PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Reports of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Reports of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands >> 1971 >> [1971] TTLawRp 2

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Patenina v Nipopo [1971] TTLawRp 2; 5 TTR 296 (14 January 1971)

5 TTR 296


PATENIN A, Plaintiff


v.


NIPOPO, Defendant


Civil Action No. 442


Trial Division of the High Court


Truk District


January 14, 1971


Action to determine ownership of land Nepinong, Mechitiu Village, Moen Island. The Trial Division of the High Court, H. W. Burnett, Chief Justice, held that the last surviving member of a lineage could dispose of lineage land as he wished and in case in question, absent proof of a previous transfer, "a death bed disposition of lineage land by sole Survivor was valid.

Truk Land Law-Lineage Ownership-Transfers

The last surviving member of a lineage is free to dispose of the lineage land as he" wishes.

Assessor:
JUDGE SOUKICHI FRITZ
Interpreter:
SABASTIAN FRANK
Counsel for Plaintiff:
FUJITA PETER
Counsel for Defendant:
RU K.

BURNETT, Chief Justice

The land here in dispute, Nepinong, Mechitiu Village, Moen Island, was originally owned by the lineage of Fining, husband of the plaintiff, and Puaseka, father of defendant. Fining, the last surviving member of the lineage, died in 1964.

Plaintiff claims through gift from Fining, just before he died in the Truk hospital. Defendant does not deny that Fining stated on his death bed that Patenina should get the land, but claims that he had given it to her in 1959 in exchange for other land, belonging to her, which he sold.

There was no evidence of any transfer of Puaseka's interest in the land to the defendant. That, following the death of her father, she worked on the land does not support such a claim; as an afokur of the lineage she, might reasonably expect to receive benefits from the land.

Nor is defendant's claim that Fining gave her the land supported by convincing evidence. Testimony of impartial Witness established, to the satisfaction of the court, that there was no mention of the land Nepinong in connection with Fining's sale of other land in 1959.

There is, however, clear and direct evidence that Fining gave the land to Patenina before he died. As the 1ast surviving member of his lineage he was free to dispose of the land as he wished.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed:-

1. As between these parties and all those' claiming under them, title to the land Nepinong, located in Mechitiu Village, Moen Island, Truk District, is in the plaintiff Patenina, who lives in Mechitiu Village;' the defendant Nipopo arid others of her lineage have no rights therein.

2. No costs are assessed, against either party.


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/other/TTLawRp/1971/2.html