PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Reports of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Reports of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands >> 1962 >> [1962] TTLawRp 10

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Jonjen v DeBrum [1962] TTLawRp 10; 2 TTR 336 (16 November 1962)

TRIAL DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT


MARSHALL ISLANDS DISTRICT


Civil Action No. 131


JONJEN

Plaintiff


v.


CAPELLE deBRUM

Defendant


November 16, 1962


Action to determine alab of Kejjen Island, Likiep Atoll. The Trial Division of the High Court, Chief Justice E. P. Furber, held that once those having property rights of an iroij lablab in lands in question have recognized party as alab, and decision is reasonable and fair, it will prevail over objections of one claiming to be alab merely because he is son of former alab.

1. Marshalls Land Law-"Alab"-Establishment

Under Marshallese custom, where party recognized as alab by those having property rights of iroij lablab in lands in question is half brother of former alab, decision is reasonable and fair and should prevail.

2. Marshalls Land Law-"Alab"-Succession

Claim to alab rights based solely on fact claimant is son of former alab is contrary to Marshallese custom, since alab rights do not descend that way as matter of course.
Assessor:
Interpreter:
Counsel for Plaintiff:
Counsel for Defendant:
JUDGE SOLOMON, L.
CARL HEINE
MONNA
OSCAR DEBRUM

FURBER, Chief Justice

The plaintiff Jonjen claims that he should be the alab of the lands in question simply because he is the son of the former alab.

The defendant claims that the third Finding of Fact by the Master, is not correct, but appears to have no explanation of how this damages, or prejudices, him.

Counsel agreed that the claim for Fifty-Two Dollars and Thirty-Six Cents ($52.36) set forth in the complaint has been settled and that the plaintiff makes no claim for that now.

Monna, named as a plaintiff in the complaint, stated he is only acting as counsel for Jonjen and makes no claim for himself as a party.

OPINION

This action is controlled by the principles discussed in the Conclusions of Law, by this court, in the case of Lalik v. Elsen, 1 T.T.R. 134. Those not familiar with the general situation affecting property rights on Likiep Atoll are referred to the judgment of this court in the case of Monna and Others v. Rudolf Capelle and Others, Marshall Islands District Civil Action No. 49.

[1] Clearly those having the property rights of an iroij lablab in the lands in question have recognized Amlej as alab. Amlej is the half brother of the former alab. Under the circumstances disclosed their decision seems to the court reasonable and fair and should therefore prevail.

[2] The plaintiff Jonjen does not even claim any definite approval, by those having iroij lablab property rights, for his becoming alab. He claims he should do so just because he is the son of the former alab. Alab rights just do not descend that way as a matter of course under the Marshallese system of land ownership.

JUDGMENT

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed as follows:-


1. As between the parties and all persons claiming under them, the plaintiff Jonjen has only dri jerbal rights on Kejjen Island, Likiep Atoll, Marshall Islands District, under Amlej as alab and the deBrum and Capelle heirs (represented in this action by the defendant Capelle deBrum) as owners of the property rights of an iroij lablab in the land.

2. Monna, named as a plaintiff in the complaint, is dropped as a plaintiff.

3. No costs are assessed against any party.


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/other/TTLawRp/1962/10.html