|
Smith v Jones
|
[1999] 1 SCR 455
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
25 Mar 1999
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
26 
|
|
[1999] Docket 25780
|
[1999] Docket 25780
|
|
United States - Pennsylvania
|
circa 1999
|
|
|
1
|
|
Re Bruce R Lindsey
|
158 F3d 1263; 332 USApp DC 357
|
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
|
United States
|
9 Oct 1998
|
WorldLII
|
|
8
|
|
R v Pearson
|
[1998] 3 SCR 620
|
|
|
circa 1998
|
|
|
1
|
|
Reference re Secession of Quebec
|
[1998] CanLII 793
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1998
|
CanLII
|
|
|
|
R v Creswell
|
[1998] BCJ No 1090
|
|
Canada - British Columbia
|
circa 1998
|
|
|
1
|
|
Court of Appeal for Ontario
|
(1997) 32 OR 3d 181; 5 CR (5th) 391; 115 CCC (3d) 310; 96 OAC 372
|
|
Canada - Ontario
|
circa 1997
|
|
|
1
|
|
R v Lore
|
(1997) 116 CCC (3d) 255
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1997
|
|
|
1
|
|
A (LL) v b (a)
|
[1995] 4 SCR 536
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
14 Dec 1995
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
7
|
|
R v Matthiessen
|
(1995) 172 AR 196
|
|
|
circa 1995
|
|
|
1
|
|
R v O ’ Connor
|
[1995] CanLII 51
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1995
|
CanLII
|
|
|
|
R v Power
|
[1994] CanLII 126
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1994
|
CanLII
|
|
|
|
R v Potvin
|
[1993] 2 SCR 880
|
|
|
circa 1993
|
|
|
7
|
|
Rutherford v Swanson
|
(1993) 6 WWR 126
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1993
|
|
|
1
|
|
R v Bond
|
(1993) 135 AR 329
|
|
|
circa 1993
|
|
|
1
|
|
"Crossing the Constitutional Line: Due Process and the Law Enforcement Justification"
|
(1992) 67 Notre Dame Law Review 745
|
Notre Dame Law Review
|
United States
|
circa 1992
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
|
R v t (v)
|
[1992] 1 SCR 749
|
|
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
5
|
|
R v Ladouceur
|
[1992] BCJ No 2854
|
|
Canada - British Columbia
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
1
|
|
R v Gray
|
(1992) 74 CCC (3d) 267
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
1
|
|
R v Xenos
|
(1991) 70 CCC (3d) 362
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
1
|
|
R v Douglas
|
[1991] 1 SCR 301
|
|
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
1
|
|
R v Seaboyer
|
[1991] 2 SCR 577; (1991) 83 DLR (4th) 193
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
51 
|
|
R v Stinchcombe
|
(1991) 68 CCC (3d) 1; [1992] LRC (Crim) 68; [1991] 3 SCR 326; 18 CRR (2d) 210
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
86  
|
|
R v Gruenke
|
[1991] 3 SCR 263
|
|
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
17
|
|
Doe v Board Of Commissioners
|
(1990) 74 OR 2d 225
|
|
Canada - Ontario
|
circa 1990
|
|
|
4
|
|
R v Scott
|
[1990] 3 SCR 979
|
|
|
circa 1990
|
|
|
11
|
|
R v Conway
|
[1989] CanLII 66 (SCC); [1989] 1 SCR 1659
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
22 Jun 1989
|
CanLII
|
|
11
|
|
Jane Doe v Board of Commissioners of Police for the Municipality of Toronto
|
(1989) 58 DLR (4th) 396
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1989
|
|
|
5
|
|
R v Mancuso
|
(1989) 51 CCC (3d) 380
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1989
|
|
|
1
|
|
Gujarat v Sunil Fulchand Shah & Anr
|
[1988] INSC 34; 1988 1 SCC 600; 1988 1 SCALE 257; 1988 1 JT 274; 1988 2 SCR 903; AIR 1988 SC 723
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
8 Feb 1988
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
14
|
|
R v Keyowski
|
[1988] 1 SCR 657
|
|
|
circa 1988
|
|
|
7
|
|
R v Showman
|
[1988] 2 SCR 893
|
|
|
circa 1988
|
|
|
1
|
|
R v Jewitt
|
[1985] 2 SCR 128
|
|
|
circa 1985
|
|
|
25 
|
|
Rogers v Bank of Montreal
|
[1985] 4 WWR 508
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1985
|
|
|
1
|
|
Perka v R
|
[1984] CanLII 23 (SCC); [1984] 2 SCR 232; (1985) 13 DLR (4th) 1
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
11 Oct 1984
|
CanLII
|
|
49 
|
|
R v Young
|
(1984) 40 CR (3d) 289
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1984
|
|
|
8
|
|
R v Eldorado Nuclear Ltd
|
[1983] 2 SCR 551; (1983) 4 DLR (4th) 193
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
circa 1983
|
|
|
19
|
|
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v R
|
[1983] 1 SCR 339
|
|
|
circa 1983
|
|
|
4
|
|
Baucom v Martin
|
677 F2d 1346
|
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
|
United States
|
7 Jun 1982
|
WorldLII
|
|
9
|
|
R v Dunbar and Logan
|
(1982) 68 CCC (2d) 13; (1982) 138 DLR (3d) 221
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1982
|
|
|
12
|
|
[1982] 1 SCR 860
|
[1982] 1 SCR 860
|
|
|
circa 1982
|
|
|
31 
|
|
Re Girouard and R
|
(1982) 68 CCC (2d) 261
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1982
|
|
|
1
|
|
Upjohn Co v United States
|
449 US 383; 66 L Ed 2d 584; 101 SCt 677
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
13 Jan 1981
|
WorldLII
|
|
216   
|
|
Salvador
|
(1981) 59 CCC (2d) 521
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1981
|
|
|
2
|
|
Solosky v R
|
[1980] 1 SCR 821
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
21 Dec 1979
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
20
|
|
Lewis v R
|
[1979] 2 SCR 821
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
14 Jun 1979
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
8
|
|
Perrier v Sorgat
|
(1979) 25 OR 2d 645
|
|
Canada - Ontario
|
circa 1979
|
|
|
1
|
|
Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Board of Commissioners of Police
|
[1979] 1 SCR 311; (1978) 88 DLR (3d) 671
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
3 Oct 1978
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
34 
|
|
R v Mamchur
|
[1978] 4 WWR 481
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1978
|
|
|
1
|
|
R v Sherman
|
(1977) 36 CCC (2d) 207
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1977
|
|
|
1
|
|
Attorney General of Canada v Lavell
|
[1974] SCR 1349
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
27 Aug 1973
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
15
|
|
Crompton (Alfred) Amusement Machines Ltd v Comrs of Customs and Excise (No 2)
|
[1972] 2 All ER 353
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1972
|
LexisNexis
|
|
6
|
|
R v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, ex parte Blackburn
|
[1968] 2 QB 118; [1968] 1 All ER 763; [1968] 2 WLR 893; 12 Page 348
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1968
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
191   
|
|
Ridge v Baldwin
|
[1963] UKHL 2; (1963) 1 QB 539; [1964] AC 40; [1963] 2 All ER 66; [1963] 2 WLR 935; 14 ACJ 699
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
14 Mar 1963
|
BAILII
|
|
980    
|
|
Roncarelli v Duplessis
|
[1959] SCR 121; (1959) 16 DLR (2d) 689
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
circa 1959
|
|
|
94  
|
|
Attorney-General for New South Wales v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd
|
[1955] AC 457; [1955] 1 All ER 846; [1955] 2 WLR 707
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1955
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
65  
|
|
Minter v Priest
|
[1929] 1 KB 655; [1930] AC 558; [1930] All ER 431
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1929
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
96  
|
|
O'Rourke v Darbishire
|
[1920] AC 581; [1920] All ER 1
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1920
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
212   
|
|
Enever v R
|
[1906] HCA 3; (1906) 3 CLR 969; 12 ALR 592
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
12 Mar 1906
|
AustLII
|
|
219   
|
|
McLeave v City of Moncton
|
(1902) 32 SCR 106
|
|
|
circa 1902
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cunningham v Neagle
|
135 US 42; 135 US 1; 34 L Ed 55; 10 SCt 658
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
14 Apr 1890
|
WorldLII
|
|
98  
|
|
R v Cox and Railton
|
(1884) 14 QBD 153
|
Queen's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1884
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
220   
|
|
State ex rel North Pacific Lumber Co v Unis
|
579 P2d 1291
|
|
United States
|
circa 1955
|
|
|
1
|
|
Anderson v Nixon
|
444 FSupp 1195
|
|
United States
|
circa 1955
|
Westlaw
|
|
6
|
|
United States v Exxon Corporation
|
94 FRD 246
|
|
United States
|
circa 1955
|
|
|
6
|
|
"The Future Crime or Tort Exception to Communications Privileges"
|
77 Harvard Law Review 730
|
Harvard Law Review
|
United States
|
circa 1955
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
9 
|