{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}
{\f66\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR;}{\f67\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f68\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f70\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}
{\f71\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f72\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f73\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f74\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}
{\f75\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;
\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\f66\fs24\lang1033\langfe5129\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp5129 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*
\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\*\cs15 \additive \ssemihidden footnote reference;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid20127\rsid4267218
\rsid5054104\rsid6817112\rsid7155828\rsid7805918}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.4219;}{\info{\title IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI}{\author Emalus Campus}{\operator ehndvaun_d}{\creatim\yr2003\mo7\dy31\hr17\min33}{\revtim\yr2003\mo7\dy31\hr17\min33}
{\version2}{\edmins0}{\nofpages7}{\nofwords2612}{\nofchars14890}{\*\company USP}{\nofcharsws17468}{\vern16469}}\paperw11905\paperh16837\margl1700\margr1700\margt1700 
\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\notabind\wraptrsp\transmf\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\truncatefontheight\subfontbysize\sprsbsp\wpjst\lytprtmet\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3
\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot7805918 \fet0\sectd \sbknone\linex0\headery1700\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid7805918\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\f66\fs24\lang1033\langfe5129\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp5129 {\insrsid6817112 
\par }\pard \qj \fi-720\li-260\ri-260\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin-260\lin-260\itap0 {\lang3081\langfe5129\langnp3081\insrsid6817112 C:\\WPDOCS\\SINGH\\HBC0361D.94S
\par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}
{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 
\f66\fs24\lang1033\langfe5129\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp5129 {\b\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
\par At Suva
\par CIVIL JURISDICTION
\par }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par CIVIL ACTION NO. 0361 OF 1994
\par 
\par Between:
\par 
\par }{\b\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 FIJI SPORTS COUNCIL
\par }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 Plaintiff
\par 
\par - and -
\par 
\par }{\b\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 FIJI ELECTRICITY AUTHORITY
\par }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 Defendant
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par Mr. S. Parshotam for the Plaintiff
\par Mr. Anu Patel for the Defendant
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\b\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 DECISION
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\b\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 This is an application by the defendant seeking an order for the dissolution of the interim injunction granted herein by }{
\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 KEPA J}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  on 21 July 1994.
\par 
\par By Summons ex parte dated 21 July 1994 the Plaintiff (hereafter referred to as }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 'FSC'}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ) had applied to Court for an O
rder that the Defendant (hereafter referred to as }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 'FEA'}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ) }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"whether by itself or by its agents or servants or otherwise howsoever, be restrained from continuing with the construction of a power substation in the land known as 'Victoria Park' and comprised in
 Crown Lease No. 12274 located at the corner of Pender Street and Disraeli Road, Suva"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 .
\par }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218 
\par }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 On the said 21 July }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 KEPA J}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
, upon FSC giving its undertaking as to damages, granted an interim order for injunction as prayed.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
The hearing inter partes was adjourned to 28 July 1994.
\par 
\par The Summons subsequently came before me for argument on 16 March 1995 after efforts between the parties to resolve their differences failed.
\par 
\par The Affidavits on which the FSC relies are one from }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 PIO WONG}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  sworn 20 July 1994, one from }{
\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 VIREN KAPADIA}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  sworn 20 July 1994 and a further Affidavit in Reply of PIO WONG sworn 14 September 1994.
\par 
\par The FEA relies on Affidavits of }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 NIZAM UD DEAN}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
 the then acting Chief Executive (now Chief Executive) of FEA sworn 28 July 1994 and 8 February 1995.
\par 
\par I shall now set out briefly the salient features of the said Affidavits.
\par 
\par The said }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 PIO WONG}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
 in his affidavit sworn 20 July 1994 stated, inter alia, that (a) FSC is the registered proprietor of CL 12274 known as }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "Victoria Park"}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  (hereafter referred to as }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 'VC'}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ); (b) in A
ugust 1989 FSC agreed with FEA for the relocation of power transformer substation from corner of Knolly Street and Pender Street (which is behind the Squash Court on }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 'VC'}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ) to the corner of Pender Street and Disraeli Road and at that time the views of the r
esidents were not taken into account by FSC; (c) FSC reconsidered its decision as soon as it received severe opposition in writing for the construction of the substation from the residents as soon as FEA began construction work on 1 March 1994; (d) as a r
esult of the opposition he informed FEA to cease work }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218 on the site so that an alternat}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ive site }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "which was less prominent and open"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  could be decided upon between FEA and FSC; (e) on {\*\bkmkstart QuickMark}
{\*\bkmkend QuickMark}8 March 1994 an alternative site was }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "agreed"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  upon, namely, behind the Tennis
 Court No. 5 next to Knolly Street and}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
FEA would seek the necessary formal approval etc; (f) on 16 June 1994 FSC was informed that FEA is going ahead with the construction of the substation on the corner of Pender Street and Disraeli Road; (g) on 11 July 1
994 construction work re-commenced and the residents again objected; (h) because of the opposition by the residents and because of breach by FEA of the }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "agreement"}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  reached on 8 March 1994 the present proceedings were instituted.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 

\par 
\par In his second affidavit sworn 14 September 1994 }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 PIO WONG}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
, in reply to DEAN'S affidavit states, inter alia, that (a) it was }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"oversight on my part to show that the land on which FEA was constructing the new substation was leased by it from the Director of Lands"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ; (b) it was the }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "agreement"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  reached that }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"forms the basis of the plaintiff's claim against FEA"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 .
\par 
\par In Reply to the Plaintiff's said affidavits, the said DEAN deposed, inter alia, that, (a) the proposed }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "substation"}{\b\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
 }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 the subject matter of this action is }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "situated on Lot 2 S.O. 2
695 and not on land known as "Victoria Park" comprised in CL 12274 being Lot 1 on S.O. 2695"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  and further that the }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"Director of Lands has agreed to issue a registered lease"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  over this Lot to FEA.
\par 
\par Before I proceed any further, I notice that there is an error in describing the proposed substation site.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
It should be Lot 2 on S.O. 26}{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 59}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  and Not 26}{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 95}
{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  and also in paragraph 3 of Dean's Affidavit it states }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "Lot }{
\i\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 1}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  SO 26}{\i\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 95}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  it should read Lot }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 2}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  on 265}{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 9}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 .
\par 
\par He further deposed that (b) in 1989 }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "it was agreed between the Plaintiff, the Director of Lands, the Suva City Council and the defendant, the area now kno}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218 wn as Lot 2 SO 2659}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 be the site for the substation"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
; (b) on 4 March 1994 
\par 
\par PIO WONG }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "unlawfully and without colour of right prevented and stopped the defendant's contractor from continuing with the construction of the substation"}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ; (d) then on 8 March 1994 parties did negotiate the possibility of relocating the substation }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"provided all necessary approvals, consents and permits could be obtained within a reasonable time"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ;
 (e) he is advised that the Lands Department was not in favour of the relocation of the substation stating that the Department was in the process of issuing a lease over the said Lot 2 S0 2659; and it was only on 14 July 1994 that Mr. Queet, the Director 
of Lands, replied to FEA's inquiry of 18 March 1994.
\par 
\par In his second Affidavit, DEAN deposed that (a) neither FSC nor the residents, particularly MANI LAL KAPADIA who lives opposite the site, are willing to pay relocation costs of $24,000; (b) the F.E.A. has suffered and }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"is continuing to suffer loss of revenue as a consequence of its inability to construct the proposed electrical substation and to be put in a position to increase its Amp/Phase lease and is asking for the dissolution of the injunction"}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 .
\par 
\par I have given careful consideration to all the affidavits filed in this matter and to the arguments put forward by both counsel for their respective clients.
\par 
\par I have also considered the principles to be applied in considering applications for interlocutory injunction.
\par 
\par Mr. Patel has submitted there was a material non-disclosure by FSC when it made the application ex parte by not disclosing in its affidavit in support that the portion of land on which it is proposed to build the substation does not belong to FSC 
but to FEA.
\par 
\par He says that, this in itself is sufficient ground to dissolve the injunction.
\par 
\par I am entirely in agreement with him.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 In this regard the said }{
\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 PIO WONG}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  has been less than frank.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 In fact his first affidavit has been very misleading.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 He had withheld a very material fact at the time of his application ex parte for an injunction.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 In the Writ of Summons in the Indorsement of Claim FSC is asking for, inter alia, a declaration }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"that the defendant is not entitled to construct a power substation on that site located at the corner of Knolly Street and Disraeli Road, Suva }{\i\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 being part of the Plaintiff's land}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  known as 'Victoria Park' and comprised in Crown Lease No. 12274"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 . (underlining mine for emphasis) 
\par 
\par It is not on the land known as }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "Victoria Park"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  that the substation is being constructed.}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 It is on Lot 2 on Plan SO 2659 being 81 sq.m. at the corner of Pender Street and Disraeli Road.
\par 
\par It was on this misstatement that FSC obtained the interim injunction.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
Although after the error was pointed out in reply by }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 DEAN}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 , the said }{
\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 PIO WONG}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  said }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "it was an oversight on my part"}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 .
\par 
\par In }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 PERKINS MARITIME INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD v COMMONWEALTH BANK and ANOTHER}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
 (105 FLR (1991) Sup.Ct. of Northern Territory) }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ANGEL}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  J said:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "When an ex parte application is made to injunct a party e
ither to do something or refrain from doing something, courts will only make an order if satisfied that justice demands that a party be ordered to do or refrain from doing something before they are heard.}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 Normally the court would require the party to be before it and be heard before any order is made at all.}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 It behoves a plain}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218 tiff who seeks an order in such }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 circumstances }{\i\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 to be very frank}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
 with the court, not only to put its own case, but to put all relevant matters against the granting of the order sought.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 It is apparent in this case that there was not the full frankness before the learned Chief Justice that there ought to have been.}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 I do not wish to dwell upon this.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 I do not wish to develop it.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
The principles are well-known.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 It is sufficient to refer to the 
well-known case of Thomas A Edison Ltd v Bullock (1912) 15 CLR 679, particularly at 681-682".
\par }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 (underlining mine).
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par On the matter of non-disclosure the headnote to }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 THOMAS A. EDISON LIMITED and BULLOCK (15 CLR p.679)}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  states:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "It is the duty of a party askin
g for an interlocutory injunction ex parte to bring before the Court all facts material to the determination of his right to that injunction, and omission to bring any material facts before the Court is a ground for dissolving an injunction so obtained".

\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par I refer to the following passage from the judgment of }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ISSACS J}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  in }{
\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 BULLOCK}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  (supra) at p.681-682 on the duty of disclosure of material fact:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"Dalglish v Jarvie (1), a case of high authority, establishes that it is the duty of a party asking for an injunctio
n ex parte to bring under the notice of the Court all facts material to the determination of his right to that injunction, and it is no excuse for him to say he was not aware of their importance.}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 Uberrima fides is required, and the party inducing the Court
 to act in the absence of the other party, fails in his obligation unless he supplies the place of the absent party to the extent of bringing forward all the material facts which that party would presumably have brought forward in his defence to that appl
ication.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
Unless that is done, the implied condition upon which the Court acts in forming its judgment is unfulfilled and the order so obtained must almost invariably fall".
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par In this case it will not do for }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 PIO WONG}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  to say it was }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "oversight"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  particularly whe
n it was so important for the purposes of application ex parte although I am not unmindful of the fact that not all facts are material which would lead to summary discharge of an ex parte injunction.}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 What are material facts has been put by }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
RALPH GIBSON L.J}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 . in }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 BRINKS MAT LTD v ELCOMBE}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
 (1983) 3 AER 188 at 192-193 thus:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
".... the material facts are those which it is material for the judge to know in dealing with the application as made; materiality as to be decided by the Court and not by the assessment of the applicant or his legal advisors".
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par Also on the subject of disclosure of material facts on application ex parte, in }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 RAUZIA MOHAMMED}{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 d/o Rahimat Ali and ANZ BANKING GROUP}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  (Civ. App No. 66/84) Fiji Court of Appeal said:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "The guarantee of 9th July, 1982 gives rise to two important matters.}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
First, it was not disclosed in the evidence tendered in support of the ex parte application for the interlocutory injunction which was granted on 26th March, 1984.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 This material did not come to knowledge until after the ex parte order had been made.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 But it is before us now and in our view, it is warrant for dismissal of the appeal without further ado.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 In }{\i\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 Dalglish v. Jarvie}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  2 Mac &}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid5054104  G. 231, 238 it was held that:}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "It is the duty of a party asking for an injunction to bring u
nder the notice of the court all facts material to the determination of his right to that injunction; and it is no excuse for him to say that he was not aware of the importance of any facts which h}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218 
e has omitted to bring forward.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 The statement of the law was cited with approval by Lord Cozens - Hardy M.R. in }{
\i\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 Rex v. Kensington Income Tax Commissioners ex parte Princess Edmond de Polignac}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  (1917) 1 K.B. 486 at 504.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 And in the }{\i\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
Republic of Peru v. Dreyfus Bros. & Co.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  55 L.T.R. 802, 803 Kay J. stated the law in this way:
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid5054104 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"I have always maintained, and I think it most important to maintain most strictly, the rule that, in ex parte applications to this court, the utmost good faith must be observed.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 If there is an important misstatement, speaking for myself, I hav
e never hesitated, and never shall hesitate until the rule is altered, to discharge the order at once, so as to impress upon all persons who are suitors in this court the importance of dealing in good faith with the court when ex parte applications are ma
de."
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 That passage was cited with approval by Scrutton L.J. in }{
\i\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 Rex v. Kensington Income Tax Commissioners}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  (supra) at page 514."}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par The effect of non-disclosure in this case was that my learned brother was not afforded the opportunity of considering the real circumstances, and of exercising his discretion upon it.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 It follows that the failure to disclose the true ownership of the property in question was material and could have affected the manner in which the Court exercised its discretion.
\par 
\par All that I have sta
ted hereabove boils down to this that in an application ex parte the party seeking relief in which an order affecting the right of another is involved, without that party having the opportunity to be heard, then the applicant must show utmost good faith a
nd make a full disclosure of all relevant material which might have a bearing on the Court's decision.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
In the absence of such disclosure, as in this case, the Court was induced to make an order grossly prejudicial to F.E.A..}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 Had the Court been in possession of this fact which was not disclosed and which is now before the Court the interim injuncti}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid5054104 
on would not have been granted.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par 
\par Now that I find that the ex parte order was obtained without regard to the principle involved, it was in my view improperly obtained, then it should be discharged.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 (}{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 THE REPUBLIC OF PERU v DREYFUS BROTHERS AND CO}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
 55 LTR 803 & 803.
\par 
\par What is the effect of concealing something relevant has been stated by }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 LORD COZENS-HARDY}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  MR in }{
\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 REX v KENSINGTON INCOME TAX COMMISSIONERS, ex parte PRINCESS EDMOND DE POLIGNAC}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  (1917 1 KB 486 at 506) thus:
\par 
\par }\pard \ql \li720\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
"If you make a statement which is false or conceal something which is relevant from the Court, the Court will discharge the order and say "You can come again if you like, but we will discharge this order, an
d we will apply the general rule of the Court to applications like this."}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
There are many cases in which the same principle would apply.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
Then it is said "That is so unfair; you are depriving us of our right to a prohibition on the ground of concealment of misstatement in the affidavit."}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 The answer is that the prerogative writ is not a matter of course.}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 The applicant must come in the manner prescribed and }{\i\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 must be perfectly frank and open}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  with the Court."}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid5054104  (underlining mine)}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par Before concluding this aspect of the matter I have not lost sight of the fact that the grant of an interim injunction is a remedy which is both temporary and discretionary.
\par 
\par Therefore, in considering the granting of an injunction, in addition to what I have already said, I hold that the Plaintiff has no legal right over the property in question, namely, Lot 2.}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 It is a fundamental rule that the court will grant an injunction only to support a legal right (per }{
\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 ORMROD J}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 . in }{\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 MONTGOMERY v MONTGOMERY}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  1965 P 46) Also where the Plaintiff has no legal right recognizable by the Courts, there is no power to grant him an interlocutory injunction (}{
\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 GOURIET v UNION OF POST OFFICE WORKERS (1977) 3 WLR 300}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218 ).}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
\par 
\par For the reasons given hereabove the interim injunction should be dissolved.
\par 
\par Before leaving the matter I should make my comments on the subject of the alleged }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "agreement" }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
between the FSC and FEA.
\par 
\par Mr. Parshotam argues in effect that FEA should have honoured the understanding that was reached between FSC and FEA to obtain all necessary consents and approval for the construction of the substation on the alternative site.}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 By memorandum dated 16 June 1994 FEA informed FSC, inter alia, that }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "later developments in an attempt to secure that particular site did not go well in our favour"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
 and for the reasons it gave it stated that it }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "has now decided to go ahead with the construction of the substation on the site approved at the corner of Pender and Disraeli road"}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 .}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
There was nothing to legally bind the FEA to adhere to the said arrangement to build on an alternative site.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
The land for the substation had been approved to FEA sometime ago for the purpose of substation by the Director of Lands and a lease is to issue to them.
\par 
\par In these circumstances and on the facts of this case I fail to see how FEA can legally be prevented from proceeding with the construction work on land which legally belongs to it by injunction.}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 The claim }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 '(A)'}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  in the Writ of Summons is, as has now been revealed, untrue stating that the substation is being built on FSC's land.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 I have already dealt at length on this aspect hereabove.
\par 
\par Initially when FSC agreed to the present site it says that it had not taken the views of the residents }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "in the corner of Pender Street and Disraeli Road"}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 .}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
Upon receiving "severe opposition" from the residents when FEA commenced construction work on 3 March 1994 PIO WONG told FEA to cease work.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 The residents are not a party to this action.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
What right the residents have to object and what they can do to stop construction on land which belongs to FEA is not for me to decide in this action.}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 PIO WONG's affidavit clearly shows when he says that upon }{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "severe opposit}{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid6817112 i}{\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 on"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218  from the residents he }{
\i\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 "informed FEA to cease work"}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
 that he took up the cudgel more so for the residents than for FSC as it had already agreed to the said Lot 2 for the site for substation although later arrangements were discussed following on the heels of the said opposition.}{
\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218  }{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 
The outcry by the residents is a red herring introduced by FSC and this does not in any way boost the Plaintiff's argument for the injunction to continue.
\par 
\par Accordingly, for these reasons, the interim order for injunction, should be and is hereby discharged, and that the Plaintiff's application for interlocutory injunction to continue against the Defendant should be and is hereby dismissed with
 costs which is to be taxed if not agreed.
\par 
\par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\b\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 D. Pathik
\par }{\b\f0\ul\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 Judge
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\b\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918\charrsid4267218 At Suva
\par 7 April 1995}{\b\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid7805918 
\par }\pard \qr \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx-1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4267218 {\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218 HBC0361D.94S}{\f0\lang2057\langfe5129\langnp2057\insrsid4267218\charrsid4267218 
\par }}