{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f178\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f179\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f181\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f182\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f183\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f184\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f185\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f186\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;
\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;
\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*
\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\*\ts15\tsrowd\trbrdrt\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrl\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrb\brdrs\brdrw10 
\trbrdrr\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrh\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrv\brdrs\brdrw10 \trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \sbasedon11 \snext15 \styrsid4260965 Table Grid;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid616857\rsid734090\rsid1050069\rsid1987863\rsid2968047\rsid3288943
\rsid3757778\rsid4260965\rsid5047160\rsid5265929\rsid5470732\rsid5909204\rsid6102204\rsid6772309\rsid9851755\rsid9916180\rsid10109559\rsid10828331\rsid11544961\rsid12216575\rsid14296862\rsid15616184\rsid15669486\rsid16006146\rsid16210826}
{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6775;}{\info{\author blake_r}{\operator blake_r}{\creatim\yr2005\mo12\dy15\hr15\min51}{\revtim\yr2006\mo5\dy29\hr9\min41}{\version20}{\edmins92}{\nofpages8}{\nofwords2989}{\nofchars17038}{\*\company USP}{\nofcharsws19988}
{\vern16391}}\margl1440\margr1440 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\subfontbysize\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3
\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot5470732 \fet0\sectd \linex0\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}
{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}
{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain 
\qr \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3757778 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16210826 [1991] 37 FLR 137}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 

\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3288943 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 HIGH COURT OF FIJI
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3288943 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3288943 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 v
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3288943 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 NATIONAL BANK OF FIJI
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3288943 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 [HIGH COURT, 1992 (Fatia}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 ki}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778  J), 6 December]}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3288943 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 Civil Jurisdiction
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid14296862 {\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
Company law- whether repayment of bank overdraft by insolvent company a fraudulent preference- Bankruptcy Act (Cap 48) Section 46(1).
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid14296862 {\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Limitation- whether cause of action accru}{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 ed beyond the limitation period - }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 whether Official Receiver guilty of laches. - Limi}{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 tation Act (Cap 35) Sections 4(1}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 ),}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778  }{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 15,}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778  }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 26}{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15669486 .}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
More than 7 years after a company made repayments of its overdraft to the bank the Official Receiver sought to set them aside on the grounds of fraudulent preference. The High Court HELD: (1) that the action 
was statute-barred (2) that the Official Receiver had unreasonably delayed his application and (3) that there was in any event no evidence of fraudulent preferences.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Cases cited:
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3288943\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069 Lindsay Petroleum Company }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid1050069 v Hurd}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  (1874) 5 LR PC 221

\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069 Mehta and Anor }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid1050069 v Official Receiv}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 e}{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid1050069 r }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 8 FLR 184
\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069 Marquis of Clanricarde v Henning}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  132 RR 227
\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid1050069 Peat v Gresham Trust Ltd.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  [}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 1934] AC 252}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid1050069 R}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069 e Cutts}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  [1956] 1 WLR 739
\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069 Re F.L.E. Holdings Ltd.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  [1967}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 ] }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 3 All E.R. 553}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid1050069 R}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069 e Kushler Limited}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  [1943] 1 Ch.D 248

\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069 Watt }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid1050069 v}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069  Assets Company}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  [1905] AC 317
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069 H. Lateef}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  for the Official Receiver}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid1050069 R. Patel}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  for the Respondent
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Fatia}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 ki}{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  J:
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In the application the Official Receiver as provisional liquidator of Pinnacle Frozen Foods Ltd. (hereafter referred to as }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 the company') by a summons dated the 12th of February 1991 seeks to set aside as fraudulent preferences several payments totalling}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15669486 
 $13,565.01 made by the company }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 to the respondent bank between the 7th and 23rd of September 1983.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 At the hearing of}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 the application learned counsel for th
e bank somewhat belatedly raised a preliminary issue that the action was statute-barred.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In particular, counsel drew the court's attention to the provisions of Section 4 of the Limitation Act Cap. 35 which provides (inter a}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15669486 lia}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1050069 ):}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 "4}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5909204 . }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 (1) The following actions shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued, that is to say}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 (a)}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 actions founded ... on tort;
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \fi22\li1418\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1418\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 (d)}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 actions to recover any sum recoverable by virtue of any Act, other than a penalty or forfeiture .."}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
Put simply, counsel's argument was that the payments were made to the bank in September 1983 and the present action to recover them based as it is on a tort was not instituted until February 1991(i.e. almost 8 years after the event which is}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid616857  1}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9851755 \'bd }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid616857 years}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  out of time).}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid616857 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Learned counsel for the Official Receiver argued however that until the 16th of February 1987 the Official Receiver's cause of action had not accr
ued in terns of Section 4(1). In addition he relied on the saving provisions of Section 15 of the Limitation Act Cap. 35 which provides (inter alia)}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5909204 :}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
"15. Where, in the case of any action for which a period of limitation is prescribed by this Act ... either}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 (a) the action is based upon the fraud of the defendant ... or any person through whom he claims;}
{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1050069 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1050069 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1050069 
\par }\pard \ql \li2160\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin2160\itap0\pararsid1050069 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 or
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid3757778 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 (b) the right of action is concealed by the fraud of any such person;
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid5909204 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has 
discovered the fraud, ... or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it..."}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In counsel's submission the Official Receiver's cause of action did not accrue until after the bank had categorically rejected his claim to the payments which event did no
t occur until the bank's letter of 16th February 1987 (i.e. 4 years to the date of the present summons).}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In other words until the bank denied that the payments it had received were fraudulent preferences the possibility always existed that it may have agr
eed with the Official Receiver's claim and voluntarily made-over the payments to him as provisional liquidator of the company.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 If I may say so this latter submission has only a superficial attraction and in any event is incorrect.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Section 46 of the Bankruptcy Act Cap. 37 under which the present cause of action falls to be considered is a deeming provision which renders any}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 successfully impugned payment "... fraudulent and void as against the trustee in bankruptcy".}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In my view there is nothing that needs to be done by an}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
alleged preferred creditor before a payment which falls within the statutory prohibition can be, challenged by the trustee in bankruptcy.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 True, the existence of}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
the payment must be uncovered before it can be challenged, but once uncovered, the section itself lays down the circumstances under which it may be attacked.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Needless to say in my view even if the bank had admitted that it was preferred by the company in respect of the payments being challenged that does not thereby absolve the co
urt from having to consider and decide the issue of the relevant state of the debtor's mind at the time of making the payment. Such an admission, in the unlikely event that it was forthcoming, would be only one of the factors to be considered by the court
 in seeking to ascertain the debtor's intention at the relevant time. (See : }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid616857 Mehta and Anor v. Official Receiver}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid616857 8 FLR 184.)}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Furthermore even accepting without deciding that Section 15 of}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 the Limitation Act Cap. 35 applied in this case, this court's view would remain unchanged.
\par 
\par The Section in clear terms postpones the commencement of the period of limitation, for an action based on fraud or where the cause of action has been fraudulently concealed, "... until the plaintiff has }{
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid616857 discover}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid616857\charrsid616857 ed}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid616857  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 the fraud ... }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid616857 or}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
 could with reasonable diligence have }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid616857 discovered it}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 ". (my underlining}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16210826 )}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid16210826 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In this regard, Romilly M.R. a master of equity said as long ago as 1861 in Marquis of }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid616857 Clanricarde v. Hennin}{
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid616857\charrsid616857 g}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  132 RR 227 at 231}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 :}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16210826 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
" ... in these cases time begins to run from the period at which the fraud was discovered. That is the principle of all the cases. Until the fraud is discovered the time does not oper}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid616857 ate; but the fra}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10828331 ud}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid616857  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 is considered to be discovered at the time when such r
easonable notice of what has happened has been given to the person injured, as to make it his duty, if he intend to seek redress, to make enquiry, and to ascertain the circumstances of the case.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 

\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Clearly discovery precedes investigation and confirmation.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
In this instance both the existence and preferential nature of the company's payments was first brought to the attention of the Official Receiver in a letter dated the 23rd of March 1984 from a secured creditor of the company. It was then in my view that 
the fraud (if any) was discovered for the purposes of Section 15.
\par 
\par Further, if the submission of learned counsel for the Official Receiver was correct then the date on which the cause of action accrued could be unilaterally and indefinitely postponed by the
 mere inactivity of the claimant such as to render nugatory any time limitation at all, and that could never have been the intention of the legislature.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Even if}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid16210826  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
this interpretation or approach were wrong the Court would nevertheless have to consider wheth
er or not in the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction, to refuse relief to the Official Receiver on the ground of his acquiescence or laches. (See: Section 26 of the Limitation Act.)}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Sir Barnes Peacock delivering the judgment of the Privy Council in }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid5265929 Lindsay Petroleum Comp}{
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid5265929 an}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid5265929 y v Hurd}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
 (1874) 5 LR PC 221 said of the doctrine of laches at p. 239 and 240:}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16210826 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 "W
here it would be practically unjust to give a remedy, either because the party has, by his conduct done that which might fairly be regarded as equivalent to a waiver of it, or where by his conduct and neglect he has though perhaps not waiving that remedy,
 
yet put the other party in a situation in which it would not be reasonable to place him if the remedy afterwards were to be asserted, in either of these cases, lapse of time and delay are most material ... Two circumstances always important in such cases,
 are, the length of the delay and the nature of the acts done during the interval, which might affect either party and cause a balance of justice or injustice in taking the one course or the other, so far as relates to the remedy."}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In this latter regard th
e precise payments would have been confirmed from bank statements of the company made available to the Official Receiver at about the end of April 1986 pursuant to his request dated the 14th of April 1986, and, although the precise amounts of the payments
 could be said to have been known only then (i.e. within 6 years of the institution of proceedings) there can be no doubt in this Court's mind that the payments had been or could have been }{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid9851755 discovered}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  much earlier had the Official Receiver exercised reasonable diligence in the matter.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
Instead, the available correspondence indicates that after learning of the payments in 1984 the Official Receiver procrastinated for over 2 years before even requesting the bank for the relevant statements of the company }{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid9851755 and}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 , a
fter receiving them, a further 7 months elapsed before a demand was made for the return of the payments. Then, after the bank's denial of liability in February 1987, the Official Receiver waited a further 4 years before instituting the present proceedings
 for the recovery of the payments!}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 No effort has been made to explain or account for these 7 years of delay which are directly attributable to the Official Receiver, and the bank not}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 unjustifiably complains that it is prejudiced in presenting the facts and producing other relevant documents in the account.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1987863 The Earl of Halsbury L.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 C. in }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid6102204 Watt v. Assets Company}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  [1905] AC 317 at p.333 in refusing relief on an alleged fraudulent concealment in an action brought after 20 years said}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 :}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9851755  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16210826 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 ". .. at this distance of ti
me I shall make every intendment in favour of that having been honestly done which purported to be done. I think I should expect some evidence to be produced contradicting that state of things rather than insist on evidence in its support at this distance
 
of time and. with the loss of evidence that undoubtedly has occurred from the delay that has taken place ... which has been the fault of those who are pursuers here - that is to say they have lain by upon their supposed rights all this time, during which 
t
ime witnesses have died and the means of explanation have disappeared also to an extent which, to my mind, renders it impossible, or at all events extremely inexpedient as a matter of law and administration, to allow these things to be ripped up at this d
istance of time, when both the opportunities of explanation have gone by and when witnesses have passed away."}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Needless to say there is no evidence nor was it suggested that the bank was a party to any fraudulent or improper conduct of the company or was i
n any way responsible for the delay in bringing these proceedings and, although nothing is known of}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
the present whereabouts of the officers of the company, its account with the bank "... has been closed for more than 6 years".}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 For the foregoing reasons this Court upholds the bank's preliminary objection and fords that this action is statute-barred and may not be brought or entertained by the Court.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 If however the above conclusion should be wrong then in deference to the extensi
ve arguments addressed to the Court on the merits of the application, I turn to consider the Official Receiver's substantive application for a declaration that the payments made by the company to the bank were fraudulent preferences.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Section 46(1) of the Bankruptcy Act Cap. 48 provides so far as relevant for present purposes}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 :}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid9916180 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
"Every ... payment made, ... by any person unable to pay his debts as they become due from his own money, in favour of a creditor, with a view to giving such creditor ..., a preferen
ce over the other creditors, shall, if the person... paying the same is adjudged bankrupt on a bankruptcy petition presented within}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid6102204  three months }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9916180 
after the date of \'85 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10828331 paying the same, be deemed}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9916180  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
fraudulent and void as against the trustee in the bankruptcy."
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 By virtue of Section 261 of the Companies Act Cap. 247 this provision applies equally to any payments made by a company that is subsequently wound-up within the statutory time period.

\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 It is sufficiently clear from the wording of Section 46 that four condi
tions must be established before any payment can be said to be a fraudulent preference. These are, in the present context:}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 
\par }\trowd \irow0\irowband0\ts15\trgaph108\trleft612\trftsWidth3\trwWidth8602\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trautofit1\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tblrsid5909204\tbllkhdrrows\tbllklastrow\tbllkhdrcols\tbllklastcol \clvertalt
\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth1548\clshdrawnil \cellx2160\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth7054\clshdrawnil 
\cellx9214\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid11544961\yts15 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid9916180 First}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid3757778 :}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 
\par \cell }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid3757778 that on the dates of the payments (i.e. between the 7th and 23rd of September 1983) the company was unable to pay its debts as they became due from its own money;}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 
\par \cell }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 \trowd \irow0\irowband0
\ts15\trgaph108\trleft612\trftsWidth3\trwWidth8602\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trautofit1\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tblrsid5909204\tbllkhdrrows\tbllklastrow\tbllkhdrcols\tbllklastcol \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl
\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth1548\clshdrawnil \cellx2160\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth7054\clshdrawnil \cellx9214\row }\pard\plain 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid11544961\yts15 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid9916180 Secondly}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid3757778 :}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 
\par \cell }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid4260965\yts15 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid3757778 that the payments were made in favour of a creditor;}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid11544961\yts15 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 \cell }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0 
\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 \trowd \irow1\irowband1
\ts15\trgaph108\trleft612\trftsWidth3\trwWidth8602\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trautofit1\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tblrsid5909204\tbllkhdrrows\tbllklastrow\tbllkhdrcols\tbllklastcol \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl
\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth1548\clshdrawnil \cellx2160\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth7054\clshdrawnil \cellx9214\row }\pard\plain 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid11544961\yts15 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid9916180 Thirdly}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid3757778 :}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 
\par \cell }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid4260965\yts15 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 t}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid3757778 
hat the company was wound up within 3 months of the payments; and
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid11544961\yts15 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 \cell }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0 
\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 \trowd \irow2\irowband2
\ts15\trgaph108\trleft612\trftsWidth3\trwWidth8602\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trautofit1\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tblrsid5909204\tbllkhdrrows\tbllklastrow\tbllkhdrcols\tbllklastcol \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl
\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth1548\clshdrawnil \cellx2160\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth7054\clshdrawnil \cellx9214\row }\pard\plain 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid11544961\yts15 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 Lastly}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 :
\cell }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid4260965\yts15 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965\charrsid3757778 (and
 perhaps most difficult of all to prove) that the payments were made by the company with a view to giving the bank a preference over its other creditors.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\pararsid11544961\yts15 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 \cell }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0 
\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 \trowd \irow3\irowband3\lastrow 
\ts15\trgaph108\trleft612\trftsWidth3\trwWidth8602\trftsWidthB3\trftsWidthA3\trautofit1\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tblrsid5909204\tbllkhdrrows\tbllklastrow\tbllkhdrcols\tbllklastcol \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl
\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth1548\clshdrawnil \cellx2160\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrtbl \clbrdrl\brdrtbl \clbrdrb\brdrtbl \clbrdrr\brdrtbl \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth7054\clshdrawnil \cellx9214\row }\pard 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In this case neither party has called any oral evidence nor was there a request to cross-examine th
e deponents of the three affidavits and annexures filed in Court of which two are from the Official Receiver and one from an officer of the bank. No evidence has been forthcoming from the company or its officers and the Court must decide this application 
on the barest of evidence.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
Be that as it may there appears to be little dispute over the facts and evidence that satisfies this Court that the first three conditions have been met and these may be briefly set out in chronological order as follows}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10109559  : }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16210826 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
(1) Between the 7th and 23rd of September 1983 the company made payments totalling $13,565.01 into its ov}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 erdraft account with the bank;}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16210826 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 (2) On the 3rd of October 1983 a petition for the winding}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 up of the company was presented before the Supreme Court; and}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16210826 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
(3) On the 11th of November 1983 the company was ordered to be wound-up and the Official Receiver was appointed the provisional liquidator of the Company.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
\par Several matters are immediately clear from those three undisputed facts namely, that within 3 mont
hs prior to its winding-up the company made several payments to a creditor and, although it is not entirely clear on what ground(s) the petition to wind-up the company was based, the 2nd affidavit of the Official Receiver contains an assertion that "... t
he company was insolvent and/or was unable to pay its debts ..." at the time of the payments.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In the circumstances the sole issue that remains to be determined by the Court is whether the Official Receiver has discharged the onus of proving upon a review o
f all the circumstances of the case that the dominant intent of the company when making the payments was to prefer the bank over its other creditors.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In other words in the absence of direct or circumstantial evidence of such an intent the question for the
 court to decide is whether upon the facts in this case a dominant intent in the mind of the company to prefer the bank was so much the most probable of the possible explanations of its action in making the payments into the bank that the Court could prop
erly hold it to be the t}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1987863 rue explanation. (per Jenkins L}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 J. in }{
\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid10109559 In re Cutts}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  [1956}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 ] }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 1 WLR 739.)
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In this regard the parties have advanced two possible explanations for the payments. The Official Receiver deposed that "... the directors of the company knew that 
the company was unable to pay its debts and its creditors were pressing unsuccessfully for payment and in the circumstances the company intended to prefer the bank", whereas the bank says that "... the payments were done in the ordinary course of business
 and further to reduce the overdraft sum owing to the Bank".}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
It is common ground that the company maintained an account with the respondent bank. It is also undisputed that the company at the relevant time also had an account with the Bank of New Zealand. 
That these payments were made to one bank account and not to another does not in my view of itself give rise to an inescapable or most probable inference that the company intended to prefer one to the detriment of the other.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Nothing is known of the extent
 of the company's liability to the Bank of New Zealand or of the nature of the account other than that it was secured by a debenture and other than the fact of the winding-up nothing is known about the grounds of the petition or who the petitioning credit
or was, if indeed there was one. Needless to say no statutory demand notice has been produced and the law provides no less than 5 grounds for the winding-up of a company by the Court exclusive of an inability to pay due debts.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Nothing is known about the le
vel and frequency of any payments, bankings or trading that was being conducted at about that time by the company through either bank account or to any other creditor (other than the contested payments) }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10109559 or how}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  far the }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10109559 liquidation}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  of the}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10109559  company has progress}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4260965 ed (if at all).}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
\par 
\par The present whereabouts of the directors of the company are unknown nor does there appear to have been any correspondence exchanged with them or the company. Certainly none was produced and the Official Receiver's assertion that " ... cre
ditors were pressing unsuccessfully for payment of their accounts ..." remains a bald unsubstantiated assertion of doubtful weight. Indeed the number of creditors to whom the company owed monies is not disclosed nor its total indebtedness and assets.

\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 Then
 it is claimed the payments were made to pay a debt owed by the company directors and guarantor, but nothing has been produced to support this contested assertion and in any event it is not known if the payments resulted in the company's entire overdraft 
with the bank being extinguished.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 In supporting the application learned counsel for the Official Receiver relied heavily on }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid16006146 
In re Kushler Limited}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 [1943]}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
 1 Ch.D 248 as bearing some striking similarity to the present case. I cannot agree. In that case the di
rectors had guaranteed a bank overdraft and although they had been advised that the company was insolvent, they knowingly made several voluntary payments to their bank extinguishing the company's overdraft and thereby obtaining for themselves "... a direc
t and immediate benefit".}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 This is clear from the words of Lord Greene MR when he said at p.251.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16210826 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
"These cases of guarantees of overdraft and securities deposited to cover overdrafts are very common, and where directors have given guarantees the circum
stances of a strong element of private advantage resulting from payment of the debt may justify the court in attaching to the other facts much greater weight than would have been attached to similar facts in a case where that element did not exist."

\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 On the other hand learned counsel for the bank referred the Court to }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid16006146 Re F.L.E. Holdings Ltd}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 . }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 (1967) }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
3 All E.R. 553 which was a case where an insolvent company within a month of its winding-up voluntarily executed a first charge over lands to secure its bank overdraft. It was there:
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15616184 {\fs24\insrsid3757778\charrsid15616184 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid15616184 {\fs24\insrsid3757778\charrsid15616184 "}{\fs24\ul\insrsid3757778\charrsid15616184 Held}{\fs24\insrsid16006146\charrsid15616184  : }{
\fs24\insrsid11544961\charrsid15616184 The execution of the legal charge ... was not a fr}{\fs24\insrsid15616184\charrsid15616184 audulent preference of the bank \'85 }{\fs24\insrsid11544961\charrsid15616184 
because on the evidence, (the debtor's) dominant intention at that time was to keep on good terms with the bank in the hope of future facilities, not to confer on the bank a benefit or advantage."
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11544961 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 
The authorities are clear that the question whether a transaction is a fraudulent preference, that is to say, whether the debtor had the dominant intention to prefer a creditor is one of fact for the
 Court, and must be judged not from one fact, however important, but from all the circumstances of the case.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 It is also well settled that the onus of proof in these cases is upon the person seeking to avoid the transaction to establish what the debtor rea
lly intended and that the real intention was to prefer (per: Lord Tomlin in }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid15616184 Peat v. Gresham Trust Ltd}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 . }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778 [1934]}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778  AC 252 at 262).
\par 
\par Bearing in mind that the onus in this case is upon the Official Receiver to establish the true intent of the company in making th
e payments to the bank and mindful of the extreme paucity of the evidence in that regard both direct and circumstantial, this Court is driven to the inevitable conclusion that the applicant has failed to discharge that burden and accordingly this summons 
must and is hereby dismissed with costs to the respondent.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3757778\charrsid3757778 
\par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11544961\charrsid3757778 (Action dismissed.)
\par }}