The plaintiff did absolutely nothing to progress his action for over 4 years, and it was not in interests of justice to allow plaintiff to proceed.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4211201\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 (2) The plaintiff was aware of the defendant}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s case of contributory negligence that the contain er was negligently packed and the plaintiff was responsible for the misfortune he suffered. The matter could only be fairly tried by a full examination of the circumstances in which the container was packed, shipped}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767 and delivered to the consignee.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 Here, the plaintiff had done nothing beyond the summons for directions. \par \par Plaintif}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 f}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s action dismissed.}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767\charrsid6846396 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid7109898 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 [}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5977938\charrsid3080296 n}{ \b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid3080296 ote}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 , on appeal, the Court of Appeal dismissed a submission that a period of delay taken up by an application for restoration should be disregarded. The judge could consider all periods of delay up to the hearing of the application. However, given the paucity of evidence on whether there would be serious prejudice caused to the respondent, the court was not satisfied. The appeal was allowed and the High Court o rder set aside. The respondent}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s application to dismiss for want of prosecution was dismissed with costs: ABU0024}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5977938 /}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 0}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767 0}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 S 30 May, 2003.] \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6846396 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 \par }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid8812767 Cases referred to in judgment \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767\charrsid4211201 foll }{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767\charrsid1464665 Allen v McAlpine}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767\charrsid4211201 [}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid4211201 1968}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767\charrsid4211201 ] 2 QB 299; [1968] 1 All ER 543 \par foll }{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767\charrsid1464665 Birkett v James}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767\charrsid4211201 [1978]}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid4211201 AC 297 \par foll }{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid1464665 Merit Timber Products Limited v NLTB}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid4211201 (FCA Reps 94}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8812767\charrsid4211201 /}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid4211201 609) \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4997572\charrsid4211201 foll }{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4997572\charrsid1464665 Owen Potter v Turtle Airways Limited}{ \b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16084721\charrsid1464665 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11883827 [1993] ABU}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7109898 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16084721 49}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11883827 /}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4211201 92 FCA Reps 93/}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4997572\charrsid4211201 205 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4997572 20 August 1993.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4997572\charrsid6846396 \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4921699\charrsid13437989 R.R. Gordon for the plaintiff \par Ms. B. Narayan for the defendant \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4921699 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13437989 6 March, 2000}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7109898 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13437989 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7109898 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16149705 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4921699\charrsid16149705 JUDGMENT}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4921699 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13437989 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7109898\charrsid7109898 \par }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13437989 Scott, J \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13437989\charrsid7109898 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6846396 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 The Plaintiff was formerly a manufacturer of furniture. On 19 August 1989 a container of furniture was sent by him to Australia. It was conveyed in a container which was carried upon the Fua Kavenga, a vessel operated by the Defendant. On arrival in Sydne y the consignee found that the furniture was damaged.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16149705\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 On 1 November 1990 the Plaintiff issued the writ. There was then a first Defendant who was the consignee and there was also a third Defendant, the Insurers. The Plaintiff is no longer proceeding against these former Defendants who have been dismissed from the suit.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16149705\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 The Plaintif}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 f}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s case against the Defendant is that the furniture was damaged by a sea voyage which took much longer than it was anticipated, by heat and lack of ventilation, by the tossing and turning of the Fua Kavenga and by the slap-dash loading and unloading of the container at the various ports visited on the way to Sydney. The Plaintiff claims damages for negligence and consequential loss.}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16149705\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 On 13 November 1990 the Defendant fil ed its Defence. This is an important document since the principal defence was to deny negligence, to put the Plaintiff to strict proof of the various facts and matters alleged and to assert that the cause of any damage which the furniture may have sustain ed was the Plaintif}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 f}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11690400 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s failure to pack it in the container properly.}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16149705\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 On 28 February 1991 the Defendant applied to have the Plaintif}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 f}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s claim struck out on the ground that the Plaintiff had not taken out the summons for directions as required by Order 25.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16149705\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 On 26 July 1991 the application was withdrawn on the Plaintif}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 f}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s undertakings to file the summons. It was filed on 22 July, returnable on 11 September.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16149705\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 On 11 September 1991 there was some confusion. Counsel for the then 3}{\fs18\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid461496\charrsid6422600 rd}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid461496 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 defendant told the former Chief Registrar that the 28 February summons had not yet been dealt with. This was wrong since it had been withdrawn on 2}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 6}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 July. Furthermore, the 28 February summons was taken out not by the then 3}{\fs18\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid15681550\charrsid6422600 rd}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 Defendant but by the}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 present Defendant, the then 2}{\fs18\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid15681550\charrsid6422600 nd}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 Defendant. Apparently the Chief Registrar did not examine the file properly because he the}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 n noted on it "no order on the S}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 ummons for Directions would be made against the 3}{\fs18\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid15681550\charrsid6422600 rd}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 Defendant". The action then went to sleep until 3 February 1993 when the Defendant filed a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 notice of intention to proceed pursuant to }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 O }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 3 r 5. That notice was followed by a similar notice filed by the Plaintiff on 7 May 1993. Nothing then happened until 12 October 1993 when the Defendant filed a summons seeking to have the action struck out for want of prosecution (see the White Book, 1988, paragraphs 25}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 /}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 1}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 /}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 4 and 25}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550 /1/}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 5). There was no affidavit in support. On 28 October 1993 the Plaintif}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 f}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s action was struck out by order of Kepa J.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15681550\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid2837309 Nothing at all then happened until July 1997 whe n the Plaintiff filed a summons to have the action re-instated. He deposed that he had not been served with the summons of 12 October 1993.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2837309 \par On 9 December 1997, after various adjournments and the non appearance of the Plaintiff the action was adjourned sine die.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2837309\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2837309 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 On 19 March 1998 the Plaintiff applied to have the }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14970666 action restored. On 5 May 1998 I}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 dismissed the application to set aside the order of Kepa J on the ground that the order had been perfected (see O 32 r 5 (3)).}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2837309\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 On 26 November 1999 the Fiji Court of Appeal allowed the Plaintif}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 f}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s appeal and set aside the order of Kepa J. It did so on the ground that the Plaintiff had not been served with the summons and that accordingly Kepa J}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s order was}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid349095 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 a nullity. It followed that the summons to dismiss for want o f prosecution filed on 12 October 1993 remained to be disposed of. It is that summons, now supported by an affidavit filed on 15 December 1999, which is before the Court. An affidavit in answer was filed by the Plaintiff on 14 January 00.}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid349095\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 The principles governing the exercise of the Court}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s jurisdiction to strike out for want of prosecution are well settled. The leading English authorities are }{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid349095 Allen v. McAlpine}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 [1968] 2 QB 299; [1968}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid349095 ]}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid349095 1 All ER }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 543 and }{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid349095 Birkett v. James}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 [1978}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid349095 ]}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 AC 297; [1977}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid349095 ] }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 2 All ER 801 and these have been followed in Fiji in, for example, }{ \b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid349095 Merit Timber Products Ltd v. NLTB}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 (FCA}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6764791 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 Reps 94}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6764791 /}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 609) and }{ \b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6764791 Owen Potter v. Turtle Airways Ltd}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 (FCA Reps 93}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6764791 /}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 205). In the present case it is the Defendant}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s submission that the Plaintif}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 f}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s prosecution of the action has been inordinately and inexcusably delayed and that the consequences of this delay have seriously prejudiced the Defendant.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6764791\charrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6764791 Ms. Narayan pointed out that the former 3rd Defendant has ceased trading and is in receivership while the Defendants principal and indeed only witness with whom the Plaintiff dealt died in early 1999. }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 Given that the matters complained of were said to have taken place over 10 years ago Ms. Narayan submitted that a fair trial was no longer possible.}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }{\fs24\cf1\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6764791\charrsid7802388 \par }{\fs24\cf1\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid7802388 In his affidavit in opposition the Plaintiff relied heavily on the confusing order of the Chief Registrar made on 11 September 1991. He exhibited a copy of a letter which he said he sent to the Chief Registrar in October 1991 (oddly enou gh, a copy is not to be found on the file) but to which he obtained no reply. It was because he, as a litigant in person, was confused about what to do next that he had done nothing until 1993 when he had issued his notice of intention to}{ \fs24\cf1\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7802388 proceed.}{\fs24\cf1\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid7802388 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 \par In reply to my question, Mr. Gordon argued that the only period of delay with which the Court was now concerned was the period 1991 to 1993 since that was the only period covered by the 1993 summons. Ms. Narayan on the other hand suggested t}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7028445 hat the whole period, 1991 to 20}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 00 was to be taken into consideration. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7802388 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 With respect, the order of the Court of Appeal is slightly ambiguous but I was satisfied that the real question to be answered was whether the Plaintiff should now be allowed to take his action any further and I so ruled. Mr}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5851429 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 Gordon then forcefully argued that although the Plaintiff might well have difficulty in making out his case at this late stage he should not be denied the opportunity. Even if John Eastgate could no longer give evidence then there were numerous documents which would still be available and from which it would be possible to deduce where responsibility for the damage to the furniture lay. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11037346 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 It is well understood that the Court will not lightly deprive a Plaintiff of the opportunity to present his case in Court, however weak. But at the same time the interests of a Defendant who may well be put to great trouble and considerable expense in pre paring the Defence must also be considered. \par \par In the present case the Plaintiff has discovered no documents to the Defendant other than 3 documents wrongly attached to the Statement of Claim. His case appears to depend heavily on assurances which he says wer e given to him by an unnamed person on behalf of the Defendant on the day the container was delivered to the wharf. He asserts, on what basis it is not known, that the container was mishandled on the voyage. Presumably the Plaintiff}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11037346 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 did not himself physically pack the c}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14290962 ontainer but as long ago as 1990}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 he knew that it was the Defendant}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s case that the container had been packed negligently and that the Plaintiff was himself responsible for the misfortune which he suffered. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11037346 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 Beyond the pleadings themselves no progress whatever has been made in this action. In my view it could only be fairly tried by a full examination of the circumstances in which the container was packed, }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11037346 shipped and delivered to the }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 consignee. However confused the Plaintiff might have been by the events of September and October 1991 the plain fact is that he did absolutely nothing whatsoever at all to further the action between 7 May 1993 and July 1997, a delay of over 4 years. \par \par In all the circumstances of this case I am satisfied that it would not be in the interests of justice to let it go any further. Accordingly the Defendants application succeeds and the Plaintif}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 f}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6422600 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid6846396 s action is dismissed. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14970666 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3080296 {\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid14970666 Application granted.}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396 \par }\pard \qr \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid7233966 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6846396\charrsid3080296 Marie Chan \par }}