{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}
{\f169\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}WP TypographicSymbols;}{\f173\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f174\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f176\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}
{\f177\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f178\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f179\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f180\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}
{\f181\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;
\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*
\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\*\cs15 \additive \ssemihidden footnote reference;}{
\s16\ql \fi-720\li2160\ri720\nowidctlpar\faauto\ls1\outlinelevel0\rin720\lin2160\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Level 1;}{
\s17\ql \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\ls1\ilvl1\outlinelevel1\rin0\lin1440\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext17 Level 2;}}{\*\listtable{\list\listtemplateid0{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0
\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'00);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'01);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}
{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'02);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0
{\leveltext\'03(\'03);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'04);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0
\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'05);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'06);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}{\listlevel\levelnfc4
\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'07);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat0\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext
\'00;}{\levelnumbers;}}{\listname AutoList1;}\listid1}}{\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid1\listoverridecount8{\lfolevel\listoverridestartat\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat6
\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'00);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}}{\lfolevel\listoverridestartat\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext
\'03(\'01);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}}{\lfolevel\listoverridestartat\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'02);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}}{\lfolevel
\listoverridestartat\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'03);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}}{\lfolevel\listoverridestartat\listoverrideformat{\listlevel
\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'04);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}}{\lfolevel\listoverridestartat\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0
\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'05);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}}{\lfolevel\listoverridestartat\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext
\'03(\'06);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}}{\lfolevel\listoverridestartat\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'03(\'07);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}}}\ls1}}
{\*\rsidtbl \rsid749535\rsid2193246\rsid10355461\rsid11275090}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6764;}{\info{\title IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI}{\author blake_r}{\operator blake_r}{\creatim\yr2006\mo4\dy20\hr16\min22}{\revtim\yr2006\mo4\dy20\hr16\min22}
{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages11}{\nofwords3414}{\nofchars19464}{\*\company USP}{\nofcharsws22833}{\vern16391}}\margl2160\margr2160\margt1296\margb1296 
\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\notabind\wraptrsp\transmf\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\truncatefontheight\subfontbysize\sprsbsp\wpjst\lytprtmet\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3
\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot2193246 \fet0\sectd \sbknone\linex0\headery1296\footery1296\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid2193246\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid749535 
\par }\pard \ql \li-720\ri-720\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin-720\lin-720\itap0 {\field{\*\fldinst {\insrsid749535 FILENAME  \\* upper \\p }}{\fldrslt {\insrsid749535 D:\\Singh\\hbc0205r.01s.wpd}}}{\insrsid749535 
\par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}
{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
\par AT SUVA
\par CIVIL JURISDICTION
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 CIVIL ACTION NO. }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461\charrsid10355461 HBC0}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 205 OF 2001
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Between:
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 RAJENDRA PRASAD BROTHERS LIMITED
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Plaintiff
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 and
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 FAI INSURANCES (FIJI) LIMITED
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Defendant
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par Mr. B.C. Patel for the Plaintiff
\par Mr. F. Haniff for the Defendants
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 DECISION
\par (Chamber application for
\par Leave to appeal from interlocutory order
\par and leave to appeal out of time)
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461\charrsid10355461 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Applications
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par By Summons filed in Court on 31 May 2002 }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Fai Insurances (Fiji) Limited}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 (the }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 defendant}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 ) seeks Orders as follows:
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 THAT}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  it may be gran
ted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal from the Order of the Honourable Mr Justice D Pathik in this matter delivered on 7 May 2002 and entered on 13 May 2002 }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 AND THAT}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  the time for bringing}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
such appeal be extended until such time as this Honourable Court determines the Applicant/Defendant}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s application for leave to appeal }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 AND THAT}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 proceedings in the High Court be stayed in the meantime and in the event that such leave is granted until the delivery of the judgment of the Court of Appeal on any appeal brought in terms of such leave.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par The grounds on which the defendant relies on leave to appeal are set out in great detail in the said summons.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Ground 6}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  was deleted to read: }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL
 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 His Lordship erred in law in holding that the originating summons procedure was ap
propriate in these proceedings despite the disputes of fact that exist in the affidavit evidence before the Court}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt
\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
These grounds can be summarized in nine words, that is, that I as the Judge erred in law in every aspect of the case.
\par 
\par The Summons was supported by just one affidavit of }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Peter Fimone}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  who is the Claims Manager of the defendant company.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
All he says, which is of any substance, is that the defendant wants to appeal to Court of Appeal against my decision herein of 7 May 2002 wherein I refused the defendant}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst 
SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s application under }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Order 28 Rule 9(1)}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  of the }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 High Court Rules 1988}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 that this matter be continued as if}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 begun by writ.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The defendant contended that the originating summons procedure was inappropriate in these proceedings.
\par 
\par All that Fimone deposes to in his affidavit which is of any moment is }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 If the High Court proceeds to determine the substantive matter under the Plaintiff}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s originating summons, the Applicant/Defendant}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL
 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s application for leave to appeal and, if leave is granted, its appeal against 
the decision of the learned Judge would be futile as the basis of the Applicant appealing his Lordship}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s decision is the inappropriateness of the originating summons procedure in these proceedings}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL
 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .
\par 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The decision impugned}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par On 7 May 2002 I gave a comprehensive decision when I said, inter alia:
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 In the circumstances of this case, in the exercise of my discretion, I disallow the defendant}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
s application as it would be an exercise in futility and a sheer waste of time; it will unnecessarily prolong the determination of the issue.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 In short the issue can be determined quite easily on affidavit evidence alone and without having to call oral evidence which the defendant wants.}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par I further said (at p13 of my decision) that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 on the affidavit evidence before me, bearing in mind certain admissions by the defendant and the facts including those which can be }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 judicially noticed}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 there is sufficient evidence to determine the substantive issue under the Originating Summons procedure}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}
}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 I concluded by saying that }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 the originatin
g summons procedure is quite appropriate and there is no need to grant the Order sought, namely, that these proceedings continue as if begun by writ under Order 28 r.9 of the High Court Rules 1988}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Defendant}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s submission}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par In his submission on }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 leave to appeal}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 the learned counsel for the defendant Mr. Haniff referred the Court to a number of authorities on the principles applicable upon which leave to appeal an interlocutory decision is granted.
\par 
\par He submitted that the general principle is that leave will not be granted except in cases of incorrect application of the law, or where the order was made in disregard of principle, or with a misapprehension as to the facts or where the order was }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 plainly}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  wrong.
\par 
\par Mr. Haniff then dealt with each of the grounds of appeal citing authorities which concentrated wholly on where he alleges the Court erred in law.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 In short his whole argument boils down to saying that there are so many disputed facts in this action that the originating summons procedure is }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 not}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  appropriate.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 It was the same argument which was advanced previously on which I have given a decision and is}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  now proposed to appeal against}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
However, as I indicated to Counsel, it is not for me to go into the merits of the case in this application and also that I have already dealt with the issues which he is raising in his grounds in support of his application.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 It is now for the Court of Appeal, if granted leave, to hear him on those matters and not for me.
\par 
\par Counsel further submitted that he admits that the onus is on the defendant to prove that exclusions in Clause 5.1(b) apply.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
He says that the defendant has maintained throughout these proceedings that the only way it could prove that the exclusions apply is by calling oral evidence of witnesses to and participants of events of 19 May 2000.
\par 
\par Counsel further submits that injustice would be done if the defendant were not permitted to call witnesses, either voluntarily or by subpoena, regarding the events of 19 May 2000 to establish the applicability of the exclusion clause.
\par 
\par For these reasons he is seeking leave to test the Court}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s decision on whether the originating summons procedure is appropriate in these proceedings
\par 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Plaintiff}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s submission
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the Court did not determine any }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 substantive rights}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  but in the exercise of its }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 discretion}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 gave its decision which is interlocutory on a matter of}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt
\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 practice and procedure}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .
\par 
\par On application for extension of time to appeal, Mr. Patel says that it has come too late and no }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 good reasons}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  have been shown to warrant such an extension.
\par 
\par The facts relating to time are that the defendant filed its application on 31 May 2002 and the time for appeal was expiring on 4 June 2002.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 So the application was filed 3 days before expiry of time limit knowing full well that such an application could not be called, let alone determined within the permitted time.
\par 
\par On the grant of leave counsel submits, inter alia, that the requirement for leave is designed to reduce appeals from interlocutory orders as much as possible (per }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Murphy J}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Niemann v Electronic Industries Ltd}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 [1978] VR 431 at 442).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
A party appealing against such an order made in the exercise of a discretion upon a matter of practice and procedure undertakes a }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols"
 \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 formidable task}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt
\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  [}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v HGL (Advances) Ltd}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 (1990) 98 HLR 200 at 206].
\par 
\par Mr. Patel further submits that even if the order is seen to be clearly wrong, this is not sufficient.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 It must be shown, in addition, to }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
effect a substantial injustice by its operation}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  (per }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Murphy J}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  in }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Niemann }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 (supra) at 441).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Counsel also referred to a case which I decided, namely, }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Edmund March v Bank of Hawaii & Others}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  (unreported FCA 25 of 2000, delivered 10.10.2000) where as a single Judge of Appeal I said that in respect of an interlocutory order leave is seldom given except}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 where there are }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 exceptional circumstances}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  warranting it.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Mr. Patel says that that situation does not prevail here.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Counsel submits that the defendant will not suffer any injustice, and if it succeeds on appeal after substantive hearin
g, there will be a retrial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 It will not be left without a remedy.
\par 
\par Mr. Patel submits that the defendant has not made out a case for extension or for leave and so both applications should be dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Determination of the issue}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par There are two applications before me, namely: (i) extension of time to appeal out of time and stay and (ii) leave to appeal from an interlocutory order.
\par 
\par I shall deal with (ii) above first and (i) above is dependent on whether or not I grant leave to appeal.
\par 
\par Both counsel made oral and written submissions and I have carefully considered their arguments.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
I have already stated hereabove what the affidavit in support of the summons says.
\par 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The principles}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par The application for leave to Court of Appeal is made under }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 section 12(2)(f)}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 of the }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Court of Appeal Act}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  which provides (inter alia):

\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 12(2) No Appeal shall lie }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461 -}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\s16 \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 (f)\tab}}\pard\plain \s16\ql \fi-720\li2160\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\ls1\rin0\lin2160\itap0\pararsid10355461 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
without the leave of the judge or of the Court of Appeal from any interlocutory order or interlocutory judgment made or given by a judge of the Supreme Court (now High Court) except in the following cases, namely: .... ......}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par This application as I see it is not only on }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 interlocutory}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  order but also one of }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 practice and procedure}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Here there was an exercise of }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 discretion }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 by the Court on a point of }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst 
SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 practice and procedure}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
I find that the following passage from the judgment of the High Court of Australia in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc. & Anor,}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  [1918] 148 CLR 170 at 177 wherein is repeated with approval the oft}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461 -}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
cited statement of }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Sir Frederick Jordan}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  in}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 Re Will of F.B. Gilbert}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  (dec}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 d) [1946] 46 SR (NSW) 318 at 323 pertinent:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li709\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin709\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 ...I am of the opinion that,...there is a material difference between an exercise of discretion on a point of }{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
practice or procedure}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  and an exercise of discretion which determines }{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 substantive rights}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
In the former class of case, if a tight rein were not kept upon inference with the order of judges of first instance, the result would be}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 disastrous to the proper administration of justice.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The disposal of 
cases could be delayed interminably, and costs heaped up indefinitely, if a litigant with a long purse or a litigious disposition could, at will, in effect transfer all exercises of discretion in interlocutory applications from a judge in chambers to a Co
urt of Appeal.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461 (emphasis mine)}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par Even in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Salmond on Jurisprudence}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 10th Ed. (1947) p.476, difference between substantive law and procedural law have been described thus:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Substantive law is concerned with the ends which the administration of justice seeks; procedural law deals with the means and instruments by which those ends are to be attained.}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
The latter regulates the conduct and relations of courts and litigants in respect of the litigation itself; the former determines their conduct and relations in respect of the matters litigated}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 It was stated in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Adam Brown}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  (supra) at 177 that:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .... that appellate courts exercise particular caution in reviewing decisions pertaining to practice and procedure.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 ..... Not only must there be }{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 error of principle}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
, but the decision appealed from must work a }{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 substantial injustice}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  to one of the parties,.....}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 For ourselves, we believe it to be unnecessary and indeed unwise to lay down rigid and exhaustive criteria.}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The circumstances of different cases are infinitely various.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 (emphasis mine)
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par This is an application for leave to appeal against the said interlocutory order which I made.
\par 
\par As can be seen from the wording of the said }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s12(2)(f)}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 leave will not generally be given from an interlocutory order unless the Court sees that }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 some injustice will be done}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The Courts have therefore laid down certain principles upon which this leave will be granted.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 In }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Hawkins v Great Western Railway}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  [1895] 14 R.360 }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Rigby, L.J }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 at 362 said: }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
.....It is only where a potent mistake is pointed out, or where it is made clear that there is some injustice which ought to be remedied, that leave should be granted}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst 
SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .
\par 
\par On the authorities, Mr. Haniff for the defendant has to satisfy the Court that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 substantial injustice will be done by leaving that erroneous decision unreversed}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  (}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 William J}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  in}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  Perry v Smith}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  27 V.L.R 66 at 68; followed by }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Full Court}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  (}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Winneke C J}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 ) in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Darrel Lea}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  (}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Vic}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .) }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
Pty Ltd v Union Assurance Society of Australia Ltd }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 [1969] VR at 401).}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
On the affidavit evidence before me I am not satisfied that any }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 substantial injustice}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  would be done.
\par 
\par As stated above, courts are reluctant to interfere with interlocutory orders.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 This is what the then President, Fiji Court of Appeal (}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Sir Moti Tikaram}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 ) said in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
Kelton Investments Limited and Tappoo Limited and 1. Civil Aviation Authority of Fiji 2. Motibhai & Company Limited}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461 , Civil Appeal No. ABU0034.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 1995:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
The Courts have thrown their weight against appeals from interlocutory orders or decisions for very good reasons and hence leave to appeal are not readily given.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Having read the affidavits filed and considered the submissions made I am not persuaded that this application should be treated as an exception.}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 In my view the intended appeal would have minimal or no prospect of success if leave were granted.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par Again in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Totis Inc Spor (Fiji) Limited & Anor. v}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
John Leonard Clark & Anor }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 (FCA No. 35 of 1996 at 15) }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Sir Moti Tikaram}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  said:}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246 
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 it has long been settled law and practice that interlocutory orders and decisions will seldom be amenable to appeal.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Courts have repeatedly emphasized that appeals against interlocutory orders and decisions will only rarely succeed.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The Fiji Court of Appeal has consistently observed the above principles by granting leave only in the most exceptional circumstances}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par Further in considering leave to appeal from an interlocutory order I have found a very useful guide in the following extract from the judgment in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Ex parte Bucknell}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  1936 56 C.L.R. 221 at 226:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 At the same time it must be remembered that the prima facie presumption is against appeals 
from interlocutory orders, and, therefore, an application for leave to appeal under sec.35(1)(a) should not be granted as of course without consideration of the nature and circumstances of the particular case.}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 It would be unwise to attempt an exhaustive st
atement of the considerations which should be regarded as a justification for granting leave to appeal in the case of an interlocutory order, but it is desirable that, without doing this, an indication should be given of the matters which the court regard
s as relevant upon an application for leave to appeal from an interlocutory judgment.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 In goes on to state at p.225 that:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 But any statement of the matters which would justify granting leave to appeal must be subject to one important qualification which applies to all cases.}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 It is this.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
The court will examine each case and, unless the circumstances are exceptional, it will not grant leave if it }{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 forms a clear opinion adverse to the success of the proposed appeal}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 (emphasis mine)
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par On the need for grant of leave the }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Master of Rolls, Sir Thomas Bingham}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 First Tokyo Index Trust Ltd v Morgan Stanley Trust Co. & Ors}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  (the Times Law Report, 6.10.95 C.A.) said:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The requirement of leave was a filter to obviate the expenditure of money and court time on appeals whi
ch had no hope of success.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
The decision whether to grant leave was usually made in the first instance on paper by the single lord justice who would refuse leave if of clear opinion that the appeal was not arguable.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par Bearing in mind the principles to be applied on an application of this nature and considering the authorities referred to hereabove, I am clearly of the view that the defendant does not have a chance of success on appeal.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 When I say this I bear in mind the following words of }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Lord Woolf M.R}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Smith v Cosworth Casting Processes Ltd}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 (The Times Law Report, The Times 28.3.97)
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
A court was entitled to grant an application for leave to appeal even if it was not satisfied that the appeal had any realistic prospect of succeeding.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 There might be many other reasons why the court thought it desirable that the appeal should proceed.}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 It was a misconception to assume when only one reason for granting leave was mention by the court that it was the only reason.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The court would only refuse leave if satisfied th
at an applicant had no realistic prospect of succeeding on the appeal.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 no realistic prospect}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 test was not meant to be any different from the test which was sometimes called }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 no arguable case}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par Apart from hammering the Court where it has erred in law without any relevant authority, Mr. Haniff has not advanced any good reason to convince the Court to enable it to lean in the defendant}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s favour.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 If anything, my previous decision has set out in considerable detail my reasons for coming to the decision particularly in the matter of }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 practice and procedure}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  in the exercise of my discretion.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 An application under Or.28 r.9(1), similar in kind to the present, fell to be determined by me in }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Dharam Singh & Ors. v Hardayal Singh & Ors.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  40 FLR p156, to which reference was made by both counsel.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 There on the subject of }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f 
"WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 disputed facts}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols"
 \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 , the point laboured by Mr. Haniff in this application, I said at 158:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 According to my interpretation, where Rule 4(2)(b) provides that proceedings }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 in which there is unlikely to be an
y substantial dispute of fact, }{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 are appropriate}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  to be begun by originating summons}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 , it merely says }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 appropriate}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 meaning, according to dictionary meaning }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 correct}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  or }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 suitable}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 , does not preclude commencing an action by originating summons }{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 where there are disputed facts}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 It does not say that it }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 must}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  issue as in Or 5 r.3.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 (underlining mine)
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Even }{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Rule 4(1)}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  provides that }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 proceedings may be begun either by writ or by originating summons as the plaintiff considers appropriate}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par Also in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Halsbury}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s Laws of England 4th Ed. Vol 37 at para 559}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  it is stated, inter alia:
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Where it appears to the court at any stage of proceedings begun by originating summons that they should for any reason (}{
\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Footnote: E.G. because a substantial issue of fact is likely to arise on which oral evidence will be required for which the ordinary trial procedure is more suitable}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 ) be continued as if begun by writ, it may order proceedings to continue as if so begun, even if the cause or matter in question could not in fact have been begun by writ.}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 (emphasis mine)}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par From what I have said on this aspect, it should not be understood that I am delving into the merits of the case for it is not in my province to do so at this stage except to point out that the application is}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 unmeritorious}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  and }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 futile}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 I cannot look into the correctness or otherwise of the order intended to be appealed against.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 However, again as }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Sir Moti Tikaram,}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 the then President, Court of Appeal said in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The Public Service Commission v Manuvavalagi Dalituicama Korovulavula}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
, Civil Appeal No. 11 of 1989 said at p.5:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
However if prima facie the intended appeal is patently unmeritorious or there are clearly no arguable points requiring decision then it would be proper for me to take these matters into consideration before deciding whether to grant leave or not.}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par However, in the case before me it is my respectful view that the grounds for appeal are }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 unmeritorious}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  and there are no }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 arguable}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  legal issues of any importance which require some authoritative decision.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
I do not see how the applicant will be prejudiced if leave is refused.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
It will still have the opportunity to put its case fully before the Court during the hearing of the substantive action.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
It will have the right of appeal if unsuccessful.
\par 
\par From the oral submission made by the
 Plaintiff I gain the distinct impression that the defendant is still fishing for witnesses so to say who could testify on its behalf in relation to exclusion clause in the insurance policy for he talks about getting witnesses on subpoena not knowing whet
her these so}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461 -}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 called birds in the bush will give evidence in his client}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 s favour or not.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 No affidavit evidence bearing on the alleged dire need to call oral evidence of persons who are unnamed has been disclosed.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The defendant should come clean and disclose all that needs to be disclosed to convince the Court that there is some substance in his argument which merit furth}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461 er consideration by the Court.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Extension of time to appeal}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par The defendant applies for an extension of time within which to appeal against my
 said decision of 7 May 2002 herein, to which the plaintiff objects stating that under Rule 16 of the Court of Appeal Rules an appeal against an interlocutory judgment or order must be filed within 21 days of the date of the Order is sealed.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Mr. Patel says that the Rules say nothing about how, or when, the leave is to be obtained.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461 
 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 But, he says that it is clear from Rule 16 that if the appeal is to be filed within 21 days of the sealed Order then leave must also be obtained within that period and that it is 
not sufficient to merely file an application within the 21 days.
\par 
\par In this case the defendant filed its application on 31 May 2002, the time for appeal was expiring on 3 June 2002.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
In other words the application was filed 3 days before the expiry of the time for appeal.
\par 
\par In any case on an application for leave to appeal out of time, it was held in }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Director of Public Prosecutions v Jikar Ali}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 21 FLR (1975) p115 that }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
substantial reasons would need to be advanced before such an enlargement would be granted and in the present case there were no proper grounds for granting the application}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .
\par 
\par Similarly, in the case before me no proper grounds for granting the application exists.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
The grant of leave to appeal out of time is entirely a matter for the discretion of the Court.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The following passage from the judgment of }
{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Privy Council in Ratnam v. Cumaraswamy and Another }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 1964 3 All E.R. 933 at p.935 is to be borne in mind:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 65 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The rules of court must, prima facie, be obeyed, and, in order to justify a court in extending the time during which some step in procedure requires to be taken, there}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 must be some material on which the court can exercise its discretion.}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 If the law were otherwise, a party in breach would have an unqualified right to an extension of time which would defe
at the purpose of the rules which is to provide a time table for the conduct of litigation}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 64 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{
\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 .
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par Applying the above principles the application for leave to appeal out of time is refused.
\par 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Stay}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par Since I have decided to refuse leave to appeal from the interlocutory order, there is no need for me to deal with the stay application as there will be nothing to be stay}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461 ed pending any proposed appeal.}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246 
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461\charrsid10355461 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Conclusion
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 To sum up, having heard arguments from both counsel, I am not satisfied that the defendant has established the principle that the Court was }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 wrong}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461  and that }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 62 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 substantial injustice}{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 {\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 61 \\f "WP TypographicSymbols" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f169\fs24}}}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
 would be done by the alleged erroneous decision.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
Also the intended appeal does not raise any point of law of any general importance requiring the attention of the Court of Appeal at this stage.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The defendant will have the opportunity to appeal to Court of appeal, if aggrieved, from a final order or judgment.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Hence no injustice will result if leave was refused on the present application.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461  }{
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 The defendant therefore fails at the very threshold on its application for leave to appeal.
\par 
\par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Orders}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par I, therefore, make the following orders }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461 -}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par 
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\s17 \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 (a)\tab}}\pard\plain \s17\ql \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\ls1\ilvl1\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid10355461 
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Summons for leave to appeal refused}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246 
\par }\pard \s17\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461\charrsid10355461 
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\s17 \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 (b)\tab}}\pard \s17\ql \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\ls1\ilvl1\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid10355461 {
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Extension of time to appeal refused}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246 
\par }\pard \s17\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461\charrsid10355461 
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\s17 \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 (c)\tab}}\pard \s17\ql \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\ls1\ilvl1\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid10355461 {
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Application for stay Order pending appeal dismissed}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246 
\par }\pard \s17\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461\charrsid10355461 
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\s17 \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 (d)\tab}}\pard \s17\ql \fi-720\li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\ls1\ilvl1\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid10355461 {
\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Defendant to pay plaintiff costs of the proceedings before me which I fix at $500.00.
\par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 D. Pathik
\par }{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 Judge}{\b\ul\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10355461 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid10355461\charrsid10355461 
\par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 At Suva
\par 9 August 2002}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2193246\charrsid10355461 
\par }}