|
LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
| Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
| Varone v E Varone | 359 F2d 769 | United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit | United States | 18 Mar 1966 | WorldLII |
|
3 |
| Mazique v C Mazique |
123 USApp DC 48; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States | circa 1966 | WorldLII |
|
3 |
| Durfee v Duke |
375 US 106; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 2 Dec 1963 | WorldLII |
|
90 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Schultze v H Schultze |
300 F2d 917; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States | 15 Mar 1962 | WorldLII |
|
2 |
| Hipp v C Hipp |
111 USApp DC 307; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States | circa 1961 | WorldLII |
|
2 |
| Gunn v United States | 283 F2d 358 | United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit | United States | 20 Oct 1960 | WorldLII |
|
12 ![]() |
| Brown v Alaska Industrial Board P |
224 F2d 680; |
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit | United States | 28 Jun 1955 | WorldLII |
|
3 |
| Heath v Heath |
89 USApp DC 68; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States | circa 1951 | WorldLII |
|
5 |
| Reilly v Reilly |
182 F2d 108; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States | 24 Apr 1950 | WorldLII |
|
11 ![]() |
| Case v Los Angeles Lumber Products Co |
308 US 106; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 4 Dec 1939 | WorldLII |
|
117 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Fall v Eastin |
215 US 1; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 1 Nov 1909 | WorldLII |
|
33 ![]() ![]() |
| 394 SW 2d 869 |
|
US | circa 1939 |
2 |
|||
| McIntyre v McIntyre |
|
US | circa 1939 |
2 |
|||
| Ray v Ray |
|
US | circa 1939 |
3 |
|||
| Moore v Moore |
|
United States - District of Columbia |
|
4 |
|||
| Allen v Kelso |
|
US |
2 |
||||
| Hardy v Hardy |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
5 |
||
| Trotta v Trotta |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| McCally v McCally |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Smith v Smith |
|
United States - Maryland |
|
4 |
|||
| Sirianni v Sirianni |
|
United States - New York |
|
2 |
|||
| Bailey v Bailey |
|
United States - Maryland |
|
3 |
|||
| Brucker v Benson |
|
United States - Maryland |
|
2 |
|||
| Lopez v Lopez |
|
United States - Maryland |
|
4 |
|||
| Hipp v Hipp |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
3 |
||
| Lawrence v Lawrence |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| 189 f2d 697 |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
5 |
||
| Glasser v Glasser |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Lundregan v Lundregan |
|
United States |
|
3 |
|||
| Hillery v Hillery |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Slaughter v Slaughter |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
2 |
||
| Oxley v Oxley |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
8 |
||
| Abare v Abare |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| 156 ALR 508 |
|
Australia | LexisNexis AU |
|
2 |
||
| Scholl v Scholl |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
5 |
||
| Wayne v New York Life Ins Co |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
11 ![]() |
||
| 130 Se2d 654 |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Fairclaw v Forrest |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
15 ![]() |
||
| Lewis v Romine |
|
India |
|
2 |
|||
| Jones v Jones |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Latta v Latta |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| 121 a2d 230 |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Minnesota Mining & Mfg Co v Coe |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
7 |
||
| Courson v Courson |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Richardson v Richardson |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
6 |
||
| Dollar v Dollar |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Wood v Wood |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Brown v Brown |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
4 |
||
| Gagnon v Pronovost |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| District Court, Scholl v Scholl |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
2 |
||
| Bowles v Wray |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
2 |
||
| 59 ALR 718 |
|
Australia | LexisNexis AU |
|
2 |
||
| Osborne v Osborne |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
5 |
||
| Stelz v Shreck |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Jezo v Jezo |
|
United States - Wisconsin |
|
4 |
|||
| Kollar v Kollar |
|
United States |
|
2 |
|||
| Savich v Savich |
|
United States - Illinois |
|
4 |