{\rtf1\adeflang1025\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\adeff0\deff0\stshfdbch31505\stshfloch31506\stshfhich31506\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033\themelang1033\themelangfe0\themelangcs0{\fonttbl{\f0\fbidi \froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f1\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial;}
{\f3\fbidi \froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010706020507}Symbol;}{\f34\fbidi \froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040503050406030204}Cambria Math;}{\flomajor\f31500\fbidi \froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}
{\fdbmajor\f31501\fbidi \froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\fhimajor\f31502\fbidi \froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040503050406030204}Cambria;}
{\fbimajor\f31503\fbidi \froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\flominor\f31504\fbidi \froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}
{\fdbminor\f31505\fbidi \froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\fhiminor\f31506\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020f0502020204030204}Calibri;}
{\fbiminor\f31507\fbidi \froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f40\fbidi \froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f41\fbidi \froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}
{\f43\fbidi \froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f44\fbidi \froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f45\fbidi \froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f46\fbidi \froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}
{\f47\fbidi \froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f48\fbidi \froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\f50\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CE;}{\f51\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Cyr;}
{\f53\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Greek;}{\f54\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Tur;}{\f55\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial (Hebrew);}{\f56\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial (Arabic);}
{\f57\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Baltic;}{\f58\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial (Vietnamese);}{\f380\fbidi \froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Cambria Math CE;}{\f381\fbidi \froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Cambria Math Cyr;}
{\f383\fbidi \froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Cambria Math Greek;}{\f384\fbidi \froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Cambria Math Tur;}{\f387\fbidi \froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Cambria Math Baltic;}{\f388\fbidi \froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Cambria Math (Vietnamese);}
{\flomajor\f31508\fbidi \froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\flomajor\f31509\fbidi \froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\flomajor\f31511\fbidi \froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}
{\flomajor\f31512\fbidi \froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\flomajor\f31513\fbidi \froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\flomajor\f31514\fbidi \froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}
{\flomajor\f31515\fbidi \froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\flomajor\f31516\fbidi \froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\fdbmajor\f31518\fbidi \froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}
{\fdbmajor\f31519\fbidi \froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\fdbmajor\f31521\fbidi \froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\fdbmajor\f31522\fbidi \froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}
{\fdbmajor\f31523\fbidi \froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\fdbmajor\f31524\fbidi \froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\fdbmajor\f31525\fbidi \froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}
{\fdbmajor\f31526\fbidi \froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\fhimajor\f31528\fbidi \froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Cambria CE;}{\fhimajor\f31529\fbidi \froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Cambria Cyr;}
{\fhimajor\f31531\fbidi \froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Cambria Greek;}{\fhimajor\f31532\fbidi \froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Cambria Tur;}{\fhimajor\f31535\fbidi \froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Cambria Baltic;}
{\fhimajor\f31536\fbidi \froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Cambria (Vietnamese);}{\fbimajor\f31538\fbidi \froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\fbimajor\f31539\fbidi \froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}
{\fbimajor\f31541\fbidi \froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\fbimajor\f31542\fbidi \froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\fbimajor\f31543\fbidi \froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}
{\fbimajor\f31544\fbidi \froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\fbimajor\f31545\fbidi \froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\fbimajor\f31546\fbidi \froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}
{\flominor\f31548\fbidi \froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\flominor\f31549\fbidi \froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\flominor\f31551\fbidi \froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}
{\flominor\f31552\fbidi \froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\flominor\f31553\fbidi \froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\flominor\f31554\fbidi \froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}
{\flominor\f31555\fbidi \froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\flominor\f31556\fbidi \froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\fdbminor\f31558\fbidi \froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}
{\fdbminor\f31559\fbidi \froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\fdbminor\f31561\fbidi \froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\fdbminor\f31562\fbidi \froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}
{\fdbminor\f31563\fbidi \froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\fdbminor\f31564\fbidi \froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\fdbminor\f31565\fbidi \froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}
{\fdbminor\f31566\fbidi \froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\fhiminor\f31568\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Calibri CE;}{\fhiminor\f31569\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Calibri Cyr;}
{\fhiminor\f31571\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Calibri Greek;}{\fhiminor\f31572\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Calibri Tur;}{\fhiminor\f31575\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Calibri Baltic;}
{\fhiminor\f31576\fbidi \fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Calibri (Vietnamese);}{\fbiminor\f31578\fbidi \froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\fbiminor\f31579\fbidi \froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}
{\fbiminor\f31581\fbidi \froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\fbiminor\f31582\fbidi \froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\fbiminor\f31583\fbidi \froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}
{\fbiminor\f31584\fbidi \froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\fbiminor\f31585\fbidi \froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\fbiminor\f31586\fbidi \froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}
{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;
\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\*\defchp \fs22\loch\af31506\hich\af31506\dbch\af31505 }{\*\defpap \ql \li0\ri0\sa200\sl276\slmult1
\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 }\noqfpromote {\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\loch\f0\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 \sqformat \spriority0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive Default Paragraph Font;}{\*
\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tblind0\tblindtype3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\sa200\sl276\slmult1
\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22\lang1033\langfe1033\loch\f31506\hich\af31506\dbch\af31505\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 
\snext11 \ssemihidden \sunhideused \sqformat Normal Table;}}{\*\listtable{\list\listtemplateid692572293\listsimple{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace576\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01B;}{\levelnumbers;}
\f1\fs22\expnd-1\expndtw-6\cgrid\hres0\chhres0 \fi-576\li576\jclisttab\tx576\lin576 }{\listname ;}\listid20354522}{\list\listtemplateid1065885274\listsimple{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace576
\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01G;}{\levelnumbers;}\f1\fs22\expnd0\expndtw-2\cgrid\hres0\chhres0 \fi-576\li576\jclisttab\tx576\lin576 }{\listname ;}\listid54535596}{\list\listtemplateid557427031\listsimple{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0
\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace576\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01\'b7;}{\levelnumbers;}\f3\fs22\expnd-1\expndtw-5\cgrid\hres0\chhres0 \fi-576\li576\jclisttab\tx576\lin576 }{\listname ;}\listid63693349}{\list\listtemplateid1778114820\listsimple
{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace576\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01E;}{\levelnumbers;}\f1\fs22\expnd0\expndtw-3\cgrid\hres0\chhres0 \fi-576\li576\jclisttab\tx576\lin576 }{\listname ;}\listid97364072}
{\list\listtemplateid1460591644\listsimple{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace576\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01D;}{\levelnumbers;}\f1\fs22\expnd0\expndtw-4\cgrid\hres0\chhres0 \fi-576\li576
\jclisttab\tx576\lin576 }{\listname ;}\listid112926003}}{\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid20354522\listoverridecount0\ls1}{\listoverride\listid63693349\listoverridecount0\ls2}{\listoverride\listid112926003\listoverridecount0\ls3}
{\listoverride\listid97364072\listoverridecount0\ls4}{\listoverride\listid54535596\listoverridecount0\ls5}{\listoverride\listid63693349\listoverridecount1{\lfolevel\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0
\levelstartat0\levelspace144\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01\'b7;}{\levelnumbers;}\f3\fs22\expnd0\expndtw4\cgrid \li6840\jclisttab\tx6984\lin6840 }}\ls6}{\listoverride\listid63693349\listoverridecount1{\lfolevel\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc23
\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace504\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01\'b7;}{\levelnumbers;}\f3\fs22\expnd0\expndtw-4\cgrid \fi-504\li1296\jclisttab\tx1296\lin1296 }}\ls7}{\listoverride\listid63693349
\listoverridecount1{\lfolevel\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace504\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01\'b7;}{\levelnumbers;}\f3\fs18\expnd-1\expndtw-7\cgrid \fi-504\li1944
\jclisttab\tx1944\lin1944 }}\ls8}{\listoverride\listid63693349\listoverridecount1{\lfolevel\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace504\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01\'b7;}{\levelnumbers;}
\f3\fs18\expnd-1\expndtw-7\cgrid \fi-504\li1944\jclisttab\tx1944\lin1944 }}\ls9}{\listoverride\listid54535596\listoverridecount1{\lfolevel\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace1080
\levelindent0{\leveltext\'01G;}{\levelnumbers;}\f1\fs22\cgrid \fi-1080\li2520\jclisttab\tx2520\lin2520 }}\ls10}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid1342324\rsid1459949\rsid2370446\rsid2378678\rsid2454134\rsid2770979\rsid3102061\rsid3624843\rsid4290393\rsid4662632
\rsid4857674\rsid4988749\rsid5137807\rsid5314937\rsid5374195\rsid5907117\rsid6626969\rsid6777561\rsid7017452\rsid7686695\rsid7689414\rsid7935092\rsid8410372\rsid8678517\rsid10765847\rsid11275186\rsid11339931\rsid11602134\rsid11875813\rsid12803573
\rsid12850786\rsid12918186\rsid13663309\rsid13779768\rsid14367447\rsid15206321\rsid15668508\rsid16589366\rsid16606921}{\mmathPr\mmathFont34\mbrkBin0\mbrkBinSub0\msmallFrac0\mdispDef1\mlMargin0\mrMargin0\mdefJc1\mwrapIndent1440\mintLim0\mnaryLim1}{\info
{\operator thompson_m}{\creatim\yr2015\mo12\dy10\hr15\min53}{\revtim\yr2015\mo12\dy14\hr17\min5}{\version12}{\edmins626}{\nofpages3}{\nofwords5617}{\nofchars27521}{\nofcharsws33072}{\vern32775}}{\*\xmlnstbl {\xmlns1 http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/wor
d/2003/wordml}}\paperw11907\paperh16839\margl1440\margr1440\margt1440\margb1440\gutter0\ltrsect 
\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\trackmoves0\trackformatting1\donotembedsysfont0\relyonvml0\donotembedlingdata1\grfdocevents0\validatexml0\showplaceholdtext0\ignoremixedcontent0\saveinvalidxml0\showxmlerrors0\noxlattoyen
\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace100\dgvspace120\dghorigin150\dgvorigin0\dghshow0\dgvshow3
\jexpand\viewkind5\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\ftnlytwnine\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\ApplyBrkRules\asianbrkrule\rsidroot5314937\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0
{\*\wgrffmtfilter 2450}\ilfomacatclnup0\ltrpar \sectd \ltrsect\psz9\linex0\sectlinegrid272\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid3102061\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}
{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}
{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \ltrpar
\qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11339931 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\loch\af0\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 HIGH COURT OF FIJI
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Revisional Jurisdiction
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 THE STATE
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid11339931 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 v}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ex parte}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 VIKTAR JAN KAISIEPO
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Pain J}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931 
\par 
\par \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 8 February 1996
\par 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Administrative Law- Judicial Review- whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant a stay against a government mi\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
nister or other officer of the State- High Court Rules 1988 Order 53 (8); Crown Proceedings Act (Cap 24) Section 15.
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
The High Court granted leave to a non Fiji national to move for judicial review of a decision of the Minister of Immigration to remove him\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  from Fiji. Upon application for a stay of the minister}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
s decision pending determination of the review the High Court examined the relevant authorities and HELD: that the Court has power to order that the decision of a minister be stayed.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Cases cited:}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Co\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 uncil of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5907117 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 [1985] AC}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 374}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Crystal Clear Video Limited v Commissioner of Police & Attorney General
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5907117 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Civ. Action 331/86}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Epeli Lagiloa v PSC & PS for Education}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (1994) }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 40 FLR 237}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame Limited & Ors v Secr\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 etary of State for Transport}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 [1990] 2 AC 85}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  v}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  Home Office and Anr}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1994] }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 1 AC }{
\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 377}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 

\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Minister of Foreign Affairs Trade and Industry v Vehicles and
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11339931 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Supplies Ltd. & Anor}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 [1991] 1 WLR }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
550}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 National Farmers Union v Sugar Industry Tribunal & Ors}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \_
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11339931 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Court of Appeal\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 , Civ. App.8/90}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v Customs and Excise Commissioners, ex parte Cooke and
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11339931 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Stevenson}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 [1970] 1 All ER 1068}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v Licensing Authority, ex parte Smith Kline & French
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11339931 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Laboratories Ltd}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 . }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 [1989] 2 All ER 113}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v Secretary. of State for Education and Science, ex parte\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  Avon
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11339931 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 County Council}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 [1991] I All ER }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 282}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Reg. v Secretary of State for the Home Department,}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ex parte Phansopkar}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1976] }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 QB}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  606}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v Secretary of State for Home Department, ex parte Rukshanda}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Begum}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1990] }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11602134 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 COD}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  107: The Times 3 April 1989}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Yan Xiao Qiu v Directo\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 r, for Immigration}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 (JR 32/90)}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5907117 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5907117 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 A}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 G. Prasad }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 for the Applicant}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Ms. }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M Sakiti }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 for Respondent
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11339931 {\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid11339931 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Pain J:
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ab\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11339931\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5137807 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 The Applicant has applied pursuant to Order 53 Rule 3 of the High Court Rules}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 for leave to apply for Judicial Review of the decision of the Respondent made o\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
n the 25th October 1995 dismissing the applicants appeal against the refusal of the Permanent Secretary for Immigration to grant him a work permit. The Court directed that this be heard inter partes. The applicant also applied ex parte for a stay of the d
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 cision of the Respondent. An interim order for stay was made on the 2nd November 1995 and is presently in force until the 9th February 1996.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \fi72\li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5137807 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li72\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin72\itap0\pararsid5137807 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 The Respondent opposes both the application for leave to apply for judicial review and the application stay.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5137807 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Appl\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ication for leave to apply for Judicial Review
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Counsel for the Respondent concedes that the applicant has a sufficient interest}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
in the matter to which application relates, as required by Order 53 Rule 3 (5).}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 It is submitted that leave should not be grant\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ed because this is not a case fit for}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 a full substantive hearing on an inter partes basis.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Counsel says that the application for review has no prospect of success. The applicant is an alien and the Respondent is fully entitled to deny him a work permit and\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  remove him from}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
the country. In support of this submission counsel for the Respondent referred to The Supreme Court Practice 1995 paragraph 53/1-14/30 at page 864 particularly to the case of}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
R v Secretary of State for Home Department, ex parte Rukshanda B\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 egum}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1990] COD }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 107; The Times April 3 1989 cited therein.
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Counsel for the Applicant pointed out that no affidavit has been filed by the}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Respondent. Accordingly the facts deposed by the Applicant in his affidavit remain unchallenged for the purposes of th\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 is application. It is submitted }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 that those facts establish a pri}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ma facie and arguable case entitling the Respondent to leave to apply for Judicial Review.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Certainly the applicant has no right that entitles him to a permit to reside and}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 work in this countr
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
y. The Immigration Act gives the State a wide discretion in these matters. The Permanent Secretary for Immigration, in the first instance has a discretion that is not qualified by the provision of the Immigration Act. Likewise the Respondent, on appeal, h
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 a\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 s an unqualified discretion to uphold, vary or revoke such decision. Nevertheless such discretions must be exercised reasonably and in good faith in the public interest.}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 In his 14 page affidavit with 26 exhibits the applicant sets out in detail the histor\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
y of his application for a work permit. This is the only evidence currently before the Court. It raises such matters as alleged bias, an alleged failure to take into account relevant matters, alleged influence of irrelevant matters, alleged assurances giv
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 n to the applicant}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
s prospective employer and alleged failure to be given any hearing. These matters raise a sufficiently arguable case (on a prima facie basis) to warrant a full investigation inter partes at a substantive}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 hearing. The grounds could not "p
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 roperly and reasonably be characterised as}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 13 frivolous, vexatious or hopeless in the sense of being patently devoid of merit" }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 (National Farmers Union v Sugar Industry Tribunal and Ors}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  - Fiji Court of Appeal, Civil Appeal No.8 of 1990).}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Sufficient grounds\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  have been made out for the grant of leave to apply for Judicial}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Review.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Application for Stay
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 The Applicant has applied pursuant to Order 53 Rule 3(8) of the High Court Rules for an order that the Respondent}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 s decision to dismiss the Applicant}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 s applicat\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ion for a work permit be stayed pending the determination of the application for Judicial Review.}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
The Respondent opposes the application for stay. Counsel submitted that such a stay would be tantamount to an injunction against the State which is contrary \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
to Section 15 of the Crown Proceedings Act (Cap 24). This 1952 Act amended the}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
law relating to civil proceedings against the Crown and is generally accepted as now applying to the State by virtue of Section 168 of the Constitution of Fiji (1990). Section 1\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
5 of the Act provides that in civil proceedings against the Crown (now State), "the Court shall not grant an injunction but may in lieu thereof make an order declaratory of the rights of the parties". Counsel cited and relied upon The House of Lords decis
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 i\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 on in }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Factortame Limited & Ors v Secretary of State for Transport}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1990] 2 AC 85 and several decisions of this Court in}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 which it has been held that the Court has no jurisdiction to grant an injunction or}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 stay against the Crown/State in judicial review proc\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 eedings.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Counsel for the applicant, in a comprehensive written and oral argument submitted that the Court does have jurisdiction to grant an interim injunction against a Minister of State. He principally relied upon the House of Lords decision }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M v}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid5137807 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Home Of\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 fice and anor}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1994] 1 AC 377 as authority for the Court}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
s power to grant a stay pursuant to Order 53 Rule 3 (8) and submitted that the balance of convenience clearly favours the granting of a stay in this case.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4662632 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Over the years there has been considerable \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
conflict in the English cases on the issue of injunctions against the Crown. The decisions cited by counsel in argument}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 illustrate this diversity. In R v Licensing Authority, ex parte Smith Kline &}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
French Laboratories Ltd. [1989] 2 All ER 113, the Court of\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  Appeal were of the}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 view that the phrase }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 the proceedings}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 in Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 should be construed widely so that a stay could be ordered against the Crown. The majority considered injunctive relief could also be granted. In }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Ministe\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 r of Foreign Affairs Trade and Industry v Vehicles and Supplies Ltd. and anor}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1991] 1 WL}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
R 550 the Privy Council, (on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Jamaica in a case that had been rendered purely academic and was only argued}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 by the appellant) held tha\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
t the jurisdiction given by the Civil Code to order a stay in proceedings for certiorari or prohibition "had no possible application to an executive decision which had already been made". In }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v Secretary of State for Education and Science, ex parte Avon C\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ounty Council}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1991]1 All ER 282 the Court of Appeal followed }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v Licensing Authority ex parte Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra) and held that the Court has jurisdiction, when granting}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 leave under Order 53 Rule 3 (10) (a) to apply for judicial
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  review, to grant a stay of the implementation of a decision made by an officer or Minister of the Crown.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5137807 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 The case of }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame Ltd and Ors v Secretary of State for Transport}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra) needs to be separately considered because it is a decision of the House\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 of Lords and is the authority relied upon by the Respondent in this case. In }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  t}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
he appellants had applied for judicial review of decisions of the Secretary of State for Transport as contained in specified regulations of the Merchant Shipping (Reg\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
istration of Fishing Vessels) Regulations 1988 which ceased the continued British registration of certain fishing vessels after a specified date and rendered the appellants}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 vessels ineligible to be registered. The appellants also applied for a declaration\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  that the Regulations ought not to apply to them as being}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
contrary to EEC law as given effect by the European Communities Act 1972. The Divisional Court decided to request a ruling from the European Court of Justice before proceeding to a substantive heari\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ng. On}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5137807 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  an application for interim rel}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ief the Divisional Court ordered that pending final judgment the operation of Part II of the Merchant Shipping Act and the 1988 Regulations be disapplied and that the Secretary of State be restrained from enforcing them
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  in respect of}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7686695 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 the Plaintiffs and any vessel owned by them. The House of Lords affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeal setting aside these interim }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid6777561 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 orders}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6777561 .}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  It held that the Divisional court had no power to make an order which had the effect of declarin\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
g an Act of Parliament not to be the law until some future uncertain date and thereby irreversibly determining in the Plaintiffs favour for that period rights that were necessarily uncertain and (if they failed to establish their rights before}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12918186 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 the European\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  Court of}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7686695 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Justice) directly contrary to Parliament}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 s sovereign will. That was sufficient to decide the appeal but the }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6777561 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 House of Lords went further and}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  considered the jurisdiction of the Divisional Court to grant an interim injunction against the Secretary f\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 or State. It overruled the majority decision of the Court of Appeal in }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7686695 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v Licensing Authority ex p}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7686695\charrsid7686695 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 arte Smith Kline and French }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7686695 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Laboratories Ltd}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 . (supra) which held that although th}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7686695 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e Court had no jurisdiction }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 to grant an interim injunction against the Cro}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7686695 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 wn\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 in proceedings begun by writ}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  it}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7686695 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
had such a jurisdiction in proceedings on an application for Judicial Review. Lord Bridge delivered the principal opinion, with which the other Law Lords concurred. He noted that historically injunctions had not been availa\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ble against the Crown and this was preserved by Section 21 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947. He then considered the provisions of Sections 31 (1) and (2) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 and noted that they were in identical terms to Order 53 Rule 1 (1) & (
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 2\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
) which was first promulgated in 1977. Section 31(1) provides that claims for the remedies of mandamus prohibition or certiorari shall be made by way of application for judicial review and subsection (2) states:}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li576\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin576\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 "(}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 2) A declaration may be made or an injunc\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
tion granted under this subsection in any case where an application for judicial review, seeking that relief, has been made and the High Court considers that, having regard to - (a) the nature of the matters in respect of which relief may be granted by or
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 d\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ers or mandamus, prohibition or certiorari; (b) the nature of the persons and bodies against whom relief may be granted by such orders; and (c) all the circumstances of the case, it would be just and convenient for the declaration to be made or the injunc
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 t\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ion to}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  be granted, as the case maybe".}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Lord Bridge held that Section 31 could not be construed (as was done in }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Licensing Authority ex parte Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd)}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  as "having}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 the effect}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 of conferring a new jurisdiction on the court to g\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 rant injunctions}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 against the Crown" (page 149).}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 He then gave three reasons for this and}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
concluded that "as a matter of English law, the absence of any jurisdiction to grant interim injunctions against the Crown is an additional reason why the order made by\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  the Divisional Court cannot be supported" (page 150).}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
This is the law that has been applied in the decisions of this Court that counsel for the Respondent has referred me to. In }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Crystal Clear Video Limited v}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Commissioner of Police and Attorney General}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (C\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ivil Action 331 of 1986) the learned judge refused to make an order that would effectively be a mandatory injunction against the State as it would be contrary to Section 15 of the Crown Proceedings Act. In }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Yan Xiao Qiu v Director for Immigration}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (Judicial \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Review Action 32 of 1990) the learned Judge applied the }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 decision and set aside an interim stay order that had been made against the Director of Immigration and the Minister in judicial review proceedings. In }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Epeli Lagiloa v Public Service Commis\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 sion and Permanent Secretary for Education}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (1994) 40 FLR 237 the learned Judge noted the inconsistent decisions in England. He applied }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 and held that in judicial review the Court does not have jurisdiction to grant an injunction against the State}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2454134 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  and, a fortiori,}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  no jurisdiction to grant an interim injunction or a stay which has the same effect}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 .
\par 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid7689414 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 However these decisions and the }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  case itself, must now be appraised in the light of the later House of Lords decision of M v Home Office (supra\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 )}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 which is relied upon by the Applicant. In that case the Secretary for State directed removal from the United Kingdom of a foreigner claiming political asylum. An}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
application was made for leave to apply for judicial review of that decision. The Judge hear\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ing this application considered it desirable that the applicant should remain in the United Kingdom pending determination of the application and he understood that counsel for the Secretary for State gave an undertaking to that effect. However, owing to a
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 misunderstanding, the applicant was removed from the country. The judge then issued a mandatory order that the Home Secretary}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
procure the return of the applicant to the jurisdiction of the court. The Secretary of State then applied for a discharge of the o\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
rder. The judge after hearing argument, held that he had no jurisdiction to make the order and discharged it. Proceedings were then brought on behalf of the applicant against the Secretary of State for contempt of}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13779768 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 court in failing to comply }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 with the judge}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
s order while it was in force. The judge at first instance dismissed the proceedings on the ground that}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
the Court had no jurisdiction because orders made against the Crown were not enforceable by compulsion. On appeal the Court of Appeal held that although\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 the Crown was not subject to the contempt jurisdiction of the Courts, ministers of the Crown and civil servants were subject to the jurisdiction. Accordingly the Secretary of State was guilty of contempt in withholding action to return the applicant in t
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 rms of the judges order. An appeal by the Secretary for State to}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
the House of Lords was dismissed. A crucial issue that the House of Lords decided was that the court has jurisdiction to make injunctions against Ministers of the Crown in judicial review pro\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ceedings. It held that the Judge in chambers had jurisdiction to grant the injunction against the Secretary of State requiring him to procure the return of the applicant. The Secretary had therefore been properly found to be in contempt for failing to com
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 p\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ly with that order.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 
\par 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
The reasons for the decision of the House of Lords are contained in the opinion of Lord Woolf, with which the other law lords agreed. Lord Woolf first examined the development of proceedings against the Crown prior to the Crown Proceed
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ings Act 1947 and concluded (at pages 409-410):}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13779768 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4988749 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14367447 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13779768 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
The opposition so far as civil wrongs are concerned, prior to Act of 1947, can be summarised, therefore by saying that as long as the plaintiff sued the actual wrongdoer }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14367447 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 or the person who ordered the wrongd\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
oing he could bring an action against officials personally, in particular as to torts committed by them, and they were not able to hide behind the immunity of the Crown. This was the position even though at the time they committed the alleged tort they we
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 r\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e acting in their official capacity. In those proceedings an injunction, including, if appropriate, an interlocutory }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4988749 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 injunction, could be granted".}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4988749 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Lord Woolf then considered the provisions of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947, particularly Section 21 which \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 imposes restrictions on the grant of injunctions }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
against the Crown and officers of the Crown. He concluded that the existing jurisdiction of the Court to grant injunctions against an officer of the Crown had not been affected. He said at page 412:}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li576\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin576\itap0\pararsid1459949 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 "Return\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ing to Section 21,}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 what is clear is that in relation to proceedings to which Section 21(1) provisos (a) and (b) apply, no injunction can be granted against the Crown. In addition there is the further restriction on granting an injunction against an officer}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
of the Crown under Section 21(2). That subsection is restricted in}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
its application to situations where the effect of the grant of an injunction or an order against an officer of the crown will be to give any relief against the Crown which could not have b\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
een obtained in proceedings against the Crown prior to the Act. Applying those words literally, their effect is reasonably obvious. Where, prior to}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 1947, an injunction could be obtained against an officer of the}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Crown, because he had personally committed o\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 r authorised a tort,}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 an injunction could still be granted on precisely the same basis as}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1459949 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
previously since, as already explained, to grant an injunction could}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 not affect the Crown because of the assumption that the Crown}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 could do no wrong."}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li576\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin576\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 and at pages.41\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 2 to 413:
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li576\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin576\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li576\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin576\itap0\pararsid1459949 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
There appears to be no reason in principle why. if a statute places a duty on a specified minister or other official which creates a cause of action, an action cannot be brought for breach of statutory duty}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
claiming damages or for an injunction\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 , in the limited circumstances}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 where injunct}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1459949 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ive relief would be appropriate,}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 against the specified minister personally by any person entitled to the benefit of the cause of action. If, on the other hand, the duty is placed on the Crown in general, then sec\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 tion 21(2) would appear to prevent }{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1459949 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 injunctive relief being granted,}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  but as Professor Sir William Wade Q.C. has pointed out ("Injunctive Relief against the Cr}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 own and Ministers" (1991) 107 L}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1459949 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
QR 4, 4-5) there are likely to b}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e few situations when there will be \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
statutory duties which place a duty on the Crown in general instead of on a named minister. In broad terms therefore the effect of the Act can be summarised by saying that i}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1459949 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 t is only in those situations w}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
here prior to the Act no injunctive}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 relief could be \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 obtained that section 21 prevents an injunction being}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 g}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ranted. In other words it restricts the effect of the procedural }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 reforms}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1459949 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 that it implemented so that they did not extend the power of the}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 courts to grant injunctions. This is the least that can be expe
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 cted}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 from legislation intended to mak}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16589366 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
e it easier for proceedings to b}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 brought against the Crown."}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2770979 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Lord Woolf then considered the historical development of relief against the Crown in prerogative proceedings, focusing on mandamus and prohibition "since th\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ey}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
are indistinguishable in their effect from final injunctions" (page 415). He noted that from early times "the prerogative remedies could not be obtained against the Crown directly" (page 415) and "this difficulty could not be avoided by bringing the pro
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ceedings against named Ministers of the Crown" (page 416). However, "where a duty was imposed by statute for the benefit of the public upon a particular Minister, so that he was under a duty to perform that duty in his official capacity,}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
then orders of pro\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 hibition and mandamus were granted regularly against the Minister" (page 416). He referred to the case of }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v Customs and Excise Commissioners, ex parte Cooke and Stevenson}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1970] 1 All ER 1068 as an example. Lord Woolf referred to further developments and\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  concluded by saying at page 417:}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16589366 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 "Furthermore, by the time of the introduction of the remedy of judicial review the position had developed so that the prerogative orders, including prohibition and mandamus, were being granted regularly against ministers 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
without any investigation of whether a statutory duty, which had not been complied with was placed upon the minister or someone else in the department for which the minister was responsible. Thus the Immigration Act 1971 places some duties on immigration 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 o\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
fficers and others on the Home Secretary, but even where it is the immigration officer who has not complied with the statutory duty it is the practice to make an order of mandamus against the minister (an example is provided by }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Reg. v}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid2770979 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Secretary of State fo\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 r the Home Department, ex parte
}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid2770979 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Phansopkar}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16589366 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1976}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ] QB 606 ). As a result of even more recent developments, illustrated by the decision in the }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Council of Civil}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid2770979 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Service Unions v Minister}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414\charrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  for the Civil Service}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7689414 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1985] AC}
{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  374 a distinction probably no longer has\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 to be drawn between duties which have a statutory and those w}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 hich have a prerogative source."}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16589366 
\par 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16589366 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Lord}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Woolf then considered the introduction of judicial review in 1977 by Order}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
53 of the Rules of the Supreme Court which was later given statutory authority b\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
y primary legislation in Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. He noted that the relevant provisions of Section 31 do not differ materially from the corresponding provisions of Order 53. After citing the provisions of Section 31 Lord Woolf said (at pa
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 g\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e 418):}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2770979 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid12850786 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
"In Section 31 the jurisdiction to grant declarations and injunctions is directly linked to that which already existed in relation to the prerogative orders. The jurisdiction to award damages by contrast is restricted to those situations where dam
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ages are recoverable in an action begun by writ. It has never been suggested that a declaration is not available in proceedings against a minister in his}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2770979 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
official capacity and if Order 53 and section 31 apply to a minister}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 in the case of declarations then,\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  applying ordinary rules of}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
construction, one would expect the position to be precisely the same}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 in the case of injunctions.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
As an examination of the position prior to the introduction of judicial review indicates, because of the scope of the remedies of m\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
andamus and prohibition the availability of injunctions against ministers would only be of any significance in situations where it would be appropriate to grant interim relief}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6626969 .}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 Even here the significance of the change was reduced by the power of the court \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 to grant a stay under Ord. 53 r. 3(10)."}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li1008\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin1008\itap0\pararsid16606921 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921\charrsid3102061 

\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Lord Woolf then dealt at length with the contrary decision in }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Factortame Ltd. v Secretary of State for Transport (supra)}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 in which the House of Lords had concluded that an injunction could not be granted against a M\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 inister in Judicial}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Review proceedings. He considered in detail the reasons in that case for the}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 limited interpretation given to Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. He}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 carefully explained why he did not regard those reasons as justifying the exclusio\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 n}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
of jurisdiction to grant injunctions, including interim injunctions, on applications}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6626969 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 for judicial review against ministers of the Crown. Lord Woolf concluded, at}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 page 422:}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li576\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin576\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2370446 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 "I am,}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  therefore, of the opinion that, the language of section 31 being unqualifi
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ed in its terms, there is no warrant for restricting its application so that in respect of ministers and other officers of the Crown alone the remedy of an injunction, including an interim injunction, is not available. In my view the history of prerogativ
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 proceedings against officers of the Crown supports such a}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
conclusion. So far as interim relief is concerned, which is the practical change which has been made, there is no justification for adopting a different approach to officers of the Crown from that \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
adopted in relation to other respondents in the absence of clear language such as that contained in section 21(2) of the Act of 1947.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 The fact that in any event a stay could be granted against the Crown}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
under Ord. 53. r 3(10) emphasises the limits of the \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 change in the}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 situation which is involved."}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16606921 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 There is a conflict between the two House of Lords decisions of }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Factortame Limited v Secretary of State for Transport}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra) and }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M v Home Office}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra). In my view the later decision of }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M v Home Office}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra)\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 should now be accepted as the leading authority. In coming to its decision the House of Lords had the benefit of extensive argument on the whole historical development of civil proceedings against the Crown and prerogative writs which is traversed by Lor
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 d\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  Woolf and influenced his opinion. He also considered in detail the reasons for the decision in }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame Ltd. v Secretary of State for Transport}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra) and rejected them. Thus, in }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M v Home Office}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra) the House of Lords with full}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 knowledge and consid
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 eration of its earlier decision in }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Factortame Ltd. v Secretary of State for Transport}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra) and for the reasons given by Lord Woolf, came to}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 the very clear conclusion that the court has jurisdiction in judicial review proceedings to grant injunctions, in\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 cluding interim injunctions, against Ministers and other officers of the Crown.}
{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 It is also pertinent to note the case of }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2370446 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 R v Secretary }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
of State for Education and}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Science, ex parte Avon County Council}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  [1991] 1 All ER 282 which was decided}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 after }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Factortame \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Ltd. v Secretary of State for Transport}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 (supra). In that case the Court of Appeal was required to consider whether the Court had jurisdiction on judicial review to grant a stay of the implementation of a decision made by the Secretary of State. Lord Justic\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
e Glidewell delivered the leading judg}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 men}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 t in which Taylor L.J. and Sir George Walter concurred. He noted that the }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 case decided that the Court had no power to grant an injunction against officers of the}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Crown but "their Lordships were not concer\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ned with, and did not consider the power of the court to stay a decision made by an officer of the }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12803573 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Crown under Order 53 Rule 3 (10(}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 a)}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12803573 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 (b)}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
" (page 285). He considered that the phrase "a stay of the proceedings" in that Rule was wide enough to include a stay o\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
f decisions made by the Secretary of State and the process by which he reached those decisions and that such an order is not properly}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 descri}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 bed as an injunction. He concluded}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 at pages 285 - 286:}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16606921\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid7017452 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 "Proceedings for judicial review, in the field of public law\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
, are not a dispute between two parties, each with an interest to protect, for which an injunction may be appropriate. Judicial review, by way o}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13663309 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 f an application for certiorari}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  is a challenge to the way in which a}{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7017452 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
decision has been arrived at. The decision \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
maker may appear to argue that his, or its, decision was reached by an appropriate procedure. But the decision maker is not in any true sense an opposing party, any more than an inferior court whose decision is challenged is an opposing party. Thus the di
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 s\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 tinction between an injunction and a stay arises out of the difference between the positions}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7017452 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
of the persons or bodies concerned. An order that a decision of a person or body whose decisions are open to challenge by judicial review shall not take effect unt\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 il the challenge}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13663309 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  has finally been determined is}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 in my view correctly described as a stay.
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid7017452 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7017452 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid7017452 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 For these reasons I am of the opinion that a decision made by an}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7017452 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  o}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 fficer or minister of the Crown can, in principle, be s}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7017452 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 tayed by an order of the Court."}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid7017452 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7017452\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13663309 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Thus}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  not w\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ithstanding the decision in }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7017452 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Factortame Limited v Secretary of State for Transport}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 (supra). there is subsequent Court of Appeal authority in England that a stay can be ordered a}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4857674 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 gainst a Minister of the Crown}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  in judicial review proceedings. However this dist\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
inction between a stay and an injunction becomes}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12850786 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 academic if (as I believe it should), the authority of the later case of }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7017452 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M v Home Office}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 (supra) is accepted in preference to the }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7017452 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  case.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7017452\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Traditionally the Courts of this country have followed the \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
English law and decisions. This is particularly so in judicial review proceedings as evidenced by the decisions of this Court that I have earlier referred to. Moreover the relevant law and procedure in Fiji for judicial review applications and proceedings
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
against the Crown are materially the same as those in England. Sections 21 and 23 (2) of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 which are considered in the English decisions are identical to Sections 15 and 18 (2) of the Crown Proceedings Act (Cap 24) in Fiji. Th
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 procedure for judicial review was introduced in England in 1977 by Order 53 of the Supreme Court Rules and subsequently given statutory authority by Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. Woolf J. in }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid7017452 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M v Home Office}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 (supra) said at page 417 that the re\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
levant provisions of Section 31 "do not differ materially from the corresponding provisions of Ord.53". These provisions have been adopted in Order 53 of the Fiji High Court Rules which is the same in all material respects and on some important matters id
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ntical. In particular, Order 53 Rule 3 (8) providing for stay of proceedings on the grant of leave to apply for judicial review is identical to Order 53 Rule 3 (10) of the English Rules.}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7017452\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 One difference is that the English rules have been given statutory e\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ffect by Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. There is no corresponding legislation in Fiji. However Section 25 (3) of the Supreme Court Act Cap 13 (now High Court) gives specific power for rules to be made with respect to any matter dealt with by th
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 e\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 Rules of the Supreme Court in England and Section 18 gives the Court all the jurisdiction, powers and authorities which are for the time being vested in or capable of being exercised by Her Majesty}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 s High Court of}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7017452 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  J}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ustice in England".}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8678517\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 This latter section\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  has traditionally been given a liberal interpretation.}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 In}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8678517 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid8678517 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Factortame Ltd. v Secretary of State for Transport }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 (supra) it was suggested that Rules can only legislate in matters of practice and procedure and if Order 53 purported to extend the jurisdiction o
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 f the High Court to grant injunctions against}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8678517 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 a Minister of the Crown it was ultra vires.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 However this proposition was}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8678517 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 rejected}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8678517 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 in }{\rtlch\fcs1 
\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid8678517 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M v Home Office}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra). It was said that Order 53 had always been accepted as extending the circumstances in which a declara\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
tion could be granted against a representative of the Crown and authorising the grant of interim injunctions against other respondents. As a matter of construction the injunctive provisions must also be applied to Ministers. It must also be remembered tha
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 t\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  the House of Lords, earlier in the opinion of Lord Woolf, had already found that historically injunctions, prohibition and mandamus were granted against officers}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 
\ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8678517 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 of the Crown.}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Such injunctive relief was not a totally innovative remedy}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8678517 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 introduced by Order \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 53.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid8678517\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4662632 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 For the reasons I have given, I consider that this }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Court should not follow the House of Lords decision in }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632\charrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 M v Home Office}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  (supra) and accept that the Court has no jurisdiction to grant injunctions, including interim injunctions against Ministers }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 and o\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ther officers of the State in judicial review proceedings. In those circumstances it is immaterial whether or not a stay under Order 53 Rule 3 (8) is}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
tantamount to an injunction. A stay can be granted and, even if it is tantamount to an injunction, the Cou\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 rts jurisdiction is not negated by Section 15 of the Crown Proceedings Act.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Accordingly the Court has jurisdiction to grant the stay sought by the applicant in this case. The question is whether, in all the circumstances, it ought to be}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 granted.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 In my vi\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ew the balance of convenience clearly favours the applicant. If a stay of the implementation of}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 the respondent}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
s decision is not granted, the applicant will be removed from Fiji. This will impose considerable inconvenience and hardship for him and his fami\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
ly, moreso if the application for judicial review be successful. Indeed, his removal may effectively nullify his ability to proceed with the application. It has not been suggested that the granting of a stay will in any way prejudice the Respondent. The s
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 t\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 atus quo should be maintained by the granting of a stay until the application for judicial review has been determined.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 Accordingly I make the following order
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li504\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin504\itap0\pararsid4662632 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 1}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 .}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Leave is granted to the applicant pursuant to Order 53 Rule 3 (2) of the High Court Rules to\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
 apply in terms of the application dated 2nd November 1995 for Judicial Review of the decision of the Respondent made on or about the 25th October 1995 dismissing the applicant}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 '}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
s appeal under Section}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1342324 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 18 (1}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 ) of the Immigration Act for a permit to work in \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
Fiji.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4662632 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li504\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin504\itap0\pararsid4662632 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 2.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3102061\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 
That the operation of the said decision of the Respondent be stayed and no action or proceedings be taken to implement the decision or remove the applicant or his family from Fiji until the determination of the application for Judicial Review}{
\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0  }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 or \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 further order of this Court.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508 
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4662632 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 (Leave granted to move for judicial review)}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632\charrsid4662632 
\par 
\par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 (Editor note: see pages 205 & 258 po}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 st}{\rtlch\fcs1 \ai\af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid4662632 \hich\af0\dbch\af31505\loch\f0 .)
\par }\pard \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\wrapdefault\nocwrap\nooverflow\aspalpha\aspnum\faroman\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3102061 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15668508\charrsid3102061 
\par }{\*\themedata 504b030414000600080000002100828abc13fa0000001c020000130000005b436f6e74656e745f54797065735d2e786d6cac91cb6ac3301045f785fe83d0b6d8
72ba28a5d8cea249777d2cd20f18e4b12d6a8f843409c9df77ecb850ba082d74231062ce997b55ae8fe3a00e1893f354e9555e6885647de3a8abf4fbee29bbd7
2a3150038327acf409935ed7d757e5ee14302999a654e99e393c18936c8f23a4dc072479697d1c81e51a3b13c07e4087e6b628ee8cf5c4489cf1c4d075f92a0b
44d7a07a83c82f308ac7b0a0f0fbf90c2480980b58abc733615aa2d210c2e02cb04430076a7ee833dfb6ce62e3ed7e14693e8317d8cd0433bf5c60f53fea2fe7
065bd80facb647e9e25c7fc421fd2ddb526b2e9373fed4bb902e182e97b7b461e6bfad3f010000ffff0300504b030414000600080000002100a5d6a7e7c00000
00360100000b0000005f72656c732f2e72656c73848fcf6ac3300c87ef85bd83d17d51d2c31825762fa590432fa37d00e1287f68221bdb1bebdb4fc7060abb08
84a4eff7a93dfeae8bf9e194e720169aaa06c3e2433fcb68e1763dbf7f82c985a4a725085b787086a37bdbb55fbc50d1a33ccd311ba548b63095120f88d94fbc
52ae4264d1c910d24a45db3462247fa791715fd71f989e19e0364cd3f51652d73760ae8fa8c9ffb3c330cc9e4fc17faf2ce545046e37944c69e462a1a82fe353
bd90a865aad41ed0b5b8f9d6fd010000ffff0300504b0304140006000800000021006b799616830000008a0000001c0000007468656d652f7468656d652f7468
656d654d616e616765722e786d6c0ccc4d0ac3201040e17da17790d93763bb284562b2cbaebbf600439c1a41c7a0d29fdbd7e5e38337cedf14d59b4b0d592c9c
070d8a65cd2e88b7f07c2ca71ba8da481cc52c6ce1c715e6e97818c9b48d13df49c873517d23d59085adb5dd20d6b52bd521ef2cdd5eb9246a3d8b4757e8d3f7
29e245eb2b260a0238fd010000ffff0300504b03041400060008000000210096b5ade296060000501b0000160000007468656d652f7468656d652f7468656d65
312e786d6cec594f6fdb3614bf0fd87720746f6327761a07758ad8b19b2d4d1bc46e871e698996d850a240d2497d1bdae38001c3ba618715d86d87615b8116d8
a5fb34d93a6c1dd0afb0475292c5585e9236d88aad3e2412f9e3fbff1e1fa9abd7eec70c1d1221294fda5efd72cd4324f1794093b0eddd1ef62fad79482a9c04
98f184b4bd2991deb58df7dfbb8ad755446282607d22d771db8b944ad79796a40fc3585ee62949606ecc458c15bc8a702910f808e8c66c69b9565b5d8a314d3c
94e018c8de1a8fa94fd05093f43672e23d06af89927ac06762a049136785c10607758d9053d965021d62d6f6804fc08f86e4bef210c352c144dbab999fb7b471
7509af678b985ab0b6b4ae6f7ed9ba6c4170b06c788a705430adf71bad2b5b057d03606a1ed7ebf5babd7a41cf00b0ef83a6569632cd467faddec9699640f671
9e76b7d6ac355c7c89feca9cccad4ea7d36c65b258a206641f1b73f8b5da6a6373d9c11b90c537e7f08dce66b7bbeae00dc8e257e7f0fd2badd5868b37a088d1
e4600ead1ddaef67d40bc898b3ed4af81ac0d76a197c86826828a24bb318f3442d8ab518dfe3a20f000d6458d104a9694ac6d88728eee2782428d60cf03ac1a5
193be4cbb921cd0b495fd054b5bd0f530c1931a3f7eaf9f7af9e3f45c70f9e1d3ff8e9f8e1c3e3073f5a42ceaa6d9c84e5552fbffdeccfc71fa33f9e7ef3f2d1
17d57859c6fffac327bffcfc793510d26726ce8b2f9ffcf6ecc98baf3efdfdbb4715f04d814765f890c644a29be408edf3181433567125272371be15c308d3f2
8acd249438c19a4b05fd9e8a1cf4cd296699771c393ac4b5e01d01e5a30a787d72cf1178108989a2159c77a2d801ee72ce3a5c545a6147f32a99793849c26ae6
6252c6ed637c58c5bb8b13c7bfbd490a75330f4b47f16e441c31f7184e140e494214d273fc80900aedee52ead87597fa824b3e56e82e451d4c2b4d32a423279a
668bb6690c7e9956e90cfe766cb37b077538abd27a8b1cba48c80acc2a841f12e698f13a9e281c57911ce298950d7e03aba84ac8c154f8655c4f2af074481847
bd804859b5e696007d4b4edfc150b12addbecba6b18b148a1e54d1bc81392f23b7f84137c2715a851dd0242a633f900710a218ed715505dfe56e86e877f0034e
16bafb0e258ebb4faf06b769e888340b103d3311da9750aa9d0a1cd3e4efca31a3508f6d0c5c5c398602f8e2ebc71591f5b616e24dd893aa3261fb44f95d843b
5974bb5c04f4edafb95b7892ec1108f3f98de75dc97d5772bdff7cc95d94cf672db4b3da0a6557f70db629362d72bcb0431e53c6066acac80d699a6409fb44d0
8741bdce9c0e4971624a2378cceaba830b05366b90e0ea23aaa241845368b0eb9e2612ca8c742851ca251ceccc70256d8d87265dd96361531f186c3d9058edf2
c00eafe8e1fc5c509031bb4d680e9f39a3154de0accc56ae644441edd76156d7429d995bdd88664a9dc3ad50197c38af1a0c16d684060441db02565e85f3b966
0d0713cc48a0ed6ef7dedc2dc60b17e92219e180643ed27acffba86e9c94c78ab90980d8a9f0913ee49d62b512b79626fb06dccee2a432bbc60276b9f7dec44b
7904cfbca4f3f6443ab2a49c9c2c41476dafd55c6e7ac8c769db1bc399161ee314bc2e75cf8759081743be1236ec4f4d6693e5336fb672c5dc24a8c33585b5fb
9cc24e1d4885545b58463634cc5416022cd19cacfccb4d30eb45296023fd35a458598360f8d7a4003bbaae25e331f155d9d9a5116d3bfb9a95523e51440ca2e0
088dd844ec6370bf0e55d027a012ae264c45d02f708fa6ad6da6dce29c255df9f6cae0ec38666984b372ab5334cf640b37795cc860de4ae2816e95b21be5ceaf
8a49f90b52a51cc6ff3355f47e0237052b81f6800fd7b802239daf6d8f0b1571a8426944fdbe80c6c1d40e8816b88b8569082ab84c36ff0539d4ff6dce591a26
ade1c0a7f669880485fd484582903d284b26fa4e2156cff62e4b9265844c4495c495a9157b440e091bea1ab8aaf7760f4510eaa69a6465c0e04ec69ffb9e65d0
28d44d4e39df9c1a52ecbd3607fee9cec7263328e5d661d3d0e4f62f44acd855ed7ab33cdf7bcb8ae889599bd5c8b3029895b6825696f6af29c239b75a5bb1e6
345e6ee6c28117e73586c1a2214ae1be07e93fb0ff51e133fb65426fa843be0fb515c187064d0cc206a2fa926d3c902e907670048d931db4c1a44959d366ad93
b65abe595f70a75bf03d616c2dd959fc7d4e6317cd99cbcec9c58b34766661c7d6766ca1a9c1b327531486c6f941c638c67cd22a7f75e2a37be0e82db8df9f30
254d30c1372581a1f51c983c80e4b71ccdd28dbf000000ffff0300504b0304140006000800000021000dd1909fb60000001b010000270000007468656d652f74
68656d652f5f72656c732f7468656d654d616e616765722e786d6c2e72656c73848f4d0ac2301484f78277086f6fd3ba109126dd88d0add40384e4350d363f24
51eced0dae2c082e8761be9969bb979dc9136332de3168aa1a083ae995719ac16db8ec8e4052164e89d93b64b060828e6f37ed1567914b284d262452282e3198
720e274a939cd08a54f980ae38a38f56e422a3a641c8bbd048f7757da0f19b017cc524bd62107bd5001996509affb3fd381a89672f1f165dfe514173d9850528
a2c6cce0239baa4c04ca5bbabac4df000000ffff0300504b01022d0014000600080000002100828abc13fa0000001c0200001300000000000000000000000000
000000005b436f6e74656e745f54797065735d2e786d6c504b01022d0014000600080000002100a5d6a7e7c0000000360100000b000000000000000000000000
002b0100005f72656c732f2e72656c73504b01022d00140006000800000021006b799616830000008a0000001c00000000000000000000000000140200007468
656d652f7468656d652f7468656d654d616e616765722e786d6c504b01022d001400060008000000210096b5ade296060000501b000016000000000000000000
00000000d10200007468656d652f7468656d652f7468656d65312e786d6c504b01022d00140006000800000021000dd1909fb60000001b010000270000000000
00000000000000009b0900007468656d652f7468656d652f5f72656c732f7468656d654d616e616765722e786d6c2e72656c73504b050600000000050005005d010000960a00000000}
{\*\colorschememapping 3c3f786d6c2076657273696f6e3d22312e302220656e636f64696e673d225554462d3822207374616e64616c6f6e653d22796573223f3e0d0a3c613a636c724d
617020786d6c6e733a613d22687474703a2f2f736368656d61732e6f70656e786d6c666f726d6174732e6f72672f64726177696e676d6c2f323030362f6d6169
6e22206267313d226c743122207478313d22646b3122206267323d226c743222207478323d22646b322220616363656e74313d22616363656e74312220616363
656e74323d22616363656e74322220616363656e74333d22616363656e74332220616363656e74343d22616363656e74342220616363656e74353d22616363656e74352220616363656e74363d22616363656e74362220686c696e6b3d22686c696e6b2220666f6c486c696e6b3d22666f6c486c696e6b222f3e}
{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax267\lsdlockeddef0\lsdsemihiddendef1\lsdunhideuseddef1\lsdqformatdef0\lsdprioritydef99{\lsdlockedexcept \lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdlocked0 Normal;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority9 \lsdlocked0 heading 1;\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority9 \lsdlocked0 heading 2;\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority9 \lsdlocked0 heading 3;\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority9 \lsdlocked0 heading 4;
\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority9 \lsdlocked0 heading 5;\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority9 \lsdlocked0 heading 6;\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority9 \lsdlocked0 heading 7;\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority9 \lsdlocked0 heading 8;\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority9 \lsdlocked0 heading 9;
\lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 toc 1;\lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 toc 2;\lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 toc 3;\lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 toc 4;\lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 toc 5;\lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 toc 6;\lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 toc 7;
\lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 toc 8;\lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 toc 9;\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority35 \lsdlocked0 caption;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority10 \lsdlocked0 Title;\lsdunhideused0 \lsdlocked0 Default Paragraph Font;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority11 \lsdlocked0 Subtitle;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority22 \lsdlocked0 Strong;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority20 \lsdlocked0 Emphasis;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority59 \lsdlocked0 Table Grid;\lsdunhideused0 \lsdlocked0 Placeholder Text;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority1 \lsdlocked0 No Spacing;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority60 \lsdlocked0 Light Shading;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority61 \lsdlocked0 Light List;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority62 \lsdlocked0 Light Grid;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority63 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority64 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority65 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 1;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority66 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority67 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority68 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 2;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority69 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority70 \lsdlocked0 Dark List;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority71 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Shading;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority72 \lsdlocked0 Colorful List;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority73 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Grid;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority60 \lsdlocked0 Light Shading Accent 1;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority61 \lsdlocked0 Light List Accent 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority62 \lsdlocked0 Light Grid Accent 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority63 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 1 Accent 1;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority64 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 2 Accent 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority65 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 1 Accent 1;\lsdunhideused0 \lsdlocked0 Revision;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority34 \lsdlocked0 List Paragraph;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority29 \lsdlocked0 Quote;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority30 \lsdlocked0 Intense Quote;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority66 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 2 Accent 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority67 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 1 Accent 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority68 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 2 Accent 1;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority69 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 3 Accent 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority70 \lsdlocked0 Dark List Accent 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority71 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Shading Accent 1;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority72 \lsdlocked0 Colorful List Accent 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority73 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Grid Accent 1;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority60 \lsdlocked0 Light Shading Accent 2;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority61 \lsdlocked0 Light List Accent 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority62 \lsdlocked0 Light Grid Accent 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority63 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 1 Accent 2;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority64 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 2 Accent 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority65 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 1 Accent 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority66 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 2 Accent 2;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority67 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 1 Accent 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority68 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 2 Accent 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority69 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 3 Accent 2;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority70 \lsdlocked0 Dark List Accent 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority71 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Shading Accent 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority72 \lsdlocked0 Colorful List Accent 2;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority73 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Grid Accent 2;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority60 \lsdlocked0 Light Shading Accent 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority61 \lsdlocked0 Light List Accent 3;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority62 \lsdlocked0 Light Grid Accent 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority63 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 1 Accent 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority64 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 2 Accent 3;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority65 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 1 Accent 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority66 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 2 Accent 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority67 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 1 Accent 3;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority68 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 2 Accent 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority69 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 3 Accent 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority70 \lsdlocked0 Dark List Accent 3;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority71 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Shading Accent 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority72 \lsdlocked0 Colorful List Accent 3;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority73 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Grid Accent 3;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority60 \lsdlocked0 Light Shading Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority61 \lsdlocked0 Light List Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority62 \lsdlocked0 Light Grid Accent 4;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority63 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 1 Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority64 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 2 Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority65 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 1 Accent 4;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority66 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 2 Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority67 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 1 Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority68 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 2 Accent 4;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority69 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 3 Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority70 \lsdlocked0 Dark List Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority71 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Shading Accent 4;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority72 \lsdlocked0 Colorful List Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority73 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Grid Accent 4;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority60 \lsdlocked0 Light Shading Accent 5;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority61 \lsdlocked0 Light List Accent 5;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority62 \lsdlocked0 Light Grid Accent 5;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority63 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 1 Accent 5;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority64 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 2 Accent 5;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority65 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 1 Accent 5;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority66 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 2 Accent 5;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority67 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 1 Accent 5;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority68 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 2 Accent 5;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority69 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 3 Accent 5;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority70 \lsdlocked0 Dark List Accent 5;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority71 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Shading Accent 5;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority72 \lsdlocked0 Colorful List Accent 5;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority73 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Grid Accent 5;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority60 \lsdlocked0 Light Shading Accent 6;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority61 \lsdlocked0 Light List Accent 6;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority62 \lsdlocked0 Light Grid Accent 6;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority63 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 1 Accent 6;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority64 \lsdlocked0 Medium Shading 2 Accent 6;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority65 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 1 Accent 6;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority66 \lsdlocked0 Medium List 2 Accent 6;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority67 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 1 Accent 6;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority68 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 2 Accent 6;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority69 \lsdlocked0 Medium Grid 3 Accent 6;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority70 \lsdlocked0 Dark List Accent 6;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority71 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Shading Accent 6;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority72 \lsdlocked0 Colorful List Accent 6;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdpriority73 \lsdlocked0 Colorful Grid Accent 6;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority19 \lsdlocked0 Subtle Emphasis;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority21 \lsdlocked0 Intense Emphasis;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority31 \lsdlocked0 Subtle Reference;\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority32 \lsdlocked0 Intense Reference;
\lsdsemihidden0 \lsdunhideused0 \lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority33 \lsdlocked0 Book Title;\lsdpriority37 \lsdlocked0 Bibliography;\lsdqformat1 \lsdpriority39 \lsdlocked0 TOC Heading;}}{\*\datastore 010500000200000018000000
4d73786d6c322e534158584d4c5265616465722e352e3000000000000000000000060000
d0cf11e0a1b11ae1000000000000000000000000000000003e000300feff090006000000000000000000000001000000010000000000000000100000feffffff00000000feffffff0000000000000000ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
fffffffffffffffffdfffffffeffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff52006f006f007400200045006e00740072007900000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000016000500ffffffffffffffffffffffffec69d9888b8b3d4c859eaf6cd158be0f00000000000000000000000040b3
cc793536d101feffffff00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffffffffffffffffffff00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffffffffffffffffffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffffffffffffffffffff000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000105000000000000}}