{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f2\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070309020205020404}Courier New;}{\f171\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f172\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f174\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f175\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f176\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f177\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f178\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f179\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f191\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CE;}{\f192\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Cyr;}{\f194\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Greek;}{\f195\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Tur;}
{\f196\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New (Hebrew);}{\f197\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New (Arabic);}{\f198\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Baltic;}{\f199\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;
\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;
\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{
\s1\ql \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 1;}{\s2\qc \li4320\ri0\sl480\slmult1
\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel1\adjustright\rin0\lin4320\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 2;}{\s3\qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1
\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel2\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f2\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 3;}{
\s4\qc \li4320\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel3\adjustright\rin0\lin4320\itap0 \b\f2\fs24\ul\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 4;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}
{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar
\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 header;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid1443355\rsid2242625\rsid3036411
\rsid7174627}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6764;}{\info{\title IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI}{\author Information Technology Unit}{\operator blake_r}{\creatim\yr2005\mo12\dy5\hr15\min46}{\revtim\yr2005\mo12\dy5\hr15\min46}
{\printim\yr1999\mo8\dy25\hr23\min15}{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages3}{\nofwords957}{\nofchars5461}{\*\company Judicial Department}{\nofcharsws6406}{\vern16391}}
\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow0\jexpand\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot7174627 
\fet0\sectd \linex0\endnhere\titlepg\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\header \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxc\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid1443355 PAGE  }}{\fldrslt {\cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid1443355 3}}}{\cs16\insrsid1443355 
\par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid1443355 
\par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}
{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 
\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
\par AT SUVA
\par MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411\charrsid3036411 Crim. Misc. Case No: HAM0}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 056 of 2005S
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 Between:}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411\charrsid3036411 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411\charrsid3036411 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 BINESH NARAYAN
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 Applicant
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 And:}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411\charrsid3036411 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411\charrsid3036411 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 THE STATE
\par }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 Respondent
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid7174627 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
\par Hearing:}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 9th August 2005
\par Ruling:}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 16th August 2005
\par 
\par Counsel:}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 Mr. N. Shivam for Applicant
\par Ms P. Madanavosa for State
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 RULING
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid7174627 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
\par This is a bail pending appeal application.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
The Applicant was convicted, after a trial, of the prohibited use of an examination paper, and was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 By petition of appeal, filed on the 2nd of A
ugust 2005, the Applicant appeals against the conviction on the grounds that the learned Magistrate erred in relying on the inconsistent evidence of the prosecution in accepting the evidence of accomplices without corroboration, and in failing to properly
 analyse the evidence.
\par 
\par The grounds for the bail application are that the appeal is likely to succeed, there will be delay before the hearing of the appeal and the Applicant is a 28 year old first offender who was a senior lecturer at the Fiji Institute of 
Technology and has a stable home background.
\par 
\par The State opposes the bail application saying that the merits of the appeal are difficult to assess in the absence of a court record and a filed petition of appeal, and that the Applicant was only sentenced on 
the 1st of August 2005 and therefore will not have served a substantial portion of his custodial sentence when the appeal is heard.
\par 
\par The Applicant was charged under the Examination Act Cap. 262, of giving a copy of the Business Communication exam paper to two students after receiving money from them, on the 4th of June 2002.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 The evidence led according to the judgment of the learned Magistrate was that the Applicant was a tutor at the Fiji Institute of Technology, teaching Business Communication.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 One of his students, one Riteshwar Gounder came to see him about obtaining a copy of examination papers prior to the exams.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 He and one Nitin Sharma, another student went to the Applicant\rquote s office.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 He gave them a brown envelope with the exam paper inside.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 One student gave him $30 and the other, $70.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
There was some contradiction in the evidence of the two students as to what the front page of the paper looked like.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
One of them photocopied the paper and gave it to other students.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 The examinations were to be held on the 15th of June.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 A copy of the paper was seized by the police from the house of one of the FIT students.
\par 
\par The moderator of the exam gave evidence saying that the paper he was shown by the police was the final copy of the Business Communication paper and that another was the \'93leaked\'94 copy.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 The difference between the two is that the cover sheet of the leaked copy was missing and that part of one question was laid out differently.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 However, the contents of both papers were the same.
\par 
\par The Applicant under caution denied selling the Business Communication exam paper to any of the students.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
In court he remained silent and called a witness to say that there were administrative difficulties at the Institute which had led to improper access to exam papers in the past.
\par 
\par The learned Magistrate found that there were inconsistencies in the accounts given by the two students but accepted their evidence as credible.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 In particular, she found the witness Nitin Sharma to be an impressive witness and unshaken under cross-examination.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 She found the Applicant guilty as charged.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
She sentenced him to 12 months imprisonment on the 1st of August 2005.
\par 
\par Counsel for the Applicant said that the appeal was bound to succeed because the prosecution witnesses were inconsistent with each other, and because the learned Magistrate failed to consider these discrepancies specifically.}{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
He further said that she relied on the evidence of the two students, who were accomplices, but that she failed to warn herself on the need for corroboration.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 He further said that accomplices are not mutually corroborative in law but were treated as if they were, in the judgment.
\par 
\par The merits of the appeal are certainly relevant in a bail pending appeal application.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
However, it is not enough that the Applicant shows an arguable ground of appeal.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
He must show that his appeal has every chance of success.
\par 
\par In this case the learned Magistrate gave no corroboration warning in relation to PW1 and PW2, the two students who supposedly bought the paper from the Applicant.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 Further, she accepted their evidence as being credible.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
This suggests that she found them to be mutually corroborative.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
Although counsel suggested that accomplices cannot corroborate each other, the question of whether mutual corroboration is not permissible in the case of accomplices, is a vexed one.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 In }{\b\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 DPP v. Hester}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
 (1973) 57 Cr. App. R. 212 H.L., the House of Lords (per Lord Diplock at p.245) said that the purpose of the rule was to warn the jury about the possibility of a jointly fabricated story by two or more acco
mplices who were involved in the same act as the accused (participes criminis).}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 In }{
\b\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 DPP v. Kilbourne}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
 (1973) 57 Cr. App. R. 381, Lord Reid said that the prohibition of mutual corroboration for accomplices was not a general rule.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
It did not necessarily apply 
to accomplices who were in different categories of participation (for instance a receiver giving evidence against a thief on the basis of similar offending) and that mutual corroboration may be accepted where the circumstances are such as they exclude the
 danger of a jointly fabricated story.
\par 
\par Whether or not the failure to give a corroboration warning in this case, and the failure to consider whether mutual corroboration was possible, lay the basis for a ground of appeal which is clearly meritorious, is dif
ficult to assess without the record and without hearing full argument on the issue.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
I would also need to hear argument on whether there were other sources of corroboration which existed in fact, on the evidence, thereby suggesting that there was no miscarriage of justice.
\par 
\par I am not satisfied that this appeal is bound to succeed.
\par 
\par On the question of delay, the Applicant has only served two weeks of his term of imprisonment.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
If his appeal is heard in September, he will have served less than two months of it.}{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid3036411  }{\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
This is not a substantial portion of the whole.
\par 
\par Further, on the circumstances of his employment and family I see nothing which constitutes exceptional grounds justifying the grant of bail.
\par 
\par For these reasons bail is refused.
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3036411 {\b\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 Nazhat Shameem
\par }{\b\fs24\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid3036411 JUDGE
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid7174627 {\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2242625\charrsid7174627 
\par At Suva
\par 16th August 2005
\par }}