{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f172\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f173\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f175\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f176\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f177\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f178\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};} {\f179\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f180\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\* \ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid288713\rsid1263572\rsid1715388\rsid2702663\rsid3551130\rsid3871043 \rsid4545495\rsid5379851\rsid7370135\rsid8864129\rsid10102758\rsid10371815\rsid10573568\rsid11299031\rsid13139954\rsid15229840\rsid15403371\rsid15534874}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6775;}{\info{\author teniau_d}{\operator blake_r} {\creatim\yr2005\mo12\dy12\hr12\min1}{\revtim\yr2006\mo6\dy14\hr10\min52}{\version14}{\edmins80}{\nofpages7}{\nofwords2530}{\nofchars14422}{\*\company USP}{\nofcharsws16919}{\vern16391}}\margl1440\margr1440 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\subfontbysize\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3 \jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot8864129 \fet0\sectd \linex0\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}} {\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (} {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qr \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15229840 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15229840\charrsid15229840 [1991] 37 FLR 90 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15229840 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15229840\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10102758\charrsid15229840 HIGH COURT OF FIJI \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10102758 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10102758\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Re: VIJENDRA KUMAR AND NEMANI DELAIBATIKI \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5379851 [HIGH COURT, 1991, (Jesura}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4545495 tnam J), 11 August]}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4545495 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4545495 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4545495 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4545495\charrsid15229840 Criminal Jurisdiction \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5379851 {\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Courts}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{ \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 contempt of Court}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 whether a publication in the media is in the face of the Court}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 whether proof of intent an ingredient of the offence. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 The two national newspapers both published a report of evidence adduced in a trial within a criminal trial. The High Court}{ \b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 HELD: (1) that such publication was a contempt in the face of the court (2) that the editors of the newspapers were responsible for the publications (3) that they had not tak en reasonable care to prevent them and (4) that their lack of intent to commit contempt was no defence. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Cases cited: \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Attorney}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 General v English & Another }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 [1982]}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15229840\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 2 WLR 959}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Balogh v St. Albans Crown Court}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 [1975] Q.B. 73}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Gordon v Williams}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 (FCA Reps 76/66) \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 R. v}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Border Television Ltd.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 68 Cr. App R. 375 \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Regina v Odhams Press Ltd & Others ex part}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 e}{ \i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Attorney}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 General}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 [1957]1 Q.B. 73 \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Rex v Dolan}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 (1907) 2 IR, 960 \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 St. James Evening}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15229840\charrsid15229840 P}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 ost}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 (1742) 2 ALK 469 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Proceedings for contempt of the High Court. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 B. N. Sweetman and J. G. Singh}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 for the First Respondent}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 K. Bulewa and J. Semisi}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 for the Second Respondent \par }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 L Mataitoga and Ms. N. Shameem}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 for Director of Public Prosecutions as amicus curiae \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Jesuratnam J: \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 In this case the Editor, Fiji Times Vijendra Kumar, and the Edito}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5379851 r, Daily Post Nemani Delaibatiki}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 , were called upon to show cause as to why committal proceedings should not be taken against them for having published on the 23rd July 1991 proceedings of a trial}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 within}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 trial relating to the admissibility of an alleged confession of the accused held in the absence of assessors and which publications were calculated to prejudice the course of justice. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 When the trial was resumed on the 23rd July 1991 Mr. Afzal Khan, who}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 appeared for the defence, and Mr. Ravi Perera, who ap peared for the prosecution, brought to my notice the said publication in both newspapers that morning and Mr: Khan complained that his client had been gravely prejudiced and moved for the discharge of the assessors and anew trial. I readily acceded to his request as it was a proper one and discharged the assessors and ordered a fresh trial to be held about a month and a half later so as to minimise the risk of getting a fresh set of assessors from whose memories the publication in question may not have bee n fully erased. I also directed the Chief Registrar to issue notices on the two editors to show cause as to why they should not be dealt with for contempt of court. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Both editors appeared before me on 26th July 1991 and stated through their respective counsel, Mr. Sweetman and Mr. Bulewa, that they had cause to show. They also took up a preliminary objection to the procedure I had followed which I overruled in an orde r delivered then and there. The objection was that in a matter like this it is the Attorney}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -Gener}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10371815 al who should move the Court. It }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 is no doubt true that in the majority o\'a3 cases it is the Attorney}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15229840\charrsid15229840 General who initiates proceedin}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 gs in England in proceedings fo r contempt. But even in England there are situations where the court a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10371815 ct}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 s on its own motion particularly in such matters as contempt in the face of the court. In my view the instant case is akin to contempt committed in the face of the court in the literal sense. The court found itself frustrated and stultified on the morning of the resumed trial by the sensational publications which thwarted all chances of a fair trial. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 \par The court saw and read}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 the publications which were prominently displayed in both newspapers. }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10371815 I}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 t is idle to suggest that the court would be powerless to act instantly on its own to vindicate its authority to control publication of proceedings before it in the interests of justice and that instead it should petition the Attorney}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 General to ini tiate proceedings at his will and leisure. I do not think that it is seriously suggested that the court would be helpless if for some reason the Attorney}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 General refused or failed to initiate proceedings. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 There is ample authority both in England and Fiji that a court can act on its own in situations such as this. This is the course that was taken by Justice Williams in the matter of }{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Charles Gordon v Williams}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 (FCA Reps 76/66). Indeed in that case the summons was signed by the Judge himself. Furthermore the facts which came to the notice of the judge in tha}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 t case were not matters of comm}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 on knowledge but some of which had to be gathered by the judge through third parties. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15229840\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 In my view that was a case more suited and prop}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 er for a motion by the Attorney-}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 General a s all matters on which the judge acted were not within his own knowledge and notice. In the instant case all the material that was needed was available to me without recourse to any other source. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Order 52 rule }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15229840\charrsid15229840 4 and rule 9 permit the course I}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 took. Order 1 rule 7 and Section}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 3(3) of}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 the Criminal Procedure Code enable resort to be had to English practice and procedure why the local law is silent. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tx6336\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2702663 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Lord Denning dealt with the ambit of the jurisdiction of a judge to deal summarily on his own m otion for contempt in the face of the Court in}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 Balogh }{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 v. St. Alban's Crown Court}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 [1975}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid288713 ]}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Q.B. 73. He said at p. 84: \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid2702663 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 "But I find nothing to tell us what is meant by "committed in the face of the court." It has never been defined. Its meaning }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 is, I think, to be ascertained f}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 rom the practice of the judges}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 B over the centuries. }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 It was never confined }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 to}{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 conduct which a}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 judge saw }{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 with}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 his own }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 eyes}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 . It covered all contempts for which a judge of his own motion could punish a man on the spot. So "contempt in the face of the court" is the same thing as "contempt which t}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 he court can punish of its own }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 motion." }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 It}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 reall}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 y m}{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 eans}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 "contempt in the cognisance of the }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 co}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 urt}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 ." \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid7370135 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\tx4896\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid7370135 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Gathering together the experience of the past, then, whatever expression is used, a }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 judge of one of the superior }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 courts or a judge of Assize could always punish summarily of his own motion for contempt of court }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 whenever there}{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 a g}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2702663\charrsid15229840 ross interference with the course of justice in a case that was being tried, or about to be tried, or just over-no matter whether the judge saw it with his own eyes or it was reported to him by }{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 the officers of the court, or by others}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid288713 }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 -}{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid288713 }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 whenev}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid288713 e}{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 r it was urgent and imperative to act at once.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 " \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid288713 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 (The emphasis is mine) \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Both editors filed affidavits in an attemp}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 t to show cause. The }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 case of the editor of the Daily Post was taken up on the 30th August 1991 and` that of the editor of the Fiji Times on the 24th September 1991. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Substantially both affidavits were more or less in the same strain. They state that the respective }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 reports were compiled by junior and inexpe}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 rienced reporters who were not aware that such proceedings should not}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 } {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 be}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 published}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid288713 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Both editors also state that the p}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 ublications in question were the }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 r}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 e}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 sult of an innocent mistake and that they did not intend to publish the proce edings which should not have been published, it seems to me that the averments in the respective affidavits do not show any cause as such but are in truth pleas in mitigation of punishment. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid7370135\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 A clear distinction has con}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 sistently been made in English }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 common law between publication of matter calcula}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 ted to prejudice the fair trial }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 of}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 a pending case on the one hand and the other forms of contempt on the other. Strict liability attached to the former while mens rea as such was required in the latter. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 It has been established in England by a long line of cases beginning from 1742}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 that in the former class of cases all that the complainant had to prove was that the respondent had published matter which in fact tended to prejudice pending proceedings. It was ir relevant that the respondent did not know that proceedings were pending or that he failed to appreciate the proposed nature of his publication. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 In the instant case no assessor could have failed to have read or heard about the publication as the trial was continuing from day to day. The printed word leaves a lasting impression on the human mind which is difficult to obliterate even with the strongest of warnings by the judge. To the lay assessor there could be nothing truer than an admission coming from th e accused himself which was in effect what the publication held it out to be to the public. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tx3888\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 In the ear}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 ly case of }{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid288713 St. James Evening P}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 ost}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 (1742) 2 ALK 469 an ignorant woman who merely had possession of the manuscript and whose trade was printing was held liable in }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 contempt. Lord Hardwicke said:-}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid15534874 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 "B}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 ut}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 , though it is true, this is a trade, yet they must take care to do it with prudence and caution; for if they print any thing that is libellous, it is no excuse, to say, that the printer had no knowledge of the c ontents, and was entirely ignorant of its being libellous; and so is the rule at law, and I will always adhere to the strict rules of law in these cases." \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15534874 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 This trend was followed by Palles C.B. who said in }{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Rex v. Dolan}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 (1907) 2 I.R. 960: \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid15534874 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 "Actual intention to prejudice is immaterial. I wholly deny that the law of this court has been that absence of an actual intention to prejudice is to excuse the party from being adjudged guilty of contempt of court, if the court arrives at the conclusion which I have arrived at, that there is a real danger that it will affect the trial: or that absence of intention is to excuse the party from punishment. Such a circumstance as that ought, no doubt, to be taken into consideration in considering the nature of the punishment to be awarded, as, for instance, whether it should be imprisonment." \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 This position was finally confirmed i}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 n }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11299031 Re}{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 gina v. }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 Odh}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 ams Press Ltd and Others Ex parte Attorney}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 General}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 [1957] 1 Q. B. 73. After reviewing all earlier authorities Chief Justice Lord Goddard said at p. 81: \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid15534874 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 "Again this seems to dispose of any suggestion that mens rea, which means a guilty intention, is in any way material except as to penalty." \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 It may be of interest to note that the Contempt of Court Act 1981 which is now}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 the law of England defines the doctrine of strict liability in Section I as "the rule of law whereby conduct may be treated as a contempt of court as tending to interfere with the course of justice in particular legal proceedings regardless of intent to d o so." This section is applicable to publications which create a substantial risk that the course of justice in proceedings that are active will be seriously impeded or prejudiced. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Anyone who publishes the first day's proceedings in a long awaited trial such as the instant case would surely know that the proceedings were very much active. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Under the present Act in England certain defences are available to the publisher and distributor. A publisher will not be liable if he proves that having taken all reason able care he does not know and has no reason to suspect that the relevant proceedings are active. A distributor will not be liable if he proves that having taken all reasonable care he does not know that the publication contains such matter and has no rea son to suspect that it is likely to do so. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Even in England therefore in circumstances like those of the instant case the editor will be liable. Any publisher or any one else who chanced to read the report in this case in its unpublished form will not fail to have realised that the relevant proceedings were active and continuing. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 It may also be mentioned that intention is even now }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11299031 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 as it always was }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 irr}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 elevant in England as appears from }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 Attorne}{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 y}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 General v English and another}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 [1982}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid11299031 ] }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 2 WLR 959 which was decided after the new Act. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5379851 Watkins L}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 J said at 964: \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid15534874 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 "By way of preface to our reference to it (the Act) it is important to observe that the Attorney-General has not alleged that the respondents intended to influence the course of justi ce in Dr. Arthur's trial. His application is founded on the rule of strict liability as defined in section 1." \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 \par The editor, Fiji Times, has in his affidavit categorically accepted full responsibility for the publication. The editor, Daily Post, has stated in his affidavit that he is directly responsible for all the matters that are printed in the newspaper. In any event it is the editor of a newspaper who is generally responsible for all matters published in the newspaper. In the words of Chief Justice Lor d Goddard in the }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Odhams }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 Press}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 case (Supra) at p.83: \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10573568 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 "It has always been a tradition of English journalism that the editor takes responsibility for what is published in his paper and this was held to be a rule of law in }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Reg}{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 ina v. Evening Standard Co. Ltd}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 " \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10573568 The editor of the Fiji Tim}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 es states that the reporter was not aware that the}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 proceedings were of a trial}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 within}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 a}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 trial held in the absence of the assessors. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 The Editor of the Daily Post states that the reporter in question was not aware and did not know that such proceedings could not be published. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 If the reporters concerned had in fact taken down the proceedings in the court mom itself the empty assessors' box would have stared them in the face and they should immediately have been thrown on their guard. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15534874 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Thereafter at the next stage what were the sub}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 editors doing? On a reading of the reporter's copy it should have been obvious from the intrinsic and internal evidence available in the story itself that there was more to it than met the eye. They should promptly have been alerted to make further inquiries, as for instance, from the Registry or clerk of court or even the prosecuting or defence solicitors. Even further questioning of}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 the reporter concerned may have revealed the true position. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 It seems to me that no reasonable care or precaution was t}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 aken to avoid publication of matte}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 r which caused incalculable damage to the course of justice. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 It is my view that the defences set up in the affidavits are of no avail in a case like this so far as liability is concerned. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 I can do no better than cite the words of the Lord Chief Justice of England, Lord Widgery, who said in }{\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid10573568 R. v. Border Television Ltd.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 68 Cr. App R. 375 cited by the learned Director of Public Prosecutions. His Lordship said at page 379: \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid15534874 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 "Equal ly, I would have thought it quite simple for reporters, newspaper men, policemen, probation officers, etc., to realise that when the judge sends the jury out in the course of a trial he sends the jury out in order that he may deal with some point which is not fit for the jury's ears at this stage. It follows from that that when the jury have bee}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 n out in the course of the day'}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 s hearing the newspaper covering the case should not refer to what went on in their absence or you would get the futile situation in w hich, having gone to great pains to keep the matter from the jury's ears during the afternoon, it was made available to their eyes in the evening paper as they left the court. These things are only common sense, and I do not think it is expecting too much to expect reporters and the like to realise when the jury are sent out that they must not report what goes on in the jury's absence." \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 \par It is perhaps needless to say that the Divisional Court held that the offence of contempt of court had been committed in that case. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 I hold that both editors are guilty of contempt of court in the instant case. The}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15534874\charrsid15229840 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 question of penalty has caused me a consid}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 erable amount of concern and anxi}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 ety. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 A newspaper undertaking is a sacred trust to be discharged with due regard to the rights of others }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid1715388\charrsid15229840 -}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 not least the rights and privileges of the inarticulate and voiceless defendants in the dock. I have to balance the need for deterrence in the future on the one hand with all the mitigating circumstances on the other. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Mr Sweetman referred to the paucity of trained and experienced journalists in the country and said that the newspapers have to manage as best as they could with the limited material available. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 I am therefore mindful of}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 the difficulties and constrai}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 nts under which newspapers function in the country due to the lack of trained and qualified journalists. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 I have also taken into }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 account the expense and wastage}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10573568 }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 -}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10573568 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 apart from }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 the hardships and inconvenience}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10573568 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 -}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10573568 }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 caused by the abortive trial of two days. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 I am aware that this is the first case of its kind to come up in our Courts. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13139954 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Above all I have taken into consideration the public apology published by both newspapers which gives hope that such deplorable situations will not recur in the future. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 I therefore refrain from imposing a sentence of imprisonment or fine. Instead I propose to do what Lord Chief Justice Widgery did in the }{ \fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Border Television}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 case (supra) in similar circumstances. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1715388 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 I order the Editor, Fiji Times and the Editor, Daily Post to }{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 pa}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 y a sum of $300.00 each as costs within one month from today}{ \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 .}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 In this case I permitted the editor, Fiji Times to leave the country on the personal undertaking of Mr Sweetman that he would ensure the personal attendance of the respondent if it was required at any time. In view of the order I have now made such personal attendance would be unnecessary if the costs are duly paid. \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13139954\charrsid15229840 \par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 (}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 Convictions entered; costs awarded}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3551130\charrsid15229840 ) \par }}