{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f37\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}
{\f38\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f40\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f41\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f42\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}
{\f43\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f44\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f45\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;
\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;
\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*
\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Style 1;}{\s16\ql \fi144\li0\ri0\sl192\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Style 2;}
{\*\cs17 \additive \ul\cf2 \sbasedon10 \styrsid9708279 Hyperlink;}}{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid732027\rsid741847\rsid1271501\rsid2568483\rsid4523624\rsid7150773\rsid9391392\rsid9708279\rsid9898675\rsid10890256\rsid13194881
\rsid13771798\rsid15283318\rsid15956363}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\author Robynne Blake}{\operator Robynne Blake}{\creatim\yr2011\mo3\dy10\hr11\min26}{\revtim\yr2011\mo3\dy14\hr10\min14}{\version15}{\edmins39}{\nofpages4}
{\nofwords1977}{\nofchars11273}{\*\company scims}{\nofcharsws13224}{\vern24689}}\paperw11907\paperh16840\margl1134\margr1134\margt1134\margb1134 
\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\subfontbysize\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3
\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot7150773 \fet0\sectd \psz9\linex0\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid9708279\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2
\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang 
{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qr \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9708279 [1923] 2 FLR 110}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9391392 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9391392 SUPREME COURT CASES OF FIJI
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9708279 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9391392 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 [CIVIL JURISDICTION.]}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9708279 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9391392 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 [ACTION No. 3, 1923.]
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9391392 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 DIN MAHOMED KHAN}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392  v. }{
\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 ANNIE GASPARD.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9391392 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 1923, }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 Oct.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  4.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
\par }{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid13194881 Real}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid13194881  }{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid732027 Property Ordinance 1876 - J}{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid13194881 
udgment of Supreme Court - entry on Certificate of Title under provisions of Rule 286 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1875. Effect of section 91 of the Real Property Ordinance - Order for sale made under Rules 321 and 322 - as to p
ractice and procedure thereon - jurisdiction of Court to rehear.}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid732027  }{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid13194881 
Defendant registered a mortgage prior to the Order for sale and filed a caveat subsequent to such order being made - submitted the Certificate of Purchase issued}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid13194881 
 by the Court consequent on the}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid13194881  sale is not final and binding against defendant.
\par 
\par }{\i\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid13194881 Held}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid13194881 , (1) Certificate final an}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid13194881 
d binding against all parties (2) Court no jurisdiction to rehear or alter the Order for sale.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
\par }{\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 ALFRED YOUNG, C.J.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  This matter came before me by way of a Special Case. The f
acts leading up to the case are fully set out in the Statement of the Special Case, and therefore there is no }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid732027 n}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
eed for me to repeat them seriatim.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 Mr. Grahame of counsel, who appeared on behalf of Annie Gaspard, submits that the Certificate of Purchase, 
bearing date the 9th January, 1923, issued under the hand of the Acting Chief Justice and the Seal of the Court to Din Mahomed Khan and referred to in paragraph 17 of the Special Case is not final and binding against the defendant.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 This certificate was is
sued as the result of the proceedings taken pursuant to the Order of the Court dated the 3rd November, 1922, for the sale by public auction of the interest of one Dwarka i}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
n a piece of land of about 17 4/}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 10}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 t}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
h perches situated at Davuilevu, Rewa, in Fiji, and being the whole of the la}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10890256 nd comprised in the Certificate}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
 of Title registered under the provisions of the Real Property Ordinance 1876, in the Register of Titles Volume 45, Folio 4432. Mr. Grahame proceeded to argue that the procedure under which this or
der was obtained is contrary to law and altogether irregular. At this stage of the argument I indicated that it seemed to me that the effect of the application was in truth in the nature of a rehearing and for a revision of the order of the 3rd November, 
a
nd in the light of authority I was of the opinion that this Court had no such jurisdiction. Mr. Grahame replied that owing to the facts of the case, the difficulty of appeal, and also to the fact that the order complained of was made by another judge, the
 Court should entertain the present application. He then continued to argue, }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 inter alia}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
, that the Certificate of Title was conclusive evidence of title (section 14 of the Real Property Ordinance 1876) and that under section 39 of the Ordinance, unregistered
 instruments were invalid. This proposition would no doubt be correctly put, provided that there had been no registration in the register of any charge or encumbrance binding and affecting the land. In the present case has there been any such registration
 so as to bind, charge or affect the land?}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9708279 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 I find entered on the Certificate of Title (exhibit A), }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid4523624 inter alia}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 , a note or memor}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10890256 andum to the following effect:-
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10890256 {\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256 Order of the Supreme Court registered 2nd February, 1922, at 11 o'clock}{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10890256\charrsid10890256 . Register of Caveats Book 45, F}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256 olio 2, J.P. Maharaj & Company for }{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid10890256 \'a3}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256 170 1}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10890256\charrsid10890256 0}{
\i\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256 s.}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256  4}{\i\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256 d.}{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256  and }{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid10890256 \'a3}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256 7 7}{
\i\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256 s.}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256  costs against the interests of Amika (otherwise known as Maniram) in this land}{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10890256\charrsid10890256 .}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid10890256  (sgd) Geo. S. Parker.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
\par Mr. Parker is the official attached to t
he Lands Titles Office whose duty it would be to make or note any entries in the Register of Titles. This entry was made pursuant to a request addressed to the Registrar of Titles by the solicitor of J.P. Mahraj & Co., in which they forwarded a}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392  sealed copy of a judgment for \'a3}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 170 10}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 s.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  4}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 d.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2568483  and}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  \'a37 7}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 s.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
 costs obtained by J.P. Maharaj & Co. against two defendants, namely, Dwarka and Amika. As authority for this procedure Mr. Ellis of counsel who appeared for Din Mahomed Khan re}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 l}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 ies on the provisions of Rule 286 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 1875, which reads as follows:-}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9708279 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid9391392 {\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid2568483 A
 judgment for the payment of money shall bind the lands, tenements, and hereditaments of the judgment debtor within the Colony to the extent of his beneficial interest therein, both at law and in equity, and the same shall be deemed to be attached by virt
u}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid2568483 e of such j}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid2568483 udgment, in satisfaction thereof}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid2568483 
, from the date of the judgment}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid2568483 , subject to Crown debts and to any prior }{\i\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid2568483 bona fide}{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid2568483  mortgage, charge, or incumbrance thereon. Upon the filing of the judgment, as aforesaid, the Registrar shall forthwith record the same in the judgment book.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 It is argued on the other side that these rules being of earlier date than the Real Property Ordinance 1876 cannot }{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid2568483 per se}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  bind lands registered under the provisions of that Ordinance in that section 91 of the Ordinance provides 
a specific way in which land is affected under its provisions. However much there may be to be said in support of this argument, the provisions of section 91 have not been overlooked, inasmuch as the draftsman of Rule 286 has inserted a marginal note of r
eference to section 91 from which it might be inferred that the provisions of the rule and th}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2568483 e section of the Ordinance were}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
 intended to be read together. The wording of the rule admits of no doubt that a judgment for the payment of money binds all the lan
ds of the judgment debtor within the jurisdiction in that they are deemed to be attached by virtue of such judgment, subject to Crown debts and to any prior }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid1271501 bona fide}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  mortgage, charge or encumbrance. The legislature specifically took cognisance of the fact that lands registered under the Real Property Ordinance mig}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13771798 ht b}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 e affected by the Civil Pro}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
cedure Rules (rules approved by that body and subject to disallowance by His Majesty), inasmuch as section 109 of the Real Property Ordinance provides}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624  in certain circumstances for "}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 an immediate Order of Sale o}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13771798 f the lands notwithstanding the}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
 provisions contained in Rule 322 of the Civil Procedure Rules." The rule referred to and Rule 321 is the authority}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
under which the Court made the Order of the 3rd November, 1922, for the sale of the land.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9708279 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
The rules, however, do not prescribe any procedure for giving effect to the provisions of Rule 286, and on examination of the Register of Titles to land kept in accordance with the provisions of the Real Property Ordinance 1876, 
I find that as far back as 1881 it was the practice to lodge a caveat founded on a judgment, and that it was not until 1897 the first departure from this practice seems to have taken place, when a judgment creditor filed a notice of his judgment. He had, 
however, previously served the Registrar with a copy of a writ of Seizure and Sale directed to the Sheriff to levy against the "goods and chattels" of the judgment debtor, a practice adopted at that date and previously; no doubt in}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 an endeavour to comply with the provisions of section 91, but I a}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 m}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  unable to fol}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15283318 low how a writ of such a nature}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
 could affect a judgment debtor's lands. In 1910 I find the first introduction of the practice adopted in the present case where the judgment purported to be served purs
uant to the provisions of section 91 of the Real Property Ordinance 1876. I must express my doubt whether such a judgment is a "Decree}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 or Order" within the meaning of section 91. However, the practice referred to has continued generally to the present time.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9708279 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
The Order of the 3rd November, 1922, in effect treats the judgment creditor's registered charge on the land on the same footing as a "judgment mortgage" taking priority of other charges or mortgages of subsequent registration; an order no doubt based on
 the provisions of Rule 286 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, and following the interpretation which, apparently, has always been placed upon that rule and one with which I see no reason to disagree. Subsequent to the entry of the judgment debt Annie Gaspa
rd, on the 26th August, 1922, registered her mortgage for \'a3614 17}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 s.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  9}{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 d.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  in respect of the one undivided moiety
 of the land of which Dwarka was at that date the proprietor, Amika, otherwise known as Maniram, the judgment debtor, having transferred on the 21st August, 1922, his interest in the land to Dwarka. She was given notice as mortgagee by letter dated the 19
t
h September, 1922, of the intention of the judgment creditor to apply to the Court for the sale of the land in satisfaction of the judgment debt registered against the land on the 2nd February, 1922. Annie Gaspard did not move in the matter, and on the 3r
d November, 1922, the Court made the order for the sale of Dwarka}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9708279\charrsid9708279 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
s interest in the land, and ordered the balance of the}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
judgment obtained by the judgment creditor on the 24th January, 1922, together with eight per cent. interest from the date of the judgme
nt and the costs of the proceedings to be paid out of the proceeds of the sale, and the balance of the proceeds of the sale, after payment of all encumbrances registered against the interest of Dwarka in the land to be paid into Court for his benefit.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9708279 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 On obtaining this Order for sale the interest in the land was advertised for sale by public auction on the 6th January, 1923, subject to the settled conditions of sale.
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 Ten minutes before the sale Annie Gaspard through her solicitor filed a caveat forbidding
 the registration of any dealing with the land unless subject to her interest as a duly registered mortgagee. Notwithstanding the caveat the Acting Registrar of the Supreme Court, under whose direction the sale took place, allowed the sale to proceed in a
c
cordance with the terms of the order, and with the result that Din Mahomed Khan was declared the highest bidder, and on the 9th January a certificate of purchase of the interest of Dwarka in the land was issued to Din Mahomed Khan; the certificate is unde
r the seal of the Court and signed by the Acting Chief Justice. Although the words "(subject to the mortgages and encumbrances notified hereunder)" occur in the certificate, none are noted thereon, and these words must therefore be treated as }{
\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 non scripta}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 , inasmuch as under the terms of the order its}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
elf no such reservation is made}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
 unless therefore the order of the 3rd November, 1922, is set aside; the certificate is in my opinion final and binding against all parties. I have examined the question of the proce
dure adopted in obtaining the order for sale so as to enable me to form an opinion as to whether }{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 ex debito justitiae}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  I should venture to assu}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 m}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
e jurisdiction to review the order as requested by counsel, and, although the procedure followed to bind the land 
may not strictly comply with the requirements of the Real Property Ordinance 1876, it occasions, in my opinion, no substantial wrong. Whether Annie Gaspard was well advised in being allowed to accept as collateral security for the}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392  s}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 u}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 m}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  of 
\'a3614 17}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 s.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  9}{\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 d.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 , Dwarka}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9708279\charrsid9708279 '}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
s interest in land, which at the sale only realised \'a3230, is another matter, and}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392  to my mind,}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
 affects the position, of the solicitors upon whose advice she acted, the same firm of solicitors, it may be noted, who had registered J.P. Maharaj & Company}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9708279\charrsid9708279 '}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 s judgment on the 2nd February, 1922, and who obtained the order for the sale of the land, and are now the solicitors for Din Mahomed Khan.
\par 
\par I have above given my reasons for bearing lengthy argument on the case in which it has been approached from every point of view, and I have expressed an opinion on the fundamental points raised. However, on the authority of }{
\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid741847 Preston Banking v. Allsop }{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid741847\charrsid741847 &}{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid741847  }{
\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid741847\charrsid741847 S}{\b\i\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid741847 ons}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid741847 , 1 C.D., 1895, p. 141,}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  I find this Court has no jurisdiction to rehear or alter the order of the 3rd November, 19
22, and admitting that there was power. I doubt whether after this lapse of time since the date of the order complained of the Court would exercise such power without some very good reason being given accounting for the delay.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9708279  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 In answer to question A of th
e Special Case I have already found that the Certificate of Purchase issued by the Court to Din Mahomed Khan is fin}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid741847 al and binding. As to question B}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 , I have gone into the facts for the reasons}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15956363  given and so far find they are}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279  relevant. As to C, I have alread
y indicated that as to the question whether Annie Gaspard had notice or not of the fact that the judgment of J.P. Maharaj & Company was registered prior to her execution of the mortgage is not material to the issue, but affects rather the position of the 
s}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15956363 olicitors who were}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9708279 
 then acting for her. As to E, I find that Din Mahomed Khan is entitled to be registered as the proprietor of one undivided moiety (formerly the interest of Amika) in the land described in the Certificate of Purchase issued to him by th
e Court on the 9th January, 1923, and I accordingly order that the caveat registered in Register of Caveats Book 46, Folio 1, be withdrawn. Plaintiff to be allowed his costs.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624 
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9391392 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392 ____________________________
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9708279 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9708279 
\par }{\i\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid15956363 Memo.}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392  - With reference to the observations in this
 judgment relating to the advice given to Annie Gaspard by Messrs. Garrick, Caldwell & Ellis, the firm of s}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid15956363 olicitors who drew the Mortgage}{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392  Deed of the 25th August, 1922, Mr. Ellis of cou}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9391392 n}{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 sel stated at the Bar that he strongly advised Annie Gaspard against accepting as collateral security Dwarka}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9708279\charrsid9391392 '}{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 s interest in the land dealt with, and pointed out to her tha}{\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9391392\charrsid9391392 t the registered judgment of J.}{
\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid4523624\charrsid9391392 P. Maharaj & Company would take priority of her mortgage.
\par }}