LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite

Cases Referring to this Journal Article | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

"The Equitable Approach to Mistakes in Contract"   flag 

[1957] Res Jud 3
Res Judicatae
Blackburn, R A
Australia

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission [1951] HCA 79; (1951) 84 CLR 377; [1951] ALR 771; (1951) 25 ALJR 425 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 27 Aug 1951 AustLII flag 293
[1951] AC Z5i [1951] AC Z5I United Kingdom circa 1951 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1
Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86; [1950] 1 All ER 693 United Kingdom circa 1950 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 33
(1950) 66 Law Quarterly Review 169 (1950) 66 Law Quarterly Review 169 Law Quarterly Review United Kingdom circa 1950 Westlaw flag 1
"General Theory of Mistake in the Formation of Contract" (1948) 11 Modern Law Review 257 Modern Law Review United Kingdom circa 1948 HeinOnline flag 2
Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd [1931] UKHL 2; [1932] AC 161; [1931] All ER 1; 4 WN 165 House of Lords United Kingdom 15 Dec 1931 BAILII flag 289
(1880) 15 Ch D 21s (1880) 15 Ch D 21S Court of Chancery United Kingdom circa 1880 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1
Cundy v Lindsay (1878) 3 AC 459 United Kingdom circa 1878 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 34
Rogers v Ingham [1876] UKLawRpCh 257; 3 Ch D 351 United Kingdom 18 Jul 1876 CommonLII flag 25
Right Hon Frederick Earl Beauchamp v Charles Winn [1873] UKLawRpHL 8; (1873) LR 6 HL 223; 22 WR 193 United Kingdom 15 May 1873 CommonLII flag 40
Leaf 'v International Galleries 7 3 The contract is void at common law but will not be rescinded in equity, e g where the plaintiff has not "clean hands" The fourth proposition- 4 The contract is void at common law and will be rescinded in equity- is, it is submitted, pos~ible in principle, but in practice it is not easy to imagine how it could arise In proposition (I) we can substitute "but specific performance will be refused"; in (2) we can substitute "and specific performance will be decreed"; in (4) we can substitute "and specific performance will be refused" Examples are unnecessary The only substitution which is impossible is in (3) A decree of specific performance necessarily depends on the validity of the contract at law S fl9501 1 KB 671 United Kingdom circa 1867 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 87
Cochrane v Willis [1865] UKLawRpCh 4; (1865-1866) LR 1 LRCh App 58 United Kingdom 7 Nov 1865 CommonLII flag 3
(1865) 34 Beav 6ii (1865) 34 Beav 6II Rolls Court United Kingdom circa 1865 flag 1
Malins v Freeman [1837] EngR 382; 2 Keen 25; 48 ER 537; 44 ITR 178 United Kingdom circa 1837 CommonLII flag 16
Ramsden v Hylton [1751] EngR 60; 28 ER 196; (1751) 2 Ves Sen 304 Court of Chancery United Kingdom circa 1751 CommonLII flag 14
Cocking v Pratt [1749] EngR 39; (1750) 1 Ves Sen 400; 27 ER 1105 Court of Chancery United Kingdom circa 1750 CommonLII flag 3
(1748) 1 Ves Sen 1Z6 (1748) 1 Ves Sen 1Z6 Court of Chancery United Kingdom circa 1748 flag 1
Jac and W 205 Mos 364 Court of Chancery United Kingdom flag 1
13 Belts Supp 79 13 Belts Supp 79 Court of Chancery United Kingdom flag 1
11 Mos 364 11 Mos 364 Court of Chancery United Kingdom flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback